CAQH Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry Operating Rules Initiative March 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Advertisements

Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996– charged the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) with creating health information.
HIPAA Administrative Simplification Final Rule for Transactions Code Sets Stanley Nachimson
CHAPTER © 2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Career Education Computers in the Medical Office Chapter 1: The Medical Office.
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Life Cycle of an Insurance Claim.
Overview Clinical Documentation & Revenue Management: Capturing the Services Prepared and Presented by Linda Hagen and Mae Regalado.
PMO Services RFP Overview Patty Fontneau ED and CEO.
Clinical Information System Implementation Project Prepared for Clinical Affairs Committee December 4, 2002.
HIPAA TRANSACTIONS HIPAA Summit IV 2002 UPDATE. HHS Office of General Counsel l Donna Eden l Office of the General Counsel l Department of Health and.
Minnesota Law and Health Information Exchange Oversight Activities James I. Golden, PhD State Government Health IT Coordinator Director, Health Policy.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
Enabling a Medical Home With a Patient Communication Strategy Jeanette Christopher Northwest Primary Care Group, P.C.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
March Sliding Fee Scales, Patients Cap on Charges Eli Camhi, MSSW – Tom Hickey -
RCMS (Revenue Cycle Management System) Flow chart model
The Use of Health Information Technology in Physician Practices
CERCA: Healthcare Working Group Fall Meeting October 12, 2011.
Compliance Issues for Medical Research at Healthcare Systems Jerry Castellano, Pharm.D., CIP Corporate Director Institutional Review Board Christiana Care.
Information Assurance The Coordinated Approach To Improving Enterprise Data Quality.
Propriety and Confidential. Do not distribute. 1 What do MCO’s need from network participants? High quality services that are also compliant with state.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Computerized Networking of HIV Providers Workshop Data Security, Privacy and HIPAA: Focus on Privacy Joy L. Pritts, J.D. Assistant Research Professor Health.
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
1 Health Exchange Proposal Delaware Health Care Commission May 5, 2011.
Health Information Technology The Texas Landscape Presentation to TASSCC 2010 Nora Belcher Texas e-Health Alliance August 3, 2010.
New York State Health Homes Implementation and Billing Update Statewide Webinar Presented by: New York State Department of Health January 12,
UN CEFACT Single Window Recommendation Simplifying International Trade Gordon Cragge Chair – International Trade Procedures Working Group (TBG 15 of UN.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Oncology Nursing Society Forming a new CHIP at the local level.
LEGAL ISSUES IN MEDICAL HOME DEVELOPMENT Presented by: Gerry Hinkley Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Ch 8 Privacy Law and HIPAA.
HIT for Health Plans 101: What Emerging Changes Mean for You L. Carl Volpe, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives WellPoint Health Networks Inc. October.
HIPAA Vendor Readiness Siemens/HDX Audio Telecast July 24, 2002.
Health Information Technologies and Health Care Transformation James Golden, PhD Director, Division of Health Policy Minnesota Department of Health February.
Transactions, Code Sets and Identifier Update Steven S. Lazarus, PhD, CPEHR, CPHIT, FHIMSS President, Boundary Information Group April 11, 2006.
ISO (C)SR Standard: Implications from a market access perspective Tom Rotherham International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
1 The GCC Metrology Group GULFMET Mohammad Al Mulla GSO - Building for Integration
Standard Unique Health Identifier for Health Care Providers April 9, th Annual HIPAA Summit Gail Kocher Highmark.
© 2004 Moses & Singer LLP HIPAA and Patient Privacy Issues Raised by the New Medicare Prescription Drug Program National Medicare Prescription Drug Congress.
Confidential 1 HIPAA Compliance at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota: A Case Study Tim Wittenburg Director of Corporate Architecture & Data Management.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
- Revenue CycleRevenue Cycle Improvement “From customer contact to cash in the bank” HIPAA Transaction Implementation Eligibility Case Study 270/ X092A1.
1 Video 1 Should I Become a 3 rd Party Provider Addressing: The types of 3 rd Party Payers The types of 3 rd Party Payers Why or why not be a 3 rd Party.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Nevada State Innovation Model (SIM) Health Information Technology and Data Taskforce May 07,
State Alliance for e-Health Michelle Lim Warner, MPH Senior Policy Analyst NGA Center for Best Practices
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
“DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL ICT POLICY ICT Policy in the ECTEL Member States Mr. Donnie Defreitas MSc, (Hav.), ECTEL Caribbean Internet Forum Bay Gardens.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
ICD-10 Operational and Revenue Cycle Impacts Wendy Haas, MBA, RN Dell Services Healthcare Consulting.
Documentation Requirements for Hospital Accreditation -By Global Manager Group.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
HIPAA Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow? Dianne S. Faup Office of HIPAA Standards Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Patient Encounters and Billing Information Chapter 3
Electronic Transactions Workshop
2 Selecting a Healthcare Information System.
Electronic Transactions Workshop
3 Understanding Managed Care: Medical Contracts and Ethics.
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

CAQH Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry Operating Rules Initiative March 2005

2 Today’s Agenda CAQH Improving Access to Eligibility and Benefits Information Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE) –Work Groups –Timeline –Participation –Next steps

3 An Introduction to CAQH The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) is a not-for-profit alliance of health plans and networks that promotes collaborative initiatives to: Make healthcare more affordable Share knowledge to improve quality of care Make administration easier for physicians and their patients

4 Areas of Focus CAQH designs and implements achievable, concrete initiatives to make administration easier for physicians and consumers Universal Credentialing DataSource Simplified Prescribing Standard Billing Terminology Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry

5 Pre-Visit Activities Office and Other Visits Inpatient Activities Surgical Cases Post-visit Follow-up Admin. Responsibilities Admin. Follow-up Patient inquiry Appt scheduling Scheduling verification Financial review of pending appts. Encounter form/ medical record preparation Registration & referral mgmt. Admin & medical record preparation Patient visit Ancillary testing Charge capture Prescriptions Scheduling & referral mgmt. Admin & medical record preparation Inpatient care Ancillary testing Charge capture Scheduling & referral mgmt. Admin & medical record preparation Surgical care Post care Follow-up care Visit orders & instructions Education materials Prescriptions Ancillary tests Referrals Follow-up visits Utilization review Claims/bill generation Billing Payment processing Claims follow-up Personnel management Financial management Managed care Information systems Facilities management Medical staff affairs Physician Activities That Interact with Payers are Primarily Administrative in Nature, with Some Clinical Interaction Primary Physician Activities

6 Focus On Eligibility and Benefits HIPAA does not offer relief for the current eligibility problems –Data scope is limited; elements needed by providers are not mandated –Does not standardize data definitions, so translation is difficult –Offers no business requirements, e.g. timely response Individual plan web sites are not the solution for providers –Providers do not want to toggle between numerous websites that each offer varying, limited information in inconsistent formats Vendors cannot offer a provider-friendly solution since they depend upon health plan information that is not available –Data interpretations vary from plan to plan and can not be accurately translated by vendors –Data elements available from plans vary and are very limited, requiring providers to still call the health plans –Access is not available for all plans and/or plan products –Vendors maintain multiple interfaces, yet have minimal provider uptake

7 Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry: Vision Note: No guarantees would be provided. *Only HIPAA mandated data element; other elements are part of HIPAA, but not mandated ** These components are critically important to providers, but are not proposed for Phase I. Providers will send an on-line inquiry and know: –Which health plan covers the patient * –Whether the service to be rendered is a covered benefit (including copays, coinsurance levels and base deductible levels as defined in member contract) –What amount the patient owes for the service** –What amount the health plan will pay for authorized services** Give providers access to information before or at the time of service...

8 Online Eligibility and Benefits Inquiry: Vision As with credit card transactions, the provider will be able to submit these inquiries and receive a real- time response*: –From a single point of entry –Using an electronic system of their choice For any patient For any participating health plan *CAQH initiative will initially support batch and real-time. … Using any system for any patient or health plan

9 Industry Operating Rules Are The Key What are operating rules? –Agreed upon business rules for utilizing and processing transactions –Encourages the marketplace to achieve a desired outcome – interoperable network governing specific electronic transactions Key components –Rights and responsibilities of all parties –Transmission standards and formats –Response timing standards –Liabilities –Exception processing –Error resolution –Security CAQH to serve as facilitator of cross-industry operating rules development

10 Industry Support Stakeholders agreed that the initiative will offer substantial market benefits Providers –Reduce bad debt and staff time devoted to eligibility and benefits –Have access to all-payer solutions with accurate, timely, and standardized data –Need information from later phases to avoid phone calls Vendors/Clearinghouses –HIPAA is starting point, but more is needed –offers an industry-sponsored solution rather than state-specific regulations or plan-specific solutions –Allows for expansion and improvement of current service offerings –Does not support one vendor solution over another and does not create a new product offering –Would no longer need to manage multiple interfaces –Would benefit from increased provider adoption

11 Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange A multi-stakeholder initiative organized and facilitated by CAQH to create, disseminate and maintain Operating Rules and to enable healthcare providers to obtain patient-specific information about the patient’s healthcare benefits What is CORE?

12 CAQH Role: Facilitator Build rules and tools for implementation Establish vision/ charter Bring stakeholders together Step 3 Step 4 Physicians Hospitals Other providers Clearinghouses Government Vendors Non-CAQH health plans Standard setting organizations Medical societies Design structure, process and work plan Step 1 Step 2

13 Initiative Launch Orientation Meeting held January 11, 2005 –More than 125 representatives from 70 organizations Payer community Provider community Technology vendors Standard-setting organizations Banking industry Government agencies (CMS, ONCHIT) CORE Membership: More than 40 organizations to date

14 Functionality to be Addressed CORE will begin by drafting rules for the following:  Confirm which health plan covers this patient  Confirm health benefit plan coverage  Confirm Service Type (e.g., major medical, long-term care, pharmacy, etc.)  Provide Co-Pay Amount*  Provide Base Deductible*  Provide Co-insurance Level* *Not accumulator, but amount defined in contract Data elements will be based upon HIPAA 270/271 standards. Additional functionalities will be addressed after rules are written for the scope above.

15 Topics for Consideration Standard and clear definitions and interpretations of the data elements Roles and responsibilities of all parties Technical transmission standards and formats Standards for data timeliness of batch and real-time transactions; encourage market to move to real-time transactions over a specified timeline Error resolution Exception processing Certification Security Standardized response reporting

16 CORE Structure CAQH CORE CORE Steering Committee Other Work Groups Rules Work Group

17 Maintenance Phase CAQH CORE CORE Steering Committee Other Work Groups Rules Work Group Nominating Committee

18 Who Should Participate Health plans Providers Technology companies Clearinghouses Government entities Trade and professional associations Vendors Standard setting organizations Consultants Other interested organizations

19 Categories of CORE Membership Categories of Membership Organizations that create, transmit or use eligibility data in daily business Participate in rules development Vote on rules Participation fee 1.FullYes 2.Private AdvisoryNoYesNoYes 3.Standard setting/technical advisory NoYesNo 4.Government/ Government advisory Depends on entity YesYes*No * If entity creates, transmits or uses eligibility data and decides to vote

20 Work Groups Initial Work Groups Policy Work Group Rules Work Group Technical Work Group Potential Future Work Groups Communications Work Group Legal and Regulatory Issues Work Group

21 Policy Work Group Charge –Identifies policies CORE should develop and makes recommendations to the Steering Committee Key areas –Connectivity –Certification –Auditing –Rules Enforcement –Exception Processing –Error Resolution –Standard agreements between participants and CAQH –Third party service provider requirements –Granting variances to the rules –Scoping issues Participants –Management-level staff familiar with relevant industry issues and stakeholder perspectives

22 Technical Work Group Charge –Determines technical specifications for CORE Key areas –Scoping Issues –Technical requirements of organizations initiating and transmitting inquiries –Technical requirements of payers receiving inquiries and generating responses –Role of Network/System/Router (if appropriate) Participants –Individuals familiar with the technical requirements that compose each transaction addressed by CORE and/or are familiar with their organization’s system requirements, as well as industry requirements

23 Rules Work Group Charge –Writes the detailed business rules that will be reviewed by the Steering Committee and then voted on by CORE –Ensures CORE and its operating rules are coordinated with standard setting entities such as X12 Key areas –Detailed requirements of organizations initiating and transmitting inquiries –Detailed requirements of payers receiving inquiries and generating responses –Definition of data terms –Coordination with standard setting entities such as X12 Participants –Individuals with expertise in interpreting and implementing technical specifications or coordinating specifications with daily operations

24 Examples of Resources Available to Work Groups Reference documentation –Analysis of technical and strategic approaches –Analysis of rules currently adopted or under consideration by regional initiatives, health plans and vendors –Analysis of relevant eligibility transaction standards

25 Time and Resource Commitment* CORE Meeting frequency –In-person meetings approximately twice per year; may hold conference calls between meetings Skill set –Represent your organization’s/stakeholder perspective regarding issues being discussed by CORE –Communicate with your organization’s leadership regarding CORE’s status as it impacts your organization and whether/when your organization should adopt/challenge the rules –If your organization agrees to adopt the rules, oversee, or gain commitment from your organization to assign someone to the implementation process –Assign Work Group members CORE Work Groups* Member participation is voluntary Meeting frequency –During rule writing phase, monthly conference calls and at least one in- person meeting annually Skill set –Different for each Work Group *If an individual is appointed to the CORE Steering Committee or to Chair a CORE Work Group, level of time and resource commitment will increase.

Timeline Highlights ActivityDate Orientation MeetingJanuary 11 th Applications dueongoing CORE leadership invitationsFebruary Work Groups launchMarch Work Group rule writingMarch - May Draft 1 st set of rulesJune Full membership meeting to review draft rulesJuly Test rulesAugust – October Revise rules based on testingNovember Finalize and approve 1 st set of rulesDecember

27 Participation vs. Adoption CORE participation only commits your organization to participate in the creation of the rules Once the rules are approved by CORE, each member will decide on its own whether to adopt the rules Adoption of the rules may require changes in contracts between relevant CORE parties

28 From Vision to Reality Provide easier access to consistent, predictable eligibility and benefits information at the point of care Build upon HIPAA to promote the interoperability required Recognize that no single organization, or any one segment of the industry, can do it alone Come together to take the next step and fundamentally change the way that eligibility and benefits information is exchanged

29 Next Steps 1.Complete application Applications can be found at Completed applications can be faxed or mailed to CAQH 2.Assign individuals to participate on CORE Work Groups Participation in Work Groups is not a requirement of CORE membership Questions? Contact: Gwendolyn Lohse, ,