® ® © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Modernization of the Surface Observations Hub in Meteo-France based on SWE standards 76th OGC Technical Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Geospatial Research & Consulting Ingo Simonis Ingo Simonis Freelancer.
Advertisements

CEOS WGISS, China, February, Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS China, 2008.
The GEONETCast Alert Channel and CAP over GTS
The Next Generation Network Enabled Weather (NNEW) SWIM Application Asia/Pacific AMHS/SWIM Workshop Chaing Mai, Thailand March 5-7, 2012 Tom McParland,
Proposed update of Technical Guidance for INSPIRE Download services based on SOS Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke, 52°North.
Sensor Asia Development Progress HONDA Kiyoshi Asian Institute of Technology / Mie University Aadit Shrestha, Rassarin Ch., NGUYEN Duy Hung Asian Institute.
® Hosted and Sponsored by ESA/ESRIN Progress towards a standard WMO Hydrologic Metadata Model 86th OGC Technical Committee Frascati, Italy Irina Dornblut,
June 2010 At A Glance The Room Alert Adapter software in conjunction with AVTECH Room Alert™ devices assists in monitoring computer room environments as.
® ® © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. February/March 2011 TC Meeting Met Ocean DWG : IE Status Report 76th OGC Technical Committee Bonn, Germany.
FOSS4G 2009 Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Eike Hinderk Jürrens,
UNCERTML - DESCRIBING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY Matthew Williams
May 2004Iridium Users Workshop, Seattle National Data Buoy Center’s Experiences with Real-Time Data Retrieval from Remote Stations using Iridium; and Data.
Tsunamis Detection The Mission  Tsunamis Detection can help to minimize loss of life and property from future tsunamis. Mission Introduction Mechanism.
Service Oriented Sensor Web Xingchen Chu and Rajkumar Buyya University of Melbourne, Australia Presented by: Gerardo I. Simari CMSC828P – Fall 2006 Professor.
1 NODC, Russia GISC & DCPC developers meeting Langen, 29 – 31 March E2EDM technology implementation for WIS GISC development S. Sukhonosov, S. Belov.
Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference 2010, Suva, November 2010 Sensor Web Enablement for the Pacific Vulnerability and adaptation of coastal.
Application of OGC Sensor Web Enablement Standards for the planning of atmospheric research flights Thomas Everding, Marc Rautenhaus.
Nov Copyright Galdos Systems Inc. November 2001 Geography Markup Language Enabling the Geo-spatial Web.
From Sensor Web to Sensor Grid Yaohang Li Department of Computer Science North Carolina A&T State University.
1 NOAA/National Weather Service John Halquist. 2 Why Standards? Accessibility Versatility Consistency Ensure correct use Remove ambiguity Leverage toolkits.
Discussion and conclusion The OGC SOS describes a global standard for storing and recalling sensor data and the associated metadata. The standard covers.
® © 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Hydrology DWG Meeting Surface Water IE – Use Case 1 OGC Technical Committee Toulouse, France Chris Michl, Carsten.
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Updates on WaterML 2.0 development and the standards harmonization discussion paper Updates on WaterML 2.0 development.
1. There are different assistant software tools and methods that help in managing the network in different things such as: 1. Special management programs.
® The sampled feature of hydrologic observation Hydrology Domain Working Group at the OGC/TC Meeting, Austin, 2012, Mar Irina Dornblut, Global Runoff.
Environmental Monitoring: Database and Beyond Chengyang Zhang Computer Science Department University of North Texas.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Module 10: Monitoring ISA Server Overview Monitoring Overview Configuring Alerts Configuring Session Monitoring Configuring Logging Configuring.
Sensors, SWE and European spatial data initiatives – INSPIRE and GMES Brno, Radim Štampach, Ph.D.
IntroductionToSensorML Alexandre Robin – October 2006.
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Towards a common information model for water 71st OGC Technical Committee Mountain View, CA. USA Rob Atkinson.
TECO Geneva1 Integrated Quality Control Functions on AWS-Level Gealog SG Station Manager Gerhard Pevny, Logotronic GmbH, Austria Dietmar Pindeus,
® SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 91 st OGC Technical Committee Geneva, Switzerland Simon Jirka (52°North) 11 June 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial.
Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Time issue : Meteo Domain needs and WMS present means Meteorology DWG Frédéric Guillaud, Marie-Françoise.
Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Towards a Common Information Model of Water 70th OGC Technical Committee Darmstadt, Germany Rob Atkinson.
CEOS WGISS, Hanoi May OSCAR Prototyping the sensor web Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS Hanoi May 2007 (Slides.
Local Alarm Station Data Acquisition, Storage and Visualization for Radiation Portal Monitor (RPM).
® Making Location Count Copyright © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium Hydrology DWG Meeting Surface Water IE – Use Case 1 76th OGC Technical Committee Bonn,
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
An Integrated Meteorological Surface Observation System By Wan Mohd. Nazri Wan Daud Malaysian Meteorological Department Due to the increasing and evolving.
1 NOAA IOOS Program Data Integration Framework (DIF) Project Overview Adapted from a brief to the NOAA Data Management Committee August 6, 2008 by Jeff.
CEOS WGISS 28 Meeting, Pretoria, September 2009 Wyn Cudlip BNSC/GeoSeren Presentation to WGISS28 Pretoria, September 2009 Experiences with SWE
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Existing time series delivery formats and Water Data Services requirements, and OGC-compliant Water Data Services.
1 Mexico Regional AMDAR Workshop November 2011 Data Quality Monitoring and Control (QM / QC) Axel Hoff Convenor of WMO AMDAR Panel‘s Science and Technical.
Service Oriented Sensor Web: NOSA Approach Rajkumar Buyya and Xingchen Chu Grid Computing and Distributed Systems (GRIDS) Laboratory Dept. of Computer.
SensorGrid Galip Aydin June SensorGrid A flexible computing environment for coupling real-time data sources to High Performance Geographic Information.
Air Quality Data Services: Application of OGC specifications Air Quality Data: Multi-dimensional, multi-source, multi-format Point observations are collected.
Copyright © 2009, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Web Services Report from the working group of 2nd Workshop on GIS/OGC Use in Meteorology Frédéric Guillaud,
© 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. The OGC Sensor Web Enablement framework Simon CoxMike Botts CSIRO Exploration & MiningNational Space Science &
An Ontology-underpinned Emergency Response System for Water Pollution Accidents for NYIT October Conference 2015 Dr. Xiaoliang Meng Associate Professor.
® ® © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Met Ocean DWG 76th OGC Technical Committee Bonn, Germany Chris Little, Marie-Françoise Voidrot
Cal/Val for physics MED-MFC internal meeting CMCC-INGV-SOCIB Lecce E. Clementi, INGV.
Sensor Observation Service (SOS) WATER FOR A HEALTHY COUNTRY FLAGSHIP SISS Workshop v2.3 Florence Tan | Research Projects Officer 8 May 2013.
The DEWETRA platform An advanced Early Warning System.
Data Assimilation Decision Making Using Sensor Web Enablement M. Goodman, G. Berthiau, H. Conover, X. Li, Y. Lu, M. Maskey, K. Regner, B. Zavodsky, R.
© 2005, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. CrisisGrid: Critical Infrastructure and Informatics for Emergency Response 4 May 2005 Mark Reichardt President.
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Hydrology DWG Tentative Work Plan 71st OGC Technical Committee Mountain View, CA. USA Ilya Zaslavsky, David Lemon,
IOOS DIF SOS Project. June 5, 2008IOOS DIF SOS Project2 What is SOS? Sensor Observation Service (SOS) – an API for providing sensor and observation data.
NOAA IOOS SOS Implementations in 2008 Jeff de La Beaujardière, PhD NOAA IOOS Program DIF Sr Systems Architect.
® Sponsored by SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 90th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC Michael Utech 26 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium.
OGC TC Washington – HydroDWG meeting – Inspire O&M & SWE requirements - profile BRGM – S.Grellet 52N – S.Jirka.
Metadata for the SKA - Niruj Mohan Ramanujam, NCRA.
Botts – August 2004 Sensor Web Enablement Sensor Web Enablement WG (SWE-WG)
WLCG Transfers monitoring EGI Technical Forum Madrid, 17 September 2013 Pablo Saiz on behalf of the Dashboard Team CERN IT/SDC.
® OGC Sensor Web Enablement Dr Andrew Woolf STFC e-Science Centre Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.
Local Alarm Station Data Acquisition, Storage and Visualization for Radiation Portal Monitor (RPM).
The Next Generation Network Enabled Weather (NNEW) SWIM Application
102nd OGC Technical Committee Delft, The Netherlands
Distributed Marine Data System:
HMA Follow On Activities
Presentation transcript:

® ® © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Modernization of the Surface Observations Hub in Meteo-France based on SWE standards 76th OGC Technical Committee Bonn, Germany Yann Génin Alexandre Robin, Frédéric Guillaud March 2, 2011 Sponsored by United Nations Platform for Space-based Information for Disaster Management and Emergency Response - UN-SPIDER

OGC ® Current surface observation landscape Heterogeneous networks COBALT, RADOME, PATAC, AURORE, … > 1000 real time stations Regional acquisition (RADOME Hub) Copyright © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium 552 RADOME ~500 PATAC ( autres et RIC) ~500 RIC SPC (DGPR) 250 OARA ( Salamandre, feux de forêt, sémaphores…)

OGC ® Acquisition levels Sensors Plugged onto in-situ station computer … In-situ station computers : depend on heterogeneous networks … XARIA (RADOME network) PULSIA (SALAMANDRE network) OPALE/COBALT (synoptic/ aeronautic network with human presence) MIRIA (measure networks not under MF responsibility : Power plants, railways, motorways, …) NIVOSE (mountain networks) Regional acquisition system RADOME hub Copyright © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium

OGC ® Project’s objectives Re-engineering of the regional RADOME hub Centralization in Toulouse (redundancy in Paris ) Ability to handle new sensors, new (standard) transport protocols (http) Standardization of public interfaces (Web Services, XML, OGC SWE)

OGC ® Target architecture Raw Data Harvesting Platform (PFC) SWE Server (52 North) Networks Monitoring & Administration SOS 1.0 SPS 1.0 BUFR encoding SensorML Data SWE Common BUFS Ascii FTP Data dissemination TRANSMET WMO BUFR Dial-Up MODEMS RAS Server (multiple communication channels aggregation) In-Situ Station Computer Public Switched Telephone Network

OGC ® SWE concepts mapping : Overview Feature-of-Interest The stations and their localizations if any (ie : 07149, Orly Airport) (feature-of-interest) Localization in the Station (ie : QFU 26) (feature of interest as well, sampling points in the feature of interest) Offering Parameter aggregate on the basis of sensor type : (ie : Wind, Temperature, Moisture, Visibility, Precipitations …) Procedure The whole network for each offering (ie : Wind Network, Temperature Network, …) For each station (in-situ metrological configuration) Observed Properties Parameters (or phenomena) > 150 !

OGC ® SWE Mapping issues : case of multiple localizations Main 2608 MED 2406 MED Feature-Of-Interest Sampling-Points

OGC ® Issue : Phenomenon stuff Surface parameters WMO tables CF conventions Up to 150 parameters Many of them undefined in existing registries Fortunately not available everywhere ! RDF / SKOS dictionary seems to meet requirements hierarchical / horizontal semantic relation Multilingual definitions

OGC ® Data acquisition Measurement frequency up to 1 minute Up to 150 parameters Up to 1000 real-time stations Acquisition wave : up to 100 stations to be processed within a 30 seconds slot (pool of 100 dial-up modems) Up to one month data retention This leads to huge « Observation » table – Double partitioning TimeStamp / Offering SWE service : SOS InsertObservation

OGC ® Network administration Create / Update / Delete station's profile – Communication (protocol, …) – Identification, localization – Metrological configuration (sensor modules, addresses, calibration parameters, …) – Planning for data acquisition & data transfer – Subscriptions for notifications (parameters, alert thresholds) SWE Services : SOS & SPS – SOS RegisterSensor / UpdateSensor / DeleteSensor – SPS Submit / GetStatus – Issue : Useful UpdateSensor / DeleteSensor not supported in SOS 1.0 (will be available in SOS 2.0) This has been implemented on 52 N by Alex Robin SWE Data model : SensorML

OGC ® Network monitoring Sensors and in-situ computer station status –Daily status message (sensors and station status) –Daily and on-demand station’s logs (to be visualized as is) –Communication logs (after each transfer, to be visualized as is) SWE Service : SOS InsertObservation / GetObservation –Sensor status parameters are handled as meteorological properties in a dedicated offering –The daily status message is decoded, and the sensor status information stored in the 52 N database through SOS InsertObservation –Sensor status values are retrieved through SOS GetObservation for monitoring. –Time series for met parameters are also retrieved through SOS GetObservation for monitoring in order to detect anomalies.

OGC ® Next steps & milestones Finalize the server : By October 2011 – Initialize station / network configuration – Data quality checks – Statistical parameters computation – RDF/SKOS phenomena dictionary Developments on client side : March – December 2011 – Administration / Monitoring console – SWE Common to BUFR SWE 2.0 migration : Late 2011 – Early 2012 –depending on 52N availability Upper level observations ? Feedback at September and / or December 2011 TCs

OGC ® © 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium Wind Offering …

OGC ® © 2010 Open Geospatial Consortium Sample RDF/SKOS Dictionary