Preliminary Results on Hydrophones Energy Calibration with a Proton Beam Results at an intense low-energy proton beam in ITEP (Moscow), special thanks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Understanding Piezo based Sensors for an acoustic neutrino detector Christopher Naumann, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg ARENA-06, Newcastle, UK.
Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements
Jonathan Perkin SUD Catania 07 Acoustic Cosmic Ray Neutrino Experiment Amplitude calibration 2007… Amplitude Calibration with Acoustic Transducers Jonathan.
Bunch shape monitor for Linac-4 A.V.Feschenko Institute For Nuclear Research (INR), Moscow , Russia.
Cosimo Trono - Arena Workshop May 2005 Fiber laser hydrophones as pressure sensors P. E. Bagnoli, N. Beverini, E. Castorina, E. Falchini, R. Falciai,
ECE 501 Introduction to BME
Neutron background measurements at LNGS Gian Luca Raselli INFN - Pavia JRA1 meeting, Paris 14 Feb
Kay Graf University of Erlangen for the ANTARES Collaboration 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, August 23 – 29, 2007 Acoustic.
R&D Towards Acoustic Particle Detection Uli Katz Univ. Erlangen University of Pisa, The thermo-acoustic model and particle detectionThe thermo-acoustic.
Mercury Jet Studies Tristan Davenne Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Joint UKNF, INO, UKIERI meeting 2008 University of Warwick, Physics Department 3-4 April.
1 Sinusoidal Waves The waves produced in SHM are sinusoidal, i.e., they can be described by a sine or cosine function with appropriate amplitude, frequency,
R&D Towards Acoustic Particle Detection Uli Katz Univ. Erlangen Schule für Astroteilchenphysik, Obertrubach-Bärnfels, The thermo-acoustic.
Kay Graf Physics Institute University of Erlangen TeV Particle Astrophysics II Madison, WI, USA August 28 – 31, 2006 Towards Acoustic Detection of UHE.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Acoustic Detection Activities in the UK Status and Future Plans Lee F. Thompson University of Sheffield, UK Acoustic Detection Workshop, Stanford, CA 14th.
Study of the acoustic field generated by the electron beam in water Olga Ershova July, 19 th 2006 INFN Genova.
Ultrasound – Physics & Advances
Jonathan Perkin ARENA May 05 Acoustic Cosmic Ray Neutrino Experiment FUTURE PROSPECTS simulation…
Acoustic detection of high energy showers in water *introduction *activity in Italy *perspectives, possible collaborations M.Anghinolfi Istituto Nazionale.
Energy Resolution of a Parallel- Plate-Avalanche-Chamber Kausteya Roy Professors E. Norbeck and Y. Onel.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic sensor and transmitter development Amanda/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley March 2005.
Sebastian Böser Development of glaciophones and acoustic transmitters for ice 1 st International ARENA Workshop Zeuthen May 2005.
RITEC MEDARS MULTIPLE EMAT DRIVER AND RECEIVER SYSTEM Your Logo Here Drive Phased Arrays of EMATs at high powers.
ANTARES: Towards Acoustic Detection of Highest Energy Neutrinos Kay Graf for the ANTARES Collaboration Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics VLV T.
RAL/BENE meeting, April Marcos Dracos Collection system for future neutrino beams horn and target integration 2 LoI's sent –CERN –Strasbourg.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Hydrophone based calibrator for seawater acoustic detection of UHE neutrinos Omar Veledar ACoRNE collaboration – University of Sheffield Sapienza Universitá.
ARENA Workshop, May, 2005 First Activities in Acoustic Detection of Particles in UPV M. Ardid, J. Ramis, V. Espinosa, J.A. Martínez-Mora, F. Camarena,
S. Viola VLVνT 2015, Rome – 14/09/2015 Characterization and testing of the KM3NeT acoustic positioning system F. Simeone VLVνT 2015 – Rome, 14/09/2015.
TIDE TESTS AT GDD LAB M. Casiraghi and F. Vasi. New detector configuration Low pressure chamber anode.
ACoRNE*, UK The calibration and experiment of transmitter array for the acoustic neutrino detection W. Ooppakaew*, S. Danaher*, R. Lahmann**, K. Graf**
Geant4 Simulation of Neutrons interaction with GEM-foil and gas Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Marco Villa (CERN)
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 5-9 October th ICATPP, Como, Italy S. Maltezos NITROGEN MOLECULAR SPECTRA OF AIR FLUORESCENCE EMULATOR USING A LN 2 COOLED CCD S. Maltezos, E.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
May 17-19, 2005D. Zaborov, ARENA workshop1 Dmitry Zaborov for the ITEP group Berlin, May 2005 Analysis methods of ITEP Baikal data.
27-30 June 2006V. Bertin, V. Niess- ARENA Newcastle1 Acoustic Signal Computations in the Mediterranean Sea ARENA 2006, Newcastle V. Bertin, V. Niess.
Feasibility of acoustic neutrino detection in ice: First results from the South Pole Acoustic Test Setup (SPATS) Justin Vandenbroucke (UC Berkeley) for.
ATLAS LAr Forward Calorimeters C. Zeitnitz (Universität Wuppertal) for the ATLAS LAr Community.
Status and First Results of the Acoustic Detection System AMADEUS in ANTARES Robert Lahmann for the ANTARES Collaboration ARENA 08, Rome, 26-June-2008.
Status and Advances on the Acoustic Positioning System for KM3NeT Giuseppina Larosa, IGIC-UPV KM3NeT General Meeting, Nikhef 28-31/03/2011.
WP 7 (RDH) Detector for high intensity beam WP 6 (IRPT) New TERA chip development Leslie Karen Fanola Guarachi.
ARENA08 Roma June 2008 Francesco Simeone (Francesco Simeone INFN Roma) Beam-forming and matched filter techniques.
Acoustic transceivers for the KM3NeT positioning system Miguel Ardid KM3NeT General Meeting Marseille, January 29 – February 1, 2013.
ESS Detector Group Seminar Edoardo Rossi 14th August 2015
Munib Amin Institute for Laser and Plasma Physics Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Laser ion acceleration and applications A bouquet of flowers.
Future plans for the ACoRNE collaboration Lee F. Thompson University of Sheffield ARENA Conference, University of Northumbria, 30th June 2006.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
ARENA RomaGiulia De Bonis1 Acoustic Signals from Proton Beam Interaction in Water Comparing Experimental Data and Monte Carlo Simulation Giulia.
Bou-Cabo Manuel Ardid-Ramírez Miguel Camarena-Femenía Francisco Espinosa-ResolloVíctor Larosa Giuseppina Martínez-Mora Juan A (IGIC- Universitat Politècnica.
Bou-Cabo Manuel Ardid-Ramírez Miguel Camarena-Femenía Francisco Espinosa-ResolloVíctor Larosa Giuseppina Martínez-Mora Juan A (IGIC- Universitat Politècnica.
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
INTERCOMPARISON P3. Dose distribution of a proton beam
Robert Lahmann VLVnT – Toulon – 24-April-2008
The ACoRNE Collaboration Present projects and future plans
Introduction Goal: Can we reconstruct the energy depositions of the proton in the brain if we are able to reconstruct the photons produced during this.
Transducer Specifications for Thermoacoustic Range Verification
Acoustics (Activity of ITEP group) 1. Proton beam measurements
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Calibration of Sensors for Acoustic Detection of Neutrinos
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
Real-time Uncertainty Output for MBES Systems
Acoustic Measurements in ANTARES: Status and Aims
Powering scheme for Hollow Electron Lens
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Results on Hydrophones Energy Calibration with a Proton Beam Results at an intense low-energy proton beam in ITEP (Moscow), special thanks to Vladimir Lyashuk and Andrei Rostovstev group N protons ~ E protons = 100 MeV, 200 MeV International ARENA Workshop May 17-19, 2005 DESY, Zeuthen Giulia De Bonis University “La Sapienza” Rome, ITALY

Overview Hydrophones Characterization (Frequency Response) Hydrophones Calibration on Proton Beam Future Developments

BENTHOS (prototipe) L = 15.5 cm d = 2 cm RESON 4042 (modified) Piezo-Electric HYDROPHONES previously used for 6 months at 2000 m depth. Both hydrophones are pre-amplified (~ 30 dB)

Frequency Response - the Hydrophones Sensitivity Test at IDAC (CNR – Roma) Data Analysis Results

CALIBRATION - Frequency Response IDAC – Institute of Acoustics “O. M. Corbino” – Rome (Italy)  UAL - Underwater Acoustics Laboratory remotely-operated transducer positioning system capable of handling weights up to 100 kg on two independent carriages water tank (fresh water) with dimensions: 6.0 m (length 4.0 m (width) 5.5 m (depth)

Experimental Set-Up Hydrophone Spherical Transducer (Model ITC 1007) d=1 m (distance) L=2.8 m (depth) The signal source (Reson ACS 9060) produces a 5KHz to 25 KHz sine wave (frequency sweep with a step of 0.5 KHz). 1.5 ms

CALIBRATION - Frequency Response RESULTS Benthos Reson Hydrophones sensitivity is measured in dB re 1V/1  Pa -173 dB re 1V/1  Pa -183 dB re 1V/1  Pa

Protons Interaction in Water - the Acoustic Signal -Test at ITEP (Moscow) Proton beam - Preliminary Data Analysis Results N protons /spill ~ E protons = 100 MeV, 200 MeV up to eV deposited per spill

Particles Interaction in Water: the Acoustic Signal “ instantaneous ” & localized energy deposition local heating of the medium Local density variation PRESSURE WAVE

The Bragg Peak If the proton energy is in the range MeV, the most of the primary proton energy is deposited at the Bragg Peak. The Bragg Peak is a good approximation of a localized high- density energy deposition in water. Considering the Bragg Peak one can simulate an acoustic source.

ITEP Experimental Set-up June 2004 Dimensions 50.8 cm × 52.3 cm × 94.5 cm The 90% of the basin's volume is filled with fresh water. NO control on temperature. Beam Output Transducer Positioning System Data Acquisition with 3 different hydrophones B  -173 dB re 1V/1  Pa T  -133 dB re 1V/1  Pa R  -183 dB re 1V/1  Pa V.Lyashuk and A.Rostovstev group, G. De Bonis, G. Riccobene, R. Masullo and A. Capone B T R p Injection Tube Beam Output BENTHOS RESON ITEP Collimator

X [ cm ] Z [ cm ] BENTHOS RESON Hydrophones Configuration BENTHOS ITEP RESON p (Monte Carlo Simulation)

TTX Data BENTHOS RESON ITEP BCT Beam Current Transformer Hydrophones

Hydrophones Data - a Zoom View  ~ 50  s A ~ 45 mV Acoustic Pulse related to protons interaction Bipolar Shape Electro-magnetic induced pulse Typical pulse collected with MeV

Hydrophones Data Analysis FIT Operation BENTHOS RESON ITEP

Results - LINEARITY BENTHOS Hydrophone E beam = 200 MeV E beam = 100 MeV N protons = 2. 5·10 10 Linear Fit Total deposited energy = 10 8 [eV] 2. 5·10 10 =2.5 ·10 18 eV Proton Intensity Bipolar Amplitude

Results - LINEARITY E = 200 MeV E = 100 MeV RESON Hydrophone Linear Fit

Results - LINEARITY E = 200 MeV E = 100 MeV ITEP Hydrophone Linear Fit

Collimator Diameter Dependance BEFORE The BCT gives a measure of the number of protons BEFORE the collimator BENTHOS Data – E=100 MeV Results show a collimator diameter dependance Beam Intensity [N protons ] 0.5· · · · ·10 10

Number of entering protons protons interacting in water. More over, collimators, located downstream the BCT, are used to modify the number of protons interacting in water. We considered collimator with diameter  = 2, 3, 5 cm). protons in the emitted bunch The voltage signal measured at the BCT channel is proportional to the number of protons in the emitted bunch. One can calculate N proton using the formula: N proton = A BCT [ V ] · 2 · C ·10 8 where C is a parameter depending on machine settings; the C-value is given by machine technicians.

N protons ENTERING THE BASIN Results (taking into accounts the effect of collimators…) E beam = 100 MeV 0.5· · · · ·10 10

Future Plans Simulation (Geant4) of proton beam energy deposition in water Simulation of acoustic signal formation Development of a tool for open sea hydrophone calibration (controlled sparker) Simulation of acoustic signal from UHE neutrino induced showers in sea water