V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, 2004 1 Progress Report on Theoretical Tools and Calculations of Cross Sections.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lorentzian-like models of E1 radiative strength functions V. A. Plujko, O. M. Gorbachenko, E. V. Kulich Taras Shevchenko National Kyiv University, Ukraine.

Advertisements

NUCLEAR REACTION MODELS FOR SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FAST NEUTRON INDUCED (n,p) REACTION CROSS SECTIONS M.Odsuren, J.Badamsambuu, G.Khuukhenkhuu Nuclear.

Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA

I. Dillmann Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe KADoNiS The Sequel to the “Bao et al.” neutron capture compilations.

Validation of EAF-2005 ( New tools for EAF-2007 ) J. Kopecky JUKO Research The Netherlands TC IFMIF Meeting FZK 4-6/10/2005.

G. Perdikakis1,2, C. T. Papadopoulos1, R. Vlastou1, A. Lagoyannis2, A

The simplified description of dipole radiative strength function V.A. Plujko, E.V.Kulich, I.M.Kadenko, O.M.Gorbachenko Taras Shevchenko National University.

INPUTS : - rock composition: - U/Th contamination: - density: 2.65 g/cm 3 Neutron yield in LSM rock.

1 Maryvonne De JésusIlias/N3/WG5 meeting Neutron studies in Edelweiss “Suite” Valencia (Espana)15/04/2005.

Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.

ELBE Neutron Source IAEA TC Meeting “Nuclear Data for IFMIF”, FZ Karlsruhe, October 4-6, 2005 Klaus Seidel Technische Universität Dresden.

The Theory of Partial Fusion A theory of partial fusion is used to calculate the competition between escape (breakup) and absorption (compound-nucleus.

1 CN formation cross section in nucleon induced reactions on 238 U Efrem Soukhovitski, JINER Frank Dietrich, LLNL Harm Wienke, Belgonucleaire Roberto Capote,

Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,

Coupled-Channel Computation of Direct Neutron Capture and (d,p) reactions on Non- Spherical Nuclei Goran Arbanas (ORNL) Ian J. Thompson (LLNL) with Filomena.

Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”

14th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Reactions Mechanisms, June 15-19, 2015, Varenna, ItalyMarilena Avrigeanu 1 Role of the direct mechanisms in the deuteron-induced.

The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.

Thomas W. Burrows NSDD 2007, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 Status of the ENSDF Analysis & Utility Codes Thomas W. Burrows* National Nuclear Data Center.

Nuclear Level Density 1.What we know, what we do not know, and what we want to know 2.Experimental techniques to study level densities, what has been done.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory SciDAC Reaction Theory LLNL-PRES Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, Livermore, CA

JENDL/HE-2007 & On going Activities for JENDL-4 Japan Atomic Energy Agency S. Kunieda IAEA 1-st RCM of CRP on FENDL-3.0, 2-5 Dec Y. Watanabe Kyushu.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)

Robert Haight LANSCE-NS Workshop on Statistical Nuclear Physics and Applications in Astrophysics and Technology Ohio University July 8-11, 2008 LA-UR

Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.

Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.

TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.

Cross-sections of Neutron Threshold Reactions Studied by Activation Method Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department.

April 17 DoE review 1 Reaction Theory in UNEDF Optical Potentials from DFT models Ian Thompson*, J. Escher (LLNL) T. Kawano, M. Dupuis (LANL) G. Arbanas.

FENDL-3 1st Research Co-ordination Meeting, 2-5 December 2008, IAEA, Vienna1 Marilena Avrigeanu Progress on Deuteron-Induced Activation Cross Section Evaluation.

Vlad Avrigeanu / Mihai Mirean_TOF Collaboration Meeting 2006, Paris, 4-5 Dec. 1 Proposal to the n_TOF Collaboration at CERN on IFIN-HH joining Activities.

Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.

IEA collaboration in fusion neutronics Contributions of TU Dresden Workshop, Baden-Baden, 18 October, 2001 K. Seidel, TUD 1. Experimental validation of.

NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.

Applied Nuclear Physics Group The final meeting of IAEA CRP – 6. 2 Calculation and Evaluation of (n,  ) Cross Sections for Producing 32 P,

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE.

Marilena Avrigeanu28th Int. Workshop. on Nuclear Theory Rila Mountains 2009 α - particle Optical Potential for astrophysical studies M. Avrigeanu and V.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Effective interactions for reaction calculations Jutta Escher, F.S. Dietrich, D. Gogny, G.P.A. Nobre, I.J. Thompson.

The concept of compound nuclear reaction: a+B  C  d+F The particle transmission coefficients T are usually known from cross sections of inverse reactions.

© 2003 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1  nuclear structure studies nn uclear structure studies Who am.

Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physical Sciences Directorate - N Division Coupled Channel Calculations 06/25/2008 Gustavo P. A. Nobre

ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.

Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical.

Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes incident on proton and 12 C International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, Japan June 3-8, 2007 W. Horiuchi.

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.

PROPERTIES OF HIGH-ENERGY ISOSCALAR MONOPOLE EXCITATIONS IN MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS SPHERICAL NUCLEI M. L. Gorelik 1), S. Shlomo 2), B. A. Tulupov 3), M. H.

Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,

KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.

Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.

Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.

KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.

1 G. Cambi, D.G. Cepraga, M. Frisoni Enea & Bologna University Team OSIRIS neutronic and activation simulation with Scalenea-ANITA in support of PACTITER/CORELE.

Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,

1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.

High accuracy neutron inelastic cross section measurements on 206 Pb A.Negret 1, L.C. Mihailescu 1,2, C. Borcea 1, Ph. Dessagne 3, K.H. Guber 4, M. Kerveno.

Fusion of 16,18O + 58Ni at energies near the Coulomb barrier

Fusion Neutronics, Nuclear Data, Design & Analyses

Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions

Marilena AvrigeanuMarilena Avrigeanu

3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2

Bucharest-Magurele, Romania M. BOROMIZA - Trieste, October, 2017

Intermediate-mass-fragment Production in Spallation Reactions

O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner

The TALYS nuclear model code II

Alpha-particle optical model potentials within

Presentation transcript:

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Progress Report on Theoretical Tools and Calculations of Cross Sections Relevant to the EAF File Vlad Avrigeanu EURATOM-MEC Fusion Association, “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics & Nuclear Engineering, P.O Box MG-6, Bucharest, Romania Since EAF-2003 (Prague, June 2002): – Completion (2002/2003) of fast neutron activation calculations for: all stable 58,60,61,62,64 Ni isotopes (+ JRC/IRMM-Geel): [Nucl. Phys. A730, 255 (2004)] all stable 92,94,95,96,97,98,100 Mo isotopes (+ JRC/IRMM, KRI-St.Petersburg) : [ –Analysis (2003/2004) of fast neutron activation of: all stable 180,182,183,184,186 W isotopes (+ UKAEA, TUD-Dresden): [Report EFFDOC-893, NEA/OECD, Paris, May 2004]

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, BASIC QUESTIONS NUCLEAR-SURFACE EFFECTS ? –in particle-hole level densities: PLD, CPCLibrary, Belfast, 1998] –Phys. Rev. C 58, 295 (1998) –Comp. Phys. Comm. 112, 191 (1998) –in GDH model for pre-equilibrium emission: STAPRE-H95, OECD/NEA-DB, Paris, 1995] –J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 20, 613 (1994) –Phys. Rev. C 65, (2001) –J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. Suppl. 2, 803 (2002) NUCLEAR MOMENT OF INERTIA ? –in nuclear level densities: [e.g., S.F. Mughabghab, C. Dunford: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4083 (1998)] –J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. Suppl. 2, 746 (2002) –Nucl. Phys. A730, 255 (2004)

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sensitivity of Activation Cross Sections of Tungsten to Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms V. Avrigeanu 1, R. Eichin 2, R.A. Forrest 3, H. Freiesleben 2, M. Herman 4, A.J. Koning 5, and K. Seidel 2 EFF-DOC-893/Rev.1 (June 2004) 1 EURATOM-MEC Fusion Association, “Horia Hulubei” National Institute for Physics & Nuclear Engineering, P.O Box MG-6, Bucharest, Romania 2 EURATOM-FZK/TUD Fusion Association, Technische Universität Dresden,Dresden, Germany 3 EURATOM-UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Center, United Kingdom 4 Brookhaven National Laboratory, P.O. Box 5000, Upton, NY Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group NRG, P.O. Box 25, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands – EMPIRE-II calculations: g=A/13 MeV -1 (default) A/14 MeV -1 – EMPIRE-II isomeric-state cross sections – (n,n’p+pn+d) reaction cross section discussion Rev.1 (June 2004):

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Outline [e.g. 1, EFF-DOC-872, Nov. 2003] Nuclear cross sections calculations -Search for appropriate optical model potentials: n+ 182,183,184,186 W - p+ 181 Ta -Compilation of the available experimental data (E<20 MeV) -Nuclear model calculations (E<20 MeV) -Comparison with all activation experimental data Processing of model calculations results -Cross sections of all individual channels with activation data - [Benchmark experiment analysis updating –calculated-to-experimental (C/E) activity: reduced deviation from unity ] 1 P. Pereslavtsev and U. Fischer, Evaluation of n+ 184 W cross-section data for EFF up to 150 MeV

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Flowchart of model calculations EMPIRE-II v.2.18 [ECIS95/SCAT2, DEGAS, MSD-TUL/MSC-H, HF]  t,  R,  CC,  abs - T l (E) neutron deformed optical potential - p-,  - spherical optical potentials - EMPIRE-specific level density, N max < 40 - DEGAS [g=A/13 MeV -1, K=100 MeV 3 ] STAPRE-H v.2002 [SCAT2, GDH, HF] - p-,  - spherical optical potentials - BSFG, E* B n : Junghans/Koning/Chadwick I/I r : 0.5(g.s.)-0.75(B n )-1(15 MeV) - GDH [ g FGM (  ), A K (p,h), f K (p,h,E,F 1 (l,E i )) ] TALYS [Koning and Duijvestijn]

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Optical model potentials Neutrons (n+ 182,183,184,186 W): SPRT analysis (SPR added in EMPIRE-II output) –P.G. Young+ (1990) [as RIPL-2 in EMPIRE-II] (local) –J.P. Delaroche, as in NEANDC-253”U”, OECD/NEA-DB, 1989 (local) –P.G. Young, NEANDC-222”U”, OECD/NEA-DB, 1986 (global: II.B) –P.G. Young+ (1990) - modified (local) –RIPL-2/P.G. Young+ (1986) - modified (local) Protons (p+ 181 Ta) –R.L. Walter and P.P. Guss, Rad. Effects 92, 1079 (1986) (global) –N. Yamamuro, NDST-1988, Mito, Japan, p.489 (global) –Walter-Guss (1986) - modified (local) Alphas –V. Avrigeanu, P.E. Hodgson, M. Avrigeanu, Phys.Rev.C 49,2137(1994) (global)

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Optical model parameters used to describe the scattering of neutrons on W isotopes, and the corresponding absorption cross section for the element W at the incident neutron energy E=14.1 MeV

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of experimental and calculated neutron scattering parameters of 182,184,186 W

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of calculated and experimental neutron total cross sections for 182,183,184,186 W isotopes with emphasis of the lower energy region

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of calculated and experimental neutron total cross sections for 182,183,184,186 W isotopes

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of neutron total cross sections for 182,183,184,186 W isotopes calculated by using presently modified OMPs

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the calculated and measured proton reaction cross sections and (p,n) reaction cross sections for 181 Ta Walter-Guss (1986) - modified (local): W D = E , E<10 MeV E , E>10 MeV a D = E, E<20 MeV 0.512, E>20 MeV

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Nuclear Level Density Cumulative number of levels against excitation energy for, e.g., 178,179 Hf, and corresponding prediction of the BSFG model

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, The  -ray strength functions 20 A.V. Ignatyuk, at 28 D.G. Gardner and F.S. Dietrich, Report UCRL-82998, LLNL-Livermore, M. Avrigeanu, V. Avrigeanu, G. Cata, and M. Ivascu, Rev. Roum. Phys. 32, 837 (1987). 30 R.L. Macklin, D.M. Drake, and E.D. Arthur, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 89, 98 (1983). Modified energy-dependent Breit-Wigner (EDBW) model 28,29 : f E1 (E  ) Comparison of experimental 20,30 and the calculated average radiative widths -   0 (meV) used for normalization of f E1 (E  ) capture data description

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of calculated and measured neutron capture cross sections of 180, ,186 W isotopes

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sample case of isomeric state populated by side- and continuum-decay cascade-feeding [

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the measured and calculated reaction cross sections for the target nucleus 180 W Calculated values by means of the computer codes EMPIRE-II and TALYS with default global parameters (except the local OMPs) and STAPRE-H with local parameter set given in this work.

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the measured and calculated reaction cross sections for the target nucleus 182 W Calculations with EMPIRE-II and TALYS, and default global parameters (except local OMPs), and STAPRE-H with local parameter set. Normalization factor of [Vonach+, 1990] is applied to data of Frehaut+ (1980).

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the measured and calculated reaction cross sections for the target nucleus 183 W Calculated values by means of the computer codes EMPIRE-II and TALYS with default global parameters (except the local OMPs) and STAPRE-H with local parameter set given in this work.

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the measured and calculated reaction cross sections for the target nucleus 184 W Calculations with EMPIRE-II and TALYS, and default global parameters (except local OMPs), and STAPRE-H with local parameter set. Normalization factor of [Vonach+, 1990] is applied to data of Frehaut+ (1980).

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Comparison of the measured and calculated reaction cross sections for the target nucleus 186 W Calculations with EMPIRE-II and TALYS, and default global parameters (except local OMPs), and STAPRE-H with local parameter set. Normalization factor of [Vonach+, 1990] is applied to data of Frehaut+ (1980).

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sensitivity of calculated (n,2n) reaction cross sections vs. reaction mechanisms & model parameters Calculations with EMPIRE-II and default global parameters excepting local OMPs. A normalization factor of (Vonach+, 1990) was applied to data of Frehaut+ (1980).

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sensitivity of calculated (n,p) reaction cross sections vs. reaction mechanisms & model parameters Calculations with EMPIRE-II and default global parameters excepting local OMPs.

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sensitivity of calculated (n,p) reaction cross sections vs. reaction mechanism codes Calculations with EMPIRE-II and TALYS, and default global parameters (except local OMPs), and STAPRE-H with local parameter set.

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Sensitivity of calculated reaction cross sections vs. model parameters (s.p.l. g = A/13 - A/15 MeV -1 ) Calculations with EMPIRE-II and default global parameters excepting local OMPs and the s.p.l. value. A normalization factor of (Vonach+, 1990) was applied to data of Frehaut+ (1980).

V. Avrigeanu - Workshop on Activation Data (EAF-2005), Prague, June 7-9, Conclusions Achievements -Appropriate optical model potentials: n+ 182,183,184,186 W -Unitary description of all activation experimental data (E<20 MeV) by using a local parameter set in STAPRE-H code -Good results of blind calculations and global parameters within EMPIRE-II and TALYS codes -Similar sensitivity of calculations vs. reaction mechanisms & model parameters Problems -Major uncertainty of calculated isomeric cross sections: level schemes & branching ratios -(n,p)-, (n,  )-reaction excitation functions at E n >15 MeV Completion -Similar analysis for: n+ 180,181 Ta, n+ 174,176,177,178,179,180 Hf -Need for - (n,p)-, (n,  )-reaction data at E n >15 MeV (e.g., JRC/IRMM) - (n.d ) reaction data (emission spectra, e.g., LLNL-Livermore)