Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY 2008-2009 March 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Special Education Leadership Meeting November 30, 2010 An Update on Special Education Compliance Monitoring Jennifer L. Kline, Esq. Education Associate.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
SPECIAL EDUCATION COMPLIANCE TIERED MONITORING: CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) TRAINING COHORT 3 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Monitoring Accommodations in Florida Karen Denbroeder Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
FDPIR Management Evaluations Purpose Process Common Findings NAFDPIR 2015.
Implementing Effective Contractor Compliance Programs.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Objectives: 1) Participants will become familiar with General Supervision Monitoring Plan Section of the Kansas Infant Toddler Services Procedural Manual.
Special Ed. Directors’ Meeting September 17, 2009 Graciela Pizzini.
WIA Administration Program Monitoring. Why Monitor Programs ? 20 CFR (b)(1) and WIA Sections 127 and 132 require the state to develop a monitoring.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Amendment to IEP Colorado Charter School Institute Donna M. Day West Slope Regional Coordinator April, 2015.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Understanding Levels of Determination—Part B (CFR and 604) Improving Performance to Increase Positive Results Eugene R. Thompson, Education Program.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
7 Due Process Update Evaluation Standards. Evaluation Materials and Procedures.
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
April Workbook Overview for Part B Locals April Workbook Overview for Part B Locals Office of Special Education Monitoring and Technical Assistance Team.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) Council For Exceptional Children March 2015 Grand Rapids.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) CEC Presentation March 2014 Grand Rapids, MI 1.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
CIMS Community of Practice (COP) Face-to-Face Call CIMS Community of Practice (COP) Face-to-Face Call ISD Monitors December 9, :00 – 2:45 p.m. 1.
GUIDANCE ON THE IDEA PART B PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS Research to Practice July 2016 What to Expect When You are Expecting a Monitoring Team.
January 21, 2014 Welcome! The January COP call will begin in a few moments. –Event password: 5COPcall –Event number: 666– To hear the presentation.
11/23/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.
Welcome! The Welcome Back webinar will begin in a few moments
Agenda Workbook updates Miscellaneous updates and reminders
Compliance Committee (3C)
Welcome! The B-13 CAP Webinar will begin in a few moments.
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
SPR&I Regional Training
in Correcting Noncompliance
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Community Based Assessments
Presentation transcript:

Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011

Compliance Monitoring Tool Records Keeping -2 compliance items IEP Meeting -2 compliance items Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures -16 compliance items Individualized Education Program File -3 compliance items Participants on IEP Team -6 compliance items IEP Content -13 compliance items Invitation -4 compliance items Written Notice -2 compliance items Placement and Services -3 compliance items Transition Services -7 compliance items I dentification Specific to Compliance Monitoring, what is a Finding of Noncompliance? A Finding is systemic and not child-specific. Findings are in categories, with the subparts (items) having to be corrected at 100% to complete correction of the Finding.

Compliance Monitoring Brief Overview  Identification On-site Compliance Monitoring of special education programs at 173 schools for compliance with IDEA schools identified with findings of noncompliance Written Notification of Findings of Noncompliance provided to school on-site at the exit meeting

Brief Overview (cont.)  Corrections Each school was directed to develop and implement a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Correct the findings of noncompliance as soon as possible and no later than one-year from written notification 1. Correct each individual item of noncompliance* 2. Correctly implement the regulatory requirements of IDEA 2004* (*OSEP memo/FAQ document)

According to OSEP Correction is as follows: (OSEP Memo/FAQ document) If school has corrected and is correctly implementing the specific regulatory requirements based on updated data, the BIE can verify correction of noncompliance If school has corrected and is not correctly implementing the specific regulatory requirements based on updated data, the BIE cannot verify correction of noncompliance

Brief Overview (cont.)  Corrections Individual student corrections to ensure FAPE (ASAP) Redo IEP Amendment of IEP Service delivery on the IEP Processes that may be needed for schools to correctly implement regulatory requirements of IDEA 2004 Root Cause Analysis Change Policy and Procedures Training

Brief Overview (cont.)  Correction of Findings of Noncompliance  By October 15, 2010, all 138 schools had corrected individual items of noncompliance  Corrected noncompliance within 1 year of notification 52 schools had corrected individual items of noncompliance, and the schools were implementing the specific regulatory requirements of IDEA 2004  Corrected noncompliance beyond 1 year of notification 52 schools had corrected individual items of noncompliance, and the schools were implementing the specific regulatory requirements of IDEA 2004  Not correctly implementing the regulatory requirements of IDEA schools had corrected individual items of noncompliance, the schools were not implementing the specific regulatory requirements of IDEA Tribally-Controlled schools 14 BIE-Operated schools

To Ensure Correction, BIE/DPA will: Review updated data Comparison of Compliance Monitoring categorical findings to Compliance Monitoring categorical findings Sampling review of current NASIS special education module student IEP files 3 electronic IEPs (< 50 SWD) 5 electronic IEPs (> 50 SWD)

Sanctions: I. Intensive Technical Assistance Three required webinars: March 10, 2011—Identification/Correction of Noncompliance March 17, 2011—Root Cause Analysis March 24, 2011—TA on high need areas Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures Participants on IEP Team IEP Content Transition Services

What’s Next Sampling review of current NASIS special education module student IEP files during the week of April 18th Student IEP files December 1, 2010 – April 18, 2011 Notification of Close-out, if corrections verified Continuation of Sanctions, if there is continued noncompliance

Sanctions II. Enforcement Actions BIE Operated Schools Notification of Associate Deputy Director and Education Line Officer Tribally Controlled, Grant/Contract Schools Notification of Associate Deputy Director and Education Line Officer Notification of Grantee

Concerns/Issues to Address Root Cause Analysis of Findings of Noncompliance Problem-solving method to correct noncompliance findings. March 17 Webinar NASIS special education module Scan and upload of IEP files and supporting documentation NASIS Special Education Process Guide Locking past and current IEPs NASIS Special Education Process Guide