2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.573.3 State Performance Targets.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
Advertisements

2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
Contents: Writing Academic Goals, Strategies, and Action Steps Website and eCIP The CIP Worksheet Writing Academic Goals Writing Action Steps, Benchmarks,
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
November, 2013 Next steps – Need to look at new assessment rubric and start looking at monitoring measurable objectives, identifying sub groups and targeted.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan ITBS/ITED Results for
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Title I Part C Migrant Education Program.  By end of school year 2015, 60% of migrant students are meeting standard in Reading.
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 18, 2013.
Cholla High Magnet School Open House August 22, 2013 "Every Student, Every Day, Charging Fearlessly Toward Academic and Personal Excellence"
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Creating Your School Improvement Plan in ASSIST. Click on the “Goals & Plans” Tab.
Leadership Academy “Data Analysis” June Some thoughts about data analysis… We have moved from a system where hunches and “cardiac data” were followed,
Kindergarten – Grade 2. Testing in the Primary Grades Provides information for instructional planning Serves as a baseline for monitoring student progress.
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
IOWA ASSESSMENTS – RED OAK RESULTS JANUARY THIS IS ALL STUDENTS NOT JUST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR – WHICH IS USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
PRESENT LEVELS OF ACADEMIC & FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010.
SEC – ELL Cross-state Results 1. To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic.
SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Lakeview Community Schools NeSA Results
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017
Mr. Madsen’s Schedule
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
WELCOME.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review Plan Year 1/2
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Montgomery County Public Schools MSA July 21, 2009
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
Hedenkamp Elementary School
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
MEAP Results.
Presentation transcript:

2009 ITBS RESULTS

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY Comparing Percent Proficient-- Simple Cohort Grouping

Annual Reading Goals In , Grade 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grade 7 full academic year students in Gr Gr

Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th and 8 th grade language arts, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of reading comprehension in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the APR in September.

AYP Proficiency Trajectories Reading Comprehension th Grade79.3% Annual Reading Goal: In , Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITED than Grade 11 full academic year students in

ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

ITBS/ITED Mathematics FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

ITBS Mathematics FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Simple Cohort Grouping

Annual Math Goals In , Grades 7 and 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS than full academic year students in Grades 6 and 7 in Grade 6 to Grade Grade 7 to Grade

Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th and 8 th grade math, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of mathematics in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the APR in September.

AYP Proficiency Trajectories Mathematics th Grade79.3% Annual Math Goal: In , Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITED than full academic year students in Grade 11 in

ITBS Science FAY 2009 Percent Proficient

ITBS Science FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Cross Sectional

ITBS Science FAY Comparing Percent Proficient Simple Cohort Grouping

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

Annual Reading Goals In , Grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grades 3,4, 6, and 7 full academic year Low SES students in Gr. 3- Gr Gr. 4- Gr Gr. 6- Gr Gr. 7- Gr

Corrective Actions If you teach language arts in grades 3,4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat or Mrs. Koether. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of reading comprehension. These ideas will be submitted in the APR in September. **Check back to the APR to see what was written for Grade 3 reading comprehension.

ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

Annual Math Goals In , Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS/ITED than full academic year students in grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 in Gr. 4- Gr Gr. 5- Gr Gr. 6- Gr Gr. 7- Gr Gr. 10- Gr TBD

Corrective Actions If you teach math in grades 4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of mathematics. These ideas will be submitted in the APR in September.

FAY ITBS Science 2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data

Annual Science Goal In , Grade 8 Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the science subtest of the ITBS than Low SES students in Grade 7 in Gr.7 to Gr

Corrective Actions If you teach 7 th or 8 th grade science, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of science. These ideas will be submitted in the APR in September. **Check back to see what was written in the APR.

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 Gender Proficiency Data State Trajectory for 4 th grade is 76%

ITBS Mathematics FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 Gender Proficiency Data

FAY ITBS Science 2009 Gender Proficiency Data

FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 12.7 N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 85.5 N=278

ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Mathematics 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 39.4 N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade 85.0 N=278

ITBS Mathematics FAY 2008 Gender Percent Proficient State Performance Targets

FAY ITBS Science 2009 IEP Proficiency Data IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade N=51 Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per reporting grade N=278

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Reading Comprehension Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent nd GradeNA2.5 3 rd Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade6.67.4

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Mathematics Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent nd GradeNA2.0 3 rd Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade6.57.0

ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results for Science Current Grade Level Grade Equivalent from Last Year Grade Equivalent nd GradeNA1.9 3 rd Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade th Grade6.76.8

HEART Data Website

Past Data Presentations Online Curriculum and Other Documents Website/curriculum/index.htm