Offshore Wind Energy Deployment in the European Union Concerted Action for Offshore Wind Energy Deployment (COD) Environmental Issues Ruud de Bruijne (SenterNovem)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
David McCormick & Simon Harrison
Advertisements

Gero Vella Offshore renewable energy: a business perspective On behalf of: Renewable Energy Systems Limited (RES) & Centrica Renewable Energy Limited.
O.de Funded by in cooperation with Expert meeting on biodiversity standards and strategies for sustainable cultivation of biomass for non-food purposes.
National Environmental Research Institute - DENMARK Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity RECOMMENDATION FOR GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE INTO.
EU Policy Workshop Development of offshore wind energy & Concerted Action for the deployment of offshore wind energy COD Imar Doornbos Ruud de Bruijne.
Birds & Wind Farms - high fliers? Rowena Langston Assessing the impacts offshore.
North Hoyle Offshore Wind Farm 17th April 2002 BONUS Energy A/S.
Patrick Kearon The Bristol Port Company
Beyond stereotypes – ecological and landscape solutions for offshore wind farms Dr Maggie Hill Countryside Council for Wales.
BMT Cordah Limited 1 Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons” Mark Jennison and Trevor Baker BMT Cordah.
Public consultation in EIA procedures Geert P.J. Draaijers Netherlands Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment (
Science requirements to support licensing of marine renewable Ian Davies Marine Scotland.
Environmental Assessment of Marine Renewable Energy Presentation to Pre-BIC meeting 24 th June 2010 Andrew Casebow Chris Green.
Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Danish marine stocking experiments applying the Responsible Approach.
Cumulative Impact Assessment for the Wind Energy Sector
“Insert” then choose “Picture” – select your picture. Right click your picture and “Send to back”. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Wind.
BWEA OFFSHORE MARCH th 2003 COWRIE UPDATE Dr. Carolyn Heeps Environmental Policy Manager Marine Estates.
1 BI 3063 J. Mork H08 Genetic and biologic stock management I C E S The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
A review of the experience on the impacts of energy from sea (offshore wind, wave, current-tidal, thermal) on the marine and coastal environment Takvor.
Coastal Wind Energy Study In summer 2008, the North Carolina General Assembly directed the UNC Board of Governors to study wind energy feasibility University.
Operational integration of biodiversity and physico-chemical data: experience at the BMDC Meerhaeghe A., De Cauwer K., Devolder M., Jans S., Scory S.
Mainstreaming migratory bird requirements into wind energy development Maxim Vergeichik UNDP Bulgaria COP Meeting, September 2005, Bratislava.
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 Chapter 4, Module 3 1.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Palanga,
Nature protection and wind farm development in Serbia Dr. sc. Toni Safner IRES ekologija.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Pan-Baltic stakeholders’ dialogue on MSP: Synthesis report Anda Ruskule, BEF Berlin,
1 Some Context for NMFS Ecosystem Modeling Ned Cyr NMFS Office of Science and Technology.
Agenda item 3.1 (c) Presentation of the EASIN CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature 13 th meeting – 06/09/12.
Vulnerability and adaptive capacity of biodiversity in Wales Dr Clive Walmsley Countryside Council for Wales.
Future European issues on off-shore wind power deployment Steffen Nielsen Head of Section Danish Energy Authority Ministry of Transport and Energy European.
Offshore wind farms and marine environment Ideas from UNIFOB.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research.
Nautilus (Dr M. Norman, Museum Victoria) Butterfly fish & Yellowback Fusiliners (R.Thorn) Soft coral and diver (M. Ball) Tiger Anemone (L. Wiseman) Whale.
Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.
2006 Cumulative Effects Assessment CEA Definition  Potential for residual project-specific effects associated with Meadowbank project in combination.
Climate Limnos / Ocean Biota Global –> Regional Climate Models (e.g. CGCM -> Great Lakes down-scaled projections) Air Temperature, Humidity, Precipitation,
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.
National Scallop Group eNGO dredging positions Dr Tom Pickerell Shellfish Development Manager - SAGB.
Czech methodology for wind power plants localization (from the point of view of nature conservation) Brussels January, 17th 2006 Ministry of the Environment.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Dutch program offshore wind energy Cumulative effects and Mitigation measures ORELG 4 february 2016.
Marine Planning since 2011 Linda Rosborough – Director of Marine Scotland.
Agnes Water Desalination Project Preliminary Studies – Aquatic Ecology John Thorogood and Kylie McPherson.
Eng UK © TYRÉNS 2016 ROAD ECOLOGY Mårten Karlson Tyréns AB
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Overview of.
Baseline Ecological Study of Wind Turbines at Block Island Wind Farm
“HABITAT FRAGMENTATION TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE”
Using EcAp/IMAP indicators for MSP: Experience from Montenegro
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3-Nature, DG ENV Habitats Committee
Follow up of the Saint Malo seminar conclusions in the Batic Sea
EU Thematic Strategy for the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment Outline of impact assessment François Wakenhut – European Commission.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
EU Biodiversity Strategy in context
Offshore Wind Farms and the Environment
Feedback received on the establishment of fisheries management measures in Natura 2000 sites (Document 4.1) Exchange information on ongoing activities.
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Progress Works, recommendations and future work programme
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Update of Guidance document on Wind ENErgy and natura 2000
Alan Fisher OSPAR Pilot project on Ecological Quality Objectives ( ) for the North Sea.
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Group 2.
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
INTRODUCTORY OVERVIEW OF THE GUIDANCE OUTLINE
Wind energy & EU legislation for Nature conservation
31 January 2008 Erika de Visser Ecofys Netherlands
Expert meeting on Wind Energy Potential in Europe
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Head, Marine Conservation
Presentation transcript:

Offshore Wind Energy Deployment in the European Union Concerted Action for Offshore Wind Energy Deployment (COD) Environmental Issues Ruud de Bruijne (SenterNovem) Elke Bruns (TU-Berlin) Working Group meeting Wind & Nature Conservation Brussels, 17 January 2006

COD 2 Results: All relevant studies in database (286) Impacts lower than postulated Siting most important for mitigation and social acceptance (Single case results only – generalisation limited) Future: Cumulative effects area for investigation Planning tools cumulative & trans national level (e.g. SEA) Environmental impact COD

3 Benthos Increase of biomass & biodiversity Fish Positive effects. Negative impacts negligible Marine mammals No effects on habitats Birds Avoid wind farm area. No significant strikes seen Environmental impact COD

4 Database: contents COD database   284 entries number/ distribution of entries dependent on research activities Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany provide highest numbers of publications Country Data records BE (Belgium)9 D (Germany)56 DK (Denmark)119 IRL (Ireland)5 NL (Netherlands)19 PL (Poland)1 SE (Sweden)6 UK (United Kingdom)69 ∑284 COD

5 Environmental planning and assessment  pilot offshore projects on different sites necessary to gain more experience on factual effects  continued adjustment of assessment procedures, tools and standards  in view accumulative or transboundary effects  in view of high background stress level COD

6 Components of the marine ecosystem (potential receptors) birds (sea birds, resting birds, migrating birds) marine mammals fish benthos soil/seabed hydrology visual landscape men Observations:  the list widely represents a similar interpretation of national EIA-regulations  harmonisation of investigation methods desirable  different levels of investigation needs COD

7 Potential effects barrier and scaring effects collision risks (birds / bats) noise disturbing effects electromagnetic fields (cables) introduction of artificial / hard substrates sedimentation / turbidity changes in hydrography visual intrusion, ship collision Observations:  listed scope of potential effects is generally approved  more knowlegde about effects on the factual level was made available  results from Danish monitoring and effect studies most helpful But:  few effects are quantifiable COD

8 Main potential impacts (e.g.) loss of habitats due to disturbance effects / avoidance physical damage due to noise (ramming) Results from effect/monitoring studies: no direct impacts (physical damage) stated avoidance of habitats was not observed Recommendation:  accumulation of effects and impacts on population stability (e.g. by noise, disturbance) has to be monitored Impacts on marine mammals COD

9 Main potential impacts (e.g.): loss of habitats due to disturbance bird collision Observations: higher collision risks for migrating birds avoidance of wind farm areas is also observed habituation / avoidance behaviour is species-specific differentiation between migrating birds and seabirds/resting birds needed collision rates: no reliable numbers Recommendations:  high priority: monitoring of wind farm related accumulative effects  monitoring of collision risks (quantifying methods)  development of models to support predictions of habitat loss and change Impacts on birds COD

10 Main potential impacts: habitat loss due to foundation / scour protection change of species composition due to artificial substrate Observations: increase of biomass and increase of biodiversity possible exclusion of fisheries in wind farm areas lead to positive effects Recommendations:  monitoring of accumulative effects  adjustment of evaluation standards (depending on local protection aims) Impacts on benthos COD

Main potential impacts: disturbance effects during construction phase turbidity electromagnetism (follow-up effect) Observations: consideration of isolated effects on fish stocks is difficult improvement of nutrients (biomass) due to artificial reef-effect wind farm areas may serve as refuge for fish (exclusion of fishery) Recommendations:  not available Impacts on fish COD

Up to now: single case results only – generalisation is limited! effects on project level seem less invasive than expected, accumulative impacts on the background of a high stress level are dominant ! avoidance strategies on superior level (SEA, spatial planning) are required proper site selection seems most important for mitigation and social acceptance pilot wind farms accompanied by a compulsory monitoring scheme Conclusions COD But: