Performance Comparison of CDM and FDM for Sounding Channel of 802.16m AWD IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-0850.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Modified pilot patterns for 8 data streams IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1724 Date Submitted:

Advertisements

1 IEEE m Synchronization Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/823r3 Date Submitted:

1 IEEE m Synchronization Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/823r1 Date Submitted:

Relative Timing of Super-Frames in the Legacy-Support Mode IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/244.

Views on IEEE m Frame Structure Document Number: C80216m-07_354 Date Submitted: November 12, 2007 Source: Sassan Ahmadi

Proposed Amendment Text for 8-Stream Pilot Pattern Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0570 Date Submitted: Source: Chih-Yuan Lin

Frame structure supporting the WirelessMAN-OFDMA frames IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0475r1 Date.

1 Random Sequence Generator Issue (AWD ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1311r2 Date Submitted:

Flexible Frequency Reuse for 16m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/588 Date Submitted: xx.

Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE m Amendment Working Document IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-0848.

Discussion of Control Channel Power Control Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/2846 Date Submitted:

8Tx Dedicated Pilot Pattern Simulation Results IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0805 Date Submitted:

8Tx Pilot Pattern Performance for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0544 Date Submitted:

Design of Sounding Channel Structure IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/904 Date Submitted:

Sounding Sequences Comparison for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/2232 Date Submitted:

FDD Frame Structure for Legacy Support ( ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2095 Date Submitted:

16m Relay frame structure considering interfering issue IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1176r1.

Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.

1 MIMO Supports for IEEE m Broadcast Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1416r1 Date.

Performance Evaluation of MIMO midamble design for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1237.

1 Pilot Pattern for 8-Stream Transmission Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1138 Date Submitted: Source: Debdeep Chatterjee, Jong-kae (JK) Fwu,

MU-MIMO System Performance of 8TX codebook IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0803 Date Submitted:

Title: Evaluation of DL MIMO Schemes: OL SU Spatial Multiplexing with 2-D MMSE channel estimation Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1043r2 Date Submitted:

MIMO midamble sequence proposal (AWD ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-09/1313 Date Submitted:

Performance Evaluation of Pilots for MIMO Mode 5 (CDR) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-09_2253 Date.

Comparisons on Frame Structures for Supporting WirelessMAN-OFDMA ( ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE.

Preamble Requirements in IEEE802.16m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/485 Date Submitted:

Resource granularity for unicast and E-MBS FDM multiplexing IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0405r1.

Modified Pilot Structure for WiMAX PUSC Permutation Scheme Document Number: C80216m-09_1109 Date Submitted: Source: Khalid Elwazeer Mohamed.

Support of Dynamic Load-balancing between 16m and 16e in Uplink System - ( ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document.

Distributed Sounding Channel – Simulation Results Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0749 Date Submitted: Source: Bishwarup Mondal, Fan Wang,

Synchronization Drafting Group Schedule Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0379 Date Submitted: Source: Paul Cheng

Backward Compatible FDD m Frame Structure for Full-Duplex and Half-Duplex MS Operations Document Number: S802.16m-08/031r2 Date Submitted: January.

1 Comparison of DL Pilot Patterns IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/798r1 Date Submitted:

DL Preamble Design for m Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/385 Date Submitted: Source: Sun Changyin, Liu Min, Wang Wenhuan,Yao

E-MBS Feedback Channel Design (E-MBS) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1877 Date Submitted: Source: Chih-Yuan Lin

Proposed Text on Section Miniband Permutation of m Amendment Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0623 Date Submitted: Source:

1 Miniband Permutation Formula Update for DL/UL PHY IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0886r1 Date.

1 Equation revision for Frequency Partitioning in DL/UL PHY IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0887r1.

IEEE m Sounding Channel Designs Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0140r1 Date Submitted: Source: Chih-Yuan Lin

Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.

Results on Downlink Pilot Structures IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/762 Date Submitted:

MCS table design for 16m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1007 Date Submitted: Source: Zhou Liang

Collaborative uplink MIMO techniques for IEEE m Document Number: C80216m-08/638 Date Submitted: 7/7/2008 Source: Mohamed Abdallah Mohammed Nafie.

1 Proposal of the UL Pilot Pattern IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_977 Date Submitted:

Relay/EMBS Ad-Hoc Group Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2678r1 Date Submitted: Source: Kanchei(Ken) Loa Relay/LBS/EMBS.

Multi-Level Codes Sequence for Simultaneous MCS Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1152 Date.

System Level Performance of 8TX Measurement Pilot IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0808 Date Submitted:

Uplink HARQ Feedback Channel Design for IEEE802.16m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/968 Date Submitted: Source: Dengkui Zhu

1 Proposed Randomization for 16m Document Number: S80216m-09/1415 Date Submitted: Source: Changlong Xu, Tom Harel, Huaning Niu, Jong-Kae Fwu,

1 Comparison of Variable and Fixed MCS for DL Unicast Service Control Channel Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/1269 Date Submitted: Source:

UL Pilot Simulation Results Comparison Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_1204 Date Submitted: Source: tian qu hong yun.

Bandwidth Request Channel Physical Layer Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0222 Date Submitted:

1 Modifications on Subband (SB) Partitioning Equations ( and ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:

Clarification on the Usage of Femtocell Over The Air (OTA) Signaling ( ) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2603 Date Submitted: Source:

Dynamic Subcarrier/Subchannel Allocation for Interference Mitigation in IEEE802.16m Networks IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document.

802.16m sounding sequences comparison

IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:

Sounding Antenna Switching for IEEE m Amendment Working Document

Text Proposal of PC-A-MAP IE Assignment in IEEE D3 (

Project Planning Committee Opening Report

Comparison Between FDM and CDM Sounding Methods

Investigation on One- and Two-Stream BCH MIMO Schemes

UL Fast Feedback and HARQ Feedback Channel Structure

QPSK Mapping Rule for Constellation Rearrangement

IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:

Investigation on one and two stream BCH MIMO Schemes

Harmonized text proposal to SDD on UL HARQ Feedback Channel

Zhu dengkui,Jerry Chow UL HARQ Feedback Channel Performance Comparisons of tile Format Options Document Number: C80216m-09_0158.

Network Synchronization Considerations for n

Presentation transcript:

Performance Comparison of CDM and FDM for Sounding Channel of m AWD IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-0850 Date Submitted: Source: KeunChul Hwang, Jing Li, Inseok Hwang, Soon Young Yoon Samsung Electronics Venue: IEEE m Session#61, Cairo, Egypt Base Contributions: N/A Re:Call for Contributions on Project m Amendment Working Document (AWD) Content Purpose: To discuss and adopt in TGm Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: and. Further information is located at and.

Motivation There are Two Options for sounding multiplexing in the current UL CTRL AWD text (80216m-09_0010r1a), –Option 1: decimation separation (FDM) or cyclic shift separation (CDM) –Option 2: decimation separation (FDM) Link-level and system-level simulation results are provided to compare the performance of decimation separation (FDM) and cyclic shift separation (CDM).

Performance of CDM and FDM depends on the number of MS per sector, the channel estimation scheme and interference level Option 1 is needed for 16m Sounding due to different performance of CDM and FDM Summary Preferred Scheme K=1 MS/sectorK=6 MS/sector LSLS+MMSELSLS+MMSE Noise limitedCDM CDM  FDM CDMFDM Interference limited CDM CDM  FDM

Performance at low SINR ( less than 0dB) should be paid more attention The following simulations focus on performance at SINR [-10, 10]dB UL SINR distribution (57 sectors)

Simulation parameters OFDM parameters10 MHz (1024 subcarriers, 864 used subcarriers) Sounding sequence CDM cyclic shift (P): 6, 18 cyclic shift index: 0,1,2,…,K for both serving and interference cell FDM decimation value (D): 6, 18 subcarrier offset (g=0,1…D) for both serving and interference cell Loading size72 tones (one band) # of sectors 1 for noise limited case 2 for interference limited case # of MS per sector (K)1 or 6 Channel modelITU modified Ped.-B (3km/h, 2.4GHz) Channel estimation -LS -LS+MMSE: perform LS over each P tones, then MMSE over 18 tones Performance MetricMSE

LLS results (K=1,P=D=18) In noise limited case, using LS+MMSE, CDM and FDM have similar performance In the other cases, CDM performs better than FDM

LLS results (K=1,P=D=6) In noise limited case, using LS+MMSE, CDM and FDM have similar performance In the other cases, CDM performs better than FDM

LLS results (K=6,P=D=18) In noise limited case, using LS+MMSE, FDM performs better In the other cases, CDM performs better than FDM

LLS results (K=6,P=D=6) CDM and FDM have similar performance when P=D=6 and K=6

SLS results (P=D=6) SLS results (57 sectors) are provided with LS+MMSE channel estimation CDM is obviously better than FDM when K=1/Sector, and CDM is slightly better than FDM when K=6/Secoter

Proposed Remedy Modify the text in lines 65, page 118 (section in 80216m- 09_0010r1a) Multiplexing for multi-antenna and multi-AMS AMS and multiple antennas per AMS can be multiplexed through [Option 1: decimation separation or cyclic shift separation][Option2: decimation separation] in each sounding allocation. Also, in case of multiple UL subframes for sounding, time division separation can be applied by assigning different AMS to different UL subframe. For cyclic shift separation each AMS occupies all subcarriers within sounding allocation and uses the different sounding waveform [Editor's note: remove this sentence if Option 2 will be adopted]. For frequency decimation separation each AMS uses decimated subcarrier subset from the sounding allocation set with different frequency offset. For antenna switching capable AMS, ABS can command the AMS to switch the physical transmit antenna(s) for sounding transmission. The details for supporting antenna switching on sounding is TBD.

Appendix. Channel estimation methods System model LS LS+MMSE

Appendix. Impact of power difference Power difference has little impact on MSE performance of both FDM and CDM Simulation condition –Power difference between center and edge users : 10dB –Relative power difference at SNR = -10, -5, 0 (low geometry) [desired user#0, interf#1, interf#2,…interf#5] = [0dB 0dB 0dB 10dB 10dB 10dB] – Relative power difference at SNR = 5, 10 (high geometry) [desired user#0, interf#1, interf#2,…interf#5] = [0dB 0dB 0dB -10dB -10dB -10dB]