Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
Advertisements

PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
KCS Ongoing R&D Christopher Nantista SLAC LCWS11 Granada, Spain September 29, …… …… …… … ….
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
RF Synchronisation Issues
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Technology Meeting July 28, 2010 REPORT.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
Test Facilities Sami Tantawi SLAC. Summary of SLAC Facilities NLCTA (3 RF stations, one Injector, one Radiation shielding) – Two 240ns pulse compressor,
RF COMPONENTS USING OVER-MODED RECTANGULAR WAVEGUIDES FOR THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER MULTI- MODED DELAY LINE RF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM S. G. Tantawi, N. M.
Christopher Nantista Chris Adolphsen SLAC TILC09 Tsukuba, Japan April 20, 2009.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
Christopher Nantista 2011 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas (ALCPG11) University of Oregon, Eugene March 20, …… …… …… … ….
KCS Operational Issues Chris Adolphsen, Chris Nantista and Faya Wang GDE PAC Review at KEK 12/12/12.
Particle-in-Cell Modeling of Rf Breakdown in Accelerating Structures and Waveguides Valery Dolgashev, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Breakdown physics.
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
Chris Adolphsen 10/03/09 MLI and HLRF Summary. Vladimir Kashikhin.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
Proposed TDR baseline LLRF design J. Carwardine, 22 May 2012.
Super High-Power Microwave Semiconductor Switches S. Tantawi F. Tamura.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Vladimir Kashikhin. FLASH Cavity Gradient Stability Comparison of beam-off measurements of pulse-to-pulse cavity gradient jitter during the flattop.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Study of Absorber Effectiveness in the ILC Main Linacs K. Bane, C. Nantista and C. Adolphsen SLAC, March 26, 2010 Goal: Compute the HOM monopole losses.
1 SPL Collaboration Meeting dec 08 - WG1 Introduction First SPL Collaboration Meeting Working Group 1 High Power RF Distribution System Introduction.
Modulator and overmoded RF components status for the 12GHz Test Stand at CERN - RF meeting – 17/03/2010.
Power Distribution System R&D at SLAC Christopher Nantista ILC08 Chicago, Illinois November 18,
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
KSC Operation Control of Cavity Gradients Failure Analysis Near and Long Term R&D Effect on Beam Emittance Chris Adolphsen SLAC 9/7/2010 Going Native in.
Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010.
Design of Microwave Undulator Cavity
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
TE 01 -TE 02 DLDS Elements BINP-KEK
Power Distribution System (PDS) Design and R&D Status Christopher Nantista SLAC SCRF Fermilab April 24, 2008.
The Design and Analysis of Multi-megawatt Distributed Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Microwave Switches Sami G. Tantawi, and Mikhail I. Petelin Stanford.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
Evaluation of the TE 12 Mode in Circular Waveguides for Low-Loss High Power Transportation Sami G. Tantawi, C. Nantista K. Fant, G. Bowden, N. Kroll, and.
KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
A Multi-Moded RF Delay Line Distribution System for the Next Linear Collider S. G. Tantawi, G. Bowden, Z.D. Farkas, J. Irwin, K. Ko, N. Kroll, T. Lavine,
GHz High Gradient Testing of a T18 TW StructureUsing a Fast Response Protection and Power Recirculating System GHz High Gradient Testing.
HLRF R&D Towards the TDR Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Webex meeting June 29, 2011.
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
Christopher Nantista SLAC Project X Workshop November 12, 2007 Fermilab.
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
ILC High Power Distribution
Klystron Cluster System (KCS)
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
A frequency choice for the SPL machine: Impact on hardware
NC Accelerator Structures
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CEPC RF Power Sources System
RF Pulse Shaping.
Presentation transcript:

Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC

downstream upstream The waveguides share a shaft down to the accelerator tunnel and then turn, one upstream and one downstream to feed, through periodic tap-offs, a combined 64 RF units, or ~2.5 km of linac. service tunnel eliminated underground heat load greatly reduced cluster building shaft accelerator tunnel

Clusters of MW klystrons housed, with modulators, in a single building on the surface, feed 350 MW into each of two ~0.5 m diameter evacuated circular waveguides. Cluster Layout

Tap off 10 MW every 38 m for an RF distribution unit. Each tap-off from the main waveguide feeds 10 MW through a high power window and probably a circulator or switch to a local PDS for a 3 cryomodule, 26 cavity RF unit (as shown for baseline). Local Distribution (remains essentially the same)

Assume smooth copper plated or aluminum walls: TE 01 : Waveguide Attenuation Take D = m = 48.0 cm, between TE 51 and TE 22 cutoffs, 6.8% below TE 02 cutoff Transmission over 1 km for D = m Cu: Al: (power)

SLAC’s 5 cell L-band cavity runs stably with surface fields of 20 MV/m with 1 ms pulses - given the higher power of the ILC system, we are even more conservative by choosing a lower surface field limit (i.e. 10 MV/m). 40 MV/m (400 ns/1.6 ms) 1/6 = ~10 MV/m In the waveguide, 350 MW → ~1.9 MV/m peak, not on wall. We should be able to keep surface fields below 10 MV/m threshold while coupling in and out 10 MW increments. Scaling by pulse width dependence, we should try to keep surface fields below 10 MV/m in couplers. X-band design goal maximum pulse width ratio L-band design goal maximum Power Handling

General Atomics high power 90° profiled curvature bend in 44.5 mm corrugated waveguide for TE 01 mode at GHz Overmoded Bend (two approaches) Each TE 01 bend is composed of two circular-to-rectangular mode converters and an overmoded rectangular waveguide bend. SLAC compact high power 90° bend in 40.6 mm circular waveguide tapered to overmoded rectangular waveguide for TE 01 mode at GHz TE 01 TE 20

Launchers and Tapoffs Co-axial TE 01 Fractional Tap-offs Need to be designed. Could be “wrap-around” based 3-port tap-off or 4-port directional couplers? C. Nantista X-Band Designs

3-port tapoffs: only one port is matched. for combining, the tap-offs are installed backwards. reflected/mismatched power goes to circulators. Directional couplers: more complicated/difficult to design requires a load on the unused port. combiningextracting combiningextracting Couplings ranging from 1 to 1/32 are required. Feeding the power in efficiently at each junction depends on having the right amplitude already flowing in the line and being properly phased relative to it.

Waveguide (and Bend) Tests Resonant Line 6.2 MW 350 MW dB 100 m of WC1890 back-shorted tap-off Resonant Ring 6.2 MW 350 MW dB 200 m of WC1890 directional coupler To test the feasibility of the klystron cluster scheme, in terms of power handling, we could build a resonant waveguide and build up the stored energy until it represents traveling waves on the order of 300 MW.

T c = Q L /  = 23.1  s Round trip loss: 1.8 % Round trip delay time: 823 ns (vs ns shutoff time in ILC) Dissipated power: 6.2 MW = input power to produce 350 MW critically coupled Critical coupling for the emitted field to cancel the reflected field = dB. Stored energy: 288 J Required Power and Coupling (for a 100 m line or 200 m ring)

The scattering matrix for a lossless 3-port tapoff with coupling C and reference planes chosen to make all elements real can be written: tap-off Short port 1 at a distance l to reduce to a 2-port coupler at the input of the line and adjust C or l to achieve critical coupling. Coupling to a Resonant Line With a 3-Port Tap-Off l input resonant delay line effective coupling: The smallest coupling distribution tap-off we need is C = 1/32 = , or dB. From attenuation calculation, we want C’ = = dB resonant line coupling. two knobs, C and l = →  l = 67.65°

LLRF Control Use summed vectors from 32*26 cavities (instead of 26) to control common drive power to the klystrons. The increased length adds ~ 9 us delay time to the response, so perturbations cannot be very fast (which should be the case as we will know the beam current before the rf pulse in the ILC). Assumes uncorrelated, local energy errors are small –will investigate by examining FLASH LLRF data during the next accelerator physics run –if needed, could add 1 or 2 fast phase/amplitude controllers to each rf unit (to drive the unmatched cavities in the two 9-cavity cryomodules in the ACD scheme).

Fast Amplitude and Phase Control (AFT prototype for FNAL PD) Rated for 550 kW at 1.3 GHz and has a 30 us response time