NCI-MAINE What is NCI?  NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Advertisements

National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Washington Lisa A. Weber, Ph.D. Division of Developmental Disabilities.
Values in the DD Act. Individuals with developmental disabilities, including those with the most severe developmental disabilities, are capable of self-determination,
DD Council Mandate Advocacy Advocacy Capacity Building Capacity Building Systemic Change Systemic Change.
What Working in the Community Means Employment and Outcomes for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities from Across the United States Chas.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
National Core Indicators Adult Family Survey Results Josh Engler, Human Services Research Institute
MAKING A CASE FOR EXPANDING SHARED LIVING IN PENNSYLVANIA.
Selecting Your Evaluation Tools Chapter Five. Introduction  Collecting information  Program considerations  Feasibility  Acceptability  Credibility.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
Family Quality of Life and Application Among People with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Families Professor Robert L. Schalock, Ph.D. Institute of.
Self Direction and Resource Allocation September 9, 2014 at 12:00 pm ET John Agosta, PhD Katie Howard, MPH
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS DATA FOR SYSTEMS CHANGE USE OF MEDICATIONS TO ADDRESS MOOD, ANXIETY, PSYCHOSIS AND BEHAVIOR AND STATE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS MARCH.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
What’s Health Got to Do With It? Integrating Education & Health Care Transitions to Achieve Mutual Outcomes APSE National Conference Philadelphia, PA June.
FAMILY PEER SUPPORT SERVICES OMH Children’s Division of Integrated Community Services May 19, 2015 Presentation to New York State Success Membership.
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
Developmental Disabilities Council Washington State Children’s CORE Indicators Review Panel Results October 2004.
It is the mission of Options and Advocacy to enhance and protect the lives of children and adults with disabilities. Options and Advocacy for McHenry County.
Psychotropic medication use and obesity among IDD service recipients in 15 states AAIDD 2012, 6/19/2012.
Washington State Team May, 2015 Ed Holen, DDC Shannon Manion, DDA Debbie Roberts, DDA Community of Practice: Supporting Individuals with Intellectual/Developmental.
Providing leadership in the development of services and supports for persons with disabilities. Patricia A. Moss Interim Director.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Understanding NCI Reports Sarah Taub NCI Webinar Series April 29 th, 2014 National Core Indicators (NCI)
INCOPORATING NCI INTO A QUALITY REVIEW SYSTEM CONNECTICUT DMR Laura Nuss, Director of Strategic Leadership Reinventing Quality Conference 2004.
NCI Survey Respondents Who Are Verbal and Non-Verbal: A Profile.
Principles and Practices of Person-Centered Planning: Provider Network for UPCAP February 9, 2006 Pam Werner Specialist Michigan Department of Community.
What Do People Tell Us About the Quality of Their Supports? American Association on Mental Retardation Val Bradley and Sarah Taub Human Services Research.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS ADULT CONSUMER SURVEY
N ATIONAL C ORE I NDICATORS : U SING D ATA TO M ANAGE P UBLIC S YSTEMS Valerie Bradley Human Services Research Institute Cambridge, Massachusetts People.
1 CT DDS Quality Service Review Connecticut Community Providers Association Presented by Fred Balicki, DDS Quality Management Services May 27, 2008.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
The Quality Conundrum Achieving Safety, Health and Valued Outcomes.
June 4, Systems Change Grants: 2001 Real Choice & 2003 Independence Plus Presenters: Keith Jones, RCCPIG Co-Chair & Erin Barrett, Project Director.
What We've Learned: How Service Prepares Individuals for Employment and Post-Secondary Education Sheila Fesko Dana Carpenter.
NCI: A Growing Commitment Five Years of Performance Measurement 127 th Annual AAMR Meeting, Chicago, IL Val Bradley  Human Services Research Institute.
Profile of Caregivers AUCD Conference: November 17-20, 2013.
Using Health Care Indicators to Improve Individual and Systemic Health Care Outcomes National Core Indicators (NCI) Cross-State Data & Additional Health.
MN Choices The role of employment in long-term care assessment.
1 Quality of Life Project by Robert Schalock, PhD Self-Advocate Presentation May 2010.
C ore I ndicators P roject An Overview of How Connecticut Is Using the NCI CONSUMER SURVEY FAMILY SUPPORT SURVEY CHILDREN’S SURVEY State of Connecticut.
December 20, A Brief Overview: Real Choice and Independence Plus Systems Change Grants Connect the Dots Meeting December 20, 2004.
National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Maine Sarah Taub & Giusi Chiri Human Services Research Institute January 30, 2003.
Age & Disabilities Odyssey Conference Tuesday, June 21, 2011.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
1 Measuring Quality Using Experience Surveys 2005 Center for Policy and Innovation Quality Assurance and Improvement January 26, 2006.
NUTS AND BOLTS FOR NEWBIES Donna Hornberger, ARC of Lancaster IM4Q Program Director Christine Greene, St. Francis University IM4Q Program Director.
Supporting People in the Intellectual Disability and Day Support Waivers Division of Developmental Services Provider Training Department of Behavioral.
BUILDING CAREER PATHS JOB COACHING IN PRACTICE. A JOB MAKES A DIFFERENCE… Rhode Islanders Perspective Employment Can WORK For You! A documentary produced.
D B H D S Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services My Life, My Community Update: Building Blocks October 8, 2015 VACSB Developmental.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Outcomes For Adults On The Autism Spectrum Receiving Services In 31 States: Putting The Research In Context Valerie J. Bradley Human Services Research.
Maryland Access Points and Money Follows the Person Lorraine Nawara Office of Health Services Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Identifying PHR Requirements through Town Hall Meetings Minakshi Tikoo, PhD MBI – Connecticut’s HealthIT Coordinator Giuseppe Macri, - Research Assistant.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
Annual Meeting American Association of University Centers on Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Stephanie Giordano Valerie Bradley Alexandra Bonardi.
Charting LifeCourse Showcase
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Outcomes For Adults On The
The Arc of the District of Columbia, Inc.
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS FAMILY SURVEY RESULTS FY10-11
National Core Indicators
Trends in Quality Assurance
Office of Developmental Programs IM4Q Annual Training Quality Management Updates July 28, /18/2018.
Val Bradley and Sarah Taub Human Services Research Institute
Nebraska’s National Core Indicators Project: A Partnership Between DHHS-DD Services and the Nebraska UCEDD NCI Annual Meeting August 1, 2018 Brad Wilson,
Presentation transcript:

NCI-MAINE

What is NCI?  NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and track their own performance.  Collaboration began in 1997  Currently 38 states and Washington D.C. represented plus 22 sub-state entities  Coordinated by HSRI and NASDDDS

What is an “Indicator”?  Indicators are standard measures used across states to assess the outcomes of services provided to individuals and families. Indicators address key areas of concern including employment, rights, service planning, community inclusion, choice, and health and safety.

NCI Goals  Establish a nationally recognized set of performance and outcome indicators for DD service systems  Develop reliable data collection methods & tools  Report state comparisons and national benchmarks of system-level performance

NCI- Maine Goals  Obtain direct feedback from service recipients  Connect indicators to other initiatives (SIS, Olmstead, etc)  Utilize reliable data to  Measure user satisfaction with services  Identify areas for quality improvement  Support the evolution of the service system

NCI-Maine History  Through 2010  “Quality of Life” Survey was administered to Section 21 Waiver recipients  Interviewers were primarily agency staff  Project overseen by the (former) Office of Quality Improvement

NCI-Maine History   OADS received a grant to resume participation in NCI  Contracted with Maine Developmental Disabilities Council  Interviews completed in 2014 & 2015  2015 data is being analyzed by HSRI

NCI “Adult Consumer Survey”  Uses conversations with adults receiving services to get information about their experiences  Keyed to important person-centered outcomes  Measures system-level indicators related to:  Employment, choice, relationships, case management, inclusion, health

NCI Adult Consumer Survey  Information Gathered is Confidential  Only participation is tracked  Participants are identified in the database only with a code (made up number)  After the information is entered, paperwork is shredded

Why participate?  Participation can help other people  OADS learns about how well services are meeting people's needs  OADS learns about what people like and don’t like about services  Maine learns abut how well it is doing compared to the rest of the country

 Reliable & valid for people with all levels of ID  Provides objective data (which we don’t have much of!)  Random sample  Not sensitive to nuances of service systems  Not sensitive to the nuances of people’s lives Strengths Limitations

What we learned form the process  Participants seemed to enjoy the interview process  People did not always say what we expected them to say

Interviewer feedback  It was a privilege to spend some time with people with so many different life experiences  Those who live most independently seemed the happiest  Integrated employment seems to contribute strongly to happiness, well-being & self determination.

Interviewer feedback  People do not seem to have many choices about where & how they spend their days  People who have had behavior problems in the past said that nobody lets them forget and rules just don’t relax, even when their behavior has improved.  People often had a difficult time answering questions about living, working, doing something else or somewhere else, and about services needed- lack of awareness that there ARE other options

 Choice and Decision Making  Self Determination  Community Inclusion  Relationships  Satisfaction  Service Coordination  Work  Access  Health  Medications  Wellness  Respect and Rights  Safety Areas Addressed

Selected Survey Results

Rachel Dyer Associate Director Maine Developmental Disabilities Council 225 Western Avenue, Suite 4 Augusta, ME or