ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We gratefully acknowledge funding from the NOAA Climate Program, and thank the Dr. Brent Holben for establishing and maintaining the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optical characteristics of aerosol across Europe (WP2.2) Dry/wet aerosol optical properties (and how we got there) Optical closure (agreement between Mie.
Advertisements

UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Deep Blue Algorithm: Retrieval of Aerosol Optical Depth using MODIS data obtained over bright surfaces 1.Example from the Saharan Desert. 2.Deep Blue Algorithm.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
A Dictionary of Aerosol Remote Sensing Terms Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Short.
JERAL ESTUPINAN National Weather Service, Miami, Florida DAN GREGORIA National Weather Service, Miami, Florida ROBERTO ARIAS University of Puerto Rico.
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
METO 621 Lesson 27. Albedo 200 – 400 nm Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) The previous slide shows the albedo of the earth viewed from the nadir.
Figure 5. Plots of a) fRH versus the sub 10um scattering coefficient Angstrom exponent and b) fRH versus the sub 10um absorption coefficient Angstrom exponent.
Measurement of the Aerosol Optical Depth in Moscow city, Russia during the wildfire in summer 2010 DAMBAR AIR.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Figure 1 Figure 8 Figure 9Figure 10 Altitude resolved mid-IR transmission of H 2 O, CH 4 and CO 2 at Mauna Loa Anika Guha Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Investigation of Decadal Changes in Aerosol and Asthma Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
1. The MPI MAX-DOAS inversion scheme 2. Cloud classification 3. Results: Aerosol OD: Correlation with AERONET Surface extinction: Correlation with Nephelometer.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
AOPC-20 (2015)Atmos. Comp. JH Butler Atmospheric Composition Issues James H. Butler Global Monitoring Division, NOAA/ESRL Boulder, CO, USA WMO Global Atmosphere.
Lidar Working Group on Space-Based Winds, Snowmass, Colorado, July 17-21, 2007 A study of range resolution effects on accuracy and precision of velocity.
ARM Aerosol Working Group Meeting San Francisco – 2 November, 2006 Anne Jefferson (SGP, AMF) John Ogren (Instrument Mentor) Betsy Andrews (IAP) Allison.
Summer Institute in Earth Sciences 2009 Comparison of GEOS-5 Model to MPLNET Aerosol Data Bryon J. Baumstarck Departments of Physics, Computer Science,
Aerosol Optical Depths from Airborne Sunphotometry in INTEX-B/MILAGRO as a Validation Tool for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura J. Livingston.
Satellite Observations of Tropospheric Gases and Aerosols Randall Martin With contributions from: Rongming Hu (Dalhousie University) Chris Sioris, Xiong.
Figure 1 – Image of Amazon Basin There is a very sharp increase in the atmospheric aerosol loading during the biomass burning season, that is observed.
Page 1 Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9– 13 December 2002 Observations of aerosol and clouds obtained during the M-55 Geophysica ENVISAT.
Lesson 01 Atmospheric Structure n Composition, Extent & Vertical Division.
About the status and outlook for OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Antti Arola.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Figure 1. (left) Direct comparison of CCN concentration adjusted to 0.4% supersaturation and 499 nm AOD, both observed from ≤1 km altitudes during ARCTAS.
Page 1© Crown copyright Aircraft observations of mineral dust.
NASA Ocean Color Research Team Meeting, Silver Spring, Maryland 5-7 May 2014 II. Objectives Establish a high-quality long-term observational time series.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000 Gunnar Myhre 1,2 Terje K. Berntsen 3,1 James M. Haywood 4 Jostein K.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
Timothy Logan University of North Dakota Department of Atmospheric Science.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
Retrieval of biomass burning aerosols with combination of near-UV radiance and near -IR polarimetry I.Sano, S.Mukai, M. Nakata (Kinki University, Japan),
How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Rob Albee, Jim Wendell, Stan Unander, NOAA Climate Forcing program, DOE ARM program, NASA, Met. Service Canada, Chinese Met. Agency,
DODO RESULTS: Campaign Averages & BAe-146 Nephelometer Findings Claire McConnell Ellie Highwood Acknowledgements: Paola Formenti, Met Office, FAAM.
Relating Aerosol Mass and Optical Depth in the Southeastern U.S. C. A. Brock, N. L. Wagner, A. M. Middlebrook, T. D. Gordon, and D. M. Murphy Earth System.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
This report presents analysis of CO measurements from satellites since 2000 until now. The main focus of the study is a comparison of different sensors.
Review of PM2.5/AOD Relationships
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies in the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid 1, P.B. Russell 2, P.Pilewskie 2, J. Redemann 1, P.V. Hobbs.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
March 29 – April 1, INTEX-NA Workshop Aerosol and Cloud Spatial Distributions and Microphysical Properties Bruce Anderson, Lee Thornhill, Gao.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
- 1 - Satellite Remote Sensing of Small Ice Crystal Concentrations in Cirrus Clouds David L. Mitchell Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Robert P.
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF IAPP MOISTURE RETRIEVALS USING DOE ARM MEASUREMENTS Wayne Feltz, Thomas Achtor, Jun Li and Harold Woolf Cooperative Institute.
International Ocean Color Science Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, May 6-8, 2013 III. MODIS-Aqua normalized water leaving radiance nLw III.1. R2010 vs. R2012.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Challenges in remote sensing of CCN concentration An assessment based on airborne observations of AOD, CCN, chemical composition, size distribution, light.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
J. Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J.A. Eilers 2, R. Kahn 3, R.C. Levy 4,5, P.B. Russell 2, J.M. Livingston 6, P.V. Hobbs 7, W.L. Smith Jr. 8, B.N. Holben 4 1.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to CCN, aerosol chemistry and smoke type.
Studying the radiative environment of individual biomass burning fire plumes using multi-platform observations: an example ARCTAS case study on June 30,
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
 Both chilled mirror devices lag the fast Ly-α TWC by an amount dependent on mixing ratio and phase of water on mirror. Facility for Airborne Atmospheric.
University of Hawai`i, Hawai`i Group for Environments Aerosol Research School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology A. Clarke, S. Howell, C. M c Naughton,
Daytime variations of AOD and PM2
Cloud Property Retrievals over the Arctic from the NASA A-Train Satellites Aqua, CloudSat and CALIPSO Douglas Spangenberg1, Patrick Minnis2, Michele L.
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Measuring microphysical, chemical and optical properties of aerosols aboard the NCAR/NSF C-130 during VOCALS Studying size-resolved aerosol cloud interactions.
Presentation transcript:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We gratefully acknowledge funding from the NOAA Climate Program, and thank the Dr. Brent Holben for establishing and maintaining the Bondville Aeronet site. For more information on AAO, see The NOAA/ESRL Airborne Aerosol Observatory: The First 2 Years of Operation P. Sheridan 1, J. Ogren 1, E. Andrews 1,2, and T. Anderson 3 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA 2 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, USA 3 Department of Atmos. Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA In order to estimate global aerosol radiative forcing and the effects of aerosols on the global climate, measurements of the aerosols are being made by the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Global Monitoring Division (GMD) at many locations around the world. Many major surface regions remain undersampled, however, and very few long term measurement efforts have been made above the surface. In an effort to characterize when, how often, and under what conditions the surface measurements are representative of the lower column, ESRL has undertaken regular aircraft measurements over two heavily instrumented surface sites: The DOE/ARM Southern Great Plains Central Facility near Lamont, Oklahoma, and the NOAA Surface Aerosol Monitoring Station near Bondville, Illinois. Unfortunately, lack of funding has caused the Oklahoma program to terminate at the end of 2007 after almost 8 years of successful operation. The Illinois aircraft has been flying regularly since June Here we report on the first 2 years of operations of the NOAA/ESRL Airborne Aerosol Observatory (AAO). Three-dimensional schematic of the NOAA/ESRL Airborne Aerosol Observatory, showing orientation of inlet and major measurement systems. The AAO was conceived, designed, and built by the Global Monitoring Division Aerosol Group to conduct regular long-term aircraft measurements over the central US. Aerosol optical, microphysical, and chemical properties are measured on this Cessna T206H aircraft, as well as atmospheric gases. The airplane is based at Champaign-Urbana Willard Airport, so that regular vertical profiles over the Bondville surface station (BND) can be performed. Specific aerosol measurements on the AAO aircraft include particle number concentration (using a condensation particle counter, CPC), size distribution (scanning electrical mobility sizer, SEMS), aerosol light scattering and absorption coefficients at 3 visible wavelengths (nephelometer + PSAP), aerosol hygroscopic growth factor, f(RH) (four nephelometers, measurements at different relative humidity (RH) levels), and aerosol ionic composition (particle into liquid sampler, PILS). In addition, ozone is monitored continuously, trace gases (carbon cycle, N 2 O, CFC’s, halons, HFC’s, HCFC’s, etc.) are collected in flasks, and ambient temperature and relative humidity are also measured. The above plots show aerosol data from all AAO profile flights conducted near the Bondville site through June The yellow boxes show segment-averaged data (no size cut) from the individual AAO flight segments. The vertical lines through the boxes represent the 25 th, 50 th and 75 th percentiles of the distributions, while the ends of the horizontal lines show the 5 th and 95 th percentiles. The lowest flight segment data are shown outlined in red, and represent low-level fly-bys (at ~200m above ground) of the BND station. The plot on the left shows total (Dp < 10  m diam) aerosol data from BND (purple box), while the one on the right displays submicrometer surface aerosol data from BND. The extinction data show the expected decrease in aerosol amount with altitude, while the single-scattering albedo (SSA) data show little variation in the vertical. The low-level fly-by SSA data agree more closely with the other airborne data than with the surface data, indicating a real difference in aerosol optical properties between the surface and the lowest flight level. The difference appears to be more related to absorption than scattering, suggesting the possibility of cloud processing and selective removal of hygroscopic scattering aerosols at altitude. Cessna Aerosol Inlet Particle Transmission Efficiency of Inlet Tubing The AAO Cessna has an inlet system featuring a sheathed inlet and large diameter stainless steel tubing. The flow rates were chosen to optimize the transmission of the optically important fraction of the size distribution. The above plot shows the transmission efficiency of particles through the inlet tubing (from the rear of the inlet to the optics instruments). Our calculations indicate efficient transmission of accumulation mode and supermicrometer particles. We are currently conducting modeling studies of the inlet itself and expect to have a similar plot of transmission efficiency for the entire inlet system available soon. Typical time series of aerosol light scattering (550 nm) and GPS altitude during a recent flight. Flight levels are 10 minutes duration at higher altitudes (15 kft, 12 kft, 10 kft, 8 kft, and 6 kft asl) and 5 minutes at lower altitudes (5 kft, 4 kft, 3 kft, 2 kft, and 1.5 kft asl). Automated instrument background checks occur just after takeoff and just prior to landing. This profile shows  sp = Mm -1 at the three highest levels, and a well mixed layer with  sp = Mm -1 below about 5 kft. The plots above show AAO flights conducted over the Bondville (BND) site through end of June Total scattering data (no size cut) from lowest leg of AAO profile is compared with BND surface scattering data. Top and bottom plots show comparisons with BND total (Dp 1  m are being less efficiently collected by the aircraft system, or c) both of the above. The long term average submicron scattering fraction at BND is ~ 0.87 (Delene and Ogren, 2002), in reasonable agreement with the slope of 0.84 shown in the upper plot. One of the goals of this program is to perform flight profiles coincident with remote sensing measurements to provide verification and validation of the surface and satellite sensors and retrieval algorithms. These include overpasses of the A-Train (AQUA and CALIPSO) and TERRA satellites and aerosol optical thickness measurements made by the Aeronet Cimel sunphotometer at BND. The top plot at right shows a comparison of aerosol optical depths from the BND Aeronet sunphotometer and those derived from AAO profile flights. The AAO data have been adjusted to 500 nm to match the Aeronet wavelength, and to ambient RH according to the long-term mean submicrometer f(RH) measurement at BND. The AAO AOD is typically lower than the corresponding Aeronet AOD because of several reasons. These include 1) the AAO inlet has a decreased sampling efficiency for large (i.e., supermicrometer) particles; 2) the AAO does not fly above 15 kft, and aerosols are there at times; 3) the AAO may miss aerosol layers between the sampling altitudes; and 4) the possibility that the submicrometer f(RH) adjustment is not appropriate in all cases. The bottom plot at right shows an example of the comparisons between AAO in situ aerosol and CALIPSO lidar data. The red line represents the lidar profile of attenuated backscatter (532 nm) of an 80-km mean, cloud-cleared viewing area around the BND site, and the dashed line shows the estimated profile of molecular backscatter. Aerosol layers encountered by aircraft at ~3650 m and ~1000 m asl with mean aerosol scattering coefficients (  sp, 550 nm) as shown are included for comparison. Our qualitative results for many profiles suggest that the lidar is able to detect these aerosol layers above background when the  sp is roughly 15 Mm -1 or higher. To assess how the aerosols over the BND site change with time, we have plotted segment- average aerosol properties as a function of time. A contour plot of the aerosol light scattering coefficient (550 nm) taken from the segment data is shown above left. This plot shows higher scattering coefficients extending to high altitudes in the summertime, consistent with the notion of more emissions and secondary aerosol formation in a deeper mixed layer. Measurements during wintertime flights show generally lower scattering coefficients, and they are confined to altitudes below about 1.5 km. The plot above right shows the single-scattering albedo (SSA, 550nm) plotted in the same way. Lower SSA values are observed at low altitudes during the late summer, fall and early winter over the BND site. Extinction (Mm -1, 550 nm)Single-scattering albedo (550 nm) Altitude (m asl) Extinction (Mm -1, 550 nm) Single-scattering albedo (550 nm) Altitude (m asl) In situ Aerosol Scattering (Mm -1, 550 nm) In situ  sp : 15 Mm -1 In situ  sp : 52 Mm -1