Examples of New Partially Accredited School Ratings Division of Student Assessment & School Improvement Virginia Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal NCLB Regulations
Advertisements

1 High School Graduation Requirements A Parent’s Guide (Modified from NMPED Slide Show)
January 10, 2013 Report on the Virginia Early Warning System (VEWS) Education Commission of the States June 27, 2013 Virginia Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
How Are You Testing Me? LEP Assessment Requirements VATD Conference November 1, 2007 Richmond, Virginia.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Rule Development Workshop: School Grades Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division of Accountability,
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
By Meredith Hawkins Deborah Fajuyigbe Robert McArdle.
Djole Hinic Danielle Stokes Achievement and Behavior Data for Elementary Schools.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
Roncalli Central High School Cardinals.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Suffolk Public Schools School Board August 9, 2012.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Academic Review School Improvement Plan Mathematics March 13, 2007 Manassas City Public Schools Grace E. Metz Middle School.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
Presentation I A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Nexus Schools – Algebra I Data Created by: Kaylin Hansen © 2014 Connections Education LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
FBISD Grading Policy Changes EIA(Local) Student/Parent Handbook Page 11.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Standards of Learning (SOL) Overview Presented by your third grade team: Mrs. Patton, Mrs. Barrales, Ms. Murphy, and Ms. Gilmartin.
TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
STATE OF THE STATE as presented to VATE October 17, 2015 Tracy Fair Robertson English Coordinator Virginia Department of Education
Adult High School PLAR Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Communication Webinar:
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
2012 Accountability Determinations
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
Mount Holly Township School District September 2016
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Proposed Revision to Standards of Accreditation Regarding Locally Awarded Verified Credits, According to Criteria and Procedures Dr. Cynthia A. Cave Assistant.
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Update on School Accreditation Ratings under the Revised Standards of Accreditation October 2018.
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Presentation transcript:

Examples of New Partially Accredited School Ratings Division of Student Assessment & School Improvement Virginia Department of Education

New Partially Accredited Ratings Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark- Graduation and Completion Index Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark- Pass Rate Partially Accredited: Improving School- Graduation and Completion Index Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate Partially Accredited: Warned School- Graduation and Completion Index Partially Accredited: Warned School-Pass Rate 2

Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-GCI “To achieve a rating of Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Graduation and Completion Index, the eligible students in the school must have met the pass rates required for full accreditation in all four content areas (English, mathematics, science and history/social science) and the school must achieve 84 percentage points on the Board of Education's graduation and completion index.” Guidance Related to the Partially Accredited Rating Included in the Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 3

Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-GCI 4 All content areas meet or exceed the accreditation benchmarks. While the Graduation and Completion Index does not meet the minimum benchmark (85 points), GCI is “approaching” because it is within the narrow margin (1 point) as defined by the Board of Education. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the GCI designation. This school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-GCI. Content Area/GCIDesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeets75% MathematicsMeets74%70% HistoryMeets79%71% ScienceMeets77%70 GCIApproaching84 points87 points

Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate “A school will be rated as Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate if the school does not meet the requirements for full accreditation but the school’s pass rate in each of the four content areas (English, mathematics, science, and history/social science) either: (1) meets the benchmark required for full accreditation or (2) meets the narrow margin criteria.” Guidance Related to the Partially Accredited Rating Included in the Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 5

Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate 6 English and science meet the accreditation benchmarks. Mathematics and history are approaching because the pass rates are within the narrow margin (2 points). The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the lowest content area designation. The GCI is not considered in the school’s rating because the accreditation benchmarks were not made in all content areas. This school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate. Content Area/GCI DesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeets75%71% MathematicsApproaching69%74% HistoryApproaching68%54% ScienceMeets77% GCIImproving68 points67 points

Partially Accredited: Improving School-GCI “A school will be rated as Improving School-Graduation and Completion Index, if it fails to meet the requirements for the Approaching Benchmark-Graduation and Completion Index rating but 1) the eligible students in the school have met the pass rates required for full accreditation in all four content areas (English, mathematics, science and history/social science) and 2) the school’s Graduation and Completion Index has improved by at least one point from the previous year.” Guidance Related to the Partially Accredited Rating Included in the Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 7

Partially Accredited: Improving School-GCI 8 All content areas meet the accreditation benchmarks. GCI is improving because the graduation completion index increased by one point from the previous year. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the GCI designation. The school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Improving School-Graduation and Completion Index. Content Area/GCI DesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeeting75% MathematicsMeeting74%70% HistoryMeeting79%71% ScienceMeeting77%70% GCIImproving76 points75 points

Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate “A school will be rated as Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate if the school does not meet the requirements for full accreditation or for Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate but the school’s pass rate in each of the four content areas (English, mathematics, science, and history/social science) either: 1) meets the benchmark required for full accreditation, or 2) meets the narrow margin criteria, or 3) has shown sufficient improvement as compared to the pass rate for the previous year.” Guidance Related to the Partially Accredited Rating Included in the Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 9

Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate 10 Math, Science & HistoryEnglish Previous Pass Rate Required Improvement Previous Pass Rate Required Improvement 65%2 points70%2 points 60-64%3 points65-69%4 points 50-59%9 points60-64%7 points 40-49%10 points45-59%11 points Below 40%15 pointsBelow 45%15 points Note: A school with a previous pass rate of 66-67% in Mathematics, Science or History or a previous pass rate of 71-72% in English must meet the criteria for Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark or is rated as Partially Accredited: Warned.

Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate 11 Mathematics, history and science are all meeting the accreditation benchmarks; however, in English this school is improving because the pass rate meets the requirements for sufficient pass rate improvement (in this case, 2 points) as indicated in Table C of the guidance document. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the lowest content area designation. The school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate. Content AreaDesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishImproving72%70% MathematicsMeeting73%75% HistoryMeeting79%78% ScienceMeeting82%

Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate 12 English and science meet the accreditation benchmarks. Mathematics is approaching because the pass rate is within the narrow margin (2 points) as defined by the Board. History is improving because the pass rate meets the requirements for sufficient pass rate improvement (in this case, a minimum of 9 points) as indicated in Table C of the guidance document. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the lowest content area designation. The school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate. Content AreaDesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeeting75%71% MathematicsApproaching69%74% HistoryImproving66%54% ScienceMeeting77%

Partially Accredited: Warned School-GCI “A school will be designated as Partially Accredited: Warned School-Graduation and Completion Index if it has failed to achieve Fully Accredited, Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Graduation and Completion Index, or Partially Accredited: Improving School- Graduation and Completion Index status.” Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 13

Partially Accredited: Warned School-GCI 14 All content areas meet the accreditation benchmarks. GCI is warned because the graduation and completion index did not meet the minimum of 85 or improve at least one point from the previous year. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the GCI designation. The school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Warned School-Graduation and Completion Index. Content Area/GCI DesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeeting75% MathematicsMeeting71%70% HistoryMeeting71% ScienceMeeting70% GCIWarned72 points

Partially Accredited: Warned School-Pass Rate “A school will be designated as Partially Accredited: Warned School-Pass Rate if it has failed to achieve Fully Accredited, Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark-Pass Rate, or Partially Accredited: Improving School-Pass Rate status.” Revisions to the Regulations Establishing the Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia (8VAC under the Fast Track Provisions of the Administrative Process Act) 15

Partially Accredited: Warned School-Pass Rate 16 English meets the accreditation benchmark. History is approaching because the pass rate is within the narrow margin (2 points) as defined by the Board. Mathematics and science are warned because they do not meet the benchmark or criteria for approaching or improving. The Graduation and Completion Index meets the accreditation benchmark. The school’s overall accreditation rating is determined by the lowest content area designation. The school’s overall rating is Partially Accredited: Warned School-Pass Rate. Content Area/GCI DesignationCurrent YearPrevious Year EnglishMeeting75% MathematicsWarned67%70% HistoryApproaching68%71% ScienceWarned67%70% GCIMeeting87 points

Examples of New Partially Accredited School Ratings Division of Student Assessment & School Improvement Virginia Department of Education