Contemporary Issues October 20, 2010. Technology Report Presentations Introducing…… 1. Sarah!!!! 2. Allison!!!! Clap! Clap! Clap! Applause!!!!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships….Every Student, Every Teacher, Every Day!
The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test Michele Hunter Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction Mobile County Public Schools.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
No Child Left Behind Passed by Congress in 2001 A reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
AYP and Report Card.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Presentation transcript:

Contemporary Issues October 20, 2010

Technology Report Presentations Introducing…… 1. Sarah!!!! 2. Allison!!!! Clap! Clap! Clap! Applause!!!!

What would you do??? Teacher Suspended

Google Maps You Tube Clip My google map

No Child Left Behind January 2, 2002

Parental Involvement : The participation of parents in regular, two-way, and meaningful communication involving student academic learning and other school activities.

Students with involved parents : Earn higher grades and test scores Enroll in higher-level programs Are promoted and earn credits Adapt well to school and attend regularly Have better social skills and behavior Graduate and go on to higher education.

What Is No Child Left Behind ? · Funding: Gives school districts more money (supplement, not supplant) · Flexibility: More control to use resources where they are needed most · Accountability: Holds schools and districts accountable for results. Requires states to test reading and math every year in grades 3 – 8 / once in high school · Teacher Quality: Funding to help teachers become better teachers · Scientific Research: To guide classroom practice

EXPLANATION OF TITLES Title I, Part A: Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Education Agencies Title II, Part A: Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting Title II, Part D:Enhancing Education Through Technology Title III, Part A: English Language Acquisition and Language Enhancement Title III Immigrant: Increased enrollment in the ESL Population Title IV, Part A: Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Title V, Part A:Innovative Education Program Strategies

TITLE I (At-Risk) · Allocations are based on the number of low-income students. The proportion of economically disadvantage students in a school determines the amount of funds that may go to a school. · Services are directed to those students who are the lowest achieving or at the highest risk for school failure. · Participation of Non-Public Schools

Targeted Assistance School Direct services to specific students in eligible schools who are identified as failing, or most at-risk of failing, to meet the state’s content and student performance standards.

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (The dedication of $$) Definition: A method of determining the progress of student achievement in each school district and school to measure the yearly incremental progress of schools in reaching 100% proficiency by the 2013 – 2014 school year. Accountability applies for all student sub-groups including: economically disadvantaged, students with disabilities, limited English proficiency, race and ethnic groups Comprehensive Needs Assessment: Enable schools to identify their strengths and weaknesses so they can specify priority problems and plan activities to help improve student achievement and meet state academic standards.

TITLE IIA Purpose: To increase student academic achievement through strategies such as improving teacher and principal quality, and increasing the number of highly qualified teachers in the classroom. ·Highly Qualified Teachers (100%) ·Mentoring (Peer Coaching) · Integration of technology into curriculum ·Allocate funds for professional development (focus on AYP) All professional development: must be grounded in scientifically based research · Scientifically Based Research Programs: The term scientifically based involves the application of rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid knowledge relevant to education activities and programs.

TITLE II D ·Funds for educational technology are required to be used to provide ongoing, sustained, intensive high-quality professional development · District must provide professional development in the integration of advanced technologies, including emerging technologies into curricula and instruction and in using those technologies to create new learning environments * Lap Top Initiative PD

TITLE III ·Funds must be used to provide high-quality language instruction programs · Provide high-quality professional development to classroom teachers and other educational personnel that is designed to improve instruction and assessment of limited English proficient students *County Consortium – Training, Summer School, After-School Tutoring

TITLE III Immigrant $$$ ·Funds must be used to provide high-quality language instruction programs · To schools with significant immigrant population growth (2%)… minimum of 20

TITLE IV · To support programs that prevent violence in and around schools · Foster a safe and drug-free learning environment that supports student academic achievement · Prevent the illegal use of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs

NJASK / HSPA

Data Recording Procedures Changed Students enrolled less than one year count in the aggregate data collection (after July 1 st ) “VOIDS” now count in the data collection

AYP Adequate Yearly Progress The AYP benchmarks for grades 3, 4, and 5 have been re-adjusted again. (Two years in a row). The raw cut score changed back to 200. Can not compare tests from year to year in grades 3 – 5 since 2007 Grades 3 – 5 scores re-issued (August) AYP is identified by the following: – Participation, Total Population, Economically Disadvantaged, Ethnic Sub- Groups, LEP, Students with Disabilities Sub-groups with 40 or more students count. 40 Possible Indicators to achieve AYP

The State of New Jersey AYP High School175High School152 Middle School369Middle School536 Elementary368Elementary632

SES Services Last year for the first time ever we spent all but $2,000 of our required federal dollars on SES instruction ($45,000). 42 students benefitted from SES instruction by a state recommended SES provider. If we didn’t spend the funds, the funds would have had to be returned to NJDOE. Parents are given a list of state recommended SES providers and they choose. Each student at the Middle School receiving free lunch is offered SES instruction. 1:5 students in West Deptford receives free or reduced lunch (DISTRICT AVERAGE = 20.9% / Middle School 23.5%) First time ever – Economically disadvantaged was identified as a sub-group at the Middle School level to not make AYP.

NJASK Grades 3 - 8

New Jersey State Benchmarks for Adequate Yearly Progress Language Arts Literacy Elementary (Grades 3-5) Middle School (Grades 6-8) High School (Grade 11) Mathematics Elementary (Grades 3-5) Middle School (Grades 6-8) High School (Grade 11)

Safe Harbor Linked Cut Score Grade Language Arts LiteracyMathematics 3 182/ / /200 NJASK Language Arts Total Proficiency 2009 Total Proficiency 2010 General Education Population Reg. Ed. 3 rd LAL Reg. Ed. 4 th LAL NJASK Math General Education Population Reg. Ed. 3 rd Math Reg. Ed. 4 th Math

AYP Status Chart What does it mean? YearStatus Interventions for Title I Year 1 Early Warning – Did not make AYP for one year None Year 2 First year of school in need of improvement status. Did not make AYP for two consecutive years in the same content area. Parent notification, public school choice (or supplemental educational services), school improvement plan, technical assistance from district. Year 3 Second year of school in need of improvement status. Did not make AYP for three consecutive years in the same content area. Parent notification, public school choice, supplemental educational services, school improvement plan, technical assistance from district. Year 4 Third year of school in need of improvement status – corrective action. Did not make AYP for four consecutive years in the same content area. Parent notification, public school choice, supplemental educational services, school improvement plan, technical assistance from district and state, corrective action, participation in CAPA.

Important State Up-dates Biology EOC Exam will count toward graduation HSPA contract soon to expire Algebra I next EOC to count toward graduation – Last year and 2011 will be pilot test Algebra I – Below Basic & NJASK 8 / HSPA (PP) – Education Proficiency Plan – Alg. I – Below Basic (repeat content course)

Homework for next week: Read: Chapter Four and Chapter Five (in Ryan) Article: Find an article in favor of NCLB/ESEA (accountability) and one against NCLB/ESEA (accountability). Compare and contrast the two articles. Give your own opinion, too. October 27 th