The Market Supply & Demand & all that
The Big Picture DemandSupply The Market Q Q Q P P P Equilibrium Price & Quantity
Demand Analysis based on individuals' behavior, then summing of individuals into aggregate demand at various prices Explanations Verbal: quantity demanded changes inversely w/price Simple graph: downward sloping curve of P vs Q Graphic derivation: from preferences Mathematical specification: D = f(P) Axiomatic derivation
Indifference Curves - I Quantity of Good 1 Demanded (Q 1 ) Quant. of Good 2 Dem. (Q 2 ) I 1 < I 2 < I 3 O P1P1 qq'q" higher levels of preference higher levels of utility NB: under usual assumptions: 1. Q 1 and Q 2 are infinitely divisible, so: infinite # of smooth curves 2. curves are open, I.e., you always prefer MORE of everything Two space defines various combinations of Q 1 & Q 2 that you might choose. Some (Q 1, Q 1 ) you prefer to others, some you prefer less, some alternatives leave you indifferent. An “indifference curve” is defined by set of combinations among which you are indifferent.
Indifference Curves - II Quantity of Good 1 Demanded (Q 1 ) Quant. of Good 2 Dem. (Q 2 ) I 1 < I 2 < I 3 O P1P1 qq'q" NB: if you drop the assumption that you always prefer MORE of everything, then at some point curves close, and MORE would mean a lower level of utility
Budget Line - I Q1Q1 Q2Q2 NB: if you spend less than M, you will be at some point under the budget line in the space defined by 0,q 1,q 2. O Available budget (money) = M with prices of Q 1 = P 1, Q 2 = P 2 so, total expenditure = M = P 1 Q 1 +P 2 Q 2 which defines the “budget line.” If you rewrite M = P 1 Q 1 +P 2 Q 2 as Q 2 = (1/ P 2 )M - (P 1 / P 2 ) Q 1 you can see that the slope of the line = P 1 / P 2 (and is negative) q1q1 q2q2 If all M spent on Q 2 then you would be at q 2. If all M spent on Q 1 then you would be at q 1.
Budget Lines - II If income (M) increases, budget line shifts right Q1Q1 O P1P1 M' =P 1 Q 1 +P 2 Q 2 M=P 1 Q 1 +P 2 Q 2 If M' > M, then line shifts right. Q2Q2
Budget Lines - III If P 1 increases, budget line intercept shifts left Q1Q1 Q2Q2 O If P1 increases, max Q 1 falls (Change in P1 would have no effect on vertical intercept if all M spent on Q 2 ) If P1<P1’, then intercept shifts left.If P 2 /P 1 changes, slope changes
Utility Maximization I3I3 O M=P 1 Q 1 +P 2 Q 2 q Q2Q2 Q1Q1 To Maximize utility you will want to be on highest possible I. Highest possible I will be that which is tangent to budget line.
Graphic Derivation of Demand Curve Demand Curve shows what happens to quantity demanded as price changes. So we raise P 1 and see what happens to Q 1 Quantity of Good 1 Demanded (Q 1 ) I 1 < I 2 < I 3 O As price rises, P 1 < P 1 '< P 1 ”, quantity demanded falls, q to q’ to q” and the combinations of P 1 and q define a demand curve for Q1. P1"P1" P1'P1' qq'q" P1"P1" P1'P1' P1P1 qq" q' P1P1
Mathematical Specification of Demand Curves D = f(P) dD/dP < 0 D/ P < 0 Linear Demand Functions D = a - bP D = P
Axiomatic Derivation Subset of Assumptions A > B, A B, A < B, A = B axiom of transitivity axiom of asymmetry comparability egotism, no one else's consumption matters to you continuity (continuous curves, eg., indifference curves insatiability (no maximium, always want more)
Utility Indifference Curves defined by: preference - further from origin prefered utility - further from origin, higher utility Utility = satisfaction derived from consumption Utility derived from "utilitarians" - Eng. Philos. all action taken with view to utility to be derived measured by "utils" cardinality law of diminishing marginal utility (maybe!) Utility functions: U = f(x 1, x 2,.... x n )
Problem w/utility Cardinality you can compare utility for different people interpersonal comparisons Law of Diminishing Mar. Utility how much utility depended upon how much you have Cardinality + Law of Diminishing Utility total social utility would increase through redistribution of money from rich to poor a political problem! Solution: shift to ordinality( ±) utility theory replaced by preference theory
Supply Analysis based on each firm's behavior, then summing of firms into aggregate supply at various prices Explanations Verbal: quantity supplied changes directly w/price Simple graph: upward sloping curve of P vs Q Graphic derivation: from costs + profit maximization Mathematical specification: S = f(P) Axiomatic derivation
Costs average cost Marginal cost (MC) price given = marginal revenue (MR) quantity produced Price, costs Profit Maximization occurs where MC = MR
Derivation of Supply Curve Marginal cost (MC) = S quantity produced Price, costs Profit Maximization occurs where MC = MR P2 P3 P1 q1q2q3
Mathematical Specification S = f(P) dS/dP > 0 S/ P > 0 Linear Supply Functions S = a + bP S = P
Axiomatic Derivation Subset of axioms Existence of Production There exists some attainable element x that can be transformed into y Neutrality of Transformations any two transformations T are indifferent their inputs are indifferent and their outputs are indifferent Convexity Production set Y j is convex
Change in Technology Improvements in Technology that lower costs of production, shift MC curve down, and Supply curve to Right MC/SMC'/S' marginal cost shifts down Supply shifts to the right
Equilibrium Shapes of S & D guarantee "equilibrium", i.e., tendency to return to price that equalizes them Demand Supply equilibrium price equilibrium quantity excess supply Q P
--END--