Analysis of MDS Data Deborah J. Ossip-Klein, Ph.D. University of Rochester Medical Center 2005 NAQC Annual Membership Meeting Chicago.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Terry R. Reid, MSW Quitline Funding & Budget Considerations.
Advertisements

Strategy Maps for Structuring Program Operating Plans: Tobacco Examples Public Health Foundation Paul Epstein, Results That Matter Team Kentucky Public.
Achieving minimum standards for Australian Quitline Services Suzanne Stillman: Quit Victoria (The Cancer Council Victoria) Caroline Miller: The Cancer.
Using New Communication Technologies to Enhance Services at Smoking Quitlines Lorien Abroms, ScD. Dept. of Prevention & Community Health GW School of Public.
Intervention and Promotion Makes a Difference Tobacco cessation intervention by healthcare providers improves quit rates. Brief counseling is all that.
Funding Proposals Submitted 2010 Andrew Stripp. Contents EAHC – Midwives Project SOcial Networks to Improve Cessation Services (SONICS) Skype What next?
The Standards of Practice for a Tobacco Treatment Specialist (TTS) Gaylene Mooney, M.Ed., RRT-NPS, CTTS Program Director, Respiratory Therapy San Joaquin.
Improving Quality, Addressing Disparities, and Achieving Equity Language Barriers and Health Care Joseph R. Betancourt, M.D., M.P.H. Director, The Disparities.
Public-Private Partnerships: Sustaining and Expanding Access to Quitlines Deb Osborne, MPH NAQC Public-Private Partnership Manager May 29, 2014.
The Role of Quitlines in Comprehensive Tobacco Cessation: Where are We Now; Where are We Going; and How do We Get There? Tamatha Thomas-Haase, MPA Manager,
Nancy Rigotti, MD Integrating Quitlines with Health Care Systems: A Case Study at Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA USA 10/10/2011.
Consumer Demand Roundtable Session Two February 1-2, 2006 Academy for Educational Development Washington DC Consumer Demand Roundtable Session Two February.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Basics: 2As & R Clinical Intervention Artwork by Nancy Z. © 2010 American Aca0emy of Pediatrics (AAP) Children's Art Contest. Support for the 2010 AAP.
SAH Year 2: CHANGE Reassessment Shannon Griffin-Blake, Ph.D. Team Lead, Program Services and Evaluation CDC’s Healthy Communities Program National Center.
The Cost-Efficient Quitline: Considerations for Funders Christopher Anderson.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Session 7—Presentation and Panel Discussion International Quitline Institute 2011 Conference October 11, 2011 Seattle, Washington National Center for Chronic.
Source: Massachusetts BRFSS Prepared by: Health Survey Program Using the BRFSS to Track Healthy People 2010 Objectives Highlights from the 2004 Massachusetts.
Qualitative Evaluation of Keep Well Lanarkshire Alan Sinclair Keep Well Evaluation Officer NHS Lanarkshire.
Highlights from the 2009 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: ERDU, Mignonne Guy, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 22, 2010.
University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute Kit R. Van Stelle, Principal Investigator Treatment Alternatives and Diversion (TAD)
Demonstration of a Process- Outcome Link for Smoking Cessation Melissa M. Farmer, PhD 1,2 Elizabeth M. Yano, PhD 1,2 Brian S. Mittman, PhD 1,2 Scott E.
RE-AIM Plus To Evaluate Effective Dissemination of AHRQ CER Products Michele Heisler, MD, MPA September, 2011.
Office of Global Health and HIV (OGHH) Office of Overseas Programming & Training Support (OPATS) Maternal and Newborn Health Training Package Session 12:
© January 23, 2013 Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund All rights reserved.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
The NIDCR funded Collaborating Research Centers to Reduce Oral Health Disparities (CRCROHD) represent an innovative approach to understanding determinants.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
A Fresh Start for WIC: Tailoring Smoking Cessation for WIC Participants and Their Families Laura A.Van Dyke, CSW Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers.
Coverage of Cessation Services for Medicare Beneficiaries: An “Almost” Success Story Linda A. Bailey Executive Director, NAQC Smoking Cessation Leadership.
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
Outreach to Physicians to Increase Early Identification and Referrals to Early Intervention Linda Tuchman-Ginsberg, PhD Director of the Early Childhood.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Clubhouse of Suffolk: A Model Intervention for Tobacco Dependence in Individuals with Serious Mental Illness Tara Fredericks, LMSW.
MINIMAL DATA SET FOR QUITLINES North American Quitline Consortium Annual Meeting May 2005 NORTH AMERICAN QUITLINE CONSORTIUM.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
Agenda Item: Break Out Session 2 - A. The Center For Multi-Stakeholder Demonstrations (CMD) Co-Chairs Carole Flamm, MD, Executive Medical Director, BCBSA.
The Relationship Between Reach and Spending for U.S. Quitlines Mignonne Guy, Ph.D. Jessie E. Saul, Ph.D. Michele Walsh, Ph.D. Pamela Luckett, M.C.C., L.P.C.,
Building and Maintaining a Real Community Referral Resource Database NAQC Annual Meeting.
Range of Quitline Practice in North America and Europe Sharon Cummins, Ph.D., Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., Linda Bailey, JD, MHS, Regina Van der Meer, Ph.D., Sharon.
Booster/Refresher Training: Classroom System Benchmarks of Quality Items # 42 –
On-Time Prevention Program for Long Term Care: Clinical Decision Support On-Time Prevention Program for Long Term Care: Clinical Decision Support William.
TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.
NAQC Special Recognition Award 2005 Presented to Sharon Campbell, PhD For her leadership in developing a minimal data set for evaluating quitlines.
EHealth Progress Across the States in 2007 Results of a Survey of State Officials AcademyHealth National Health Policy Conference State Health Research.
1 Current Evidence-Based Cessation Treatments: Efficacy and Critical Ingredients Saul Shiffman.
Why Quitlines Work Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D Gary Tedeschi, Ph.D. University of California, San Diego NAQC Annual Membership Meeting, Chicago May 2-3, 2005, Chicago.
Role of the National Network of Quitlines in the Cessation Services Delivery System Linda A. Bailey Innovations in Building Consumer Demand for Tobacco.
National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care June 15, 2011 Kana Enomoto Director Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
Linda A. Bailey, JD, MHS How Regional Networks Can Support Quitlines 11/11/2011.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Effect of Diabetes Education During Retinal Ophthalmology Visits on Diabetes Control (Protocol M) 11.
Reducing Health Disparities Through Research & Translation Programs Francis D. Chesley, Jr., M.D. Francis D. Chesley, Jr., M.D. Director, Office of Extramural.
Slide 1 Oregon Smoke Free Mothers and Babies Project Lesa Dixon-Gray, MSW, MPH Office of Family Health (503)
NRT & NRT+ Pilot Preliminary Results Gowri Shetty MS, MPH Gita Bewtra MPH.
Prepared by: Program Inventory / Assessment: Summary of Findings Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium Tools.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
Evaluating the Impact of the National Tobacco Quitline Network Paula A. Keller, MPH Linda A. Bailey, JD, MHS Shu-Hong Zhu, PhD Michael C. Fiore, MD, MPH.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVING RACIAL & ETHNIC MINORITY HEALTH & ELIMINATING RACIAL & ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES Garth N. Graham, MD, MPH, Valerie.
Real World Experience Panel: Engaging the Patient Robert J. West, PhD Professor of Health Psychology Director of Tobacco Studies Cancer Research UK Health.
How Can Evaluation Efforts Illuminate Systems Change in Courts, Tribes, and States? 19 th Annual National Human Services Training Evaluation Symposium.
Approaches to Linking Process and Outcome Data in a Cross-Site Evaluation Laura Elwyn, Ph.D. Kristin Stainbrook, Ph.D. American Evaluation Association.
NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program
Current Evidence-Based Cessation Treatments: Efficacy and Critical Ingredients Saul Shiffman.
Results from the 2013 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of MDS Data Deborah J. Ossip-Klein, Ph.D. University of Rochester Medical Center 2005 NAQC Annual Membership Meeting Chicago

Overview Benefits of MDS for Analyses Where to Start: Initial Common Questions to Address

Benefits of MDS for Analyses Consistent measures Comparability of measures across quitlines and over time Take advantage of natural experiments Can randomize quitlines to different treatment conditions (e.g., promotion, intervention)

MDS allows for at least 3 general types of analyses: Internal Tracking Within Quitlines Services delivered, caller characteristics, outcomes, other Benchmarking Across Quitlines Reach, outcomes, other Research Can answer research questions that are better addressed with multiple quitlines vs. a single site Reach and outcomes for populations whose numbers are too small at individual quitline sites for analysis (e.g., ethnic minority populations) How different environments and service delivery models relate to outcomes Others

Where to Start: Initial Common Questions to Address NAQC Research and Evaluation Workgroup identified a 2-part strategy for research: Begin with “Low Hanging Fruit” studies as a means of generating research data relatively quickly (building early success) and engaging/refining the research network based on lessons learned in working together Expand to Longer-Term research projects (projects that would take longer and more intense efforts to implement)

Low Hanging Fruit Pull from subsets of baseline MDS items that quitlines would feel comfortable sharing Descriptive Studies of North American Quitlines with Special Focus on Diversity and Reach Who calls (and who doesn’t call) quitlines in North America (e.g., ethnicity, age, gender, pregnancy)? What services do callers receive? Does this differ by population characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, gender, age, pregnancy)? NRT availability and use: What % request/ quitlines offer NRT? What is the range of services offered? Do callers who receive NRT differ from callers who do not (i.e, does NRT availability attract different types of callers – by ethnicity, gender, age, etc.)? What is the reach of quitlines? Does this differ by population characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, gender, age, pregnancy)? Concurrent Process Studies - with subsets of quitlines engaged in this research to identify barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned in using and sharing MDS data

Longer-Term Studies (partial listing – most frequently listed research topics) In general – how can quitlines improve quit rates? What is the relationship between baseline variables (e.g., population characteristics, referral source/media, quitline characteristics) and outcomes? Who does well with what kinds of interventions? How does this vary by gender, racial, ethnic, smoking characteristics? Does caller success vary by characteristics of counselors? What marketing/communication strategies can improve the reach and quit rates for quitlines? What are effective models for delivering NRT/medications through quitlines?

What is the impact of the context in which quitlines operate on process and outcomes? What is the impact of linking quitline services with other smoking cessation services and health systems (e.g., doctor offices) on utilization and outcomes? What effect does state/provincial legislation have on quitline utilization and outcomes, e.g. does a tax increase drive callers to quitlines? Do these callers have different quit rates? Operational Issues What is the optimal “packaging” of sessions (e.g., what is the optimal number of counseling sessions)? What are effective means of decreasing dropout from intervention and improving follow-up completion rates? How do variations in quitline services relate to outcomes?

The goal is for the MDS data to be useful Internally, to help each quitline track and maintain high quality services To provide helpful benchmarking across quitlines To answer research questions of value to quitlines and quitline funders

What is the Next Step? Your input is important What do you need to make this happen? What is missing? What looks right?