Handbook of Families and Poverty Chapter 27—Increasing Marriage Would Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty Presented by Maria Daniela Garcia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 31 The Economics of Children.
Advertisements

12. US Government Programs to Reduce Social and Economic Inequality Learning Intentions (After this lesson pupils should be able to): Describe two of the.
PAI786: Urban Policy Class 16: Welfare Programs and Principles of Welfare Policy.
1. 2 The Administration for Children and Families African American Healthy Marriage Initiative African American Healthy Marriage Initiative Mission Statement:
Sociology 1201 Week Four: Social class and public policy I. Low Income Budget II. Video: Let’s Get Married Groups So why has marriage become so uncommon?
Earned income tax credit (EITC) Lecture 20. Reading Assignment and Sources Reading Assignment: –Greenstein, “ The Earned Income Tax Credit: Boosting Employment,
1 VITA at Colgate: The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) VITA Presentation Nicole Simpson January 2013.
Earned income tax credit (EITC). Reading Assignment Greenstein, “ The Earned Income Tax Credit: Boosting Employment, Aiding the Working Poor, ”
NEW DIRECTIONS IN CHILD SUPPORT: HOW CHILD SUPPORT AND ASSET BUILDING ARE CONNECTED Jennifer Burnszynski acf.hhs.gov.
Diana Tania Fiorillo1 THE US EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT, ITS EFFECTS, AND POSSIBLE REFORMS Bruce D. Meyer.
Chapter 12 Poverty, Welfare, and Women Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives  reform EITC Poverty in the U.S. Welfare  programs  incentives.
Poverty: Facts, Causes and Consequences Hilary Hoynes University of California, Davis California Symposium on Poverty October 2009.
Chapter 12 Poverty and Welfare Two ways to measure poverty: –Absolute terms: in poverty if income  threshold –Relative terms: in poverty if income is.
Poverty, Welfare, and Women Chapter 12. Measuring Poverty Absolute Measure of Poverty –People living below a certain threshold Relative Income Poverty.
Cohabitation Family Sociology
Colorado’s powerhouse for the poor COLORADO CENTER on LAW & POLICY Advancing the health, economic security and wellbeing of low-income Coloradans.
Sociology 1201 Week Four: Social class and public policy Why has marriage become so uncommon and why does the government think it should get involved?
Chapter 12: Low-Income Assistance Chapter 12 Low-Income Assistance Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CHAPTER 2 PARENTING: A CHOICE PAGE 24. OBJECTIVES THE STUDENT WILL: THE STUDENT WILL: –Recognize parenting as a lifetime commitment –State reasons often.
A Few Facts 1.Federal spending in FY 2000 and 2001 as a percent of GDP is the lowest since Federal government spending (not including social security,
US Government Programs to Reduce Social and Economic Inequality Describe two of the main US Government programs that aim to reduce social and economic.
Work Study Employment Kim Matison and Leanne Foster Financial Aid/Human Resources March 10, 2009.
Introduction to Family Studies Families, the State & Social Policy.
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
Chapter 13SectionMain Menu Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment? How are unemployment rates determined? What is full employment?
Types of Unemployment Frictional Unemployment
FATHERHOOD AS AN ASSET Building Strong Families and Communities Robert D. Johnson.
Welfare and Welfare Reform. AFDC (Aid for Families with Dependant Children) Cash Welfare 87% of funds generally went to those who would be poor Targeted.
Welfare and Welfare Reform. AFDC (Aid for Families with Dependant Children) Cash Welfare 87% of funds generally went to those who would be poor Targeted.
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. Overview of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program Reduction.
Timebanking and Poverty: Creating Abundance in a Challenged Economy.
Journal “The happiest moments of my life have been the few which I have passed at home in the bosom of my family.” Thomas Jefferson What have been the.
Improving Work Supports Nancy K. Cauthen Deputy Director, National Center for Children in Poverty Agenda for Shared Prosperity: Alleviating Poverty Economic.
Types of Unemployment Frictional Unemployment
Chapter 13SectionMain Menu Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment? How are unemployment rates determined? What is full employment?
Family Sociology Families, the State & Social Policy Professor Connie Gager.
American Free Enterprise
Economic Stability and Opportunities. Women In Government Women In Government Foundation, Inc. is a national, non-profit, non-partisan organization of.
Poverty Programs. NEW DEAL REFORMS Created during the Depression President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Changing Demographic Trends & Families in the U.S. Lecture 2 Family Sociology.
Poverty Janava M. Benton. overview The official poverty data overstates the poverty problem More accurate measures show that we are closer to eliminating.
10/27/20151 Introduction to Family Studies Welfare Reform.
Chapter 18Copyright ©2009 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved 1 ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. 18 CHAPTER.
Promoting Work Supports: Background, Issues, Opportunities June 17, 2005 Mark Greenberg Director of Policy Center for Law and Social Policy th.
Providing a Safety Net. Why Households Differ One of the main reasons why household income differs is because the number of household members who work.
Chapter 27 Income Inequality and Poverty. Facts Income Inequality Income Inequality million (14.3%) in poverty million (14.3%) in.
Family Sociology Families, the State & Social Policy Professor Connie Gager.
Monday, August 24, Copy your learning target. 2.Bell Ringer- What have been the happiest memories with your family?
P OVERTY. H ISTORY Poverty in the U.S. was at its worst during the Great Depression Population suffered widespread hardship Millions of Americans were.
Family Forms…. Millions of Kids Children living in blended families, including either a step-parent or step-sibling. Children living with both natural.
Chapter 13: Economic Challenges Section 3. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2Chapter 13, Section 3 Objectives 1.Define who is poor, according.
ASSESSING WELFARE REFORM IN THE U.S.: FROM CASH ASSISTANCE TO LOW-WAGE EMPLOYMENT Sheldon Danziger, Henry J. Meyer Distinguished University Professor of.
Family Sociology Cohabitation.
EXPLORING MARRIAGES AND FAMILY, 2 ND EDITION Karen Seccombe © 2015, 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Looking Ahead: Helping.
Families & Poverty Introduction to Family Studies.
3/8/20161 Family Sociology Welfare Reform. 3/8/20162 Families & Poverty  The percentage living below poverty has changed little over the past 20 years.
Economic Challenges Chapter 13 Section 3 Poverty.
Chapter 13SectionMain Menu Types of Unemployment Unemployment: Occurs when people are without work and are actively seeking work. Frictional Unemployment.
Human Services and Social Polilcy HN 300 Unit 5 Seminar-Helping the Needy Madelyn Harvey, PhD.
 Public assistance and welfare services, including:  Temporary assistance for needy families  Medical assistance  Maternal and child health services.
Welfare Assistance GOVT Module 16.
Family Forms….
Social Welfare Policymaking
32 Income Inequality and Poverty.
Welfare Assistance December 7, 2017.
How Current Policy Issues Can Benefit from the Family Impact Lens
Chapter 13: Economic Challenges Section 3
Deciding About Children
Poverty and the Governments Role
Presentation transcript:

Handbook of Families and Poverty Chapter 27—Increasing Marriage Would Dramatically Reduce Child Poverty Presented by Maria Daniela Garcia

Facts In 2001, 1.35 million children were born outside marriage in the United States. This represents 33.5% of all children born in the United States in that year. Children raised by never-married mothers are seven times more likely to be poor when compared with children raised in intact married families. The erosion of marriage and the increase in single-parent families are major causes of child poverty and welfare dependence in the United States. Nearly 3/4 of government means-tested welfare aid to children goes to single-parent families (Fagan, Rector, Johnson, & Peterson, 2002). More than 80% of long-term child poverty occurs in broken or never-married families.

Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study President George W. Bush proposed a new trial program in 2001 aimed at increasing child wellbeing and reducing child poverty by promoting healthy marriage which was rejected by critics as illogical. The Fragile Families survey is a nationwide effort to collect data on both married and nonmarried parents at the time of a child’s birth.

ANALYSIS The data used in this analysis are taken from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, developed jointly by Princeton University’s Center for Research on Child Wellbeing and Columbia University’s Social Indicators Survey Center.

The Fragile Family Survey The Fragile Family survey shows that in 73% of out-of-wedlock births, the mother and father are romantically involved and have a relatively stable relationship. Nearly half of nonmarried expectant mothers are cohabiting with the father at about the time of their child’s birth. 95% of nonmarried mothers express positive attitudes about marrying their new baby’s father in the future. Yet only 9% of couples will actually marry within a year after their child’s birth. Within a few years, the relationships of most of the nonmarried parents will deteriorate and the mother and father will split up.

CHARACTERISTICS OF NONMARRIED PARENTS Non-married mothers The median age for mothers who give birth outside marriage is 22. Nearly 50% of these mothers are cohabiting with the expectant father at around the time of the child’s birth. Around 12% of the mothers report arguing with their boyfriends about a drug or alcohol problem in the last month2.5% report that drugs or alcohol impede the boyfriend’s ability to hold a job. Non-married fathers Around 67% of the fathers have at least a high-school degree. 97% were employed during the prior year of the birth. 82% were employed at the time of the child’s birth. The median wage rate of fathers is $8.55 per hour, compared with $7.00 per hour for the mothers.

MARRIAGE SIMULATION The purpose of this study is to calculate the reduction in poverty that would occur if nonmarried women married the fathers of their new children around the time of the child’s birth. First they estimated what the poverty rate of the mothers would be if they remained single. We then calculate what the poverty rate would be if the mother and father marry. The difference between the poverty rate of the mothers when single and the rate for mothers when married demonstrates the potential for marriage to reduce child poverty and maternal poverty.

EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS The Fragile Families survey contains data on the annual earnings of new fathers during the year in which the child was born. We employ these annual earnings figures in our analysis. we have calculated the effect of marriage on poverty according to three separate scenarios relating to the mothers’ employment after the child’s birth.

WELFARE BENEFITS The simulation assumes that single mothers will be eligible for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and food stamps. Simulations for married couples assume that they are eligible only for food stamps and the EITC. It is assumed that no married couples will receive TANF benefits.

ScenariosBefore StimulationAfter StimulationNet Increase in Family Income Due to Marriage #1—The mother has zero annual employment after the birth. 8,84420,26611,422 #2—The mother is employed part-time for a total of 1,000 hours per year after the birth. 13,57823,77710,199 #3—The mother is employed fulltime throughout the year after the birth for a total of 2,000 hours. 17,49129,09011,599

Findings This analysis finds that marriage would dramatically reduce poverty among the nonmarried mothers who are romantically involved with the fathers at the time of the child’s birth. Specifically, if these mothers do not marry but remain single, about 55% will be poor. By contrast, if all the mothers married the child’s father, the poverty rate would fall to less than 17%. Thus, on average, marriage would reduce the odds that a mother and a child will live in poverty by more than 70%. Even though marriage of mothers and fathers would not eliminate child poverty in every case, in most cases, marriage would lift families out of poverty.

Benefits of the Program As a new strategy for reducing child poverty and improving child well- being, President Bush has proposed a new pilot program to promote healthy marriage. A principal target population of the president’s proposed program would be romantically involved nonmarried couples at or around the “magicmoment” of a child’s birth. This target group is the precise population analyzed in this study. Participation in the president’s marriage program would be voluntary. The program would seek to increase healthy marriage by providing target couples with the following: 1.Accurate information on the value of marriage in the lives of men, women, and children. 2.Marriage-skills education that will enable couples to reduce conflict and increase the happiness and longevity of their relationship. 3.Experimental reductions in the current financial penalties against marriage that are contained in all federal welfare programs.

CRITICISM OF MARRIAGE PROGRAMS TO ALLEVIATE POVERTY In a widely publicized paper titled “Let Them Eat Wedding Rings: The Role of Marriage promotion in Welfare Reform,” an organization called Alternatives to Marriage asserted, “Marriage is not an effective solution to poverty” (Solot & Miller, 2002, p. 1) Some critics argue that societal structures preclude single women from rising up the economic ladder. By way of this argument, poverty would be the lack of economic resources, not single parenthood per se. However, the actual study cited in the paper shows the opposite: Marriage would eliminate poverty for most poor single mothers surveyed.

The next step to this research is to evaluate the efficacy of programs that would likely be included in the president’s Healthy Marriage Initiative. Ideally, two types of programs should be evaluated: 1.The first is pre-marital counseling programs aimed at low-income couples. 2.The second program should be marital skills and education programs generally. Having a federal social program such as the president’s Healthy Marriage Initiative without a strong evaluation component is not worth having at all. FUTURE RESEARCH

Current Statistics