New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination Dr Stephen Marshall University Teaching Development Centre Victoria University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Advertisements

Supporting Team-Based Learning Dr. Kathryn R. Ross, Indiana University Kokomo Team-Based Learning Conference 2007, Vancouver, Canada Copyright 2007 Kathryn.
Blended Learning Curriculum Design – Transforming Culture Peter Bullen, Director of the Blended Learning Unit Mark Russell, Deputy Director of the Blended.
Directorate of Human Resources Successful online courses have…..
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Discussion Boards. FINDINGS This tool provides students opportunities to: Connected Expression Critical thinking Reflection Points of view New Ideas.
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
Welcome to the Learning & Teaching Office New Faculty Orientation Wednesday & Thursday August 8 & 9, 2007.
Overview of Mission Statement & Organization. Development Communication Division External Affairs Vice Presidency DevComm Vision To put communication.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
Assessment matters: What guides might we use as individuals, teams and institutions to help our assessment endeavours? A presentation to Wolverhampton.
Designing an Effective Organisational Infrastructure Jim Petch – Co Director eLRC Institute of Education Learning Technologies Unit 18 th January 2006.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
Mentor Briefing Workshop
Getting Started Designing Your Online Class Jim Wright Bagwell College of Education.
SECTION ONE: PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES Let us start our discussion here by posing two related questions as follows. First, does the literature tell us that a.
Consent to use the Outcomes Group exercises
Enhancing Student Success: Teaching Well With Technology October 23, 2009.
MAGIC NUMBER SEVEN Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education TASS, March 2013.
Best Practices and Resources for Online Teaching Jym Brittain, Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning - NSU.
Learning & Teaching in FCA: Pathways and Loops!
Developing IT Capabilities
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Virginia Union University STEM Education for Pre Service Educators Abstrac t Lessons LearnedConclusion.
TENN TLC addresses retention through student engagement UT SIFE students 13 May 2010.
The Integration and Effectiveness of Information and Communication Technologies in Canadian Postsecondary Education Dr. Carl Cuneo, Director, EvNet, Network.
Directorate of Human Resources Successful online courses have…..
ELearning 2008 Day 1 Julie Collareda. TAFE NSW – Sydney Institute.
New Zealand Advanced Network –update and outlook Charles Jarvie Advanced Network Implementation Manager Ministry of Research, Science andTechnology.
E-Learning Maturity Model Mike Barker. Reference Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2004). Applying SPICE to e-learning: An e-learning maturity model? Sixth.
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
Building Best Practices In Online Courses Summer Institute 2003.
Student Engagement and Learning Tips from Award Winning Faculty Teaching and Learning Technology Conference MO S&T - March 13, 2014 Margaret Cohen, Ph.D.,
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
(and) Barely Keeping Up Joshua Johnson – Spring 2014.
Do you have your PaSsPorT? Rethinking teaching spaces for student-centred learning Wendy A. Crocker, PhD & Stephanie Oliver, PhD Teaching Support Centre.
1 Using Feedback as a Teaching Tool in the Online Classroom.
1 Techniques for Online Retention Dr. Andrea Henne, Dean, Online and Distributed Learning.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
1 Faculty Development Opportunities Weekly events – Institute on High Impact Pedagogical Practices – Faculty Development Workshop Series – The Pre-Tenure.
E-Learning The Future is Anytime, Anyplace, and Fun!!
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
Programme design and student assessment David Baume 1.
Mentoring and Teaching Pat Rogers, Associate Vice President: Teaching and Learning Wilfrid Laurier University Annual Academic Administrators Workshop Balsillie.
Assessing Online Learning Process Maturity: the e-Learning Maturity Model Stephen Marshall, Victoria University of Wellington Ken Udas, Penn State World.
Orientation for Instructors Teaching Online Marriage between pedagogy and technology Karen Harker, January 2007.
An Evaluation of Professional Development for One-to-One Instruction at Pantego Christian Academy Steven R. Newby Kristi Fairbanks Marilyn Dardenne.
1 Using Web Pages and Technology to Meet Educational Objectives Judith Johnson Business/Computer Systems Division April 26, 2002.
QTC Tel: : Yan Li QTC Tel: : Student-Centred Learning The Challenge of Change.
Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Presenter : Ching-ting Lin 2007/1/9CSL ICE.NTNU1 Considerations for Developing Evaluations of Online Courses Achtemeier,
Action planning and evaluation How to apply workshop learning and action points to deepen that learning further Identify and plan next steps for post-
Resource Review for Teaching Resource Review for Teaching Victoria M. Rizzo, LCSW-R, PhD Jessica Seidman, LMSW Columbia University School of Social Work.
Assessing Student Learning: Moving Beyond Objective Tests Susan Polich & Zachary Goodell.
UNCLASSIFIED Lift the living standards and wellbeing of all Victorians by sustainably growing Victoria’s economy and employment and by working with the.
Best Practices in F2F Teaching Renee F. Aitken, Ph.D.
CATS Self Review and Planning Tool An Introduction and Overview Alison Poot and Melody West, CATS Project Team (University of Tasmania)
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
The VET sector In times of change……. And a response…..
The Art of Teaching and the Science of Learning
CTE 2010 Summer Institute on Teaching and Learning
Accelerated Course Design
Sandy Rae, Margaret Hunn, Ana Lobo
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
Dr Camille B. Kandiko Howson Academic Head of Student Engagement
TENN TLC addresses retention
Presentation transcript:

New Zealand E-Learning Capability Determination Dr Stephen Marshall University Teaching Development Centre Victoria University of Wellington NZ E-Learning Capability Determination Determination of New Zealand Tertiary Institution E-Learning Capability: An Application of an E-Learning Maturity Model This research is supported by the New Zealand Ministry of Education Tertiary E-Learning Research Fund.

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination1 Overview Goals of the Project E-Learning Maturity Model Results of Sector Evaluation Future Directions Questions

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination2 How can Institutions help teaching staff to be more successful in their use of technology to support student learning?

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination3 Goal “The answer to large-scale reform is not to try to emulate the characteristics of the minority who are getting somewhere under present conditions … Rather, we must change existing conditions so that it is normal and possible for a majority of people to move forward” (Fullan, 2001, p268)

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination4 Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996)

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination5 Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996)

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination6 Relational model of teaching and learning - Hall and Kidman (1996)

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination7 How to improve the institutional context… Are there common practices that lead to effective adoption and support of e-learning? For example: Institutional vision and e-learning strategy? Standards based technical environment? Centralised/decentralised support? Catalogue of successful solutions?Formal project standards? Formal evaluation of resources… How are these affected by the institutional context? What aspects of that context drive e-Learning success and failure?

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination8 The Seven Principles Good Practice: Encourages student-faculty contact Encourages cooperation among students Encourages active learning Gives prompt feedback Emphasizes time on task Communicates high expectations Respects diverse talents and ways of learning Chickering and Ehrmann, 1996

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination9 Quality on the Line Institutional Support Benchmarks Course Development Benchmarks Course Structure Benchmarks Student Support Benchmarks Faculty Support Benchmarks Evaluation and Assessment Benchmarks IHEP 2000

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination10 Capability Maturity Models CMM SPICE Capability refers to the ability of an institution to ensure that e-learning design, development and deployment is meeting the needs of the students, staff and institution. As well, capability includes the ability of an institution to sustain e-learning support of teaching as demand grows and staff change.

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination11 E-Learning Maturity Model eMM

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination12

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination13 E-Learning Maturity Model

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination14 Example

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination15

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination16 Learning Processes that directly impact on pedagogical aspects of e-learning

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination17 L1 and L7: Learning Objectives

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination18 L4: Implementation of Policy

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination19 L10: Accessibility

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination20 Development Processes surrounding the creation and maintenance of e-learning resources

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination21 Coordination and Support Processes around the day-to-day management and support of e-learning delivery

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination22 C2: Libraries

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination23 C5 and C9: Support for Students

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination24 C6 and C7: Familiarisation with Technology

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination25 Evaluation Processes surrounding the evaluation and quality control of e-Learning through its entire lifecycle

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination26 E1,E2 and E4: Evaluating E- Learning

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination27 E7: Assessing Teaching Staff Skills

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination28 Organisation Processes associated with institutional planning and management

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination29 O2 and O3: Technology Plans

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination30 O4 and O9: Information Provided to Students

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination31 Summary More self awareness in sector Intentionality Communication of requirements on students Technology Learning Objectives

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination32 Future Directions Evaluation of project outcomes Development of the processes Easier assessment of institutions Expanded New Zealand coverage International comparisons

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination33 Future Directions Stage 2 TeLRF Project “New Zealand Tertiary Institution E-Learning Capability: Informing and Guiding E- Learning Architectural Change and Development” Web access to assessments Partial assessments Ongoing evaluation of effectiveness of the eMM

NZ E-Learning Capability Determination34 Questions? Acknowledgements Dr Geoff Mitchell Charlotte Clements Darren Hoshek Participating institution staff New Zealand Ministry of Education