Satellite-Forming Impact Simulations (Past, Present, and Funded Future)‏ Brian Enke Southwest Research Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of one-class classification
Advertisements

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
An example of applying Lacey et al.’s (1981) model.
New Mexico Computer Science For All Designing and Running Simulations Maureen Psaila-Dombrowski.
Formation of our Moon: The Giant Impact Hypothesis Michelle Kirchoff Southwest Research Institute Center for Lunar Origin and Evolution.
CCMT Validation of Shock Tube Simulation Chanyoung Park, Raphael (Rafi) T. Haftka and Nam-Ho Kim Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University.
Surface Chronology of Phobos – The Age of Phobos and its Largest Crater Stickney 1 N. Schmedemann 1, G. Michael 1, B. A. Ivanov 2, J. Murray 3 and G. Neukum.
LPI-JSC Center for Lunar Science and Exploration 2011 Hydrocode Simulation of the Ries Crater Impact This work was conducted as part of a NASA Astrobiology.
Optimal Design Laboratory | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2011 Design Preference Elicitation Using Efficient Global Optimization Yi Ren Panos Y. Papalambros.
Derek C. Richardson (U Maryland) Rubble Piles & Monoliths CD-VI Cannes PreshatteredRubble This online version does not include the movies. Please .
Investigating the Near-Earth Object Population William Bottke Southwest Research Institute William Bottke Southwest Research Institute.
“Rummaging through Earth’s Attic for Remains of Ancient Life” John C. Armstrong, Llyd E. Wells, Guillermo Gonzalez Icarus 2002, vol. 160 December 9, 2004.
Copyright 2004 David J. Lilja1 Errors in Experimental Measurements Sources of errors Accuracy, precision, resolution A mathematical model of errors Confidence.
Mercury’s Craters How They Are And What They Are Lindsay Johannessen PTYS 495.
Binaries in the Vesta Family of Asteroids William H. Ryan (NM Tech/MRO) Eileen V. Ryan (NM Tech/MRO) Carlos Martinez (UNM)
Tampa APS Meeting April 2004 P. Gorham 1 UH ANITA monte carlo Peter Gorham University of Hawaii A N I T A.
Modeling Impacts on Icy Bodies: Applications to Saturn’s Moons Vanessa Lauburg TERPS Conference: December 7, 2004 Tethys Mimas Rhea.
Derek C. Richardson (U Maryland) PKDGRAV : A Parallel k-D Tree Gravity Solver for N-Body Problems FMM 2004.
M. Shao - 1 SIM Space Interferometry Mission A NASA Origins Mission SIM GRID.
A Macroscale Glacier Model to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts in the Columbia River Basin Joseph Hamman, Bart Nijssen, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Bibi Naz,
Experience of short-range (1-5 days) numerical ice forecasts for the freezing seas. Sergey Klyachkin, Zalman Gudkovich, Roman Guzenko Arctic and Antarctic.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
3D multi-fluid model Erika Harnett University of Washington.
The Solar System at ~10 mas perspectives for a Fresnel imager Paolo Tanga Marco Delbò Laboratoire Cassiopée, OCA.
(MNRAS 327, 610, 2001 & 347, 1234, 2004) David Churches, Mike Edmunds, Alistair Nelson - Physics & Astronomy, Cardiff University - Physics & Astronomy,
27 NOVEMBER 2007 CLASS #23 Astronomy 340 Fall 2007.
Hydrocode validation project - I Mark Price. 4 th November 2008.
May 16-18, 2005MultTemp 2005, Biloxi, MS1 Monitoring Change Through Hierarchical Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Image Data James C. Tilton Mail Code 606*
Performance Model & Tools Summary Hung-Hsun Su UPC Group, HCS lab 2/5/2004.
INTRODUCTION TO CHROMATOGRAPY
1 IE 607 Heuristic Optimization Particle Swarm Optimization.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Cratering on Nix and Hydra William Bottke (SwRI).
I2E Data Sets MIT Building N42: 100+ points of HVAC data from TAC ASHRAE Building Energy Shootout data: 20 energy and HVAC data points MIT Building NW35:
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Moon Impact Studies. What do We Know About the Moon?
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
Kernels in Pattern Recognition. A Langur - Baboon Binary Problem m/2006/ /himplu s4.jpg … HA HA HA …
M.Chiba_ARENA20061 Measurement of Attenuation Length for Radio Wave in Natural Rock Salt and Performance of Detecting Ultra High- Energy Neutrinos M.Chiba,
MERGE 5 years from now MORE OF THE SAME OR MORE THAN THAT?
WHY DO WE WANT TO MODEL THE COLLISIONAL EVOLUTION OF MBPs? SOLAR SYSTEM FORMATION : what was the primordial distribution of the minor body population.
Fast Query-Optimized Kernel Machine Classification Via Incremental Approximate Nearest Support Vectors by Dennis DeCoste and Dominic Mazzoni International.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
Reducing the risk of volcanic ash to aviation Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley.
Binaries among small main-belt asteroids Petr Pravec Astronomical Institute AS CR, Czech Republic Workshop on Binaries Paris-Meudon, 2008 May
D. A. Crawford, Sandia National Laboratories O. S. Barnouin-Jha, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory.
Robotics Chapter 6 – Machine Vision Dr. Amit Goradia.
Introduction: Metropolis-Hasting Sampler Purpose--To draw samples from a probability distribution There are three steps 1Propose a move from x to y 2Accept.
1 First results and methodological approach to parameter perturbations in GEM-LAM simulations PART I Leo Separovic, Ramon de Elia and Rene Laprise.
Cratering in the Solar System William Bottke Southwest Research Institute Boulder, Colorado.
Understanding Martian Subsurface Geochemistry using the Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons Instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity Rover Jack Lightholder.
Simulation Modelling A Tool to Inform and Support Decisions In Iron Ore Mining Dr Steven Richardson.
Chapter 12 Case Studies Part B. Control System Design.
Overview Definition Measurements of process capability control
Modeling Vesta’s Two Big Basins
The Clutch Control Strategy of EMCVT in AC Power Generation System
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Thermal modeling of rocky bodies
The projectile shape and material effect on the momentum transfer for asteroid orbit change Daisuke Yokoo, Masashi Tanaka, Masaya Ikeda, Takao Koura and.
Homework 8 - Monte Carlo Simulation using Minitab
Daniel D. Durda, William F. Bottke, and Brian L. Enke
HIGH PRIORITY EVENTS FROM SWRI FOR 2017
An optimization approach to automate radiotherapy treatment planning
Deep Neural Networks for Onboard Intelligence
Slides for Sampling from Posterior of Shape
SWRI PRIORITY EVENTS FOR 2016
Determining Airfoil Self-Noise Levels
CS639: Data Management for Data Science
Presentation transcript:

Satellite-Forming Impact Simulations (Past, Present, and Funded Future)‏ Brian Enke Southwest Research Institute

In the beginning...  Directed Learning (AI)‏  Support Vector Machines (SVMs)‏  Simulation efficiency  Increase science ROI  Continuous parameter landscape  Non-chaotic behaviour  Specific, quantifiable objectives  High dimensionality is OK  Normalized, graded output 2001: NASA Intelligent Systems project WANTED: A Few Good Sims... Magnetosphere

 Asteroid impact simulations (binaries)‏  Magnetosphere inversions  Asteroid impact simulations (SFDs)‏  Titan Radiative Transfer Model  Dust-lifting on Mars  Mars crater detection  SPH: Erik Asphaug  N-body: Derek Richardson  Companion: Zoe Leinhardt  AI: Mike Burl, Dennis DeCoste, Dominic Mazzoni, Lucas Scharenbroich  Grading, scheduling, integration: Brian Enke  Science: Bill Merline, Dan Durda, Bill Bottke Early Candidate Sims: Tools, Collaborators:

 Materials: Basalt (constant)‏  Target Diameter: 100 km (constant)‏  Impactor Velocity (3 -> 7 km/sec)‏  Impact Angle (15 -> 75 degrees)‏  Impactor Diameter ratio (1.0->3.0)‏ (46, 34, 25, 18, 14, 10 km’s)  Non-catastrophic (>50% mass in LR)  Diameter of combined SMATS / LR  No EEBs!  Threshold of 0.03 Input Parameters: Early Satellite Results (first grading formula):

207 Run Grid Simulates a 17x17x21 grid (6069 pts) High res: 3-4, 30-45, Trolling for patterns

137 Active Learning runs Not bad!

 Resolution  Impact Angles  Noise  Preserving volume  Grading (no EEBs)  Completion and other AI details....  FUNDING Some Concerns:

 Emma  Karin  Baptistina Size-Frequency Distributions (no AI)

In the present...  Rigid N-body aggregates!  Spins!  More impacts!  … leading to….

Evolution of irregularly shaped binaries (SMATS or EEBs)

Plus... Colors!  Thermal evolution  Source (depth) of binaries

… And Rubble Piles!  Solid or rubble impactors  Limited to spheres/blobs if automated (anything is possible by hand)

… And other materials!  Basalt  Dirty Ice  Iron  Dirty Ice  SMATS  2.5 km imp.  1 km/sec Target diam (km)

… And other materials!  Basalt  Dirty Ice  Iron  Dirty Ice  EEBs  2.5 km imp.  1 km/sec Target diam (km)

… And other materials!  Basalt  Dirty Ice  Iron  Dirty Ice  SMATS  2.5 km imp.  2 km/sec Target diam (km)

… And other materials!  Basalt  Dirty Ice  Iron  Dirty Ice  EEBs  2.5 km imp.  2 km/sec Target diam (km)

In the future, All these things plus...

Back to AI…  2 years of funding: NASA AIS  From thresholds to peak values, continuous-valued landscapes  Resource optimization, completion, early termination  Better, variable balance of exploration vs exploitation  Better visualization of results  Higher dimensions, MCMC sampling, sim_explore…  SMATS and EEBs ??? Directed Exploration of Complex Systems