WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Some aspects of the STERAO case study simulated by Méso-NH by Jean-Pierre PINTY, Céline MARI Christelle BARTHE and Jean-Pierre.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Advertisements

DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop, July 2004 A two-moment microphysical scheme for mesoscale and microscale cloud resolving models Axel Seifert.
FOREST FIRE IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY THE LANCON-DE-PROVENCE 2005 CASE S. Strada, C. Mari Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse,
Effect of Rain Scavenging on Altitudinal Distribution of Soluble Gaseous Pollutants in the Atmosphere B. Krasovitov, T. Elperin, A. Fominykh Department.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Predicting lightning density in Mediterranean storms based on the WRF model dynamic and microphysical fields Yoav Yair 1, Barry Lynn 1, Colin Price 2,
THE BLACK FOREST STORM OF 15 JULY 2007: NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES Evelyne Richard 1, Jean-Pierre Chaboureau 1 Cyrille Flamant 2 and.
Deep Convecton and Lightning Ken Pickering – NASA/GSFC Chris Cantrell – NCAR Tropospheric Chemistry Future Activities Meeting March 8, 2007 Deep Convection.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
Hurricane Cloud Physics
In this work we present results of cloud electrification obtained with the RAMS model that includes the process of charge separation between ice particles.
Earth&Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Tech Modeling the impacts of convective transport and lightning NOx production over North America: Dependence on cumulus.
Simulations with the MesoNH model from 27 August 2005 to 29 August 2005 (6UTC) performed by Meteo-France CNRM Nicole Asencio See powerpoint comments associated.
Workshop Bauru STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE 8 FEB 2001 CONVECTIVE SYSTEM ON THE UTLS AIR COMPOSITION V. Marécal 1, E. D. Rivière 1, G. Held 2, S.
The IOP6 (24 September 2012) heavy precipitation event over Southern France: observational and model analysis Lagouvardos, K. (1), Kotroni, V. (1), Bousquet.
Water Budget and Precipitation Efficiency of Typhoon Morakot (2009) Hsiao-Ling Huang 1, Ming-Jen Yang 1, and Chung-Hsiung Sui 2 1 National Central University,
Electricité atmosphérique et Production d’oxydes d’azote par les éclairs: Etat des lieux et perspectives Christelle Barthe 1 et Jean-Pierre Pinty Laboratoire.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Data assimilation, short-term forecast, and forecasting error
An ensemble study of HyMeX IOP6 and IOP7a Alan Hally (1,2), Evelyne Richard (1), Véronique Ducrocq (2) (1)LA, University of Toulouse, France (2)CNRM, Météo-France,
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget Braun, S. A., 2006: High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998).
Schematic diagram of the convective system life cycle size evolution Lifetime=  (A e Initiation ) Mass flux or condensation process in the initiation.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Toulouse IHOP meeting 15 June 2004 Water vapour variability within the growing convective boundary layer of 14 June 2002 with large eddy simulations and.
On the Definition of Precipitation Efficiency Sui, C.-H., X. Li, and M.-J. Yang, 2007: On the definition of precipitation efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 64,
Objective Evaluation of the Meso-NH Simulations during Hibiscus-Troccinox-Troccibras I.Forecasts for the TROCCINOX campaign II.Three case studies: 13 Feb,
Three real case simulations by Meso-NH validated against satellite observations J.-P. Chaboureau and J.-P. Pinty Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse 1.Elbe.
A Cloud Resolving Modeling Study of Tropical Convective and Stratiform Clouds C.-H. Sui and Xiaofan Li.
Thunderstorms.
WMO Cloud Modeling workshop, Warsaw, July 2012 WMO Cloud Modeling workshop, Warsaw, July 2012 Idealized Oklahoma squall Line 20 june 2007, reflectivity.
Toward a new parameterization of nitrogen oxides produced by lightning flashes in the WRF-AqChem model Christelle Barthe NCAR/ACD Previously at Laboratoire.
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget SCOTT A. BRAUN J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
Evaluation of wet scavenging for the May 29, 2012 DC3 severe storm case Megan Bela (U. Colorado), Mary Barth (NCAR), John Wong, O. Brian Toon (U. Colorado),
AMMA WP4.1.3 meeting at Service d'Aéronomie, Jussieu, Paris 2-3 July D modeling with Méso-NH over West Africa Marielle SAUNOIS, Céline MARI, Valérie.
Moist processes involved in IOP13 and IOP16. Fanny DUFFOURG Olivier NUISSIER Christine LAC CNRM-GAME / Météo-France & CNRS HyMeX ST-WV meeting, Toulouse,
Meteorologisches Institut der Universitat Munchen A shallow convection case from BBC: Results from the WMO international cloud modelling workshop Nicole.
A regional-model « climatology » of vertical mass and water-vapour transport for the Hibiscus-Troccinox-Troccibras campaign 2004 F. Gheusi, J.-P. Cammas,
Assimilation of Lightning Data Using a Newtonian Nudging Method Involving Low-Level Warming Max R. Marchand Henry E. Fuelberg Florida State University.
Atmospheric profile and precipitation properties derived from radar and radiosondes during RICO Louise Nuijens With thanks to: Bjorn Stevens (UCLA) Margreet.
Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute of Technology A Close Look at the Aerosol-Cloud Interaction in Tropical Deep Convection.
Case 5: Tracer Transport in Deep Convection STERAO-1996 From Dye et al. (2000)
Assimilation of Pseudo-GLM Observations Into a Storm Scale Numerical Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter Blake Allen University of Oklahoma Edward Mansell.
Development of cloud resolving model with microphysical bin model and parameterizations to predict the initial cloud droplet size distribution KUBA, Naomi.
ARPS( Advanced Regional Prediction System ) Version Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS), Oklahoma University tridimensional compressible.
Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Program.
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
and NM Tech team & many HyMeX participants
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Presentation transcript:

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Some aspects of the STERAO case study simulated by Méso-NH by Jean-Pierre PINTY, Céline MARI Christelle BARTHE and Jean-Pierre CHABOUREAU Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Multidisciplinary modeling of the STERAO case study Dynamics: resolved and turbulent flow Microphysics: mixed-phase processes Chemistry: Transport of +/- soluble species Electricity: lightning flash and NO x production (simulations performed on a large domain but at moderate resolution,  x=1km)  Strong coupling between the flow structure, the water cycle, the cloud electrisation and the scavenging of gases  Requires a simultaneous integration of all the processes

Kinetic approach of mass transfer for soluble gases WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, gas phase: C g and 2 aqueous phases: C c (cloud droplets), C r (raindrops) With Mass Transfer terms as in Chaumerliac et al., 1987, Barth et al., 1992, … k tc : mass transfer coef. (particle size dependent) K H : Henry’s law coef.

Flow chart of the electrical scheme Microphysical and dynamical processes Charge separation and exchange Charge transport Electric field computation ||E|| > ||E|| trig no Lightning channel radial extension Lightning channel vertical extension Bi-leader phase ||E|| > ||E|| prop Pseudo-fractal scheme Partial neutralization of charges yes WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004

Set-up of Méso-NH Domain horizontal grid : 120 x 120 points at 1 km resolution with open LBC 50 levels : from 70 m (bot) up to 600 m (top) with wave damping Physics transport with MPDATA scheme microphysics: Pinty-Jabouille electricity: Barthe-Pinty-Molinié gas scavenging & LiNOx: Mari-Pinty 3D turbulence (TKE): Cuxart-B-R Initialization R/S with 3 warm bubbles (3K) profiles of HCHO, H 2 O 2, HNO 3 profiles of CO, NO x, O 3 3 hour run on the 12 LINUX LA Ice and Wind fields T=1 Z=10 km

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Upper level z=10 km Time = 1 hourTime = 2.5 hours W~45 m/s A B W~25 m/s C D

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Peak vertical velocity /electrical activity Multicell stage Transition to Supercell Electric field < 200 kV/m Flash length < 1000 km/min

Microphysical fields  Radar  reflectivity Gravity waves Graupels (coloured) Rain Ice+Snow Time = 1 hourTime = 2.5 hours

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Mixing ratio and Z peak values Radar reflectivity < 45 dBZ which is less than observed  Presence of hail ? Rc max ~ 4.0 g/kg Rr max ~ 2.0 g/kg Ri max ~ 1.5 g/kg Rs max ~ 1.0 g/kg Rg max ~ 9.0 g/kg

Transport of H 2 O, CO and O 3 (1) WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Stratosphere 5 %<Relative Humidity<95 % 75 ppb<CO<130 ppb 50 ppb<O 3 <130 ppb Time = 1 hour

Transport of H 2 O, CO and O 3 (2) WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Stratosphere 5 %<Relative Humidity<95 % 75 ppb<CO<130 ppb 50 ppb<O 3 <130 ppb Stratosphere Time = 2.5 hours

Gas Transport & Scavenging WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Stratosphere  HCHO H 2 O 2   HNO 3 (Scale is [0, 2 ppb]) Time = 2.5 hours

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 LNOx z=10 km Time = 1 hourTime = 2.5 hours The net LNOx production rate is continuously derived from the electrical scheme with  LiNOx)/  t = F(L flash  after Wang et al. (2000) Peak value ~ 3.5 ppbPeak value ~ 0.1 ppb  High spatial and temporal variability LNOX scale in ppb LNOX scale in 100 ppt

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Conclusion and Perspectives STERAO is a good modeling exercise for several aspects of the deep convection: dynamics and microphysics gas transport and scavenging cloud electricity and LNOx production Results are recent and need a careful evaluation against the available dataset Model runs on a larger domain to produce more realistic fluxes and budgets Parts of the model will be improved lightning flash algorithm inclusion of the ice phase for the gas scavenging careful evaluation of the LNOx production rate

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Anvil flux density computation

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Anvil flux densities (where  r glace > 0.01g/kg) Lightning NOx flux is {LNOx-TNOx} flux Max flux (air) = 5.46 kg/m 2 /s Max flux (CO) = 1.90 e-5 mole/m 2 /s Max flux (O 3 ) = 2.28 e-5 mole/m 2 /s Max flux (NO x ) = 4.65 e-8 mole/m 2 /s

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Anvil flux densities (where  r glace > 0.01g/kg) After 3 hours: Flux (HCHO) = 1.11 e-7 mole/m 2 /s Flux (H2O 2 ) = 1.10 e-7 mole/m 2 /s Flux (HNO 3 ) = 8.41 e-8 mole/m 2 /s

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Precipitation field 3 hour rainfall ~ 6.2 mm Instantaneous rate < 25 mm/h « Cell pulsating » precipitation pattern

WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Lightning NO x field Instantaneous peak value ~ 8 ppb Total mass max ~ 8800 kg