Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M03-613  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy - Pilot LPV/r - M American Study - KalMo - OK - OK04 - KALESOLO - MOST - HIV-NAT 077.
Advertisements

Switch to LPV/r monotherapy - Pilot LPV/r - M American Study - KalMo - OK - OK04 - KALESOLO - MOST - HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen - Canadian Study - CHEER - Montreal Study - EASIER - SWITCHMRK - SPIRAL.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy - ATARITMO - Swedish Study - ACTG A OREY.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  SWIFT Study. SWIFT Study: Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  Design Campo R, CID 2013, Jan 29 (epub ahead of print) LPV/rATV/rFPV.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of EFV vs MVC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077

 Design  Objective –Non inferiority of the monotherapy group in the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL in the plasma and treatment failure in the CNS or the genital compartment without modification of treatment (per-protocol analysis) ; lower limit of CI for the difference = - 12%, 80% power –Study was prematurely stopped before full recruitment when 6 patients on monotherapy (none in cART group) demonstrated a virologic failure in blood Continuation current antiretroviral therapy (cART)* LPV/r 400/100 mg bid Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label Target of 100 HIV+ On cART > 6 months HIV-1 RNA 3 months Baseline determination of HIV-1 RNA in CSF and genital secretions N = 29 N = 31 W96 * Possibility offered to switch to LPV/r monotherapy at W48 delayed switch) MOST Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Gutmann C, AIDS 2010;24: MOST

MOST Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy Continuation of cART N = 31 LPV/r monotherapy N = 29 Mean age, years4642 Female23%34% CDC stage C23%34% CD4 cell count at baseline, median/mm CD4 cell count at nadir, median/mm HIV-RNA set point, mean log 10 c/ml ARV at inclusion PI-based74%73% NNRTI-based 23%24% 3 NRTIs 3% Baseline characteristics Gutmann C, AIDS 2010;24: MOST

MOST Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Median follow-up: 48 weeks  Virologic failure (2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA > 400 c/mL) occurred in 6/29 patients in the LPV/r monotherapy group, after a median of 12 weeks, vs 0/31 in the continued antiretroviral therapy group  In these 6 failures, the median duration of HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL was 50 months ; 5/6 patients had clinical symptoms at the time of failure, all symptoms resolving after treatment switch ; all 6 patients had a nadir CD4 cell count < 200/mm 3  CSF was examined in 45 patients at study termination (25 on LPV/r monotherapy and plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 c/mL, 5 failing monotherapy and 15 continuing prior ARV therapy with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL) CSF HIV-1 RNA was > 40 c/mL –8/25 patients on monotherapy –none of the 15 patients still on continued treatment (p = 0.01)  No marked elevation of HIV-1 RNA in the genital secretions Outcome Gutmann C, AIDS 2010;24: MOST

MOST Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy SexPre-Treatment CD4 nadir /mm 3 Treatment arm Week on study/on monotherapy HIV-1 RNA plasma, log 10 c/ml HIV-1 RNA CSF, log 10 c/mL Blood failure (HIV-1 RNA > 400 c/mL) 1MaleTDF/FTC/ATV/r57LPV/r mono FemaleZDV/3TC/LPV/r5Delayed Switch60/ FemaleABC/3TC/LPV/r149LPV/r mono MaleZDV/3TC/EFV7LPV/r mono MaleTDF/3TC/LPV/r54LPV/r mono65.0ND 6FemaleTDF/3TC/EFV160LPV/r mono HIV-RNA detectable in CSF Monotherapy arm 1MaleTDF/FTC/LPV/r211Delayed Switch96/48< MaleTDF/3TC/ATV/r370Delayed Switch66/ FemaleABC/3TC/LPV/r100LPV/r mono MaleTDF/3TC/ZDV/EFV130Delayed Switch68/ MaleZDV/3TC/LPV/r120Delayed Switch72/24< MaleTDF/FTC/LPV/r20LPV/r mono37< FemaleABC/3TC/ZDV/LPV/r220LPV/r mono FemaleZDV/3TC/LPV/r17LPV/r mono44< HIV-RNA detectable in CSF Continuation therapy arm 9MaleTDF/FTC/LPV/r20cART at baseline0< MaleTDF/FTC/ATV/r126cART at baseline0< MaleTDF/3TC/EFV185cART at baseline0< MaleTDF/3TC/ATV/r370Delayed Switch48/0< Patients with treatment failure in blood or detection of elevated HIV-1 RNA in CSF Gutmann C, AIDS 2010;24: MOST

MOST Study: Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Conclusions –Maintenance of HIV treatment with LPV/r monotherapy should not be recommended as a standard strategy ; this is particularly evident in patients with a CD4 cell count < 200/mm 3 at nadir –The proportion of patients with detectable HIV-1 RNA in CSF was not only significantly higher on LPV/r monotherapy than on continued combination therapy (32% vs 0% ; p = 0.01), but the difference appears biologically (CSF inflammation) and clinically (acute symptoms) relevant Gutmann C, AIDS 2010;24: MOST