Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy - ATARITMO - Swedish Study - ACTG A OREY.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV/r vs DRV/rATADAR. ATV/r 300/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd N = 91 N = 89 DRV/r 800/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Open-label.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV - SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV STR  Design TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  RADAR  NEAT001/ANRS 143  A  VEMAN  MODERN.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study

ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (continuation) N = 51 N = 52 ATV/r 300/100 mg monotherapy  Design Randomisation* 1: 1 Open-label  Objective –Primary Endpoint : proportion with treatment success at W48 Treatment failure : treatment discontinuation for any cause or confirmed virologic rebound (first of 2 consecutive HIV RNA > 50 c/mL within 2 weeks) Non-inferiority of ATV/r (ITT analysis) ; lower limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference = -10% ; sample size = 342 (171 x 2), 80% power Interim analysis by IDMC in June 2013 : recommendation to stop further enrolment MODAT ≥ 18 years Stable ATV/r + 2 NRTI ≥ 48 weeks with HIV RNA 24 weeks No previous virologic failure CD4+ nadir > 100/mm 3 No PPI or H2-receptor antagonists HBs Ag negative W48W96 MODAt Study: switch to ATV/r monotherapy * Randomisation was stratified on HIV RNA (≤ or > 100,000 c/mL) prior to ART start Castagna A. AIDS 2014;28:

Baseline characteristics and disposition ATV/r + 2 NRTI N = 52 ATV/r monotherapy N = 51 Female14%18% Baseline CD4/mm 3, median (IQR)570 (417 – 735)599 (457 – 774) Nadir CD4/mm 3, median (IQR)278 ( )274 (221 – 355) Duration of HIV RNA < 50 c/mL (months), median1820 Duration on ATV/r + 2 NRTI (months), median st line antiretroviral therapy71% TDF/FTC backbone85%90% Re-intensified before W48 with previous 2 NRTIs because of confirmed virologic rebound, n 011 Discontinued at W48, N84 Adverse event52 Confirmed virologic rebound2- Patient’s decision / lost to follow-up12 MODAT MODAt Study: switch to ATV/r monotherapy Castagna A. AIDS 2014;28:

HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT) ATV/rATV/r + 2 NRTI Confirmed virologic rebound Efficacy results Sub groups ATV/r + 2 NRTI N = 52 ATV/r N = 51 N211 HIV RNA pre-ART > 100,000 c/mL 16 Nadir CD4 < 350/mm 3 19 HCV co-infection06 Emergence of R mutations1 (NRTI)0 MODAT Predictor of treatment failure in the ATV/r arm : HCV co-infection (HR : 7.64 ; 95% CI: 1.44 to 40.47, p = 0.017) MODAt Study: switch to ATV/r monotherapy Castagna A. AIDS 2014;28: ≠ (95% CI) ( ; 3.6) / 52 37/ 51 47/ 51 44/ 52 % ≠ (95% CI) 7.5 (- 4.7 ; 19.8) Re-intensification = failure Re-intensification = success

ATV/r + 2 NRTI,N = 52ATV/r,N = 51p Grade 3-4 clinical AEs19 (36.5%)6 (11.8%)0.003 Grade 3-4 drug-related clinical AEs 6 2 nephrolithiasis 1 cholelithiasis 1 arthritis + hyperuricemia 2 hematuria + proteinuria Change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline at W48, median Grade 3-4 total cholesterol elevation20 Change in LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline at W48, median Grade 3-4 LDL-cholesterol elevation33 Change in HLDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline at W48, median Grade 3-4 triglycerides elevation11 Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia17 (33%)20 (39%)0.542 Change in eGFR at W48, median0 ml/min/1.73m ml/min/1.73 m Safety, N (%) MODAT MODAt Study: switch to ATV/r monotherapy Castagna A. AIDS 2014;28:

 Conclusion – ATV/r monotherapy treatment simplification showed lower virological efficacy in comparison with maintaining triple therapy with ATV/r + 2 NRTI Inferiority more pronounced in those with – Pre-ART HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL – Nadir CD4 < 350/mm 3 – HCV co-infection No benefits of ATV/r monotherapy on lipids or renal function – NRTIs re-intensification was effective in all the individuals – The study was terminated early due to recommendation of IDMC MODAT Castagna A. AIDS 2014;28: MODAt Study: switch to ATV/r monotherapy