 Federal mandates exist from both NIH and FDA on including children in clinical research. However, when and how to include children, particularly in clinical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Martin E. Gutierrez, MD Recruitment Experience in a Phase 0 Trial of ABT-888, an Inhibitor of Poly (ADP- ribose) Polymerase (PARP), in Patients With Advanced.
Advertisements

Initial Validation of a New Measure of Facial Expression Recognition: Survivors of Childhood Cancer Compared to Typically-Developing Children Melanie J.
Pediatric Chronic Pain and Differences in Parental Health-Related Quality of Life Gustavo R. Medrano¹, Susan T. Heinze¹, Keri R. Hainsworth 2,3, Steven.
Is Caregiver Depression Associated with Children’s ADHD Symptoms and Overall Functioning? Randi Scott SUMR Final Presentation August 07, 2008.
For more information, please contact Katherine Salamon at Describing the Typical Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) User Katherine.
Results Mealtime Behaviors Associated with Body Mass Index in Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders William R. Black MA 1,2, Cathleen Odar Stough.
Parent Perspectives on Screening Young Children for Autism Within the Medical Home Paul Carbone, M.D., Tracy Golden, Ph.D., Jeff Hall, Ph.D., Elizabeth.
Assessing the Social Acceptability of Brief Experimental Analysis in the Context of a Complete Reading Intervention Program Greta Fenske, Erin Liffrig,
The Influence of Parent Education on Child Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Parents Beliefs and Behaviors Pamela E. Davis-Kean University of Michigan This.
Long-term Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Weight Management Clinic for Youth with Special Needs Meredith Dreyer Gillette PhD 1, 2, Cathleen Odar Stough.
Method Introduction Results Discussion The Effect of Self-Esteem, Marital Status, and Gender on Trait Anxiety and Stress Emily B Gale University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Full-time Undergaduate
Predicting Marital Success with PREPARE: A Predictive Validity Study Article by B.J Fowers and D.H Olson Presentation by: Aylin Atabek Elissa Vaidman Qiana.
Factors that Associated with Stress in Nursing Faculty in Thailand
Jared A. Rowland, M.S., Michael M. Knepp, M.S., Sheri L. Towe, M.S., Chris S. Immel, M.S., Ryoichi J.P. Noguchi, M.S., Chad L. Stephens, M.S. & David W.
The authors would like to acknowledge the nursing staff that participated at all three locations. Without their support, many things would not be possible.
Katharine Garvey MD MPH
Exploring Honors Students’ Levels of Academic Motivation, Perfectionism, and Test Anxiety Hannah Geis, Kelly Hughes, and Brittany Weber, Faculty Advisor:
IMPLEMENTING A 4 WEEK BALANCE PROTOCOL TO IMPACT QUALITY OF LIFE IN CANCER PATIENTS Alyssa Bender, Lauren Braun, Kayla Franklin, Megan Kidd, Nikki Rendler.
The authors would like to acknowledge the nursing staff that participated at all three locations. Without their support, many things would not be possible.
Asian International Students Attitudes on Women in College Keyana Silverberg and Margo Hanson Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout.
Stability of Anxiety Ratings and Parent-Child Concordance in a Pediatric Chronic Pain Population Tran, S.T., 1 Hainsworth, K.R., 2,3 Anderson Khan, K.,
Do Socio-Religious Characteristics Account for Later Alcohol Onset? Paul T. Korte, B.A. Jon Randolph Haber, Ph.D.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin. This project was funded by the Greater Milwaukee Fund. For.
For more information, please contact Katherine Salamon at Barriers to Participation: Perceptions of Prototypical Users of Complementary.
ABSTRACT The current study identified the factors related to exercisers’ self-talk and exercise adherence. Hardy (2006) defined self-talk as “(a) verbalizations.
Purpose The present study examined the psychometric properties of the SCARED in order to begin establishing an evidence base for using the SCARED in pediatric.
Ethnic Identity among Mexican American Adolescents: The Role of Maternal Cultural Values and Parenting Practices 1 Miriam M. Martinez, 1 Gustavo Carlo,
On Parenting: An Examination of Older Adolescents’ Perceptions of Parenting Styles and Success in College Results ANCOVA (controlling for ethnicity, religion,
. Relationship between Types of Sex Education and High Risk Sexual Behavior Andrea M. Anderson & Kaitlyn Harlander Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University.
Center for Psychosocial Health Correlates of Vitality in HIV+ Adults: Perceived Social Support and Life Regard Yen Nguyen, Chwee-Lye Chng, Ph.D., Mark.
Acknowledgments: Data for this study were collected as part of the CIHR Team: GO4KIDDS: Great Outcomes for Kids Impacted by Severe Developmental Disabilities.
◦ 125 adolescents (56% girls; 75% Caucasian) and their mothers from the Adolescent Adjustment Project (AAP) ◦ Adolescents’ mean age = (SD=.70) ◦
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Bedside Communication Skills: A Survey of Emergency Department Patients Amanda Keller York College of PA Biology.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
® Introduction Changes in Opioid Use for Chronic Low Back Pain: One-Year Followup Roy X. Luo, Tamara Armstrong, PsyD, Sandra K. Burge, PhD The University.
Quantitative SOTL Research Methods Krista Trinder, College of Medicine Brad Wuetherick, GMCTE October 28, 2010.
Anxiety Symptoms and Pain Catastrophizing in a Pediatric Chronic Pain Sample Susan T. Heinze¹, M.S., Kim Anderson Khan², ³, Psy.D., Renee Ladwig 3, APRN,
Behavioral and Feeding Problems in Children with Constipation Kathryn S. Holman 1, W. Hobart Davies 1, Alan Silverman 2 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
 This research is part of a larger study entitled “Stress and Psychoneuroimmunological Factors in Renal Health and Disease” that is funded by The National.
Table 2: Correlation between age and readiness to change Table 1: T-test relating gender and readiness to change  It is estimated that 25% of children.
Cleveland Clinic Science Internship Program for Nursing How do Families of Surgical Patients Perceive Communication of their Family Members’ Surgical Status?
Informed Consent for Emergency Operations in Children: Does Portable Computer-assisted Education Enhance Parental Recall? Nwomeh BC 1, Caniano DA 1, Upperman.
Early Adolescent Behaviors in Disagreement with Best Friend Predictive of Later Emotional Repair Abilities Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S.
Parent Beliefs Regarding Acceptability of Recruitment Methods in Pediatric Research Susan T. Heinze, M.S., Amy J. Majewski, B.A., Elaine C. Bennaton, B.A.,
“I Just Did It”: Health Decision Making and Perceived Outcomes of HIV Testing in the African American Church ALEXANDRIA BOOKER, BAJANNETTE BERKLEY-PATTON,
Brenda J. Stutsky RN, PhD Development and Testing of a Conceptual Framework for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice.
Results Baseline Differences Between Groups No significant differences were found between ethnic groups on baseline levels of Praise (F = 2.006, p>.05),
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
F UNCTIONAL L IMITATIONS IN C ANCER S URVIVORS A MONG E LDERLY M EDICARE B ENEFICIARIES Prachi P. Chavan, MD, MPH Epidemiology PhD Student Xinhua Yu MD.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
Dyadic Patterns of Parental Perceptions of Health- Related Quality of Life Gustavo R. Medrano & W. Hobart Davies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Pediatric.
Education Intervention in the Clinical Setting for Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics in Children Katie Butterfield.
The authors would like to acknowledge the families at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Jane P. Pettit Pain and Palliative Care Center. For more information,
Students’ Perceptions of Clinical Reasoning Development Rebecca Jensen, PhD, RN.
Printed by Natural History of Sun Protection Behaviors in a Cohort of Children in Colorado Nancy L. Asdigian PhD,* Lori A. Crane.
Crystal Reinhart, PhD & Beth Welbes, MSPH Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Social Norms Theory.
1 Fatimah Ali-Ferre´ CHES. Significance Benefits Health, nutritional, immunologic, developmental, psychological, social, economic, and environmental benefits.
Anxiety Sensitivity and Pain Catastrophizing: Distinct Factors in Predicting Pain Susan T. Heinze, Jamie L. Elftman, W. Hobart Davies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Economic & Educational Factors do not Explain Racial Differences in the Accuracy of Parental Perception of Overweight in their Child Brooke E.E. Montgomery,
Janet Schneiderman, PhD, RN Dawn McDaniel, MA Bin Xie, PhD Child Welfare Caregivers: An Evaluation of Access to Pediatric Health Care.
Literacy, Knowledge, Health Beliefs, and Self-efficacy among Urban, Low-income, Obese African American Women Feleta L. Wilson, PhD, RN 1 May T. Dobal,
Development of Physical Aggression: Exploring the Relationship with Language Elizabeth Anson MS Kimberly Sidora-Arcoleo PhD Robert Cole PhD Harriet Kitzman.
Mild, moderate, and severe intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale©: A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis Margaret.
Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences:
Parenting behaviors predict effortful control and internalizing/externalizing problems among children during the first year of a cancer diagnosis Emily.
Laura M. Sylke & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
Decreasing Compassion Fatigue In Cardiovascular Intensive Care Nurses Through Self-Care and Mindfulness Staci Abernathy, MSN, CPNP-AC, DNP Student, Rebecca.
Serik Tursunaliev, Veronica Ross
Presentation transcript:

 Federal mandates exist from both NIH and FDA on including children in clinical research. However, when and how to include children, particularly in clinical trials, is highly debated. Concerns are particularly heightened when:  Children have life-threatening conditions  There is little time to make this decision  Parents / legal guardians give permission for their children to participate in research. Older children (~>7yrs.) are asked to give assent.  Much of the previous research related to parents’ decision making around children’s participation in research has been conducted separately in the contexts of pediatric cancer, surgery or neonatology.  There are many barriers to informed permission / consent when parents are asked to make decisions about their child’s participation in research:  Time constraints  Complicated research protocols  Inadequate understanding  Stress imposed by child’s condition  Less than ideal communication Background Parent Decision Making in Pediatric Research Denise B. Angst, PhD, RN * ; Emily Hadley, MS, RN * ; Bryan Coyle, MA # Advocate Center for Pediatric Research * ; Advocate IRB # Parent Decision Making in Pediatric Research Denise B. Angst, PhD, RN * ; Emily Hadley, MS, RN * ; Bryan Coyle, MA # Advocate Center for Pediatric Research * ; Advocate IRB # Sample  Any parent who enrolled or declined enrollment of their child in a clinical research study at AHCH or ALGCH  Approached within 12 weeks of the original study  English-speaking Measurements  Demographic and Decision Making Supplement  31 items, evaluating parent and child demographics; perception of research risks and benefits, previous experience with research, decision making process  Parent Decision Making (DM) Survey  Based loosely on survey by Tait et al.  65 items were reviewed by 5 content experts  Final tool was 70 items, each item with a 5-point Likert scale (1 strongly disagree – 5 strongly agree), organized in 11 themes/domains Data Analysis  Descriptive statistics; t-tests to compare subgroups  Reliabilities and correlational analyses to evaluate DM survey Conclusions ResultsMethods Specific Aims 1)Examine parents’ decision making regarding their children’s research participation across various illness and other contexts 2)To develop and evaluate an instrument that could be used across pediatric conditions and decision making contexts. Results  These results are most representative of parents who decide to enroll (vs. decline enrollment), and only represent some of our preliminary analyses to date  The vast majority of parents are making this decision in a very short period of time (75% <1 day)  Fewer parental resources (education, SES) may make it more difficult for them to decline  Features that distinguish those who enroll vs. decline appear consistent with prior research:  Beliefs in benefits for their child and other children  Beliefs in the importance of research  Perception of risks  Compared to other conditions, parents of children with cancer see the research as benefiting their child and see their child’s condition as more serious  Decision making tool results are highly preliminary, given sample size. Tool shows some promise, but needs further evaluation when additional parents have been enrolled Enrolled N = 55 (n, %) Declined N = 14 (n, %) All Parents N = 69 (n, %) Child’s Condition Oncology Neonatology Other Chronic Condition 32 (58) 15 (27) 8 (15) 1 (7) 9 (64) 4 (29) 33 (48) 24 (35) 12 (17) Child’s Age < 1 month 2-10 years years 13 (34) 12 (32) 11 (92) 1 (8) 0 24 (48) 14 (28) 12 (24) Parent’s Highest Education High school grad Some college > College grad 10 (18) 15 (27) 30 (55) 1 (7) 2 (14) 11 (79) 11 (16) 17 (25) 41 (59) Race/ Ethnicity Caucasian African American Other 42 (76) 6 (11) 7 (13) 13 (93) 0 1 (7) 55 (80) 6 (9) 8 (11) Annual Household Income < $50k $50k - 89,999 ≥ 90k 17 (32) 16 (29) 20 (38) 0 5 (36) 9 (64) 17 (25) 21 (30) 29 (42) Table 1. Sample Characteristics: Enrolled vs. Declined Table 2. Selected DM Survey Item Responses Enrolled N = 55 (mean, SD) Declined N = 14 (mean, SD) p- value Perception of Seriousness of Child ’ s Condition (1=mild, 10 = severe) 7.2 (2.5)7.2 (2.2).96 Benefit for Child (1=no benefit, 10 = extremely beneficial) 6.1 (3.0)2.5 (2.1).0001 Benefit for Other Children (1=no benefit, 10 = extremely beneficial) 8.4 (2.2)6.2 (2.0).002 Perception of Risk (1=no risk, 10 = extremely risky) 3.4 (2.3)6.4 (2.6).0002 Importance of Research (1=not impt., 10 = extremely impt.) 8.6 (2.0)6.2 (1.6).0002 Table 3. Parent Perceptions: Enrolled vs. Declined Parents of Children with Cancer vs. Other Conditions Decision Making Survey  Based on analysis of first 50 parents  2-3 domains / scales appear to have subscales  Internal consistency:  = ; 7 scales with  >0.74  Discrimination: Enrolled vs. Declined  Most scales did not discriminate based on participation  3 scales showed differences: Decisional Uncertainty, Influence of Child’s Condition, View of Study  Discrimination: Diagnostic Groups  Oncology vs. NICU vs. Other Chronic Condition  6 scales appear to differentiate groups: Quality of Consent Process-1, Quality of Consent Process-2, View of Study, Other Decisional Influences, Trust / Relationship with Dr. / Staff, Quality of Consent Form Acknowledgements Thanks to the research coordinators and clinical staff who assisted in recruiting parents: Ramona Donovan, Rina DiMaso, Bonnie Hughes, Suellen Moen, Lorene Schweig, Regina Schwartz, and Jane Suszek. Next Steps  Parents are continuing to be enrolled; goal N=100 parents Advocate Hope Children’s Hospital Advocate Lutheran General Children’s Hospital Parent Decision Making in Pediatric Research Denise B. Angst, PhD, RN * ; Emily Hadley, MS, RN * ; Bryan Coyle, MA # Advocate Center for Pediatric Research * ; Advocate IRB # Parent Decision Making in Pediatric Research Denise B. Angst, PhD, RN * ; Emily Hadley, MS, RN * ; Bryan Coyle, MA # Advocate Center for Pediatric Research * ; Advocate IRB #  Compared to parents of children with other conditions, parents of children with cancer viewed,  Their child’s condition as more serious (8.2 vs. 6.3; p=0.002)  The research as more important (6.8 vs. 4.1; p=0.0005)  The research as benefiting their child (8.8 vs. 7.5; p=0.01)  However, there were no statistically significant differences in their perception of study risks (4.1 vs. 3.9; p=0.68) Enrolled N = 55 (n, % Agreed or Strongly Agreed) Declined N = 14 (n, % Agreed or Strongly Agreed) p- value Altruism Participating in Research will Help Other Children 53 (96)12 (86)0.18 Decisional Uncertainty Wanted Study Doctor to Advise me on Decision 14 (26) * 2 (14)0.49 Child Influences Would Participate in Any Study to Benefit Child 44 (81) # 4 (29) Study Characteristics Study Seemed Very Risky2 (4)7 (50)0.001 Trust / Relationship with Dr. and Staff Study Wouldn’t have been Offered unless Beneficial36 (65)5 (36)0.07 Understanding I Understood What was Required46 (84)9 (64)0.14 Quality of Permission / Consent Process Had Enough Time to Make Decision43 (78)8 (57)0.17 Satisfaction with Decision Making Make Same Decision Again44 (81) # 13 (93)0.44  Parents completed DM supplement and survey at a median of 7 days from their decision making regarding the original research.  75% parents made their decision re: the original study in < 1day. * N = 53 # N = 54