Ontology of Disease and the OBO Foundry Chris Mungall NCBO GO Nov 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancing GO for the sake of clinical bionformatics Anand Kumar IFOMIS, University of Leipzig/Saarbrücken.
Advertisements

Upper Ontology Summit Wednesday March 15 The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National.
More than one way to dissect an animal Melissa Haendel ZFIN Scientific Curator.
Species-Neutral vs. Multi-Species Ontologies Barry Smith.
On the Future of the NeuroBehavior Ontology and Its Relation to the Mental Functioning Ontology Barry Smith
Bridging Multiple Ontologies: Route to Representation of the Liver Immune Response Anna Maria Masci, Jeffrey Roach, Bernard de Bono, Pierre Grenon, Lindsay.
Application of OBO Foundry Principles in GO Chris Mungall Lawrence Berkeley Labs NCBO GO Consortium.
Automated tools to help construction of Trait Ontologies Chris Mungall Monarch Initiative Gene.
Iowa State University Animal Science Department Bioinformatics & Computational Biology Program - 01/16/06 1 Overview of Animal Trait Ontology and PATO.
1 ANATOMY AND TIME Barry Smith. 2 SNAP AND SPAN 3 To understand relations between universals Reference to times and instances are important A derives.
1 Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith University at Buffalo
1 An Ontology of Relations for Biomedical Informatics Barry Smith 10 January 2005.
The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies Barry Smith and Cornelius Rosse.
1 Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith. 2 Main obstacle to integrating genetic and EHR data No facility for dealing with time and instances (particulars)
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
FMA: a domain reference ontology Comments on Cornelius Rosse’s talk Anita Burgun WG6 meeting, Rome 29 Apr- 2 May 2005.
1 The OBO Foundry 2 A prospective standard designed to guarantee interoperability of ontologies from the very start (contrast.
The Problem of Reusability of Biomedical Data OBO Foundry & HL7 RIM Barry Smith.
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
Underlying Ontologies for Biomedical work - The Relation Ontology (RO) and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) Thomas Bittner SUNY Buffalo
1 Logical Tools and Theories in Contemporary Bioinformatics Barry Smith
Room for Lunch: Arlington Room Room for Evening Reception: Grand Prairie Room.
The RNA Ontology RNAO Colin Batchelor Neocles Leontis May 2009 Eckart, Colin and Jane In Cambridge.
1 BIOLOGICAL DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES & BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith.
Ontological Model for Colon Carcinoma: A Case Study for Knowledge Representation in Clinical Bioinformatics Kumar A 1,2, Yip L 3, Jaremek M 2, Scheib H.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences Biomedical Ontology in Buffalo Part I: The Gene Ontology Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
The Core Infectious Disease Ontology. Purpose: To make infectious disease-relevant data deriving from different sources comparable and computable Across.
The OBO Foundry Chris Mungall Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory NCBO GO Consortium May 2007.
PATO An ontology for phenotypes. The development of PATO is the work of George Gkoutos, supported by the NCBO, working in Cambridge.
Phenotype annotation Chris Mungall Lawrence Berkeley Labs NCBO GO.
Limning the CTS Ontology Landscape Barry Smith 1.
Linking Multiple Ontologies: The OBO Foundry Approach Chris Mungall NIAID Cell Ontology Workshop May 2008.
Computational Biology and Informatics Laboratory Development of an Application Ontology for Beta Cell Genomics Based On the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations.
Ontological realism as a strategy for integrating ontologies Ontology Summit February 7, 2013 Barry Smith 1.
GO and OBO: an introduction. Jane Lomax EMBL-EBI What is the Gene Ontology? What is OBO? OBO-Edit demo & practical What is the Gene Ontology? What is.
Amo amos amot amomus amotis amont. Happy birthday Swiss-Prot Fortaleza August 2006.
Imports, MIREOT Contributors: Carlo Torniai, Melanie Courtot, Chris Mungall, Allen Xiang.
Open Biomedical Ontologies. Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) An umbrella project for grouping different ontologies in biological/medical field –a repository.
Principles and Practice of Ontology Development: Making Definitions Computable Chris Mungall LBL.
GENE ONTOLOGY FOR THE NEWBIES Suparna Mundodi, PhD The Arabidopsis Information Resources, Stanford, CA.
IDO-Staph: An Ontology of Staphylococcus aureus Infectious Disease Albert Goldfain, Ph.D. Researcher, Blue Highway, Inc. Problems.
Cell Ontology 2.0 Elimination of multiple is_a inheritance through instantiation of relationships to terms in outside ontologies, such as the GO cellular.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Alan Ruttenberg PONS R&D Task force Alan Ruttenberg Science Commons.
Ontologies GO Workshop 3-6 August Ontologies  What are ontologies?  Why use ontologies?  Open Biological Ontologies (OBO), National Center for.
Ontological Foundations of Biological Continuants Stefan Schulz, Udo Hahn Text Knowledge Engineering Lab University of Jena (Germany) Department of Medical.
Linking Animal Models and Human Diseases Supported by NIH P41 HG002659, U54 HG004028, & R01 HG Cambridge University & the University of Oregon.
Sharing Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain Alexa T. McCray National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health & Human Services.
The Plant Ontology: Development of a Reference Ontology for all Plants Plant Ontology Consortium Members and Curators*: Laurel D.
Phenote Mark Gibson Berkeley Bioinformatics and Ontology Project (BBOP) National Center for Biomedical Ontologies(NCBO) Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
2 3 where in the body ? where in the cell ?
Scope of the Gene Ontology Vocabularies. Compile structured vocabularies describing aspects of molecular biology Describe gene products using vocabulary.
Need for common standard upper ontology
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology for Imaging Informatics Barry Smith, PhD, FACMI University at Buffalo May 11, 2015.
Phenote Mark Gibson Berkeley Bioinformatics and Ontology Project (BBOP) National Center for Biomedical Ontologies(NCBO) Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
PATO and TO Barry Smith. HP: ! tachycardia =def. Process: GO: cardiac muscle contraction Quality: PATO: increased rate HP = Human.
1 An Introduction to Ontology for Scientists Barry Smith University at Buffalo
Phenotype And Trait Ontology (PATO) and plant phenotypes
Immunology Ontology Rho Meeting October 10, 2013.
Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith August 26, 2013.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Upper Ontology Summit The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Ontological Research National.
Towards a Computational Paradigm for Biological Structure
Dear Student, Welcome to the exciting & fascinating world of
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
Why do we need upper ontologies? What are their purported benefits?
ro.owl and shortcut relations
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
OBO Foundry Update: April 2010
Presentation transcript:

Ontology of Disease and the OBO Foundry Chris Mungall NCBO GO Nov 2006

Outline  OBO Foundry introduction  Organisational principles  Phenotypes in OBO  Ontology of Disease (and disease- related entities) in the OBO Foundry  What needs to be done?

OBO Foundry goals  Data integration & reasoning  High quality interoperable gold standard reference ontologies  Coverage of all of biomedical reality  Subset of OBO  All OBO principles are inherited; eg open  OBO Foundry is a reformulation of the original OBO goals  Offshoot of GO

Organisation and principles of the OBO Foundry  Divided by partitions:  Kind of entity  Granularity  Canonical, variant and pathological  Species-specificity  Strives for orthogonality  Normalized design  Rector et al  Definitions

Division by kind: upper level categories  Entity  Occurrent (broadly: 4D entity)  Process (e.g. GO biological_process)  Organismal process, cellular process, subatomic process (REX)  Continuant (broadly: 3D entity)  Independent Continuant  Cell (CL), Organ (FMA,CARO), Organism (NCBITax), Tumor (eVOC)  Dependent Continuant  Function (GO-MF), quality (PATO), phenotype (MP), trait (TO), disease / condition, disposition Example terms/root nodes (current OBO ontology)

Division by granularity  Example of a granular partitioning:  Biological  Population (multi-organism)  Multi-cellular organismal  Cellular  Molecular/chemical

Canonical, variant and pathological  Drawing boundaries is difficult  Examples  Pathological  Pathological condition or quality (disease or mutant phenotype)  Pathological independent continuants (eg tumor)  Pathological processes (oncogenesis)  Canonical  GO (molecular function, biological process, cellular component)  FMA (canonical human anatomy)

Organism and stage specificity  Ontologies may be specific to an organism type or stage  Examples  Anatomy  FMA: Human adult  Zebrafish_anatomy: Danio rerio/Cypriniformes?  CARO: multi-species/Metazoan  Process  GO-BP: pan-kingdom pan-stage

Populating the OBO Foundry  Each ontology (partially or fully) occupies one or more slots/cells in the matrix defined by these divisions  Example:  GO Cellular component  Canonical Independent continuants: subcellular (cross- species)  PATO  Dependent Continuant (quality): all (cross-species)  Foundry strives for orthogonality

OBO Foundry Definitions  Necessary and sufficient conditions  OBO Foundry terms should have Aristotelian definitions  An is a which  Example (from FMA)  A plasma membrane is a cardinal cell part which surrounds the cytoplasm  Each term should have a single definition  Thus single primary is a parent  Full subsumption DAG can be derived automatically

The OBO Foundry should be connected  Connections required for inference  Types connected via formally defined relations  OBO Relation ontology  Some relations can connect:  different kinds of entities  across granular levels  Connections obtained through  Definitions (N+S conditions)  Relationships (N conditions)

Connectivity & GO Bio Process  GO-BP represents biological processes  Process has_participant continuant  Processes realized_by functions  Processes can be part_of other processes  Intra-ontology  Examples:  Chemical entity participant  Cysteine biosynthesis  Cell or gross anatomical entity participant  Oocyte differentiation  Neural crest cell migration

Connectivity and phenotypes  We care because we want to use computers to help understand the relationships between genes and phenotypes across species  Phenotypes are dependent continuants  They require a bearer  The bearer is an independent continuant  A phenotype is a quality inhering in a bearer  Phenotypes may be directed towards other entities  PATO ‘EQ’ methodology  Successful for MOD annotation

Phenotype (MP) Computable Definition GenusDifferentia Big ears MP: Large size PATOInheres_in ears MA Sensitivity to nicotine MP: sensitivity PATO: Towards nicotine CHEBI:17688 Susceptibility to viral infection MP susceptibility PATO: Towards viral infection GO holoprosencephaly MP Having_single_par t PATO Cerebral hemisphere FMA Hypoglycemia MP: Low_quantity PATO Glucose CHEBI:17234 Inheres_in blood FMA

Diseases and the OBO Foundry  The OBO Foundry has a vacant space for disease & related entities (DO)  How do we proceed?  What are the kinds of entities within the scope of the DO?  How do these entities connect to entities defined in other OBO-Foundry ontologies?  How does the DO address granularity?  Should the DO cover other mammals/vertebrates?  How do we define disease (general) and specific diseases?

Scope of the DO  Diseases are dependent continuants  The OBO Foundry also has space for:  Pathological independent continuants  Tumors  Viruses (NCBITax?)  Pathological processes  Caveat: pathogenic organismal processes (GO)  Should the DO manage or import these?  Phenotypes (signs, symptoms)  Covered  Overlap?

Connections to other ontologies  What entities should be related  Infected (condition) & spread of virus & virus  Cancer disease & carcinoma  Clinical procedures & diseases  Disease and diagnosis (meta-observation??)  Disease and symptoms/phenotypes/manifestations  Gene and disease  Diseases and dispositions  Diseases and anatomical entities  Disease and process  Which of these are in scope of the DO?  Application ontologies  Annotations, Databases/knowledge bases (e.g. OBD)  What relations need added to RO to support these?

Organism specificity  We are focused on translational medicine  Human health  Animal diseases that can cross to human  Eg Avian flu  Animal models of human disease  What is the scope of the DO?  Human is priority  What is the migration path?

Defining diseases  Can we always apply the Aristotelian definition methodology?  Eligibility criteria  Can we import definitions from Snomed & openGALEN?  Should there be a single axis?  What is it?  Many definitions will be hard  Use cases on wiki?

Proposal  Pick low hanging fruit  Define in terms of disruption of process/functioning (GO + ?)  As granular/specific as possible  Tag as ‘foundry subset’ as appropriate  For all disease terms  Link to aetiological agent(s) (if there is one)  Link to manifestations (phenotypes)  Link to independent continuants (eg FMA)  Link to pathological formations  These links can be used to automatically build DAGs for use in applications

Further discussion  Mailing lists  Diseasesontology-discuss  Obo-relations  Obo-discuss  Obo-phenotype

Annotations, genes  Need a place for statistical knowledge  7% of breast cancer cases are correlated with a mutation in BRCA1  OBO Foundry  OBD Foundry

Genes and the OBO Foundry  Difference between gene instance and gene type  OBD Foundry

Axes  Topog  Morphology  Etiology  Function