MBTA Customer Opinion Panel July 2015 Baseline Report 8/14/2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
Advertisements

Richmond Terrace Resident Satisfaction Survey April - June 2014 Report Results and Action Plans for Richmond Terrace April-June 2014.
D D Department of Veterans Affairs Comparing the Denver Forum Survey and Supplier Perception Survey Regional Forum – Denver, CO March 6, 2012.
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Tuesday, September 26, p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
Providing Travel Choice Through Employee Shuttles Association for Commuter Transportation of Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit 2012 Suzanne Charbonneau,
Streamlining the Journal Process June 21, 2006 Presentation to Financial Unit Liaisons.
Making Excellence - a Standard Telephone Access checks Testing the first response.
Office of Enabling Technologies Erik Hofer, Director 11/1/2011.
Twenty Years Later ICPD Beyond 2014 A Briefing on the ICPD Beyond 2014 Review Process 2012.
CSU Customer Satisfaction Surveys Q&A. Survey Dates March 24 th through May 30 th Select a (2-week) period to run your survey(s) A reminder will.
Customer Loyalty Programs – Increasing Customer Loyalty throughout the customer base! Suhail Khan – Director of WW Customer Loyalty Program – FileNet Corporation.
Evaluation National Conference on Community Based Access to Justice February 20, 2004 Bonnie Hough.
Measure What Matters Clinical Value Compass Balanced Scorecards
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Presentation to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee 27th April 2005 Implementing Electronic Government & The Change Programme.
Shared Services Workshop Break-out Session Summaries July 7, 2015.
22 May 2012 Mark Cotton Please see next slide for additional details.
Brand Awareness Supplemental questions may detail to uncover brand and messaging impact and intent to act. These following questions are fundamental questions.
March Staff Survey Results. STATE OF THE STAFF (2010 Staff Survey Results)
SGR & Capital Working Group Initial Overview 8/31/2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only1.
Pullman Regional Hospital June 30, 2010 Culture Trumps Strategy The Impact of Leadership on Patient Safety.
Get Customer Feedback Chapter 8. Customer Service, 5e Paul R. Timm 2 © 2011, 2008, 2005, 2001 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Georgia Credit Union Idea Institute 10 Tammy Gallegos SVP Marketing Communications & Service Quality August 2015.
Bus Service RFI Routes Overview on Process 8/14/2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only1.
Connecticut State Data Center at the Map and Geographic Information Center - MAGIC Connecticut State Data Center Affiliates Annual Meeting May 11, 2012.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
What’s New in PARCC: What ELC Members Need to Know February 2013 Margaret Horn, Vice President, State Engagement & Outreach Lesley Muldoon, Associate Director,
May 2015 National Employment Network Association NENA Marketing Survey Initial Observations & Results- Lisa Jordan: NENA President, and Kathy Holmquist:
Jean Wallace January 15, SP&R Part II Funding Distribution – FY2014.
Research Needs and Outputs Telecommunications Policy and Regulation Presented by: Michelle Grell The Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago.
© MORI Not to be used, reproduced or shown to any third party without the prior written permission of MORI The Big Listening - Living in Salford.
Public Health Performance Standards District System Assessment Karen O’Rourke, MPH Joan Orr, CHES 2009.
Customer Loyalty Programs – Increasing Customer Loyalty throughout the customer base! Paul Knott– Customer Services Director EMEA Response Center Paul.
IPEDS Finance Survey: Private Not-for-Profit Institutions Using FASB Reporting Standards Draft 1.
Capital Project Prioritization and Selection – MBTA Process & Plans Eric Waaramaa Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority July 22,
LD 1818 Resolve Milestones Timeline Milestone MayJuneJulyAugustSeptOctNovDecJan Review the current structures of and relationships among the Maine Health.
Safety Self-Assessments Assessing opportunities to improve Workers’ Compensation best practices within an organization.
Measurement Vicki C. Grant, Director Supporting Families National Program Office covering kids & families Process Improvement Collaborative.
Coordination of LIHEAP with State and Utility Payment Assistance Programs NEUAC Conference June 28, 2011 Jackie Berger.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
1 Exchange Network Performance Measures Exchange Network Users Conference Mary Greene, Chief Information Exchange Partnership Branch Office of Environmental.
Prospect : Acquire : Penetrate. Affinity Marketing University Curriculum –Prospect –Acquire –Penetrate Field prospecting activity How you will benefit.
November 2013 Performance Report RM Education Stoke BSF and Stoke CIS.
Information Literacy Online: p.r.n. Information Literacy Standards Delivery and Design Face to Face Partnerships Tutorials E-struction Assessment.
Vaga Associates Enquires: The North West is on the move … Cumbria is at the forefront! Story Board Progress on developing a Strategy for Sport.
IPEDS Finance Survey: Public Institutions Using GASB Reporting Standards.
CHAPTER 4 Negative Numbers. ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION USING NEGATIVE NUMBERS A number line is very useful when you have to do additions or subtractions.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
District 11 CEAL Meeting: Bike/Ped Update SETH CUTTER DISTRICT BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN COORDINATOR APRIL 13, 2016.
UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1.
Selection of System Operators 1.  WIOA Requirement  Competitive Selection  RFP Team  Selection Process  Key Elements of the RFP  County Considerations.
Proposed 2012 Methodology for Determining Ancillary Service Requirements.
Interim Survey Results August Survey Overview  Date of survey: July 18, 2012 – August 6, 2012  300 participants  52 completed  17.3% response.
Mind the Gap Stephen Thomas 22/6/17.
Research Participant Satisfaction
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
Hubs Review Overview August
Cornwall Sports Partnership CSPNetwork Partner Satisfaction
Partnership Forum 2018 Partner Institution Survey 2016/17
Research Participant Satisfaction
Connecting Customer & Employee Survey Results to District-wide Engagement Plans Discussing Public Engagement Meeting|February 7, 2019 Kayla Dean, Market.
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Collaboration and partnerships among campuses to create system-ness
Access Services Customer Satisfaction Survey Summer 2019 Transportation Professionals Advisory Committee March 14, 2019.
What is the net force on the object? Will this object move?
BPM Strategy June 2012 Info-Tech Research Group.
DRAFT ISO 10002:2018 Revision Overview Quality management — Customer satisfaction — Guidelines for complaints handling in organizations ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Presentation transcript:

MBTA Customer Opinion Panel July 2015 Baseline Report 8/14/2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only1

2 Overview on the web-based customer service survey Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only We recently resumed the customer satisfaction panel survey, which was developed in partnership with M.I.T. The survey is web-based and part of a new approach to customer outreach which leverages a panel of 6000 participants Survey participants are balance by geography, mode used and basic demographics We plan to run the survey on a monthly basis going forward to compare performance against the benchmark “Net Positive %” is calculated by scoring every question on a 1-7 basis, removing the 4s, subtracting the “negatives” (1-3) from the “positives” (5-7) to get to “net positive”, which is divided by total responses DRAFT

3 Overall Customer Satisfaction March 2014 – July 2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only Source: MBTA Internal Data – July 2015 Survey – 647 customers began survey; 4000 total riders in the panel – Opinion Panel is a collaboration between the MBTA Office of Performance Management and Innovation and MIT DRAFT

4 Likelihood to Recommend to Friend March 2014 – July 2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only Source: MBTA Internal Data – July 2015 Survey – 647 customers began survey; 4000 total riders in the panel – Opinion Panel is a collaboration between the MBTA Office of Performance Management and Innovation and MIT DRAFT

5 Wait Times March 2014 – July 2015 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only Source: MBTA Internal Data – July 2015 Survey – 647 customers began survey; 4000 total riders in the panel – Opinion Panel is a collaboration between the MBTA Office of Performance Management and Innovation and MIT DRAFT