Drought Alert System for the Upper Trinity River Basin NWS/TVA Meeting October 24, 2006 Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch National Weather Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Vulnerability to Drought through Mitigation and Preparedness Report to the Inter-Agency Task Force for Disaster Reduction Sixth Meeting Geneva,
Advertisements

Ontario Low Water Response (OLWR)
Texas State Water Planning Methodology Runnan Li Katie Born James Bronikowski.
CBRFC Peak Flow Forecast Webinar April 9th, 2014 Greg Smith & Ashley Nielson These slides: Presentation are available.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mid-West Electric Consumers Association September 16, 2014 Corps of Engineers US Army Missouri River Mainstem.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Enhancing the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service: A Program to Develop A Low-Flow/Stage Database for Selected NWS Forecast Points in the Upper Colorado.
1 NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center ESIP Federation Winter Meeting 2009 Washington, DC The NIDIS U.S. Drought Portal: An Update Mike.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Environmental Flow in the Context of Small Reservoirs in West Africa Yongxuan Gao 21 March 2009.
Carly Jerla Bureau of Reclamation Michael Hayes National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln Risk Assessment Scoping Workshop for.
Climate Prediction Applications Science Workshop Bill Proenza Regional Director National Weather Service Southern Region Tallahassee March 9, 2004.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE – ACF Operations Bailey Crane Water Management USACE, Mobile District.
Mark Svoboda, Climatologist National Drought Mitigation Center School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln Developing Partnerships and Tools.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
National Weather Service North Central River Forecast Center Mississippi River Forecast Procedure.
Bobbie Klein 1 Lisa Dilling 1, 2 Western Water Assessment 1 Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado.
Managing Drought: A Roadmap for Change in the United States
U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program U.S. Geological Survey Streamgaging Program J. Michael Norris Coordinator, National Streamflow.
National Flood Conference April 22, 2009 Victor Hom Hydrologic Services Division Office of Climate, Water and Weather NOAA’s National Weather Service National.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Predicting and Preparing for Natural Disasters Margaret A. Davidson Director NOAA Coastal Services Center June 7, 2005.
Status of the National Drought Commission (and update on the “Drought Bill”) Presented to the Interdepartmental Committee for Meteorological Services and.
FLASH FLOOD PREDICTION James McDonald 4/29/08. Introduction - Relevance  90% of all national disasters are weather and flood related  Central Texas.
Enhancing the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service A Program to Develop A Low-Flow/Stage Database for Selected NWS Forecast Points in the Upper Colorado.
California Data Exchange Center Hydrologic Database System
Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Partnerships.
The North Carolina Drought Management Advisory Councilhttp://
Strategic Planning MRC first Strategic Plan for Revised in 2000: Current Strategic Plan Vision and Mission remain unchanged Goals updated.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
Drought Monitoring: Challenges in the Western United States
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Dr. Thomas Graziano Chief, Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather.
Apalachicola River and Bay NIDIS System Development Workshop Breakout Session #1 April 27, 2010 Victor Murphy-NWS Southern Region.
Western States Watershed Study 1 Photos from the State of New Mexico and Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Websites U.S. Geological Survey.
Presented by: Diane Cooper NWS - Southern Region Headquarters.
Region C Study Commission Phase I Draft Report David Harkins, Ph. D., P.E. Espey Consultants, Inc. September 24, 2009 Espey Consultants, Inc S. 2.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
Drought Mitigation and Response Advisory Council Elements of a Drought Response Plan May 29, 2008.
Multiple Purpose Dam & Reservoir
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
National Weather Service Water Science and Services John J. Kelly, Jr. Director, National Weather Service NOAA Science Advisory Board November 6, 2001.
The U.S. Drought Monitor and Beyond
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and Drought Related Forecasts Kevin Werner.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Program Marin County Department of Public Works.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
Conservation and Reuse Water Savings (Task 3.2) Alan H. Plummer, Jr., P.E., BCEE Alan Plummer and Associates.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Note: This presentation contains only preliminary research results. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Vano at Thanks.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
NIDIS Project - Drought Alert System for the Upper Trinity River Basin NWS/USGS/COE Meeting November 15, 2006 Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch National.
Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Big Picture: Drought Early Warning
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Cary A. Talbot, PE, PhD Program Manager
Scoping Workshop for the Upper Colorado River Basin
Drought in Texas Texas Division of Emergency Management
Grapevine Lake Modeling & Watershed Characteristics
The Basin–Wide Approach New 303(D) Vision
Using Models to Explore Options for Middle Oconee River Management
UW Civil and Environmental Engineering
Flood Forecasting and Warning Vienna Flood Model
How the Missouri River is Operated - WAPA’s Role - Mid-West Electric Consumer Association Annual Meeting December 11, 2018 | Denver, CO Lori L. Frisk VP,
Presentation transcript:

Drought Alert System for the Upper Trinity River Basin NWS/TVA Meeting October 24, 2006 Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch National Weather Service Southern Region , ext. 118

National Drought Preparedness Act of 2005 The National Drought Preparedness Act of 2005 Senators Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) introduced S 802, the "National Drought Preparedness Act of 2005", on April 14, A companion bill, HR 1386, was introduced in the House by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) Rep. Dennis Rehberg (R- Mont.), Rep. Tom Osborne (R-Neb.) and Rep. Stephanie Herseth (D- So.Dak.). The bills are similar to legislation introduced in the 107th and 108th Congresses. Senators Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) and Max Baucus (D-Mont.) introduced S 802, the "National Drought Preparedness Act of 2005", on April 14, A companion bill, HR 1386, was introduced in the House by Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) Rep. Dennis Rehberg (R- Mont.), Rep. Tom Osborne (R-Neb.) and Rep. Stephanie Herseth (D- So.Dak.). The bills are similar to legislation introduced in the 107th and 108th Congresses. The effect of the bill would be to put in place a comprehensive national drought policy that statutorily authorizes a lead federal agency for drought, and delineates the roles and responsibilities for coordinating and integrating federal assistance for droughts. It would move the country away from the costly, ad-hoc, response-oriented approach to drought, and move us toward a proactive, preparedness approach, similar to what we have for other natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes. The effect of the bill would be to put in place a comprehensive national drought policy that statutorily authorizes a lead federal agency for drought, and delineates the roles and responsibilities for coordinating and integrating federal assistance for droughts. It would move the country away from the costly, ad-hoc, response-oriented approach to drought, and move us toward a proactive, preparedness approach, similar to what we have for other natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, and tornadoes.

National Integrated Drought Information System Recognition of droughts in a timely manner is dependent on our ability to monitor and forecast the diverse physical indicators of drought, as well as relevant economic, social and environmental impacts. NIDIS will coordinate and integrate a variety of observations, analysis techniques and forecasting methods in a system that will support drought assessment and decision-making at the lowest geopolitical level possible. The tools will allow users to access, transform and display basic data and forecasts across a range of spatial and temporal scales most suited to their individual needs. Recognition of droughts in a timely manner is dependent on our ability to monitor and forecast the diverse physical indicators of drought, as well as relevant economic, social and environmental impacts. NIDIS will coordinate and integrate a variety of observations, analysis techniques and forecasting methods in a system that will support drought assessment and decision-making at the lowest geopolitical level possible. The tools will allow users to access, transform and display basic data and forecasts across a range of spatial and temporal scales most suited to their individual needs.

Low Flow Information Project Objective To provide stakeholders with easy access to low water information (impacts, threshold flows/water levels) to assist with situational awareness, and drought monitoring and contingency planning. To provide stakeholders with easy access to low water information (impacts, threshold flows/water levels) to assist with situational awareness, and drought monitoring and contingency planning.

Implementation Strategy Partner with the National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) to collect low water information from local, state, and federal agencies. Partner with the National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) to collect low water information from local, state, and federal agencies. Identify other potential sources of funding to support the project (state agency received hazard mitigation grant funds for project). Identify other potential sources of funding to support the project (state agency received hazard mitigation grant funds for project). Develop NWS and state database schema to store low water information. Develop NWS and state database schema to store low water information. Populate National Weather Service hydrologic database with low water information. Share low water information with the state. Populate National Weather Service hydrologic database with low water information. Share low water information with the state. Submit requirements to display low water information on the NWS Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service (AHPS) Web Page. Submit requirements to display low water information on the NWS Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service (AHPS) Web Page. Develop state of TX web server that will provide customers with easy access to low water information. Develop state of TX web server that will provide customers with easy access to low water information. Demonstrate project in the upper Trinity River Basin. Demonstrate project in the upper Trinity River Basin.

Benefits Enhanced situational awareness capability for local/state/federal agencies involved with drought monitoring and decision making. Enhanced situational awareness capability for local/state/federal agencies involved with drought monitoring and decision making. People better informed about the impacts of low water conditions on the economy and their personal lives. People better informed about the impacts of low water conditions on the economy and their personal lives. People more likely to abide with voluntary/mandatory water restrictions if they are educated/aware of the drought impacts. People more likely to abide with voluntary/mandatory water restrictions if they are educated/aware of the drought impacts. Updated local/state/federal drought contingency plans save money for the economy. Updated local/state/federal drought contingency plans save money for the economy.

Upper Mississippi (2004) and North Platte (2005) river basins; Upper Missouri Basin underway (2006) 38 NWS AHPS forecast sites analyzed Upper Mississippi River Basin (MN) – 21 forecast points North Plate River Basin (CO, WY, and NE) – 17 points Conducted internet and literature reviews Also collected information on potential low flow impacts from 115 federal, state, and local water experts Completed Low Flow Project Studies by the NDMC

Experts Were Asked to Provide Information on: The impacts of low river levels The stage/flow at which impacts occur Which AHPS site(s) best reflect the impacts Other factors that affect particular impacts/locations Key Findings 1. Several potential impacts identified loss of municipal, industrial, and agricultural water activation of water rights regulation procedures activation of state and local drought response plans reduced recreational opportunities hydropower losses dredging to maintain navigation fish and wildlife losses exposure of infrastructure increased effluent testing (NPDES)

Flow (cfs) Stage (ft) Impacts Timing/Other Consideration s Information Sources 40 Irrigation releases for crops become sporadic; some fields may not receive full allotment of water Late summer Brian Artery, District Manager, Platte County Conservation District 20 Recreation opportunities very limited, boat ramps at Greyrocks Reservoir are likely to be inaccessible Late summer 10 Irrigation releases cease; crops will require alternative irrigation water supply Late summer 10 Conditions are not favorable for aquatic life; fish and other aquatic organisms begin to die Late summer 10 Conditions are not favorable for livestock and wildlife water, livestock producers must implement alternative livestock water supply Late summer Fort Laramie Forecast Point, Wyoming

Authorities could not describe at what stage/flow impacts at some sites would occur. Ex) “Our wells are affected by river flows but I don’t know exactly how much.” Ex) “Fish and wildlife are affected by low flows but we haven’t determined minimum flow requirements.” More research is needed in such cases to better understand low-flow vulnerabilities

Developing a better understanding of low water impacts at the local level will provide more detailed information for water resources planning applications at all levels of government Conclusion of Case Studies…

Trinity River Basin Low Water Information Project Required Sites ( 20 ) JAKT2 West Fork Trinity River near Jacksboro EAMT2 West Fork Trinity River at Eagle Mountain Reservoir above Fort Worth FLWT2 West Fork Trinity River at Lake Worth above Fort Worth BNBT2 Clear Fork Trinity River at Benbrook Lake near Benbrook FWHT2 Clear Fork Trinity River at Fort Worth FWOT2 West Fork Trinity River at Fort Worth LART2 Village Creek at Lake Arlington near Arlington GPRT2 West Fork Trinity River at Grand Prairie JPLT2 Mountain Creek at Joe Pool Lake near Duncanville GPAT2 Mountain Creek at Grand Prairie GLLT2 Elm Fork Trinity River at Gainesville RRLT2 Elm Fork Trinity River at Ray Roberts Lake near Pilot Point LEWT2 Elm Fork Trinity River at Lewisville Lake near Lewisville GPVT2 Denton Creek at Grapevine Lake near Grapevine BPRT2 West Fork Trinity River at Bridgeport Reservoir above Bridgeport DALT2 Trinity River at Dallas LVNT2 East Fork Trinity River at Lavon Lake near Lavon FRHT2 East Fork Trinity River at Lake Ray Hubbard near Forney TRNT2 Cedar Creek at Cedar Creek Reservoir near Trinidad FFLT2 Richland Chambers Reservoir near Kerens

Optional Sites ( 10 ) BRPT2 Big Sandy Creek near Bridgeport BOYT2 West Fork Trinity River near Boyd WEAT2 Clear Fork Trinity River near Weatherford GLLT2 Elm Fork Trinity River at Gainesville SGET2 Clear Creek near Sanger EFLT2 Elm Fork Trinity River near Lewisville DCJT2 Denton Creek near Justin CART2 Elm Fork Trinity River near Carrollton BVWT2 Sister Grove Creek near Blue Ridge MCKT2 East Fork Trinity River at McKinney Trinity River Basin Low Water Information Project

Potential Texas Contacts NDMC staff will be contacting Texas water experts in 2007, such as: Community water managers near AHPS points Texas Drought Preparedness Council members Trinity River Authority United States Geological Survey US Army Corp of Engineers US Bureau of Reclamation Tarrant Regional Water District They will be asked to help identify potential low-flow related impacts that can be linked to river flow/stages at NWS AHPS points.

Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service

Example Future AHPS Hydrograph with Low Water Threshold Information

Figure 4. An example of a 90-day streamflow outlook for low water. The values along the x axis show the probability of reaching a particular flow (y axis). The brown zone at the bottom of the graph shows the critical level for this forecast point at which low water impacts begin to take effect. CS = conditional simulation; HS = historical simulation. North Central River Forecast Center

NWS Hydrometeorological Web Pages NWS hydrology web pages NWS hydrology web pages o (click on River Forecast Center tab) o (AHPS web page) o (AHPS web page) o (experimental nationwide precipitation information service) o (radar data)