Value Added and Distance Travelled and the Learner Achievement Tracker

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GCSE mathematics linked pair pilot qualifications presentation November 2010.
Advertisements

The Foundation Learning Tier Strategy Managers and Curriculum Managers group 24 th March 2009.
National Pupil Database: Current content & structure Anna Barker Data Services Group DfES.
10:00 Introductions and overview of RAISEonline. 10:30Secondary School case study Primary School case study Additional case study 11.10Coffee break 11:30.
Reform of Curriculum and Qualifications. What is the Group proposing? A balanced curriculum Better vocational programmes Stretching programmes Fit-for-purpose.
Colegau Cymru Update & New DfES contract work PWCHETS October 3 rd 2014 Fran Hopwood and Katy Burns Autumn 2014 KB + FH Autumn 2014 Update SCMs.
Pan Wales Hair & Beauty Network Learning Area Programmes Fran Hopwood.
RAISEonline Purpose A joint Department for Education (DfE) and Office of Standards in Education (Ofsted) web based school performance analysis tool. It.
Insight Benchmarking for Excellence #Insightevents.
Presentation to PACE Regional Meeting November 2014 By Ainsley Cheetham.
© Herts for Learning Ltd Inspecting Sixth Form 1 st December 2014.
Insight Benchmarking for Excellence
NATT+ ‘Leading The Way’ Conference Leeds 2011 DfE Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Policy Update: Andrea Smith.
Capita’s 2012 Further and Higher Education National Conference Ofsted inspection best practice and use of data Paula Heaney HMI Adviser for learning and.
Summary Education Performance for Herefordshire Overview February 2015.
Social Care Training in Further Education 9 th March 2005 Helen McLaren Head of Faculty,Health, Humanities, Science & Care.
Destinations What do you aim to achieve through the publication of destination measures? We have made it very clear that we want to put more information.
The Study Programme Guide for ITE students The Study Programme Guide for ITE students “The aim of Study Programmes is to maximise the potential.
Teachers New to NCEA Workshop New Zealand education system receives international praise In 2011, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and.
Key Stage 4 Accountability Measures from 2016 Heads’ Huddle Bishop Fox 19 November 2013.
Slide 1 of 17 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 2: The development of English.
Kevin Fisher May 2010 Qualifications Credit Framework Overview and operational implementation.
Curriculum and Performance Measures ….an update.  Changes to content and assessment at every Key Stage  Key changes coming up  Possible considerations:
RPA/funding per student/Study Programmes – how it all fits together in 2013/14.
‘Unseen Children: access and achievement 20 years on’ (Ofsted, 2013) ‘Unseen Children: access and achievement 20 years on’ (Ofsted, 2013) The background.
Slide No:1 This presentation is designed to assist your organisation in its staff development and training regarding the measures of success. It contains.
24 June 2011 Raising standards, improving lives Moving to outstanding post-16 provision Tom Winskill HMI Principal Officer, Framework Development Ofsted.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
GCSE mathematics pilot qualifications for 2010 September 2009.
Outputs, Outcomes and Impact Andrew Harris – Derwen College Fiona Voysey – National Star College.
Catholic Diocese of Portsmouth DEPARTMENT FOR SCHOOLS.
Foundation Learning An Introduction. Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF) Painting the Picture Reform Programme Secondary Curriculum.
Subject Leader Development Meeting November 2011.
The Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT)
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Joining the dots FFT aspire: an overview Anne Pepper FFT Associate 1 Essex LA – Schools Hands On June 2015.
Ofsted Common Inspection Framework Mapping to Career Ready September 2015.
© Herts for Learning Ltd. Foundation Learning To consider the implications of: New Ofsted framework Progress 8 measure.
© Herts for Learning Ltd. Foundation Learning To consider the implications of: New Ofsted framework Progress 8 measure.
Monitoring Achievement and Progress in Independent Schools Running Your School on Data January 2011 Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant
Primary Assessment Arrangements for 2016 January 2016.
The Future of Inspection April 2005 David Hinchliffe.
Aspects of ‘outcomes for learners’ for learners with learning difficulties or disabilities, including provision in Independent Specialist Colleges Charlie.
November 2011 Careers Education, Information Advice & Guidance Update Paul Barren County IYS Team.
The New Accountability Measures
A case study. Content School context Challenges Outcomes Curriculum pathways What works in our context Process Ofsted & progression to HE – a view.
Understanding & Using School Governance ….data. Me 8.30ish finish 15 minute break Fire alarms/Loos Introduction to RAISEonline Working in groups Packs.
Sussex Coast College Hastings Inspiring futures : Changing lives From Inadequate to Recovery Sussex Coast College Hastings Response to OFSTED April Carrol.
Pamela McConnell Donna Vivers CfE Support Managers s.
© Crown copyright 2006 July 2007 Devon Subject leader development meeting.
16-19 Accountability Measures. When Outcomes from summer 2016 (for students on 2 year courses). That is enrolments September First publication:
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
‘A Flying Start’ Achievement Update November 2014 Chris Snudden Head of Education Achievement Service Head of Virtual School for Children in Care John.
Foundation Learning Tier Getting Started Briefing - Post-16 FLT Success North Conference June 2006 Foundation Learning Tier support programme.
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 17: Using the self-assessment process to improve the quality of English, maths and ESOL.
Maximising Opportunities Conference
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 12d: Developing functional mathematics with vocational learners - training the trainers.
Policy and progress update on the reforms to A levels
RAISEonline PANDA and PAT Merger Ed Price
Vocational Qualification Standards: UK
After school.
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Progress 8: an explanation
16-18 Performance Tables January and March publication What's new?
Vocational orientation in the Service sector
Vocational orientation in the Service sector
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
Presentation transcript:

Value Added and Distance Travelled and the Learner Achievement Tracker Yvonne Fullwood New Measures of Success LSC, National Office

Context of the New Measures Fair, valid and ‘fit for purpose’ measures Four partners: LSC, DfES, ALI, OFSTED ‘Basket’ of measures to contextualise performance Application across the sector No additional bureaucratic burden

New Measures of Success Qualification success rate (QSR) Value Added and Distance Travelled measures (VA/DT) Recognising and recording progress and achievement (RARPA) 4. Learner satisfaction Learner destinations Provider responsiveness to employers Value for money (VFM) Staff measures

Purpose of VA and DT for 16-19 learners Improvement and inspection: LSC: Value Added and Distance Travelled data for 16-19 learners Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT) Provider Gateway DfES accountability: VA for 16 – 19 Learners included in the School and College Achievement Tables pilot

Overview (1) Measures the progression in qualifications of 16-19 learners based on their prior attainment ie, how well do learners do post-16 based on their achievement at Key Stage 4? Cover the majority of larger, approved qualifications taken by 16-19 learners, including vocational and ungraded qualifications

Overview (2) VA for 16-19 learners will measure achievement in Level 3 graded qualifications, for example: GCE A and AS level AVCE BTEC National Diploma DT for 16-19 learners will include other approved Qualifications at levels 1,2 and 3 for example: NVQ Foundation and Intermediate GNVQ GCSE BTEC First

Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT) Produces reports for use by teachers, managers, inspectors and LSC Accessible via the Provider Gateway Uses most robust statistical methods available and includes full national sample Builds on proprietary systems currently available Software and data free of charge to all LSC-funded providers and LAs The LSC produced a prototype version of the Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT). The LAT is able to produce reports at different levels of aggregation and can be used by providers, inspectors and the LSC The LAT is available on the Provider Quality Gateway. The measures are calculated using a multi level modelling technique. More information on the statistical methodology will be available on the LSC website for the pilot year. The LAT provides the facility of reporting VA and DT data, but whilst built on similar functionality of proprietary systems, the LAT does not replicate all the functionality or range of services as these systems maybe able to offer. Further development work will continue during the pilot year and following the launch to increase the usefulness of the system and the information it presents. The software will be free of charge and will also include the entire national data set and provider data.

VA and DT data Data used to calculate the VA and DT for 16 – 19 learners is gathered directly from the the awarding bodies Additional data from the ILR is required to calculate DT for 16 – 19 learners Providers will not be involved in collecting data for the measure Providers will be involved in checking the accuracy of the VA data In accordance with the commitment to reduce bureaucracy, the data used to calculate the VA and DT measures will be gained directly from the awarding bodies. This information is sent annually to the University of Bath who match the achievement data for qualifications achieved by learners post-16 to the learners prior attainment at KS4 (or equivalent) which they have collected in the previous year(s). The dataset is credibility checked by a further contractor and the prior attainment for each learner is calculated. The achievement data provided to the University of Bath is in grade format. Each qualification (and grade within a qualification) has been assigned a number of QCA points. The grades for each learners achievement are converted into QCA points, added up and then divided by the number of qualifications achieved to give an average prior attainment in QCA points. The national performance is calculated using MLM and this information as well as the provider level data is fed into the LAT so the provider level performance can be calculated. The process for producing DT information is the same as for VA apart from an additional data source that is needed, given the nature of the qualifications included in the DT measure. The additional data source required is the ILR which is needed to identify those learners who complete a qualification but that do not achieve.

Issues for further exploration Learners with missing or no prior attainment Context variables Customising the LAT Treatment of AS levels in the VA measure Treatment of fails in the VA measure Use of success rate for DT A number of issues have been identified in discussions with providers, partners and stakeholders which are to be investigated further during the pilot year. These include: FAILS – these are not included in the VA measure at present due to an issue with the QCA points scoring system. AT present, the distance between grades is not consistent between pass and fail. In the case of an A level, the distance in QCA points between grades is 30 points (A = 270; B = 240 etc.). However the difference between an E grade (140) and a fail (0) is 140 QCA points. As a result of this, fails can skew the VA results. USE OF SUCCESS RATES FOR DISTANCE TRAVELLED – there are a number different platforms from which the Distance Travelled measure for WBL can be built, depending on whether achievement rate or success rate is used. As part of the work with the Adult Learning Inspectorate and the team leading on the Qualification Success Rate measure, analysis will be undertaken to identify which is the most suitable measure to use. CONTEXT VARIABLES / SOFT INDICATORS – at present, the VA and DT measures do not contain context variables of soft indicators. Feedback from providers particularly, has indicated that this is something they wish to be included in the measure. Further modelling work will be undertaken to ascertain how these can be built into the measures and how the LAT can accommodate them in the calculation.

LAT piloting arrangements January 2006 Updated Quality Improvement Packs available Pilot LAT will be available via the Provider Gateway. This will contain Work-Based Learning Distance Travelled (DT) data and un-amended Value Added (VA) data for schools and colleges March 2006 DT data for colleges and amended VA data for schools and colleges. to April 2006 Short term evaluation. November 2006 The LAT software released for reflection and quality improvement purposes. Ofsted continues to pilot the LAT.

More information http://www.lsc.gov.uk/nms Measuring Success Newsletter The Quality Improvement Pack Implementing New Measures of Success Local LSC

The Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT) Reports

LAT Output reports Type of LAT report What the report shows Summary Charts Overview of performance across different qualifications and across different subjects within a given qualification type compared to the national average National comparison graph Performance in a given qualification/subject compared to the national average across the full range of prior attainment National chances charts Chances of a learner with a given prior attainment achieving a particular outcome

Summary Chart for all Qualifications

A Level Summary Chart

National Comparison Graph: A Level D&T Product Design

National Comparison Graph: A Level Maths A Level Mathematics

National Comparison Graph: A Level Psychology

A Level D&T Product Design Chances Chart (40-46) 34%

A Level Mathematics Chances Chart (40-46)

A Level Psychology Chances Chart (40- 46)

Example of a Distance Travelled National Comparison Graph

Further Information The Quality Improvement Pack contains detailed information about the interpretation and application of each type of LAT reports www.lsc.gov.uk/nms