Cosmic tests and Performance of the ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker Barrels Bilge Demirköz Oxford University On behalf of the ATLAS SCT Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Advertisements

May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Workshop on Silicon Detector Systems, April at GSI Darmstadt 1 STAR silicon tracking detectors SVT and SSD.
1 Alan Barr, UCL Fixed Frequency Trigger Veto The problem: –Currents in wire bonds in presence of strong magnetic fields –DC current not a problem (small.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Operation and performance of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Vertex 2005, Nikko Manfred Pernicka, HEPHY Vienna 1.
Michał Dwużnik, for the SCT collaboration
1 ATLAS SCT Endcap C Efficiency Measurement Nicholas Austin IoP Conference April 2009.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
July 17, 2013 CERN T. Flick University of Wuppertal.
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
28 June 2004ATLAS Pixel/SCT TIM FDR/PRR1 TIM tests with ROD Crate John Hill.
Neil Jackson University of Liverpool Hiroshima Symposium June THE ATLAS SEMICONDUCTOR TRACKER (SCT) A PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Peter W. PhillipsATLAS SCT Week, CERN, September/October 2002 Electrical Tests of SCT modules using RODs Peter W Phillips Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
23/01/2007ID Software Workshop1 SCT performance from the SR1 endcap data Satoru Mima Okayama University ID Software Meeting 23-Jan Noise Study -
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
Distributed Low Voltage Power Supply System for Front End Electronics of the TRT Detector in ATLAS Experiment E.Banaś a, P.Farthouat b, Z.Hajduk a, B.Kisielewski.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker End-cap Quality Control and the Characterization of Straw Deformations Michael Kagan University of Michigan Supervisor:
1 4 July 2006 Alan Barr - SCT DAQ Experience and plans from running the (SCT) DAQ at SR1 HEP Cosmics setup Running modes Problems Future.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
Operation & Performance of the ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker Dr. Petra Haefner Max-Planck-Institut für Physik.
Noise results from SR1 combined SCT barrel tests Summary of some initial results Alan Barr, UCL Pepe Bernabeu, Valencia.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
TRTViewer: the ATLAS TRT detector monitoring and diagnostics tool 4 th Workshop on Advanced Transition Radiation Detectors for Accelerator and Space Applications.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
DAQ for ATLAS SCT macro-assembly
Experience with DAQ for ATLAS SCT
Status report of the ATLAS SCT optical links
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Vertex 2005 November 7-11, 2005 Chuzenji Lake, Nikko, Japan
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
ATLAS Silicon Tracker commissioning
BESIII EMC electronics
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic tests and Performance of the ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker Barrels Bilge Demirköz Oxford University On behalf of the ATLAS SCT Collaboration

Overview Description of a barrel module Macro-assembly: Modules  Barrels Data Acquisition System: Calibration mode –Barrel tests, check for common mode noise –Performance 4 Barrels integration  “SCT” SCT + TRT = Inner Detector Barrel Data Acquisition System: Physics mode Cosmics!

SCT Barrel Module Each side has: 2 silicon sensors –Hamamatsu –768 instrumented strips –Strip pitch = 80µm Binary Readout chip: 6 ABCD3T ASICs –Discriminator –Pipeline –Data compression logic –Readout Buffer 2 sides glued with 40 mRad stereo angle TPG baseboard with BeO ceramic facings –Thermal management –Up to 10W / module at lifetime dose! 12 cm chan 0 chan mrad stereo  6cm

ATLAS inner detector SCT barrels: 4 layers SCT endcaps: 9 disks Pixels TRT

Barrel 3 macro-assembly

Hardware Data Flow ROD BOC Formatted Event MODULE BPM TTC SERIAL TTC x48 DATA x96 DORIC VDC DATA CLKCOM DATA Electrical Domain Optical Domain SBC VME Configuration & Commands Histograms & Data Data Path in ATLAS TIM Backplane TTC BOC Configuration ROS Formatted Event SLink Readout Crate On Detector Event Builder TCP CTP

Software data flow Configure and define test Run… from ROD  RawData FittingService AnalysisService –finds optimal settings of the ABCD chip –calculates averages for noise, offsets… –cuts defined for identifying “defects” –publishes  TestResults –publishes a subset of the TestResults  (IS)Summaries  COOL (database for offline)

Testing and when? Modules are tested after –Production (at module assembly sites) –Macro-assembly (at Oxford) –Reception at CERN –Insertion (at CERN) Check that module performance does not change at different stages Development of “final running” software through all these stages –Also used for endcaps –How to recover errors on modules?

Typical Test Sequence Basic Tests –Establish Communication –Optimise Opto settings Digital Tests –Verify Communication –Do trigger counters work? Analogue Tests –Measure Gain, Offset, Noise –Measure Noise Occupancy –Look for Time Structure –Detect excess noise possibly related to high frequency, synchronous triggers Check module supply and sensor currents The Binary Architecture of the ATLAS SCT dictates that analogue information must be extracted by scanning chip thresholds.

Histogram Data (from ROD) Channel Fits Calibration Curves Fit Analyse Channel threshold corrections Channel DAC setting Threshold in mV Example Calibration

Results = 4 x Equivalent Noise Charge (ENC)

Checks for common mode noise The number of hits per event is summed and histogrammed. At higher thresholds, all entries should fall in the 0-3 bin –“Good Chip!” Any “spikes” might suggest the presence of common mode –“Bad Chip?” One event with between hits Vertical scale – Threshold in mV with reference to 1.0fC – so 20mV is ~1.3fC Except when coincident with other known defects, effects such as this were not reproducible. No significant common mode noise observed! Good Chip! Bad Chip? Plots for Module

Double Trigger Noise Verify that the detector readout does not generate noise in subsequent events Send two consecutive triggers separated by a controlled time interval Scan around 132 bco = pipeline depth Pipeline == stores data until trigger (L1A) is received.

# of bcos 6 x x10 -5 # of bcos Barrel 3 LMT09 z-4 Lower side of the module

Light leak! One opto-package leaks light onto sensor Effect occurs at bin nnnnbbbbbbbb time channels 2 light leaks on Barrel3: occupancy of 6 x10 -4 on a few channels  very small effect in the large picture… Optopackages on other barrels fixed before macro-assembly No lightleaks found!

Channel Defect Statistics BarrelTotal Channels Not bonded DeadNot Reachable Part bonded NoisyOtherTotal Defects Total The Bottom Line:  99.8% working channels! Here add the graph From the module paper Showing number of defects On module

Insertion of B3, 20/09/2005

SCT inserted into the TRT 17/02/2006 Poster by Heinz Pernegger on “SCT Integration and Testing”

Barrel TRT Proportional counters embedded in radiator –4mm diameter straw tube, 30µm wire –1.4m long wires, readout on both ends –Cosmics: Ar:CO 2 = 70:30 73 layers of straws ~ 36 hits per track Total number of straws: ~ Noise occupancy = 2% in 75nsec Final: Xe:CO 2 :O 2 = 70:27:3 Drift time accuracy ~140µm Measured with efficiency 87%

Cosmics setup SCT: 504modules 12RODs, 1TIM, 1Master LTP TRT: 2x6568 chan 9RODs, 3 TTCv, 1 Slave LTP 3 Scintillators 144cmx40cmx2.5cm TDC/QDC measurement Trigger time jitter ~ 0.5nsec ~ 300MeV cutoff for alignment studies View from outside towards Side A 20cm of concrete

TDC/ADC measurement Measure time of flight between scintillators charge deposited by the muon for event and momentum selection Measure Relative time of trigger with respect to system clock for phase corrections TDC, Time resolution ~ 35 psec ADC, Charge resolution ~100 fC Decoded online and performed simple time checks Not yet decoded and used in the offline.

Physics mode of SCT Set thresholds to optimal 1fC Read 3 time bins instead of 1: Expanded mode –1 time bin = 25 nsec Accept any hit in these three time bins Latency in components: trigger, TIM, ROD, BOC, cable/fibre lengths… ~ 30bcos SCT has a pipeline depth of 132 bcos Need to delay this signal by the right amount TRT: reads every 3.125nsec and 24 time bins (total of 75 nsec).

A module sees cosmics! Coincidences between module sides And histogram for each module! On ROD, histogram while scanning through BOC Tx coarse delays (32bcos) noise Coincidences between module sides = cosmics!

Tracks through the top sector of the SCT and the TRT

Summary ATLAS SCT Barrel Integration is complete! –All 2112 modules tested –99.8% of 3.2 million channels working The Data Acquisition System, SctRodDaq, has been developed –Largest system to date: 1 crate, 14 ROD/BOC pairs, 672 modules –Ongoing work on multi-crate readout –On-ROD monitoring of dataflow –Can “time-in” the readout for physics data taking Combined sector test (SCT + TRT) with Cosmics from May 2006 Offline is looking at the data right now… –Present residuals from tracks (without alignment) are better than the specified building tolerances.

Next steps Collect high statistics sample of cosmics muons for alignment studies Offline decoding of the timing (TDC) information –Efficiency estimates –Alignment studies Digitization work –Use the online noise and defects lists from the COOL database in SCT simulation Move to the pit in Summer 2006 Endcaps move into the pit Fall 2006

Backup slides

TTCvx Trigger and Timing Trigger LTPTTCvi L1AinL1Aout/clocked BC A-channel B-channel OptoLink TIM SCT TRT LTP Busy Orbit ADC TDC Corbo start OR phase delay L1Ain Latency in components: trigger, TIM, ROD, BOC, cable/fibre lengths… ~ 30bcos NIM VME LTP= Local Timing Processor

SCT Sector Cooling (3kW of power -- SCT sector only) 800,000 channels in the SCT

SCT Module Readout 1 TX fibre = clock+command for each module 2 RX/data links fibre-optic communication opto-package (DORIC+VDC) connection to the module redundant TTC from neighboring module dog-leg

Opto-package Chip S11 module Side view of the barrel

SCT databases DAQ parameters: –Configuration data (chip settings,…) (frequently updated): 2MB/update –Average noise, offsets(…) for each chip and lists of defects for each module: ??MB/calibration DCS parameters: 100MB/day –Temperatures, currents for each module All in COOL by offline identifier Should be easy to correlate –Noise versus current –Figures given for commissioning of full barrel

SctRodDaq Framework -- simplify!!

Readout: Redundancy If one side of the module can not be readout from its master chip due to opto-failure, it can be readout through the other side excepting its own master chip. M0S2S1S3E5S4 M8S10S9S11E13S12 Link 0 Link 1

Readout: Redundancy If one side of the module can not be readout from its master chip due to opto-failure, it can be readout through the other side excepting its own master chip. M0S2S1S3E5S4 M8S10S9S11E13S12 Link 0 Link 1

Readout: Redundancy Modified module connects M8 to E13 and allows all 12 chips to be readout. (similarly for M0 after E5 for Link 0 opto-failure) Prototype has been made and tested. Will be available for Barrel 6 construction M0S2S1S3E5S4 M8S10S9S11E13S12 Link 0 Link 1

Correlated Noise?? Occupancy per event in Noise Occupancy Test Binomial Distribution Threshold over 1fC 128 channels max

OPE Analysis: LMT21 Z-6 high threshold Threshold over 1fC Channels