Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February 2014 3L Research Institute Roula.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Performance management guidance
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
4 4 By: A. Shukr, M. Alnouri. Many new project managers have trouble looking at the “big picture” and want to focus on too many details. Project managers.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Strengthening global awareness in the local communities - Kolping 2020 Strategy.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This website reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be.
Agence Education Formation-Europe Tips for a good application.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
SARMa project development WP1 Project management and coordination SARMa internal handbook Alianta d.o.o., Ljubljana Split, 4-5 February 2010.
Prodotto da Elena Turchi 4^H Scienze Sociali. ESkills Kit.
Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
Dushanbe 14/3/2013 DoQuP Model 1 DoQuP Project WP.1 - Deliverable 1.3 The DoQuP Model: milestone of the DoQuP project Marina Cavallini CRUI.
DonQ – Air Project presentation. DonQ-Air – About project Objective: Objective: to encourage R&D activities in the aeronautic-related.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Session 26: Census 2011 « Helsinki, 6 May 2010 « Census quality control with BSC: the Portuguese.
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
BCSM&Higa Ubeho RPOs COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE (COP) _____________ By: RUSANGANWA Léon Pierre PSF/BCSM Project Manager ____________________________________________________________.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Results of the midterm evaluation exercise on the Leader + programme for Portugal Special focus on evaluating innovation Pedro Afonso Fernandes (CIDEC.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Project management and communication structure Nataša Urbančíková Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.
Number: TR/06/B/F/PP/ WASTE-TRAIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING, EDUCATION, CONVEYING INFORMATION ON UP-TO-DATE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DECISION MAKERS/STAFF.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
Interim project evaluation August 2013 – June 2014.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
BUDGET 4Distribution of budget per phases of the project; 4Itemization of budget; 4Division of budget per source of contribution; 4Division of budget between:
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula Mourmouri 1

Evaluation Plan Contents: -Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation Plan -Meetings (Meeting Evaluation Form) -Deliverables Peer Review (Quality Verification Sheet) Document Quality Control Publicity Rules -Project Management Internal Communication Monitoring and Reporting Interim and Final Report (Internal Evaluation Questionnaire) 2

Purpose of the Evaluation Plan Overall objective: - To assist project partners in establishing the procedures that will ensure the quality of the project and guide them in the evaluation process Specific objectives: - To discuss what we evaluate and why - To present the quality guidelines to be followed - To present and explain the evaluation tools to be used - What the interim and final reporting entails The goal is to ensure that the appropriate procedures are in place that will guarantee the successful implementation of the project 3

Meetings Three main stages: -Preparation -The meeting -Follow-up 4

Meetings -Preparation  Mailing List - Ensure the mailing list includes all participants and information is circulated evenly  Agenda - Agenda should be sent 15 days prior to the meeting  Material - PC should ensure that all material is ready for the meeting  Venue & other Facilities - Organizer should ensure that an appropriate venue is booked and that all practical arrangements are in place 5

The meeting  Meeting Atmosphere - committed an agreeable and congenial atmosphere  The role of Project Coordinator - encourages open and clear communication - seeks active participation - ensures that meeting objectives are achieved  Meeting Evaluation Form - the organizer should circulate it and collect it - forms should be sent to the PC and the partner responsible for Evaluation  Explanation of the Meeting Evaluation Form - Programme (presentations, discussions, key issues addressed, format) - Organization ( overall organization, information, facilities) - Suggestions for next meeting (what to issues to be included) - Meeting impressions (impressions on positive and negative issues) 6

Meeting – Follow up  Minutes - should be circulated within fifteen (15) working days after each meeting - the minutes will have to be approved by the partners - the Project Coordinator will finalise and approve the minutes within one (1) month after the meeting. 7

Deliverables  Peer Review - Partners should identify which deliverables are going under peer review - They should decide on the list of reviewers (from the partnership). It is advisable to be two (2) people for every deliverable - The Quality Verification Sheet should be used for peer review  The Peer Review Process - The reviewers will have seven (7) working days to review and send back the deliverable to the PC and the partner responsible, using the Quality Verification Sheet - The partner will have four (4) days to integrate changes and send it again to the PC and the reviewers. - The PC checks that improvements/changes were incorporated and gives final approval  Explanation of the Quality Verification Sheet A form that assesses: - The format (Table of contents included, Del. Name, Author, etc) - Content ( clarity, meets the requirements of the project plan, depth) - Suggested improvements 8

Deliverables  Document Quality Control - Apply correct technical requirements and instructions - Ensure project reports are available in the place and time determined in the application - Use the appropriate and designated templates created for the purposes of the project  Publicity Rules - All deliverables and outputs should comply with the publicity rules of the European Union - The European Union contribution should be clearly acknowledged - The appropriate Logos should be used 9

Project Management  Internal Communication - Informal day to day communication should be conducted via or phone - Teleconferences can be organized to discuss particular issues - All information distributed is considered as partnership confidential unless stated public  Rules and etiquette - Subject Line: First state the name of the project, then the Particular topic Example: NEWJOBS- 2 nd Meeting – Agenda - Keeping it consistent is important, so that s are not lost or not read, and filing is facilitated 10

Monitoring and Reporting  Interim and Final Reports - Focus on the quality control of the contractual results to be produced - Assess the underlying process of the project -They are a synthesis of the evaluation of all three aspects of the project: Meetings, deliverables and project management. -Evaluation forms and other documentation are going to be used in both interim and final reporting - The partnership should deliver the interim report at the end of the 1 st year and the final at the end of the 2 nd year of the project 11

Interim Report  Focus - Partnership Content (description of activities) - Planned and actual mobility activities  Internal Evaluation Questionnaire: Purpose and Explanation - Recommended for partners to fill in the Internal Evaluation Questionnaire before the submission of the interim report - This will allow the assessment of all processes and activities in the first year of the project and assist partners in fixing any problems - The PC will circulate and collect the Internal Evaluation Forms and communicate them to the Partner responsible for Quality Assurance 12

Final Report  Final Report -Follows the finishing of all project activities and formally ends the Project -It contains two parts: One referring to the whole partnership and one specific to each partner  Main Contents of Part A -Description of partnership, detailed list of all activities -European Added value - Work plan and tasks - Communication and Cooperation - Evaluation methodology - Results and Outputs, Aims and Objectives  Main Contents of Part B - Activities carried out at local level and during the mobility actions - If activities were achieved according to plan (provide explanation if not) - Impact of the partnership and Dissemination - Account of mobility participation 13

Evaluation Plan Thank you for listening! 14