Assessment Department Enhance student achievement while simultaneously closing all identifiable gaps by providing timely and accurate data about student.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE & TESTING. CMT-SCIENCE Given for the first time in Spring 2008 in grades 5 & 8 Consists of multiple choice and open ended questions Based on student.
Advertisements

Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation It is a process to provide holistic profile of the learner through regular assessment of both scholastic and Co-scholastic.
Part II :Some important things
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness--EOC Tim Walker Nathaniel Session.
Year 10 Transition Evening Thursday 16 th October 2014.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Benchmark Assessment Item Bank Test Chairpersons Orientation Meeting October 8, 2007 Miami-Dade County Public Schools Best Practices When Constructing.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Information Literacy and Assessment: The What, Why, Who, Where, When, and (most importantly) How.
MATH 330: Ordinary Differential Equations Fall 2014.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Year 9 Transition into year 10
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Principles of Assessment
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Placement Reading 90- Accuplacer or THEA (or passing grade on reading 80) Reading 80- Accuplacer or THEA
Fremont Christian School Instructor: Jaime Garcia x363 Course Description In this course the students study.
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.
WELCOME Mrs. Conley/Mrs. Fales Test Prep. COURSE POLICIES Test Prep.
Our mission is to help you succeed. During the next few minutes you will learn how to earn a high school diploma, while keeping hope alive to reach your.
Placement Reading 90- Accuplacer or THEA (or passing grade on reading 80) Reading 80- Accuplacer or THEA
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Syllabus and Class Policies MATH 130: Summer 2014.
Grading and Reporting Second Grade
Industrial Engineering
6 th Grade Math Mrs. Stacie Courtney Eagles. Contact Information ◦(859)
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Student assessment AH Mehrparvar,MD Occupational Medicine department Yazd University of Medical Sciences.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan December 17, 2012 Kevin Houser.
Improving Course Completion and Success Rates Easily: Leverage Summative Assessment for Formative Purposes Robert E. Vaden-Goad, PhD Southern Connecticut.
Research Problem In one sentence, describe the problem that is the focus of your classroom research project about student learning: That students do not.
Developing an Assessment System B. Joyce, PhD 2006.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
Classroom Diagnostic Tools. Pre-Formative Assessment of Current CDT Knowledge.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
Welcome to PreCalculus! Instructor: B. Beck-Smith.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
WELCOME TO ENGLISH 11! Mrs. Marciano Rm About Mrs. Marciano Background & Education Philosophy Why English?
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
Acos2010.wikispaces.com. ACT Provides the Following:  a standards-based system of assessments to monitor progress toward college and career readiness.
1 PARENT INFORMATION RISD Elementary Grading Guidelines.
akville rafalgar high school Science Grade Science.
LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING October 30, Bell Ringer Choose four formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student.
Types of Assessment in Education Week 2. Types of Assessment In the previous week’s lesson we saw that there’s two basic types of assessment formal and.
To share important information about KS2 SATs To answer any questions about KS2 SATs Discuss / share ideas about how you as a parent can help your child.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
An approach to Operations Research course in the curriculum for Informatics students KUŠEN EMA, PROF. DR. SC. MARINOVIĆ MARIJA DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATICS,
Syllabus and Class Policies MATH 130: Summer 2016.
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
Formally know as Math Analysis
ECML and Lithuanian Educational Institutions: Experence of Cooperation
Curriculum Evening Welcome 1.
Understanding Your Child’s Report Card
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF Teacher Preparation In US
Industrial Technology Management Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Eric Y. Cheng Date.
Waterford High School AP Statistics Course Syllabus
ASSESSMENT STRUCTURE CLASS IX AND X
Curriculum & Tracking Mr Rhodes - Headteacher
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Department Enhance student achievement while simultaneously closing all identifiable gaps by providing timely and accurate data about student performance on school- based, system-wide, and standardized assessments.

Functions of Assessment Department Prepares exam schedules and guidelines Develops software applications to compile student results of school-based (formative) and system- wide (summative) assessment Exam Administration Ensures the development of valid and reliable assessment tools Ensures the alignment between curriculum and assessment practices Exam Development Collects, analyzes, and interprets qualitative and quantitative data pertinent to student assessment for guiding system-wide continuous improvement Statistical Analysis and Research

Academic Year 2011/2012 Academic Year Term-1 (Sep 11 to Dec 07) School-based System-wide Term-2 (Jan 02 to Mar 22) Term-3 (Apr 08 to Jun 21) End-of-Year Mark = (1/3) (Term1+Term2+Term3) End-of-Term Mark = 75% SB + 25% SW (AT courses) = 50% SB + 50% SW (other courses)

Assessment Scheme Core; ES Cluster  ; ICT Cluster; HST Cluster School-based Assessment Participation Homework20 Quizzes30 Projects30 System-wide Exam100 Course Final Mark100  KnowledgeSkills School-based Assessment Participation School-based Assessment Housekeeping Homework20Safety20 Quizzes40Craftsmanship30 Reports20Work Completion40 System-wide Exam100 Knowledge Mark100  Skills Mark100 Course Final Mark = [(Knowledge Mark + Skills Mark)  2] = 100 Applied Technology

Quizzes Two unified quizzes per term for all core subjects (5 th & 9 th weeks of each term) Each quiz is out of 15 The quiz mark in school-based assessment should be the sum of the two quizzes Pop quizzes marks should be discussed with curriculum developer

Exam Development A question bank will be developed to generate end-of-term exams. Questions should tap all cognitive levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy in alignment with curriculum standards. Guidelines will be shared & professional developments will be conducted in this regard.

Marking Procedures These procedures should be conducted to the best of both markers(first & reviewer) abilities and abiding by the answer key. Exam markers should keep the following points in mind: 1.The first marker (marking with red pen) must follow the answer key. 2.The second marker (marking with green pen) must follow the answer key. 3.The mission of the second marker is not only to sign test paper but to actually mark again. 4.Both markers are INDEPENDENT of one another; the second marker has the RIGHT to add or subtract marks according to his/her judgment. 5.If both markers disagree on the marking of a student's solution (because it does not match the answer key) and there is a significant gain or loss in marks (more than 2 marks) then the LT should be involved immediately to take a final decision. 6. The Assessment Department WILL PULL OUT test papers randomly to check on the marking process.

Standardized Tests

Statistical Analysis & Research Data Analysis System-wide School-based Formative Summative Standardized Action Research Interviews Questionnaires Ethnographic Case Studies others

Report Cards End-of-Term results will be announced within a week from the exams. Report cards will be prepared by the Assessment Department. Student Final Result depends on his/her achievement in both: Core & Cluster Courses

Cluster Selection  Engineering Science (Core Percentage ≥ 80 & mathematics EoY ≥ 80)  Information & Communication Technology (Core Percentage ≥ 80 & computer EoY ≥ 80)  Health Science & Technology _ female only (Core Percentage ≥ 80 & English EoY ≥ 80)  Applied Engineering (GPA ≥ 2.0)

Make-up Exam Procedures A student can sit for the make-up exam if his/her absence on the day of the original exam is valid and accepted by ATHS administration. Make-up scores are treated as end-of-term exam scores and the course final marks in the corresponding subjects are calculated accordingly. If a student misses the make-up exam he/she receives a zero mark.

Re-sit Exam Procedures A student can sit for the re-sit exam if he/she fails no more than three core subjects. Re-sit scores are treated as the course final marks for the corresponding subjects. Previous scores (school-based or system-wide) are NOT considered in the calculations of the final mark. If a student misses the re-sit exam he/she receives a zero mark. If the re-sit score is a passing mark, it will be reflected as 60 on the student report card. Otherwise (failing mark), the re- sit score itself will be reflected on the report card.

 Achievement GAP: less than 5%  Curriculum-Assessment Alignment: 80% passing rate; 60% tap Bloom’s three lower levels  Class Performance: average [65-75]; std.dev. [8-12]  Student Projects: Unified & released by Curriculum Developers  Drop-out Rate: at most 5% Expectations for AY

 CEPA: Average score of 175 in English & 165 in math  IC3: all G12 students complete the requirements  IELTS: all G12 students score 5.0 or above  SAT-Reasoning: a score 520 or above  SAT-Subject: all G12-ES students score 650 or above Expectations for AY