70 Years of Radioactive Risks in America and Japan Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Moneer Aljawad, Abdulrahman Alshodokhi, Jericho Alves, Daniel Chief, Benjamin Kurtz, Travis Moore September 16, 2013.
Advertisements

Exploring Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fusion and Fission  Nuclear Fusion Small nuclei into large Immense temperature and pressure Core of stars Iron is the.
70 Years of Radioactive Risks in America and Japan Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident New.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
Nuclear Power: Basics An Alternative to Coal?. Nuclear Science.
70 Years of Radioactive Risks in America and Japan Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident New.
Meltdown alert at Japan reactor Technicians are battling to stabilise a third reactor at a quake-stricken Japanese nuclear plant, which has been rocked.
The Need to develop an A-bomb In 1939, the Nazis were rumored to be developing an atomic bomb. The United States initiated its own program under the Army.
Nuclear Power in Washington State Kathleen M. Saul November 4, 2010 gCORE.
The Cons of Nuclear Reactors By Michelle Trojanowsky.
Nuclear Energy. How does a nuclear reactor work? Is it a major energy source worldwide? Is it Green? Problems – Waste Disposal – Accidents Future – Research.
STRAGEGY FOR ENHANCING SHARE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY – Ensuring Safety & viability S.S. Bajaj Chairman, AERB 6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct 2014.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap? CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE.
Nuclear Energy Ryan, Brandon and Brenna Nuclear energy- the energy released during nuclear fission, especially when used to generate electricity.
EVALUATING NUCLEAR POWER IN THE U.S. AND ITS CLEAN FUTURE Xingzhou Li Introduction to GIS.
Nuclear Power and Water Michael Mariotte Nuclear Information and Resource Service.
Section 2: Nuclear Energy
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES REPORT Environmental health And Nuclear issues Ana Ormaechea Santi Mateos Silvia Saura.
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING OPPORTUNITIES Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.
Nuclear Power David C Howell Radiation Safety Officer Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA CHAPTER 23 NUCLEAR POWER Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rep?
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
Rated # 1 “BEST PLACES TO WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT” Dale A. Powers US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
Ivan Li and Kyle Krogman.  Nuclear reactor meltdown on March 11 th 2011 near Fukushima, Japan  An earthquake and the following tsunami knocked out electrical.
The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University.
Nuclear Energy Chapter 12. Nuclear Fuel Cycle Uranium mines and mills U-235 enrichment Fabrication of fuel assemblies Nuclear power plant Uranium tailings.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Strategic Delay in Derailing Public Policy.
Reprocessing. Reprocessing is tricky Reprocessing: separating the elements in the highly radioactive spent fuel Small reactors that produce medical isotopes.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Overview of State E-Waste Laws Barbara Kyle Electronics TakeBack Coalition June 2, 2009.
Shawn Lonabaugh. Background  Nuclear energy first came about it the 1940s during WWII. Nuclear properties had been studied for years prior but came directly.
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
Section 2Nuclear Changes Classroom Catalyst. Section 2Nuclear Changes Objectives Describe nuclear fission. Describe how a nuclear power plant works. List.
Exploring Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fusion and Fission  Nuclear Fusion Small nuclei into large Immense temperature and pressure Core of stars Iron is the.
Nuclear Power Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, NY.
Chapter 12 Nuclear Energy.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
What can go wrong? Nuclear power plants cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. A bomb needs a critical mass in a confiuration which is not present in the.
A dramatic explosion and reactor meltdown resulted in the release of radioactive material, resulting in the loss of hundreds of human lives and immense.
Nuclear Power. What Is Nuclear Power? Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy, which generates heat. The energy produced.
The Atomic Bombings of WWII Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan.
Nuclear Power Plants. If the neutrons can be controlled, then the energy can be released in a controlled way. Nuclear power plants produce heat through.
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine. Meltdown At Chernobyl Video Clip: m?guidAssetId=D B06-462A-889D-
The Price and Promise of Nuclear Science Nuclear radiation has it’s good points and it’s bad points.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Nuclear Fleet: Configuration Management Benchmarking Group 2016 June 6, 2016.
Nuclear Power Nuclear Physics Definition of isotope –Atomic mass –Atomic number Behaviors of isotopes Half life.
What do you know of Japan’s Nuclear crisis? How about any past nuclear issues? Do you feel that nuclear power is safe? Why or why not? Question of the.
NUCLEAR POWER. What is Nuclear Power? Process of harvesting energy stored in atoms Used to produce electricity Nuclear fission is the form of nuclear.
Analysis of Low Activity Waste Streams and Volumes in Decommissioning NPPs  Lisa Edwards Sr. Program Manager, EPRI LLW Forum April 13-14, 2016.
“Status of the ReACTOR Decommissioning Program” October 7, 2016 LLW Forum Ted Smith, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Division of Decommissioning,
Nuclear Power Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, NY.
CMBG History Configuration Management Benchmarking Group ( Rick Harris CMBG Steering Committee Chairman 7th Annual CMBG Conference Hosted.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
At-Risk Nuclear Plants: Challenges and Opportunities
Janet R. Schlueter Senior Director, Radiation and Materials Safety
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Challenges Facing Nuclear Operatoring Plants Today
Nuclear Power Student Work.
Nuclear Power in Japan Diego Hernandez JPN 11.
Exploring Nuclear Energy
No Nukes No Where No How [the future of nuclear power]
TEPCO’s ALARA Program (Basic Policy of Mid- and Long- Term Exposure Reduction) Toshiyuki HAYASHIDA Tokyo Electric Power Company Radiation Protection Group.
JAPAN Hiroshima Nagasaki
Presentation transcript:

70 Years of Radioactive Risks in America and Japan Kevin Kamps Beyond Nuclear Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident New York Academy of Medicine March 11-12, 2013

Hiroshima to Fukushima

March 10, 2011

Days later

Aftermath Unit 2, 3, 4Unit 3

Dec. 2, 1942

Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Fallout Oppenheimer and Groves at “Trinity” test blast site, July 1945 Destroyed Nagasaki Buddhist temple, with flattened city in background, August 1945

“Atoms for Peace”

Anti-nuclear groundswell in Japan

CIA deployed to Japan Lewis Strauss Shoriki Matsutaro

Japan’s infamous “Nuclear Village” is born

Atomic America

Atomic Japan

Workers over-exposed Tsuruga NPP, 1981Bruce NGS, Nov., 2009

Sodium fires Monju, Dec. 8, 1995Fermi 1, May 20, 2008

Reprocessing plant fire and explosion Tokaimura, March 1997West Valley, NY,

Nuclear fuel loading mishaps Fukui Prefecture, 1999San Onofre, CA, Aug. 20, 1980

Inadvertent criticality Tokaimura, Sept. 30, 1999Fermi 2, 1985

Safety cover-ups TEPCO, , 2002Davis-Besse, 2002

Deadly steam explosions Mihama-3, Aug. 9, 2004Surry NPP, VA, 1972, 1986

Radioactive steam releases Fukushima Daiichi, 2006San Onofre, CA, Jan. 2012

Earthquakes Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant, July 16, 2007 Indian Point, NY

Additional Risks: RPV Embrittlement Genkai-1,Palisades, MI

Additional Risks: High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Pools Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 on brink of collapse U.S. pools contain much more HLRW than Japanese pools Many warnings about risk of catastrophic pool fires

Additional Risks: High-Level Radioactive Waste Leaks Hanford underground tanks Indian Point HLRW storage pools

Shutdowns Oi, Fukui Prefecture, July 2012Kewaunee, WI, June 2013

Showdowns Tokyo, Indian Point,

Early Warnings “ Recent events have highlighted the safety disadvantages of pressure-suppression containments…What are the safety advantages of pressure suppression, apart from the cost saving?... I recommend that the AEC adopt a policy of discouraging further use of pressure-suppression containments, and that such designs not be accepted for construction permits filed after a date to be decided. Contained in a memo to his boss by AEC Safety Officer, Stephen Hanauer, 20 Sept.1972

Early Warnings, Ignored “The acceptance of pressure suppression containment concepts by all elements of the nuclear field…is firmly embedded in the conventional wisdom. Reversal of this hallowed policy, particularly at this time, could well be the end of nuclear power. It would throw into question the continued operation of licensed plants…and would generally create more turmoil than I can stand thinking about.” Contained in a response by AEC Safety Head, Joseph Hendrie, 25 September 1972

GE 3 blow the whistle In 1976 Gregory C. Minor, Richard B. Hubbard, and Dale G. Bridenbaugh blew the whistle on safety problems with nuclear reactors designed by General Electric. The three resigned from their jobs after becoming increasingly convinced that the nuclear reactor design they were reviewing — the Mark 1 — was so flawed it could lead to a devastating accident.

Post-Chernobyl soul searching In 1986, Harold Denton, then the NRC's top safety official, told an industry trade group that the "Mark I containment, especially being smaller with lower design pressure, in spite of the suppression pool, if you look at the WASH 1400 safety study, you'll find something like a 90% probability of that containment failing.”

Freeze Our Fukushimas There are 32 still operating GE Mark I and II BWRs in U.S.: Mark Is (23 units): Browns Ferry 1, 2 and 3, Decatur, AL -- Brunswick 1 & 2, Southport, NC – Cooper, Brownville, NE -- Dresden 2 & 3, Morris, IL -- Duane Arnold, Palo, IA --Edwin Hatch 1 & 2, Baxley, GA -- Fermi 2, Monroe, MI -- Hope Creek, Artificial Island, NJ – Fitzpatrick, Scriba, NY – Monticello, Monticello, MN -- Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Scriba, NY -- Oyster Creek, Lacey Township, NJ -- Peach Bottom 2 & 3, Delta, PA -- Pilgrim 1, Plymouth, MA -- Quad Cities 1 & 2, Cordova, IL -- Vermont Yankee, Vernon, VT. Mark IIs (8): LaSalle 1 & 2, Ottawa, IL -- Nine Mile Point 2, Scriba, NY -- Limerick 1 & 2, Pottstown, PA -- Susquehanna 1 & 2, Salem Twp., PA -- Columbia Generating Station, Richland, WA.

Collusion

Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, Fukushima, Where Next?!