Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Monte Carlo Simulation
Advertisements

Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
Genesys Model Enhancements October 4, 2011 NW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting Gwendolyn S Shearer.
05/14/2014 Flexibility Methods Workgroup. 2 © 2014 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview/Agenda Discussion of Literature.
Capacity Valuation.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Results of the 2012 Loss of Load Study January 18, 2013.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
Draft Avoided Cost Forecast and Marginal CO 2 Offset Value of Conservation Regional Technical Forum Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
Climate Change and The NW Power Supply Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest University of Washington April 21, 2009.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
Power System Research, Inc. Review of the PNW Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
The Council’s Approach to Economic Risk Michael Schilmoeller Northwest Power and Conservation Council for the Resource Adequacy Technical Committee September.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
Illustrative FCRPS Examples Comparing Capacity Adequacy Calculations for Federal Hydro- Dominated System Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Comparison of LOLP Practices Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23, 2009.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
May 31, Resource Adequacy Capacity Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee May 31, 2006 Background Image: Bennett, Christian Science.
June 27, Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2010 and 2012 Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting Northwest Power Pool.
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 6, 2011.
Evaluating Hydro Capacity for Capacity Adequacy Standard: Selection of Hydro Events Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg November.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Relationship of Regional Resource Adequacy Standards to Utility Planning PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting June 27, 2007.
Interim and Long-term Approaches for Assessing Wind’s Contribution to Capacity Adequacy PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting July 21, 2008.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
2009 Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Assessment Resource Adequacy Technical Committee October 16, 2009.
1 PNW Regional Contingency Resources Resource Adequacy Technical Committee April 6 th, 2011.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Moving toward a Final Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2007.
Evaluation of Columbia River Sustained Hydro Peaking Capacity Eric King / Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting May 31, 2006.
Providing Resource Planning Guidance to Individual Utilities PNW Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting April 13, 2007.
Work Plan Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee July 29, 2009.
DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
Capacity Metric & Hydro Capacity Assessment Decisions Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting June 20, 2007.
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
Sustained Hydro Peaking Capacity Contract with Don Long Finalizing Phase II SOW Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23,
Developing Synthetic Temperature-Correlated Wind Generation Data Steering Committee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
RFPEG2013 PRE-BID MEETING RFPEG2013 – Pre-Bid meeting January 9, 2014 Presentation by Derek Davis – Public Utilities Commission.
LOAD FORECASTING. - ELECTRICAL LOAD FORECASTING IS THE ESTIMATION FOR FUTURE LOAD BY AN INDUSTRY OR UTILITY COMPANY - IT HAS MANY APPLICATIONS INCLUDING.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Modeling the Hydroelectric System in GENESYS Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 25, 2007.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Types of risk Market risk
Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Eugene Preston,
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Steering Committee Webinar March 25, 2016
Types of risk Market risk
Transmission Planning in a Modern Market Environment
Vetting the GENESYS Model
Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2015 Interim Results Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting July 28, 2010.
GENESYS Current Functionality
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Planning Reserve Margin
Progress on Resource Adequacy Assessment for 2017
Presentation transcript:

Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting

BPA LOLP Project Joint BPA / Council Effort:  Genesys (generation evaluation system) was developed by the Council in the mid to late 1990’s  Genesys is a Monte Carlo (stochastic) model of the PNW power system; with a hourly dispatch function; one game = 1 fiscal year  BPA has been working with the Council over the past 18 months to make improvements to the Genesys model  Federal Genesys - uses the same platform as the Council Genesys  BPA specific resource/demand issues (i.e. slice, regulating reserves, Federal loads and resources etc.) are handled either through a series of switches or input data Monte Carlo Events: Hydro Generation  70 Water Years – for Federal Hydroelectric Projects both regulated and hydro independent plants Wind Generation:  40 capacity factor tables (each 8,760 hours) – for 253 MW of wind projects serving load based on historical wind data Temperature Sensitive Load:  58 temperature traced loads 1949 to 2006 (each 8,760 hours) – of the load following customers Forced Outages (Thermal Units):  CGS and Wauna Cogeneration (expires July 2016) – must run resources with random forced outages (FOR) All Events Assumed Independent *162,400 possible events (excluding FOR)* BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project2

3 BPA LOLP Project (Continued) Joint BPA / Council Effort: (continued)  Data completed for 2013 – Regional Dialogue contracts implemented  Slice logic switched ‘on’ – 27% of generation is sent to slice “account”; does not model slice customer behavior to take more or less capacity  40 capacity factor tables for wind based on 6 years of historical wind data from 5 farms – considered independent from temperature Forced Outages (Thermal Units): (continued)  Federal sustained peaking table (i.e. 2, 4, 10 hour max capacity table and min generation) developed from HOSS  Sustained peaking table includes the affect of holding ‘DEC’ for regulating reserves  Federal ‘INC’ regulating reserves incorporated into reserve requirement (also includes the contingency reserves) BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project

4 Genesys Output – How to Build Metrics and Thresholds?  Reliability record: Shows hourly curtailment and reserve violations for all games. LOLP metrics of interest – the number, magnitude and duration of events, event timing type (HLH, LLH, or both), game percent, time percent, expected unserved energy, and the 95 th & 99 th percentiles of hourly unserved demand are obtained through post-processing this record.  Dispatch records: Show the hourly and monthly loads and resources details for a single user- selected game. The hourly dispatch record includes demand, contracts, source production, overgen, transmission, reserves, unserved demand, and slice accounting. The monthly dispatch record, in addition to summarizing most of the hourly segment data, also shows source availability and thermal source displacement.  Hydro-regulator output : Similar to BPA Hydsim standard output, for up to 70 games. Includes plant-by-plant summaries of flows, spill, generation, draft, ending storage and reservoir elevations, and overall summaries of generation for each period. Additional files based on the regulator output are useful for model validation and finding duration curves for reservoir refill.  Miscellaneous output files : Assist with debugging and validation, log game parameters and input filenames, and are used with the Visual Basic shell (not currently active). Some of these output files include contract detail, hydro capacity estimation and hourly loads for a single game, water/temp/wind year selections and overgen detail for all games, and monthly hydro block sizing and flex accounting for up to 10 games. BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project

What is the Industry Standard?  Metric and threshold (or a derivative of) 1 day (or event) in 10 years  Used across the United States and in Canada  The only exception found was Hawaii (1 event every 4.5 years)  Modeling done for capacity limited systems – explicitly don’t model fuel supply and load deviation (and/or have limited load deviation)  Typically driver of energy-not-served (ENS) events: Forced Outages  First Energy quipped, “The criteria (metric) creates a good target, but a lousy planning/compliance measure” BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project5

Conversion of the Industry Standard Metric into a Probability Distribution  Industry Standard Metric: “One day in 10 years” taken to mean on average one ENS event every 10 years  In running many Monte-Carlo games, there is a distribution in the number of ENS events; some games have more than 1 while others have fewer  Assume Industry Standard Metric has a distribution of ENS events shaped like the Poisson Distribution, which requires – Events occur randomly (Forced Outage being typically the #1 driver) – Different events are independent of each other  Converting hourly Genesys LOLP results into compatible data for comparison with Industry Standard Metric: – Count ENS events only during peak hours – ENS lasting through multiple peak periods counted as multiple events – On average “1 ENS event every 10 years” becomes on average “0.1 ENS event every year” BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project6

7 Industry Standard Metric Poisson Distribution, with an average of 0.1 ENS Event per year, as Industry Standard Metric BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project

BPA Comparison to the Industry Standard Distribution Study Assumptions  1,000 games ran for FY 2013  Current FCRPS, Regional Dialogue Contracts, Resource Program market assumptions, and approximately 600 aMW of additional HLH resources available (with a seasonal shape)  Added resources until the number of games with events < 1%  Load following customers; historical conservation embedded in load forecast  No additional conservation assumed  Load following customers Tier 2 placed on BPA Results  BPA LOLP ENS events do not fit the Industry Standard Metric  Exceed the industry standard metric for games with zero event (99% versus 90%)  Yet, there are also games with multiple events outside the Industry Standard Metric  These events are primarily the result of bad water years (energy limited system); and secondarily the result of high load forecasts  The single event lasting 14 days has an average ENS (over the event period) greater than 1 aGW BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project8

9 BPA Compared to the Industry Standard Distribution Industry Standard Metric (90% of games with no event) BPA LOLP (99% of games with no event) BPA LOLP (1% of games have more than 3 events) BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project

Initial BPA Metrics LOLP (time%)  LOLP would measure the percent of total hours simulated that had ENS occurrences  A threshold of reliability could be established Tail Event Analysis  Designed to capture the frequency, duration, and magnitude of highly infrequent but significant events  Building resources of sufficient size to cover these events that would operate so infrequently may not be the desired outcome  What additional resources are available (but are not explicitly modeled in Genesys)? BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project10 PSRI contract - major task items are to review these initial metrics and to give BPA a view to countries that have developed metrics for energy limited systems

The Oregon Experience PGE August 2009 IRP Metrics:  LOLP = hours with ENS/Total Hours  Expected Unserved Energy (EUE) = Unserved Energy/Number of hours with Unserved Energy  Tail Var90 of Unserved Load  No Thresholds for LOLP metrics  Rather metrics are given a weight in portfolio selection (15 total portfolios)  LOLP no weight given  EUE given a 15% weight  TailVar90 given a 10% weight PAC May 2008 IRP Metrics:  Average annual ENS  July probability of > 25,000 GWhr ENS  Average annual ENS  July probability of > 25,000 GWhr ENS  No thresholds for LOLP metrics  Rather metrics are given a weight in portfolio selection (21 total portfolios)  Average annual ENS given a 5% weight  July Probability of >25,000 GWhr ENS given a 5% weight BPA’s Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project11 In January 2007, OPUC adopted IRP guidelines – including Guideline 11 Reliability “Electric utilities should analyze reliability within the risk modeling of the actual portfolios being considered. Loss of load probability, expected planning reserve margin, and expected and worst-case unserved energy (ENS) should be determined by year for top- performing portfolios.”