EBPM kw 29-30 achievements Kirsten Hacker. Summary Trombone fiducialization and characterization of hyteresis and backlash Accurate measurements of ACC1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A special large aperture BPM at FLASH Nicoleta Baboi for Kirsten Hacker BPM Workshop, Lüneburg, Nov. 30, 2006.
Advertisements

1 Schedule of classes in PRC I need your availability on - Wednesday - Thursday - Friday afternoon.
Lecture Notes Part 4 ET 483b Sequential Control and Data Acquisition
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
SolventTrak. The Case for Recycling HPLC Solvent.
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers
Spectral Resolution and Spectrometers A Brief Guide to Understanding and Obtaining the Proper Resolution of the 785 Raman System.
Distance observations
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
© David N. Jamieson 1999 Divergence,  o Energy Spread,  o + high low Chromatic Aberration, A closer look Are  and  correlated? Use MULE* to find out.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Instrumentation and Measurements
Scale Factor. Organizer What is it?Find a Scale Factor #1 RuleReal Word Problem Scale Factor.
S. White, LBS 17 May Van Der Meer Scans: Preliminary Observations.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Radar equation review 1/19/10. Radar eq (Rayleigh scatter) The only variable is h, the pulse length Most radars have a range of h values. Rewrite the.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.
Accuracy: The closeness of a measurement to the true or actual value
IB Physics Topic 1 Measurement and Uncertainties
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
Instrumentation and Measurements Class 3 Instrument Performance Characteristics.
Resonance in a Closed Tube Constant Frequency, Changing Length.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Electron Detection for Compton Polarimetry Michael McDonald Outline -Compton Effect -Polarimetry -Detectors -Diamond Results.
COGGING MEETING Cogging Semi-Fine Adjust without collisions? Fine Adjust When? Cogging Meeting – Sophie BARON.
CS TC 22 CT Basics CT Principle Preprocessing. 2 CT Basics CT principle preprocessing CS TC 22 Blockdiagram image processor.
Time (days)Distance (meters) The table shows the movement of a glacier over six days.
1 Henrik Loos 1 13 Sep 2011 APE Meeting Recent Activities H. Loos 09/13/2011.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
BSRT CALIBRATION MD SUMMARY LSWG #6-15/09/2015 BSRT TEAM.
1/10/2016Collaboration Meeting Feb 2011 Start Counter 1 Start Counter Update W. U. Boeglin L. Guo E. Pooser Measurements on EJ-212 scintillator bars Attenuation.
Extraction Line Laser-wire 24 th January 2013 A.Aryshev, G.A.Blair, S.T.Boogert, L.Corner, L. Nevay, P.Karataev, N.Terunuma, J.Urakawa, R.Walczak.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Turn in lab reports and WS 1 to the front basket. Remember to attach your draft.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
Jitter Monitor – Overview and Status Report Glenn Christian, Alexander Kalinin 30 May 2005.
LHC Clock Phase Stability: is it an issue?  It seems that the LHC clock phase might drift relative to the beam crossing  What can we tolerate, and will.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Sardana/IcePAP Based Control System for elliptically polarized Undulator at Max IV 30th Tango Collaboration meeting
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
R. Michaels, JLab PREX Mtg, July 2008 Recent Cavity Monitor Tests Credit: John Musson, Anna Boehle, Vince Sulkosky Good position & current for 10 nA to.
Drive Beam Feedforward and Compression
Path Length Difference Study R. Apsimon. Assumptions Assume input signals vary sinusoidally (good approximation after BPF). Input signal arrives at a.
Last page of mapping notes
Miscellaneous Measurements
Feng Zhou LCLS-II AP meeting 02/23/2017
Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Undulator Tolerances for LCLS-II using SCUs
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Lesson 10: Sensor and Transducer Electrical Characteristics
Accuracy, precision, and you
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Energy Calibration with Compton Data
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Extraction kicker scan & feedback results
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Scale Drawings – Common Core
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
SCU Phase Shifter Meeting
Impact of orbit perturbations on luminosity calibrations
Presentation transcript:

EBPM kw achievements Kirsten Hacker

Summary Trombone fiducialization and characterization of hyteresis and backlash Accurate measurements of ACC1 energy changes and gun/laser phase changes with trombone feedback active Scan of coarse signal over larger range

Trombone group delay is 7.62 cm in data sheet Beam moves Distance -d VM moves Trombone moves -d d d d -2d For any beam movement d, The trombone moves 2d => Position = diff +trombone/2 7.62/2 = 3.82 cm BUT, the data only makes sense if you scale the trombone position with something closer to 15 cm because… Trombone Fiducialization

(um) 1.4mm/V Here 10 cm trombone length scaling used between end switches Scale according to signal wavelength NO Scale according to slope YES => multiply poti by 1.14/2 VM changeTrombone 0.95 mm1.35 mm 3 mm3.42 mm 7.2 mm5.79 mm 14.1 mm11.52 mm Doesn’t actually move here! Or here! 76 mm 29.2 mm 28.9 mm 27 mm 28.5 mm 29 mm 27 mm 1.6 mm/V Bump comes from reflection in pickup: changes location with beam position Trombone calibration is not constant over full range

Nevertheless, Measurement is reproducible And accurate with 15 cm trombone scaling PMT monitor EBPM Legend:

BUT! If *something* is jittering a lot, The fine measurement of the monitor cannot correctly calibrate itself and the measurements Are polluted by trombone hysteresis And inaccurate calibrations The situation can be improved through averaging and reducing the sensitivity of the trombone feedback

When the beam is jittering a lot, it is better to use the coarse signal option of the EBPM

Typical parasitic measurements PMT monitor EBPM

Machinedrift22.txt Trombone change at 46 hours Wonderfully invisible EBPMPMTVS EBPM PMT VS Correlation coefficients EBPMPMTVS EBPM PMT VS Drift over one setpoint