An Overview of Peer Review at CSR – Critical Do’s and Don’ts Joy Gibson, D.Sc. Director, Division of Translational and Clinical Sciences American Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review at the NIH Center for Scientific Review
Advertisements

NIH Peer Review of Small Business Applications 11th NIH SBIR/STTR Conference July 2009 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human.
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
What’s NIH? National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst. National Human Genome Research Inst National Institute.
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Basics of NIH – National Institutes of Health Nancy Myers Sims, Grants.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2011 November 3, 2011 Approaches to Biomedical Research and Development Portfolio Analysis: Examples From the.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AWARD AREA (R15) Paula Flicker.
Cheryl A. Kitt PHD Deputy Director CSR October 30, 2009 Center for Scientific Review and National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human.
Weathering the Storm: How to Establish and Sustain an Independent Research Career in an Era of Limited Funds Lawrence J. Prograis, Jr., M.D Senior Scientist,
NIH Regional Seminars 2014 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute James P. Kiley, Ph.D. National Heart,
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Introduction to the NIH Grants System
NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.
NIH Regional Seminars 2015 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
Short Overview of the NIH SBIR/STTR Program “Lab to Life”
“The Grant Proposal Pathway” Hypothesis: Understanding what happens to a proposal between the time it is submitted and a funding decision is made will.
Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health.
NIAID Commitment to Influenza Research and Preparedness F. Gray Handley Associate Director for International Research Affairs National Institute of Allergy.
Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis.
Avrom Caplan, PhD Associate University Dean for Research
The Review of Your NIH Grant Application Begins Here Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. Director NIH Center for Scientific Review.
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2009 November 14, 2009 Building Data Systems to Support Evaluation in a Biomedical Research and Development.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
The Grant Renewal Review Process Nywana Sizemore, PhD Scientific Review Officer Molecular Oncogenesis - MONC Oncology I - Basic Translational - OBT Integrated.
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
National Institutes of Health. Much of the biomedical research in the United States is supported by the Federal Government, primarily the National Institutes.
Jo Anne Goodnight NIH SBIR/STTR Program Coordinator NIH Mission Improve human health through biomedical and behavioral research, research training and.
1 CSR’s Mission and Function and What’s New in Peer Review Martha M. Faraday, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Division of AIDS, Behavioral & Population.
NIH Grant Renewal Review Process (and Beyond)
1 Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
Center for Scientific Review (CSR). Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and.
BME 301 Lecture Twenty-Three. How are health care technologies managed? Examples: MRI Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Vitamin C treatment for scurvy Research.
NIH F-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships
The Search for a “Better Way:” Reauthorization of the National Institutes of Health Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., Director, NIH July 19, 2005 House Energy and.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
The NIH Funding Process Peggy McCardle, PhD, MPH Child Development & Behavior Branch National Institute of Child Health & Human Development We wish to.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop.
NIH Grant Writing Tips Kelli A. Komro, MPH, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, COM Associate Director, Institute.
Changes is NIH Review Process and Grant Application Forms Shirley M. Moore Professor of Nursing and Associate Dean for Research Frances Payne Bolton School.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
“The Grant Proposal Pathway” Hypothesis: Understanding what happens to a proposal between the time it is submitted and a funding decision is made will.
NIH Regional Seminars 2015 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Weijia Ni, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerChief, RPHB, Center for Scientific Review National Institutes.
Organizational Funding Portfolios and Beyond: Assessing the Full Research Landscape Panel Session 731 American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2012 October.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
How to get funded from the National Institutes of Health Minda R. Lynch, Ph.D., Chief Behavioral and Cognitive Science Research NIDA.
Challenges and Opportunities in Peer Review A Vision for Ensuring Its Strategic National Value toni scarpa Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Jeanne McDermott, PhD,MPH,CNM Program Officer Division of International Training and Research Fogarty International Center National Institutes of Health.
NIH HIV/AIDS Research Priorities
Overview of CSR and NIH Peer Review
Understanding NIH Peer Review
American Evaluation Association
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
The Influence of Domain-Specific Metric Development on Evaluation and Design: An Example from National Institutes of Health Technology Development Programs.
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Grant Writing Information Session
The NIH Peer Review Process
NIH Study Section Review Process
The NIH Peer Review Process
Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of Peer Review at CSR – Critical Do’s and Don’ts Joy Gibson, D.Sc. Director, Division of Translational and Clinical Sciences American Association for Thoracic Surgery March 4, 2011 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Institute on Aging National Institute on Aging National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Eye Institute National Eye Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Institute of Nursing Research National Institute of Nursing Research National Library of Medicine National Library of Medicine Center for Scientific Review Center for Scientific Review National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Fogarty International Center Fogarty International Center National Center for Research Resources National Center for Research Resources Clinical Center Clinical Center National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Office of the Director Center for Information Technology Center for Information Technology National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Review Study Section Institute Advisory Councils and Boards Institute Director Assigns to IC & I IRG/Study Section Reviews for Scientific Merit Evaluates for Relevance Recommends Action Takes Final Action Initiates Research Idea Conducts Research Allocates Funds Submits Application Review Process for a Research Grant Research Grant Application School or Research Center

Scientific Review Process Dual Review System for Grant Applications Second Level of Review NIH Institute/Center Council NIH Institute/Center Council Second Level of Review NIH Institute/Center Council NIH Institute/Center Council First Level of Review CSR or Institute Review Scientific Review Group (Study Section) First Level of Review CSR or Institute Review Scientific Review Group (Study Section)

Receives all NIH applications Refers them to NIH Institutes/Centers and to scientific review groups Reviews majority of grant applications for scientific merit Your Application Goes to the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR) Focal Point for Initial Review at NIH

Translational and Clinical Sciences Translational and Clinical Sciences Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Musculoskeletal, Oral And Skin Sciences Musculoskeletal, Oral And Skin Sciences Oncology 2 – Translational Clinical Oncology 2 – Translational Clinical Vascular and Hematology Hematology Physiological and Pathological Sciences Physiological and Pathological Sciences Endocrinology,Metabolism, Nutrition & Reproductive Sciences Reproductive Sciences Endocrinology,Metabolism, Nutrition & Reproductive Sciences Reproductive Sciences Immunology Immunology Infectious Diseases & Microbiology Infectious Diseases & Microbiology Digestive, Kidney & Urological Systems Digestive, Kidney & Urological Systems Neuroscience, Development and Aging Neuroscience, Development and Aging Brain Disorders & Clinical Neuroscience Brain Disorders & Clinical Neuroscience Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Neuroscienc Developmental Neuroscienc e Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Neuroscienc Developmental Neuroscienc e Integrative, Functional & Cognitive Neuroscience Integrative, Functional & Cognitive Neuroscience Emerging Technologies & Training in Neuroscience Emerging Technologies & Training in Neuroscience Biology of Development and Aging Biology of Development and Aging Biobehavioral & Biobehavioral & Behavioral Processes Behavioral Processes Biobehavioral & Biobehavioral & Behavioral Processes Behavioral Processes Risk, Prevention& Health Behaviors Risk, Prevention& Health Behaviors Epidemiology & Population Sciences Epidemiology & Population Sciences Healthcare Delivery & Methodologies Healthcare Delivery & Methodologies AIDS & Related Research AIDS & Related Research AIDS, Behavioral and Population Science s AIDS, Behavioral and Population Science s Basic and Integrative Biological Sciences Basic and Integrative Biological Sciences Biological Chemistry & MacromolecularBiophysics MacromolecularBiophysics Bioengineering Sciences & Technologies Bioengineering Sciences & Technologies Genes, Genomes & Genetics Genes, Genomes & Genetics Oncology 1 – Basic Translational Translational Cell Biology InterdisciplinaryMolecular & Training InterdisciplinaryMolecular & Training CSR Review Divisions

Help Get Your Application to the Right Study Section Review CSR Integrated Review Group and Scientific Review Group (Study Section) guidelines to identify a home for your application. Submit a Cover Letter!

Help Get Your Application to the Right Study Section

Help Get Your Application to the Right Study Section Integrated Review Group

Help Get Your Application to the Right Study Section Study Section

Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences IRG Cardiac Contractility, Hypertrophy and Failure Cardiovascular Differentiation and Development (CDD) Clinical and Integrative Cardiovascular Sciences (CICS) Electrical Signaling, Ion Transport and Arrhythmias (ESTA) Myocardial Ischemia and Metabolism (MIM) Lung Injury, Repair and Remodeling (LIRR) Lung Cellular, Molecular and Immunobiology Respiratory Integrative Biology and Translational Research (RIBT)

Surgical, Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering IRG Clinical, Molecular Imaging and Probe Development (CMIP) Medical Imaging (MEDI) Surgery, Anesthesiology and Trauma (SAT) Bioengineering, Technology and Surgical Sciences (BTSS) Biomedical Imaging Technology A & B (BMIT)

Division of Translational and Clinical Sciences (DTCS) Trans-IRG Imaging SEP Goal - enhance review of multidisciplinary, translational research with a focus on imaging Transformative in nature (translational research) Include humans Use imaging as a measure of diagnosis, intervention or treatment success/efficacy Editorial Board (Two Stage) Review First stage – 3 mail reviews (technical focus) Second stage – 3 clinical impact reviews Crosses disciplines of cancer, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and neuroscience

Submit a Cover Letter The cover letter should be used for a number of important purposes: Suggest Institute/Center assignment Suggest review assignment Identify individuals in conflict Identify areas of expertise needed to evaluate the application Discuss any special situations It is NOT appropriate to use the cover letter to suggest specific reviewers.

Peer Review in CSR CSR Study Sections are managed by a Scientific Review Officer (SRO) who is a doctoral-level professional, whose scientific background is close to the focus of the study section. Each CSR standing study section has regular members who are from the scientific community. Temporary members are recruited as needed. About applications are normally reviewed at each study section meeting.

The Role of Your Scientific Review Officer Designated Federal Official responsible for the overall review process

Your Study Section Meeting

Your Application Is Reviewed In Order Clustered and Ordered for Fairness New and Early Stage Investigator applications are usually reviewed first Applications in each cluster are reviewed in order of their preliminary scores

New Investigator (NI):New Investigator (NI): PD/PI who has not yet competed successfully for a substantial NIH research grant oFor multiple PD/PIs-all PD/PIs must meet requirements for NI status Early Stage Investigator (ESI):Early Stage Investigator (ESI): PD/PI who qualifies as a New Investigator AND is within 10 years of completing the terminal research degree or is within 10 years of completing medical residency (or equivalent)

Reviewers discuss about % of the applications The panel will discuss any application a reviewer wants to discuss Discussions Focus on the Best Applications

Additional Review Platforms Helps to recruit reviewers Electronic review modes reduce travel Electronic Reviews Telephone Assisted Meetings Video Assisted Meetings Telepresence Internet Assisted Meetings Editorial Board Review – multidisciplinary

Review Criteria Overall Impact: exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved Assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved Core Criteria Significance Investigator(s) Innovation Approach Environment oReview criteria each scored from 1-9

How Your Application Is Aligned to the Review CriteriaApplication Section Significance Research Strategy a. Significance Investigator(s) Biosketch Personal Statement Innovation Research Strategy b. Innovation Approach Research Strategy c. Approach Environment Resources Environment

9-Point Scoring Scale ImpactScoreDescriptor High Impact 1Exceptional 2Outstanding 3Excellent Medium Impact 4Very Good 5Good 6Satisfactory Low Impact 7Fair 8Marginal 9Poor

Scores for each review criterion Essentially unedited critiques Administrative notes if any If your application is discussed, you also will receive: An overall impact/priority score and percentile ranking An Summary of review discussion Budget recommendations Your Summary Statement

Summary Statement New Indicator for Early Stage Investigators Percentile: 29 Percentile in whole numbers Impact/Priority Score range Program Officer

Read instructions Never assume that reviewers will know what you mean Refer to literature thoroughly State rationale of proposed investigation Include well-designed tables and figures Present an organized, lucid write-up Obtain pre-review from faculty at your institution NIH Grant Writing Tips When Preparing an Application

Additional Factors to Consider Focus on significance/impact Make it exciting Be very clear Do not assume too much Have realistic aims and timelines -- Don’t be too ambitious Be brief with things that everybody knows Note the study’s limitations Proofread the application

Who Can Answer Your Questions? Before You Submit Your Application A Program Officer at an NIH Institute or Center After You Submit Your Scientific Review Officer After Your Review Your Assigned Program Officer

Key NIH Review and Grants Web Sites NIH Center for Scientific Review NIH Office of Extramural Research

Helpful Handouts Insiders Guide What Happens to NIH Grant Application to Peer Review Your Grant Application Useful Web Links