The role of vegetation and large wood in braided rivers dynamics Walter Bertoldi Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bankfull / Effective / Dominant
Advertisements

Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area Tom Coulthard Jorge A. Ramirez Paul Bates Jeff Neal.
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
The River Tagliamento Sustainable flood defence combined to floodplain preservation Nicoletta Toniutti, WWF Italy 23/1/2004, Delft Foto Toni Vorauer -
ON WIDTH VARIATIONS IN RIVER MEANDERS Luca Solari 1 & Giovanni Seminara 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Firenze 2 Department of Environmental.
EROS (Crave & Davy, 2001) “Stochastic model of erosion– sedimentation processes, based on cellular automata, which mimics the natural variability of climatic.
Entrainment and non-uniform transport of fine-sediment in coarse-bedded rivers Paul E. Grams & Peter R. Wilcock, Johns Hopkins University Stephen M. Wiele,
Soil CO 2 Efflux from a Subalpine Catchment Diego A. Riveros-Iregui 1, Brian L. McGlynn 1, Vincent J. Pacific 1, Howard E. Epstein 2, Daniel L. Welsch,
Channel Pattern Outline Description of channel pattern Alternate bars Channel pattern continua and evolution Controls of channel pattern.
Reach-scale morphological changes of a braided river following a 15-year flood with multidate airborne LiDAR S. Lallias-Tacon (1,2), F. Liébault (1), H.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
Sediment surface Main flow direction x y z Measuring point Flux contribution x Footprint definition: smallest area that contributes with 90% of the flux.
National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Modeling physical and ecological dynamics of channel systems that shape Earth’s surface Moving boundary problems.
ROMS modeling of stormwater plumes and anthropogenic nitrogen inputs in the SCB Eileen Idica PhD candidate, Dept Civil &
“Research in dam breaching" Sílvia Amaral PhD Student (1 st year) December, 14 th 2009.
COUPLED MODELING River – Delta Plain to Longshore Transport Run & Couple Surface Dynamics Models.
Hydraulic Geometry Brian Bledsoe Department of Civil Engineering Colorado State University.
RIVERS AND ASSOCIATED LANDFORMS
Fritz R. Fiedler University of Idaho Department of Civil Engineering Simulation of Shallow Discontinuous Flow over Complex Infiltrating Terrain.
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 5: watershed analyses field trip #3 – Walnut Gulch watersheds estimating flood discharges.
Applications of habitat data to fishery management Distribution and abundance of habitat for different life stages Barriers to migration; Waterfalls /
Dpt. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento (Italy) Long term evolution of self-formed estuarine channels Ilaria Todeschini, Marco.
Response of river systems to tectonic deformation Chris Paola* St Anthony Falls Lab University of Minnesota * On behalf of the experimental stratigraphy.
Formetta et al., CAHMDA IV Lhasa July GEOtop/OMS3 - Model Integration and Case Study. Formetta G. et al., University of Trento (Italy) OR:
Rhine, Netherlands, flood 4 Nov 1998 (Wilbers & Ten Brinke, 2003) The Impact of Variability in Dune Dimensions on Sediment Sorting and Morphodynamics Astrid.
Simplicity in Braiding Rivers
Temporal and spatial patterns of basin scale sediment dynamics and yield.
Managing river and coastal environments: A continuing challenge 2010 China floods Duration10 May - Present Damage41 billion US$ Fatalities dead,
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Modeling coastal flooding in urbanized lowlands: a multi- dimensional high-resolution approach Brett F. Sanders, Professor Timu Gallien, Ph.D. Student.
Morphodynamics and hydraulics of vegetated river reaches: a case study on the Müggelspree in Germany Alexander Sukhodolov and Tatiana Sukhodolova Institute.
Fluvial Processes Connecticut River, Amherst, MA. Holyoke Range in distance. Foto: Lachniet (2003)
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Confluences and Networks Outline Flow and sediment transport characteristics at river confluences Braid bar development Network characteristics and organization.
Numerical models of landscape evolution Mikaël ATTAL Marsyandi valley, Himalayas, Nepal Acknowledgements: Jérôme Lavé, Peter van der Beek and other scientists.
Modeling aquatic vegetation for Comal and San Marcos river systems Todd M. Swannack, Ph.D. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental.
CUDAM Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento Zaragoza, Nov 3 th -5 th 2004 IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes.
Comparison of Geomorphic Change in Two Flood Events on the Umatilla River, Oregon Patricia McDowell, Michael L. Hughes, and W. Andrew Marcus Department.
Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic model to morphological changes and changes in flood inundation extent J.S. Wong 1, J. Freer 1, P.D. Bates 1, & D.A. Sear.
To main objectives: Build a seamless, routed stream network across WAM tiles Apply a process based, riparian zone delineation tool Riparian Processes.
Experimental Study of Sediment Transport in Vegetated and Meandering Channels Jon Schmidt Mentor: Dr. Jennifer Duan Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering.
Detroit District, Hydraulics & Hydrology Office US Army Corps of Engineers River Bank Erosion Siskiwit River, Cornucopia, WI.
Variation in sources of wood and wood delivery to streams Tim Beechie NOAA Fisheries.
Seasonal variation in surface- groundwater exchanges in an urban floodplain with active gravel-bar formation Dorothea Lundberg Karen Prestegaard University.
A Near-Bed Study on the Affects of Spur Dikes on River Systems Ramsey Coronado PI: Guohong Duan, Department of Civil Engineering Mentor: Mary Yaeger University.
Rivers and Streams. River Systems A river or stream: any body of water flowing downhill in a well defined channel A river or stream: any body of water.
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 7: channel geometry and sediment transport power laws in channel geometry bed load sediment transport Rouse.
River Systems. Objective  Students will describe factors that affect the erosive ability of a river and the evolution of a river system.
Variational data assimilation for morphodynamic model parameter estimation Department of Mathematics, University of Reading: Polly Smith *, Sarah Dance,
Gennaro Cioffi. Field evidence for rapid downstream fining of river gravels through selective transport Ferguson, R.I, Hoey, T., Wathen, S. and Werrity,
11. Channel form: river cross- sections and long profiles Cross-section size and shape –The role of discharge and drainage area –Local variation –The role.
Project 4: hydrologic subsystems in hillslopes What are the key controls on and the key interactions between the soil, ecology, geomorphology and biogeochemistry.
Water Erosion Chapter 3 Section 2. Standard S 6.2.a – Students know water running downhill is the dominant process in shaping the landscape S 6.2.a.
Modeling the impact of vegetation changes on erosion rates and landscape evolution Jon D. Pelletier, University of Arizona.
Guido Zolezzi, Ruggero Andreatta, Marco Tubino
Assessing Bank Erosion Potential in the San Antonio River
WHAT CONTROLS BAR MIGRATION IN TIDAL CHANNELS?
Better Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Paleoflood Analyses
What’s New in Sedimentation and River Mechanics
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
Wet Granulation Small Scale Experiments
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
photo : Michael Collier
Surface Water Virtual Mission
Stream Erosion.
Streams Hydrodynamics
Streams Hydrodynamics
Siyao Xu Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (EEES)
“Characteristics of Suspended Sediment and Flow in Downstream of Mekong River, Southern Vietnam” 5/22/2019 Duong Thai Bang (M2) (Supervised by Prof. Maki.
Setback area relative to drainage area Runoff volume, mean of 4 events
Presentation transcript:

The role of vegetation and large wood in braided rivers dynamics Walter Bertoldi Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Séminaire Gestrans, Grenoble, 21 Novembre 2012

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers This work has been possible thanks to the help of many collaborators: Leverhulme Project: Angela Gurnell, Nick Drake, Alex Henshaw Trento Lab work + Tagliamento field work: Matilde Welber, Sandra Zanella, Martino Salvaro, Marco Redolfi, Lorenzo Forti Hydralab project Hull: Luca Mao, Michal Tal, Francesco Comiti, Diego Ravazzolo, Matilde Welber, Sandra Zanella, Rob Thomas + discussions with Peter Ashmore, Hervé Piégay, Nicola Surian

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 3/30 BRAIDING & VEGETATION

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 4/30 Gran and Paola, 2001 Tal and Paola, 2007, 2010 Eaton et al Murray and Paola, 2003 Perona et al., 2009 Crosato and Saleh, 2011 BRAIDING & VEGETATION

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 5/30 TAGLIAMENTO RIVER, ITALY ~ 20 km LONG ~ 800 m WIDE PINZANO GORGE ~ 120 m WIDE

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 6/30 LiDAR ANALYSIS m Canopy Surface ModelFiltered and de-trended DEMDEM + vegetation height

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 7/30 Sub-reach 3  Vegetation cover = 1.3% (~0% taller than 5m) Sub-reach 13  Vegetation cover = 16% (~8% taller than 5m) SUB-REACH COMPARISON

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 8/30 FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS The vegetation induces fine sediment deposition and island aggrading The flow is constrained in narrower and deeper channels (Bertoldi et al., WRR)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 9/30 BED STATISTICS Area proportional to tall vegetation % SKEWNESS Positive Skew Negative Skew (Bertoldi et al., WRR)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 10/30 Sub-reach 3Sub-reach 13 Euler Gamma pdf (Paola, 1996; Nicholas, 2000) EFFECT ON SEDIMENT FLUX?  ~ 5 ~ 3

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers flow direction CORNINO BANK EROSION AND TREES INPUT 11/30 Where is vegetation coming from?

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers A)26/10/ B)03/11/ C)28/12/ A)B) C) position of island edge BANK EROSION AND TREES INPUT flow direction 12/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers A) 18/12/ B) 26/12/ C) 15/01/ position of island edge on 18/12/2009 flow direction A)B) C) BANK EROSION AND TREES INPUT 13/34

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers (A)(B)(C) (E)(F) (D) m N trunk diameter (cm) # of trees flow direction TREES DISTRIBUTION (Bertoldi et al., Geomorphology) 14/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers m N m 0.8 m BED ELEVATION DEPOSITED TREES AB flow direction TREES DISTRIBUTION 15/30 (Bertoldi et al., Geomorphology)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers ELEVATION DISTRIBUTION 16/30 (Bertoldi et al., Geomorphology)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers ELEVATION DISTRIBUTION 17/30 (Bertoldi et al., Geomorphology)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 3 m 25 m 18/30 MODELLING WOOD DISPERSAL Is it possible to model these processes in the lab?  PhD work of Matilde Welber

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers Wood scaling issues: -Diameter (2-6 mm) -Length (4-12 cm) -Density -Presence of roots, branches,... 19/30 MODELLING WOOD DISPERSAL

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers BAR APEXALONG BANKS WOODDEPOSITIONPATTERNS WOOD DEPOSITION PATTERNS 20/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers SPATIALVARIABILITY SPATIAL VARIABILITY 5 RUNS WITH THE SAME PARAMETERS COMPLEX SYSTEM + LONG TIME SCALE INPUT 21/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers FLOW bar 1bar 4bar 2bar 3 BAR - WOODINTERACTION BAR - WOOD INTERACTION 22/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers Q=0.9 l/s Q=1.2 l/s Q=1.5 l/s Q=1.8 l/s Braiding formed with Q = 1.8 l/s ELEVATIONDISTRIBUTION ELEVATION DISTRIBUTION 23/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 2D  high variability 3D  narrow range 24/30 ELEVATIONDISTRIBUTION ELEVATION DISTRIBUTION

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers THE MORPHODYNAMIC IMPACTS OF VEGETATION AND LARGE WOOD IN FLUVIAL SYSTEMS PI:Luca Mao Participants: W. Bertoldi, N. Osei, D. Ravazzolo, M. Tal, M. Welber, S. Zanella UoH staff:S. McLelland, B. Murphy, R. Thomas

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers flow WOOD/VEGETATIONINTERACTION WOOD/VEGETATION INTERACTION Tagliamento 26/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers ’Aerial’ pictures to map  Planform configuration  Wood deposit  Vegetation growth EXPERIMENTSSETUP EXPERIMENTS SETUP 27/30

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers Flume 3 Flume 1 WEEK 1WEEK 2WEEK3WEEK 4 flow 28/30 PRELIMINARYRESULTS PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers Wood dynamics changed significantly even in the first hours with low vegetation  Decrease in wood deposited as single logs from 40% to 25%  <10% in long term  Decrease in wood moved after one hour from 40% to <20%  Increase in wood deposited in already existing groups from 80% in long term 29/30 PRELIMINARYRESULTS PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers average Low flood effect Low vegetation growth single runs 30/30 average High flood effect Vegetation grows fast single runs  Similar distributions  Different distributions Modelling vegetation after a sequence of floods (Gurnell et al., Earth-Science Reviews) VEGETATION AND FLOODS

QUESTIONS ?

9 positions (4 EU + 5 Non EU) Application deadline: January 15, 2013

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 33/34 FLOW-VEGETATION INTERACTION (Gurnell et al., Earth-Science Reviews)

Vegetation and wood in braided rivers 34/22 ~ 1 m Courtesy of Jonathan Laronne BRAIDING AT DWARF SCALE