Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEING AN ETHICAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHIRLEY JOHNSON & KEISHA D. SMITH BASED ON THE WORKSHOP FROM AEA 2012 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE.
Advertisements

Westminster Kingsway College QUALITY. Mission of Westminster Kingsway College: To support all of its students in realising their ambitions as learners.
Primary Strategy Subject Leader Briefing June/July 2008 Leading on learning – making best use of Assessment for learning.
Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Competencies for beginning teachers
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
PORTFOLIO.
Head of Learning: Job description
South Pacific Board for Educational Assessment M & E Teacher Performance Improving teaching effectiveness Capacity Building Workshop on ‘Monitoring and.
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International “This project was funded by the Australian.
Realities. Registration Provisional Registration (PRT) Valid for 5 years Subject to Confirmation (STC) Valid for 3 years Full Registration Valid for 5.
Consistency of Assessment
Performance management guidance
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Consistent Teacher judgement
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Session Materials  Wiki
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
POLICY ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN STANDARD FOR PRINCIPALSHIP EMASA CONFERENCE PRESENTATION JAMES NDLEBE 1.
Assessment Task Reviewing and creating an Action Plan for CL School using the QAF Trial Unit April 2011 for proposed Certificate IV in Community Languages.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Literacy Co-ordinator Session Monitoring Progress - Book Trawls/Scrutinies.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Understanding Teachers Standards. Objectives of the session To develop an understanding of the teachers standards To start thinking about the relevant.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Human Society and its Environment K-6 (HSIE) Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
TIG Ensuring Vertical Articulation in the Science Curriculum.
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING (Insert appropriate.
Leadership School Leadership Teams. Leadership Team Planning Objective: At the end of this section, you will have one SMART goal written and start on.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
STRENGTHENING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS – WHY PARENTS MATTER FHS Staff Conference May 2011.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
National Healthy School Standard The National Healthy School Standard is the result of a number of important policy drivers: Excellence In Schools (1997)
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
MY TIME, OUR PLACE Framework for School Age Care In Australia Prepared by: Children’s Services Central April 2012 Team Meeting Package.
Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006.
Planning for Curriculum Framework Implementation.
2014 Teachers Award and the classroom
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
School Self-Evaluation 
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Dr Tim Wyatt Dr Bob Carbines Erebus International Victorian Annual Conference 7 July 2007

On the Journey………. There is common agreement about the value of a Community Languages Schools Quality Framework (Octagon) There is common agreement about the value of a Community Languages Schools Quality Framework (Octagon) The framework contains 8 key dimensions The framework contains 8 key dimensions Every state/territory except NT has contributed to its development Every state/territory except NT has contributed to its development A draft National Framework has been developed for school based trialling A draft National Framework has been developed for school based trialling

Community Languages Schools (CLS) Quality Assurance Framework Student Well being Monitoring & Evaluation Teaching Practice Family Participation Education Community Links Purposeful learning Curriculum Leadership and Governance QualityCommunityLanguagesSchools

On the Journey………. The draft National Framework is currently being trialled in a sample of 12 Community Languages schools in South Australia, Victoria, NSW The draft National Framework is currently being trialled in a sample of 12 Community Languages schools in South Australia, Victoria, NSW Briefing workshops were held in each of the relevant states in the week beginning Monday 4 June Briefing workshops were held in each of the relevant states in the week beginning Monday 4 June Schools are trialling selected dimensions within the Framework throughout June-July Schools are trialling selected dimensions within the Framework throughout June-July Schools will provide feedback to Erebus in late July/early August Schools will provide feedback to Erebus in late July/early August

The Outcomes of the Process Publication of an agreed National Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Publication of an agreed National Quality Framework for Community Languages Schools Provision of professional development in the use and application of the Framework later in 2007 Provision of professional development in the use and application of the Framework later in 2007 Development of a plan to assist implementation of Framework in all Community Languages schools nationally over the next 3 to 5 years Development of a plan to assist implementation of Framework in all Community Languages schools nationally over the next 3 to 5 years

The Draft National Framework The contents of the National Framework The contents of the National Framework How schools can use the National Framework (workshop) How schools can use the National Framework (workshop)

The Eight Dimensions of the QA Framework Student well-being Student well-being Teaching Practice Teaching Practice Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation Leadership and Governance Leadership and Governance Family participation Family participation School/Community links School/Community links Purposeful learning Purposeful learning Curriculum Curriculum

Student well-being The promotion of a positive, safe and secure learning environment that makes educational provision for each student as a unique individual. Teaching Practice Those strategies undertaken by teachers to maximise student learning outcomes, underpinned by principles of best practice in classroom pedagogy Monitoring and Evaluation Strategies undertaken to seek and report information in relation to student outcomes and to use this information to enhance ongoing teaching/learning processes and school effectiveness. Leadership and Governance The practices involved in inspiring school community commitment to student learning and ensuring policies and procedures facilitate effective and efficient school operation

Family participation The active and meaningful participation of families in all aspects of community language school life. School/Community links Those relationships with other key stakeholders/organisations that produce reciprocal benefits for student learning in community language schools. Purposeful learning Authentic learning activities engaged in by students, focussed on their needs, goals and aspirations in relation to the community language being taught. Curriculum The range of learning experiences, outcomes and appropriate assessment strategies, designed and documented to facilitate student learning in local community contexts.

Dimension and Elements Curriculum 1.1 The school’s curriculum is understood by teachers and families. 1.2 The structure of the school’s curriculum makes provision for age appropriate and realistic student learning experiences. 1.3 The school’s curriculum is appropriately linked to the relevant State/Territory curriculum structures and documents. 1.4 The school’s curriculum provides for the teaching of the language in appropriate cultural contexts.

Dimension and Elements Curriculum 1.5 The school’s curriculum is appropriately resourced to promote student learning. 1.6 Structures are in place for monitoring and updating the school’s curriculum to ensure that it is reflective of broader curriculum change.

Element 1.1. The school’s curriculum is understood by teachers and families. Pointers: Teachers’ planning documentation reflects the school curriculum Teachers’ planning documentation reflects the school curriculum Teaching strategies used in classrooms are derived from the school curriculum Teaching strategies used in classrooms are derived from the school curriculum Families have been advised about key aspects of the school curriculum. Families have been advised about key aspects of the school curriculum. Teachers regularly discuss curriculum implications for teaching the language Teachers regularly discuss curriculum implications for teaching the language Student assessment strategies reflect the objectives of the curriculum Student assessment strategies reflect the objectives of the curriculum

Element 1.1. The school’s curriculum is understood by teachers and families Evidence: Each teacher regularly uses these sets of documents to teach the language. Each teacher regularly uses these sets of documents to teach the language. Each teacher is programming from the school’s curriculum in collaboration with other teachers. Each teacher is programming from the school’s curriculum in collaboration with other teachers. Teachers’ programming reflects continuity in learning across years. Teachers’ programming reflects continuity in learning across years. Teachers are involved in regular professional learning/sharing of ideas on curriculum. Teachers are involved in regular professional learning/sharing of ideas on curriculum. Families regularly help students with homework due to their understanding of the curriculum. Families regularly help students with homework due to their understanding of the curriculum.

Rating Scale Always demonstrated To achieve this rating, it would be expected that the School Review Team would agree that the majority of pointers describe the usual practices in the school. Mostly demonstrated It would be expected that the School Review Team would agree that the majority of pointers describe the usual practices in the school, but there may be some significant exceptions, or some pointers may not be evident. Sometimes demonstrated This rating would reflect a situation that applied in some cases but not all. For example, the pointers may not be observed in some cases or may not be demonstrated consistently throughout the year.

Rating Scale Rarely demonstrated This rating would be appropriate in circumstances where the School Review Team would agree that there is evidence that the pointers are demonstrated in very few instances in the school. Never demonstrated This rating would be appropriate in instances where none of the pointers for the element describe the practices in the school

Workshop Tasks In small groups: Read the extracts from the QA Guidelines document Read the extracts from the QA Guidelines document Discuss how the document could be used at your school to enhance current teaching and learning Discuss how the document could be used at your school to enhance current teaching and learning Discuss what professional development needs you believe the teachers at your school may need to work with the QA Guidelines document Discuss what professional development needs you believe the teachers at your school may need to work with the QA Guidelines document Prepare a brief report to share at the plenary session (2-3 minutes) Prepare a brief report to share at the plenary session (2-3 minutes)