Overview of the RBS Plan Review Process Leslie Ann Hay, Implementation Lead Megan Stout, CDSS Analyst.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme Procedures for Call for Proposals under Priorities 1-3.
PACESetters! Alternative Teacher Evaluation
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
U.S. General Services Administration General Services Administration Policy, the Procurement Process, the Buy Accessible Wizard, and Purchasing Section.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Community-Based English Tutoring (CBET) Programs Mark Klinesteker,
Facilitate by: Mr. Ok Libounna Director for Financial Affair, Church World Service (CWS)
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
ACTION PLANNING. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: List the goals of Action Planning Explain the Action Planning.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Using the Online HSOPS & RC Apps for CSTS Armstrong Institute for.
S L H C – P P Management Tools Kick-off Meeting April 8 th, 2008 Mar CAPEANS CERN This project has received funding from the European.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
ACADEMIC SENATE ORIENTATION 9/3/09 Welcome New and Returning Senators!
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Project Charters Module 3
A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
Family Resource and Youth Services Centers: Action Component Plan.
Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Collaboration Board F.Gagliardi Project Director Cork Conference, 20 th April.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Cost Recovery Procedures for County Extension Agents 1.
QUALITY OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN 15 Points (recommend 5 pages)
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
FY 2010 Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grant Application.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Budget Formulation 2017/2018 A review of the 2017 process and the 2018 process. Office of Budget and Performance Management November 2015.
DEX Publication Project OASIS PLCS TC Telecon 22 January 2008 Trine Hansen.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
WP6 – Dissemination Project Name: Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE- ESPAQ Ref TEMPUS BE-TEMPUS-SMGR.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Getting Public Agencies Started on Fund Mapping evidence2success Strategic Financing.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting November 19, 2013.
Market Evolution Program. 2 Topics Overview of the Market Evolution Program Consultation Plan for Phase 1 Overview of the Market Evolution Program Consultation.
Every Student Succeeds Act January Christopher Woolard Senior Executive Director, Center for Accountability and Continuous Improvement Colleen D.
Domain Champion Updates New Mexico Department of Health.
FGDC GeoReovery.gov Team and Executive Committee Report Ken Shaffer FGDC Deputy Staff Director April 14, 2009 FGDC Coordination Group.
NIH Change Management Program Change Management Program Overview March 8,
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
1 RBS Implementation Preparation Forum Wednesday  March 4, 2009 The RBS Evaluation: Reviewing the Basics.
CORC Best Practice Framework: Self-Assessment & Accreditation Tool
Implementation of RCA Projects
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Session with Partners, 8 October 2014
Building a Distributed Earth System Model Community
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Project Management Process Groups
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Dana Williamson, Director Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Timeline Overview Planned Timescales
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the RBS Plan Review Process Leslie Ann Hay, Implementation Lead Megan Stout, CDSS Analyst

Focus of Review: RBS Plans RBS Plans Submitted by Each Demo Site: Voluntary Agreement – describes the RBS plan in detail and includes signatures of the directors of the public and private agencies who are committed to participate in it. Funding Model – explains how the demonstration site will pay for the new approach, including its use of flexible state AFDC-FC funding, as well as other sources that might be used, while maintaining cost neutrality. Waiver Requests – outlines changes in the rules related to funding, licensing and regulation that will be needed to implement the new model. The California RBS Project 2 Review Process Overview 3/4/09

Purpose of the RBS Plan Review WHAT IT IS… a way to ensure Plans address the minimum requirements established for RBS reform, as outlined in AB 1453 and the framework document a way to determine Plans are a reasonable test of alternative program and funding models to test during the demonstration phase WHAT IT ISN’T… an endorsement of the plan’s overall design and approach a judgment about whether or not the plan will work Review Process Overview The California RBS Project 3/4/09 3

Who Are the Reviewers? RBS Steering Committee members Family/Youth Advisory Group members CDSS Division staff  Program/Policy  Fiscal  Legal  Licensing RBS Consultants The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 4

How Will Information Be Collected Reviewers will receive RBS Plan by Included will be link to online Review Tool Those who need hard copy (Word document) can request it from Megan Stout Reviewers have 3 weeks from receipt of RBS Plan to complete Review Tool Reviews will be collated and summary reports generated by Implementation Leadership Team (ILT) RBS & CDSS Consultants will provide feedback to demonstration sites The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 5

Structure of the Online Review Tool Review criteria organized into categories:  Proposed RBS Program Design  Putting the RBS Program Into Operation  Achieving Desired Outcomes  Paying for the RBS Program  Conclusion  General Comments See Handout of Review Tool template The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 6

Online Tool Features: Reviewer Information 7 The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09

Online Tool Features: Questions The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 8

Online Tool Features: Questions The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 9

Online Tool Features: Conclusion The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 10

Review Process Timeline Demo Site submits Plan to CDSS Plan distributed to reviewers Reviewers complete review tool CDSS compiles findings from reviews Consultants & CDSS share review findings with Demo Site RBS Overview, 3/4/09 The California RBS Project 11 3 weeks 1 week 1. CDSS receives RBS Plan & assigns version control date 2. Review period begins 3. Review period ends 4. CDSS assembles inputs, creates matrix for ILT to review & analyze 5. Face-to-face meeting to discuss review findings

Timetable Reviews will occur over next 8 weeks:  Earliest plan reviews will start: March 9  Plan reviews completed by: April 30 Possible overlap of review period for different Demo Sites, due to staggered submission dates. One month after receiving RBS Plan, Consultants will deliver Review Summary report to the Demo Site  Demo Sites can plan the feedback meeting accordingly  Local Implementation Coordinator sets date, invitees & location The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 12 Mar 9 Mar 16 Mar 23 Mar 30 Apr 6 Apr 13 Apr 20 Apr 30

Questions The California RBS Project Review Process Overview 3/4/09 13