Measuring the Status of Women: Towards Cross-Institutional Analysis to Understand Institutional Transformation Lisa M. Frehill and Cecily Jeser Cannavale.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure at the University of Washington Eve Riskin, Joyce Yen, and Denice Denton.
Advertisements

NSF ADVANCE Program Workshop March 4, 2013 Brooke Shipley Director of WISEST Professor of Mathematics Implicit Bias Panel This material was supported with.
Akron’s Project Theme: Redesign faculty recruitment and hiring practices. Encourage faculty to scrutinize current practices and to gain an enhanced appreciation.
College of Education Gender Equity Study Mitzi Schumacher, Chair Mindy Isaacs, Graduate Assistant President’s Commission on Women Subcommittee on Economic.
NSF-ADVANCE IT at NMSU History and Successes Tracy M. Sterling*, Lisa M. Frehill, Pam Hunt and Shawn Werner NSF-ADVANCE & NM-PAID New Mexico State University.
A Measure of Equity Caryn McTighe Musil The Association of American Colleges and Universities CCAS Conference – New Orleans Gender Issues Breakfast November.
The State of Women in Academic Medicine: The Pipeline and Pathways to Leadership National results and benchmarking presentation.
Why Bother? Helping Women Achieve Full Professor Rank Christine A. Hult Utah State University.
ADVANCE Institutional Data Using Institutional Data to Create Institutional Change.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
1 Leadership Development Opportunities for Tenured Faculty Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Center for Faculty.
Low Cost High Impact: Suggestions for Warming the Campus Climate for Women Professor Christine Hult Utah State University PI Utah State ADVANCE Funding.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
Summary of the Proposed Research Track. Background National prominence requires increasing diversity of our faculty not only in terms of disciplinary.
Academic Work Environment Survey 2004 Barbara Silver, ADVANCE Program Director Presented at the ADVANCE National Conference, G-Tech, Atlanta, Georgia April.
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Research & Development Hong Kong University of Science & Technology 1 Junior Faculty Recruitment and Development.
Overview of US Computer Science Faculty Life Cycle Debra Richardson University of California, Irvine Valerie Taylor Texas A&M University.
Closing the Gender Disparities Gap in Academic Medicine: Negotiating for Parity in Support. Marianne E. Felice, M.D. Professor & Chair, Department of Pediatrics,
Snapshot of WISE (Women in Science and Engineering) in Ogden College Cheryl Stevens Dean October 2014.
AACN Financial Benchmarking Survey and Other Data Initiatives Di Fang, PhD - Director of Research and Data Services.
Recruitment, Selection and Hiring Create Faculty Horizons - 2 day success workshop for post doctoral fellows and senior graduate students. Bring back Meyerhoff.
US National Academies Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM)
NSF ADVANCE P.A.I.D. at the University of Delaware: RRR (Resources for Recruitment and Retention) of Women Faculty ADVANCE at the University of Delaware.
NSF ADVANCE Program Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) Lynn T. Singer (Provost’s Office), PI John Angus (Chemical Engineering), co-PI Mary.
Developing Diverse Departments at NC State NSF ADVANCE Project
Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.
The URI ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program: Promoting Women’s Careers in Science and Engineering Presented at the AAUW Rhode Island Chapter Meeting.
Strategies for Effecting Gender Equity and Institutional Change: Lessons from ADVANCE Institutions Ann Austin & Sandra Laursen AAC&U Annual Meeting-- January.
Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.
Strategies To Diversify STEM Faculty Ranks Denice Denton, Dean College of Engineering April 20, 2004.
STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups at MSI and TWI Institutions: are their lives different? Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of the Faculty and Professor,
Faculty Gender Composition in STEM Disciplines: A Case Study Santiago-Rivas, M., Harlow, L. L., Silver, B., Stamm, K., & Mederer, H. University of Rhode.
Faculty Senate Gender Equity Task Force Report K. Klimek (Chair) History, R. Hernandez-Julian, L. Hathorn, A. Sgoutas, K. Elkins, B. Mathews.
USING DATA FOR PRACTICES OF INSTITUITONAL TRANSFORMATION Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech – NSF ADVANCE Initiative Session on “Using.
Bahareh Changizi United States Academic ranks Regular faculty: Distinguished Professor, University Professor, or Named Chair Professor ("Full.
Engineering & Science Careers in Academia, Learning from ADVANCE & Translating Effectively NSF# Social, Behavioral, & Economic Sciences ADVANCE-PAID:
Task Force on Women Faculty Report for the Advisory Committee on Faculty Well-Being August 28, 2008.
Scope ACES: Purpose and Goals The Academic Careers in Engineering & Science (ACES) program at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) is part of the National.
Principal Investigator: Jean-Lou Chameau Co-Principal Investigators: Mary Frank Fox Mary Lynn Realff Sue V. Rosser Director: Mary Hallisey Hunt Coordinator:
1 Rock Talk: NIH Support of Biomedical Research NIH Regional Seminar on Program Funding And Grants Administration Sally J. Rockey, Ph.D. NIH Deputy Director.
Supporting Women Scientists and Engineers Abigail J. Stewart University of Michigan.
Resources for the Recruitment and Retention of Women Faculty at the University of Delaware ADVANCE at the University of Delaware (UD) holds two workshops,
ADVANCE AT UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY THE GOAL OF THE NSF ADVANCE PROGRAM IS TO PROMOTE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FIELDS BY INCREASING.
Recruiting for Diversity The URI ADVANCE Faculty Fellows Program Roundtable Discussion NSF ADVANCE PI Meeting, Alexandria, VA May 12-13, 2008 Barb Silver,
Benchmarks How? Which? Who? Why? Gender Equity Project Virginia Valian & Vita Rabinowitz Hunter College 10 May 2004.
Georgia Tech-NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program Mary Lynn Realff, Director and Co-PI March 31, 2005.
ADVANCE Success Strategies and Challenging Opportunities ADVANCE Conference April 21, 2004 Sue V. Rosser Georgia Tech.
Outline Survey overview Instrument Construction Survey Logistics Response Rates Uses of Survey Data Communication with campus groups Program evaluation.
ADVANCE: A Bottom Up and Top Down Approach to Diversifying College Campuses Spurty Surapaneni, BA, Lisa M. Larson, PhD, Bonnie Bowen, PhD, Luiza Dreashear,
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity The University of Texas at El Paso April 2004 Evelyn Posey, Department of English Libby.
Assessing and Evaluating Impact Abigail J. Stewart and Janet E.Malley University of Michigan.
Bias Tidbits Multidisciplinary Work A forthcoming paper in the American Journal of Evaluation by Irwin Feller discusses the issues, noting that in disciplines.
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
SALARY EQUITY SUMMARY Faculty Council April 13, 2012 Bruce W. Carney Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost.
PATHS TOWARD EQUITY Melissa R. Gilbert Associate Professor Department of Geography and Urban Studies Temple University Achieving Equity: Women, the Workplace.
Collective Bargaining Contracts with Performance Metrics A “Success Pool” and ”Faculty Excellence Awards” Kent State University NCSCBHEP 39 th Annual National.
Gender Equity Task Force Report Presentation to the UT Austin Faculty Council January 26, 2009 Profs. J Moore, Chandra Muller & Gretchen Ritter.
Contact Information: Authors:
Academic Leadership Forum
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
ADVANCE Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers Program initiated in 2001; 2 competitions in.
IDEAL–N Kent State University
IDEAL-N Annual Plenary
Advancing Women in Science STRIDE in Context
Tenure and Faculty Compensation
Status of Women Faculty in the College of Medicine
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
Apportionment for 2016/2017 CRAO committee gathered data on faculty numbers in their college as of fall Faculty were counted if they: Held a full.
Faculty recruitment Plan
UNC Charlotte Score Card
Presentation transcript:

Measuring the Status of Women: Towards Cross-Institutional Analysis to Understand Institutional Transformation Lisa M. Frehill and Cecily Jeser Cannavale New Mexico State University ADVANCE Program This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, NSF #

Overview: 1 st Round Awardees’ Institutions

Some of the issues  Key issue: Faculty “live” in departments but departments are organized differently across institutions.  Small n’s, especially within rank and department – often even within a unit  Basis of comparability –For departments? –For units? –For institutions?

Comparability—Purpose Provide feedback for:  Departments   Deans & Provosts   Program Evaluation  Comparisons needed  Disciplinary  Field groupings  STEM vs. non-STEM at institution

Distribution of Female Faculty in STEM Departments

Fundamental Questions—Status of Women Faculty  To what extent are departmental sex compositions “equitable”? To what extent are women and men in similar positions?  Are the institution’s processes of advancement fair to men and women?  To what extent do women hold powerful positions within the institution?  To what extent are resources allocated equitably by gender?

To what extent are departmental sex compositions “ equitable”? To what extent are women and men in similar positions? Original Metrics:  1. Number and percent of women faculty in STEM  2. Number and percent of women in tenure line positions by rank and department  6. Number of women in STEM who are in non- tenure-track positions (teaching and research)

To what extent are women and men in “gender equitable” departments and positions? Original Metrics:  1. Number and percent of women faculty in STEM  2. Number and percent of women in tenure line positions by rank and department  6. Number of women in STEM who are in non- tenure-track positions (teaching and research) Report indicators for STEM and institution as a whole:  Number and percent of departments with: –Female tokens –Female minority –Gender equitable –Male minority –Male tokens  Index of positional dissimilarity, D

Relative Numbers—Conceptual Scheme

Index of Dissimilarity

Institutional Data: Departmental Sex Composition

Are the institution’s processes of advancement fair to men and women? Original Metrics:  3. Tenure and promotion outcomes by gender  4. Years in rank by gender  5a. Time at institution  5b. Attrition by gender  8. Number of women STEM faculty in endowed/named chairs

Are the institution’s processes of advancement fair to men and women? Original Metrics:  3. Tenure and promotion outcomes by gender  4. Years in rank by gender  5a. Time at institution  5b. Attrition by gender  8. Number of women STEM faculty in endowed/named chairs Report indicators for STEM and institution as a whole:  Likelihood of (by gender): –Tenure –Promotion Asst  Assc –Promotion Assc  Full  Average years at Associate rank for Full  Annual attrition: % of each sex within rank who leave the institution for any reason other than retirement  Number of women faculty in endowed/named chairs

To what extent do women hold powerful positions within the institution? Original Metrics:  2. Number and percent of women in tenure line positions by rank and department  7. Number and percent of women scientists and engineers in administrative positions  8. Number of women STEM faculty in endowed/named chairs  9. Number and percent of women STEM faculty on promotion and tenure committees

To what extent do women hold powerful positions within the institution? Original Metrics:  2. Number and percent of women in tenure line positions by rank and department  7. Number and percent of women scientists and engineers in administrative positions  8. Number of women STEM faculty in endowed/named chairs  9. Number and percent of women STEM faculty on promotion and tenure committees  Number and percent women: –Full professors (STEM and inst) –Department heads (STEM and inst) –Associate Deans (STEM units and inst) –Deans (STEM units and inst) –Provosts and VP level (inst) –President  Number and percent of women STEM faculty on STEM unit promotion and tenure committees

Women in Mid-level Academic Leadership in STEM

To what extent are resources allocated equitably by gender? Original Metrics  10. Salary of STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as department, rank, years in rank)  11. Space allocation of STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as department, etc.)  12. Start-up packages of newly hired STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as field/department,rank, etc.)

To what extent are resources allocated equitably by gender? Original Metrics  10. Salary of STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as department, rank, years in rank)  11. Space allocation of STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as department, etc.)  12. Start-up packages of newly hired STEM faculty by gender (with additional controls such as field/department,rank, etc.) Report indicators as follows:  Sex gap in pay (STEM and inst) by rank.  Sex gap in space allocation (STEM) by rank.  Value of start-up package: gap for new assistant professors (STEM) *All gaps should be ratios: Female/Male

Fundamental Questions—Status of Women Faculty  To what extent are departmental sex compositions “equitable”? To what extent are women and men in similar positions?  Are the institution’s processes of advancement fair to men and women?  To what extent do women hold powerful positions within the institution?  To what extent are resources allocated equitably by gender?

Key Metrics—Agreed Upon at First Principal Investigators’ Meeting at NSF, April 2002  # and % of women faculty in science/engineering by department  # and % of women in tenure-line positions by rank and department  Tenure promotion outcomes by gender  Years in rank by gender  Time at institution and attrition by gender  # of women in S & E who are in non-tenure- track positions (teaching and research)  # and % of women scientists and engineers in administrative positions

Key Metrics, cont’d.  # of women S & E faculty in endowed or named chairs  # and % of women S & E faculty on promotion and tenure committees  Salary of S & E faculty by gender (controlling for department, rank, years in rank)  Space allocation of S & E faculty by gender (with additional controls such as dept., etc.)  Start-up packages of newly hired S & E faculty by gender (with additional controls such as field/department, rank, etc.)

Aggregation: Number and Percent of STEM Departments with Critical Mass