LEADER+ STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING LEADER+ OBSERVATORY SEMINAR 28-29 JUNE 2006 IN BRUSSELS/BELGIUM Salla Rossi European Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
Advertisements

Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
LEADER Conference, Przemysl October 2007 Romanian National Rural Development Network Proposed structure Professor Michael Dower.
Cyprus Project Management Society
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
ATI Inea-Agriconsulting Italian Network Unit Leader + Kraków, Polska December the 1st, 2005 C. Andrea Pelagallo Deputy Coordinator of the Italian Network.
Core Indicators in the Finnish ERDF programming documents DG REGIO EVALUATION NETWORK MEETING Brussels, 26 June 2008 Harri Ahlgren Ministry of.
Rural Development Programme for Ireland – Pat Moynan, Dept. of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.
Implementation of Axis 4 Leader Programme Measure 421 In Romania 2012.
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
This is me ! Roger Silfver from the Leader area Sommenbygd in Sweden. Active in Leader since LAG chairman in Leader II Former project.
The cohesion policy of the European Union Pelle Anita University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Strasbourg 05/06/07 Strasbourg 31/07/07 EUROPEAID Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development WTD: WORKING TOGETHER FOR DEVELOPMENT.
EU funds for South East Europe: IPA II Cross-border Cooperation Programme BULGARIA-SERBIA Sofia, 2015.
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
TERRITORIAL COHESION AND NATIONAL-REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP for the programming period Benchmarking Seminar on The Regional Competitiveness and Employment.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
Tbilisi, 5 th March 2015 The LEADER Approach. Practical information and implementation The Leader method - transferring V4 experiences to Georgia (No.
Introduction to PROGRESS Community programme for Employment and Social Solidarity Finn Ola Jølstad Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
INSTITUTION BUILDING FOR LEADER FROM LOCAL TO NATIONAL AND FROM NATIONAL TO LOCAL IN SLOVENIA Tihany, november 2006 Slovenian Rural Development Network,
Promotion of Community initiatives and territorial pacts in Czech Republic - Real Partnership in Operational Programmes ? 2012, EP, Brussels.
To involve persons who have second home in rural areas Kristine Hindriks Ministry of Agriculture/ Rural Development Department
Best practices and future challenges of the LEADER approach / CLLD in the Czech Republic 28th May, 2014 Permanent Representation of the Czech Republic.
LEADER Funding tool or philosophy for successful and sustainable development Successful implementation of LEADER with reference to specific cases.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Sivu The Finnish LEADER model and reflections on the future Budapest, 12th Dec 2012 Petri Rinne
South-East Finland – Russia ENPI CBC SOUTH-EAST FINLAND – RUSSIA ENPI CBC Programme Kaakkois-Suomi – Venäjä Naapuruus- ja kumppanuusohjelma.
Part-financed by the European Union Baltic Sea Region 2007– Profile Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar, Riga, 9-11 April 2008.
The European Structural and Investment Funds & the defence sector Paul Anciaux, Helsinki, 25 March 2014.
Rural Development Programme Ireland Finola Moylette Department of Community, Equality and Gaeltacht Affairs.
1 Implementing the Danube Strategy : macro-regional mechanisms and structures GOVERNANCE OF THE EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION Ruse, 10 May 2010 David.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation Antoine SAINT-DENIS and Szilvia KALMAN, European Commission - DG Employment, social affairs and.
Options after 2013 Making better use of European resources for Territorial and Rural Development LEADER France General Assembly 8 June 2011, Strasbourg.
The LEADER approach and the Community-Led Local Development
Sivu Network Expert Juha-Matti Markkola, NRN Finland Continuous Improvement of Finnish LEADER Work.
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY M M ainstreaming of LEADER+ and Innovation – The finnish experience ainstreaming of LEADER+ and Innovation – The finnish.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Upcoming events and news, Communication actions, success stories, evaluation, OPEN DAYS 2006 SFIT, 15 June 2006.
Leader+ Observatory Seminar “Leader in the New Member States” November Tihany, Hungary Mini-plenary session: Institution building – Organisation.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
1 Wladyslaw Piskorz Head of Unit ‘Urban development, territorial cohesion’ European Commission Directorate-General for Regional Policy Seminar organised.
One-Stop Guidance Centres as part of Youth Guarantee in Finland
Ave Bremse and Ivika Maidre Estonian Rural Network Unit
Rural Development experiences of Hungary
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
Ministry of Employment and the Economy
The European Social Fund
Practical information and implementation
THE FINNISH ESF-DELIVERY SYSTEM
1. Current phase ERDF evaluation working group established 14th August 2008 Chaired by MEE (MA) Members: other ministries, regions (regional councils and.
DG AGRI, Unit F6 Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climatic changes
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
Purpose of the presentation
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
Presentation transcript:

LEADER+ STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING LEADER+ OBSERVATORY SEMINAR JUNE 2006 IN BRUSSELS/BELGIUM Salla Rossi European Commission

L L ocal Action Group in Finland

LEADER II as well as nationally financed POMO programme during 1997 – 1999 gave good results in rural development Conclusion: Local Action Group is a model of rural development that should be continued and extended further Result: Mainstreaming of local action groups into other rural development programmes L L ocal Action Group in Finland

L L ocal Action Groups Leader+ groups (Leader+ Program) 19.5 LAGs financed in Regional Rural Development Program 6.5 LAGs financed in Objective 1 development plans adapted to implement also the respective program POMO+ 7 national financing local action groups Programme document contains basic features of Leader+ (Action 1) LEADER method has been fully mainstreamed into four other programmes in addition to Leader+ 58 LAGs covering 419 municipalities out of 432 (center of large cities and a few small cities remain outside)

L L ocal Action Group in Finland LEADER+ -action group POMO+ - action group ALMA - action group Objective 1, Northern Finland - action group Objective 1, Eastern Finland - action group Border of Objective 1 - Programme

area-based approach bottom-up approach local partnership innovation multi-sectoral integration inter-territorial co-operation (incl. transnational co-operation) networking decentralised management and financing L L EADER method used in all LAGs

Members of the board of the LAG: 1/3 representatives of municipalities 1/3 local associations and enterprises 1/3 rural inhabitants National public financing: Municipalities of the LAG area must cover 20 % of total public financing National Network Unit financed nationally and serves all local action groups C C ommon features for all LAGs in Finland

P P reconditions for Powerfull LAGs A LAG is a mixed group A LAG has real power with own global grant money LAG's own plan and programme Wide range of projects In the board of the LAG own quotas for different partners Goodwill of regional and national authorities Good results on the basis of living civil society

R R Council Regulation European Rural Strategy National Rural Strategy (whole Finnish territory) National Rural Development Programme (Finnish continent / Åland Islands) Axis 1 (abx %) ural Development Strategy and Preparation of the Finnish Programme for Adopted in the Council Adopted Commission Regulations Implementation, control and transitional provisions, completed in autumn 2006 If ready, after national finance framework is read -> Commission Several working groups involved reparation of prog-ramme. Ex- ante evaluation is completed. In moment draft is in internet- pages to all citizens to comment on it. Axis 3 (abx %) Axis 2 (abx %) Axis 4 LEADER methodology (abx %) Local strategies - Leader- application Local strategies and application ready 15 December 2005, spring 2006 evaluation made and feedback given in May ready end September. Final selection after legislation ready – beginning 2007 Preparation of national legislation and implementation Started

Preparation for program period Planned timetable National Rural development strategy – summer 2006 Rural Programme (continent of Finland) – summer 2006 Regional rural program (TE-centre) – Feedback , ready autumn 2006 Local rural program (LAGs) – Feedback , ready autumn Final selection end 2006 or beginning 2007 LEADER- method is used (axes 4) in all axes (1, 2 and 3) Aim is to have LAG work all over in Finland P P rogramme period

R R epartition of Leader in programme period Information by letters Local actions groups (local people, local and regional administration…) National level (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, LAG work group, several working groups and committees…) year 2004 year 2005 year 2006 year 2007 Seminars - discussions Call for tender – Leader LAG telling selection criteria applications Feedback of local strategies Comments for Finland Continental Rural Development programme Comments for National Strategies Finland Continental Rural Development programme Seminars - discussions Final applications Selection of Leader LAGs

L L ocal Actions Groups Almost projects have already started (end of 2005). Total number of projects in Finnish LAG work will be probably around Some results + Actual local projects, activate local people and new people + Social capital is growing + LAGs very good activate female and young people + Very much training, activating and information is made + New jobs created, several people are working in projects and some impact to business activity Problems - Bureaucracy and lack of personal resources To improve: Continuation and quality of activities and Promotion of learning and networking

local people, enterprises, farms and residents Local Action Group Board 1/3 representatives of municipalities 1/3 local associations and enterprises 1/3 rural inhabitants Project munici- palities Project worker

A A dministrative model

F F inancing model MUNICI- PALITIES LOCAL ACTION GROUP LAG MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY NETWORK UNIT municipal project funding RURAL DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTRE PROJECT n private funding National funding project- and administrative funding (EU and State) project funds (EU and State) administrative funding (EU and State) project- and administrative funding (municipalities)