Dr. Robert Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Dr. Robert Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Differentiated Supervision
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
INTER-RATER AGREEMENT IN KANSAS Summer Principals Academy July 22-24, 2014 Abilene, KS.
Audience: Peer Observers, Deans, Vice Presidents for Instruction Fall 2011 Peer Observer Training.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session: Identifying CCSS Aligned Instruction in Writing.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Art and Science of Teaching: What can schools and districts do to develop highly effective teachers? Robert J. Marzano Margaret McInteer.
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model Based on the Art and Science of Teaching © 2011 Learning Sciences International Oklahoma Teacher.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
R OBERT M ARZANO E VALUATION & O BSERVATION. B ASICS Designed to create a common focus on instruction and to maximize student achievement. Research based.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Instructional Rounds Toby Boss ESU 6. Agenda Develop Common Understanding of Rounds Focus on Details – What do we do to prepare? – What do we do during.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
The Art and Science of Teaching Marzano’s principles in action at Wahoo Public Schools John Harris – Wahoo Middle School Principal.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
PAS… The Second & Third Observation Cycles. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Home Base Partnership Team
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Asking Questions of Low Expectancy Students
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Roland Wilson, David Potter, & Dr. Dru Davison
BECOMING A REFLECTIVE TEACHER
Self-Advocacy in the Observation Cycle
North Carolina Observation Calibration Process (OCT)
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Robert Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model Michael Toth, CEO, Learning Sciences International Marzano Center for Teacher and Leadership Evaluation

Observer Growth Scale Beginning 1 Not Using   Desired effect: Through accurate observations and actionable feedback, teachers move to the next level of the scale. Innovating 4 Applying 3 Developing 2 Beginning 1 Not Using The observer knows the strengths and growth needs of every teacher under his/her supervision and collaboratively focuses the observation and feedback on what the teacher is working on to improve in order for all teachers to move to the next level of the scale Observations and feedback accurately reflect a teacher’s use of classroom strategies and behaviors with feedback designed to move the teacher to the next scale level and the observer monitors for if the feedback moves the majority of teachers to the next level of the scale Observations and feedback are conducted but in a mechanistic way that does not move the majority of teachers to the next scale level   Observations and feedback are conducted but with pieces missing or with errors Observations and feedback are not conducted using the model

Practice, Practice, Practice

Observer Rounds for Practicing and Deepening

Observer Rounds for Practicing and Deepening Purpose is to practice in order to: Calibrate and deepen our understanding of the IRR training and scoring concepts Discover and document areas of clarity and areas for additional understanding

Observer Rounds for Practicing and Deepening First, principals will have the opportunity to practice with other principals in host school buildings. Then, principals will replicate the process in their own buildings with APs.

Planning is directly related to the success for the rounds

Planning for Observer Rounds Selecting a host building and volunteer teachers Identify “volunteer” teachers Communication: Make sure the teachers understand the process and feel valued for their participation Have copies of the lesson plans Identify teams of 5 observers Identify a leader for each team

Planning for Observer Rounds Resources include: Copies of the Marzano Domain 1 forms (electronic or printouts) Lesson plans for classrooms being visited Evidence collection and scoring worksheet for each lesson (ensure these remain confidential) Team reflection log to be collected by the team leader and provided to the district contact

Observational Rounds Protocol Teams of administrators (up to 5) visit “volunteer” teachers’ classrooms to gather evidence of dominant elements using the IRR training concepts Target 20-30 mins per classroom in order to collect meaningful evidence for dominate elements This is not a race Everyone individually records dominate elements, teacher and student evidences, and using the Marzano scale, assigns each dominate element with a score

Observational Rounds Norms Exit the classroom to a place to discuss the dominant elements each saw and the evidence for the score Ensure the conversation is unheard outside of the group Reserve personal judgments and focus on evidence and the scale Maintain a respectful dialog

Observational Rounds Protocol Team leader’s role: Primary role is to facilitate learning among the rounds team Facilitate discussion after each classroom visit Ensure everyone gets a turn and is heard but maintains the pace Require all discussions focus on the Marzano scales and teacher and student evidences Enforce the norms

Observational Rounds Norms: Have a copy of the lesson plan and Marzano Domain 1 form First identify DQ 2, 3 or 4 What are the dominate elements you saw Give everyone a voice but maintain the pace Focus the discussion on teacher and student evidence to the Marzano forms for purposes of calibration and understanding

Observational Rounds Norms: Discuss each dominate element until the team either reaches consensus on the score or agrees that they need more understanding/questions. Document the question(s) then move to the next dominate element to discuss. After all the dominate elements have been discussed, team leader may open to a brief discussion on what else did you see.

Observational Rounds Norms: Record which elements: The team feels confident in their clarity and agreement The team feels they need more understanding or have specific questions Provide the team summary results/questions to the district contact

Observational Rounds Norms: No feedback should be provided to the teacher unless it is specifically requested and then only the host building administrator or team leader should provide the feedback Thank all the teachers for opening their classrooms. Plan to extend the observational rounds process to your building APs.

For More Information: www.MarzanoCenter.com www.MarzanoEvaluation.com www.iObservation.com www.LearningSciences.com