Project Evaluation Criteria MF 807: Corporate Finance Professor Thomas Chemmanur.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 7 Capital Budgeting Processes And Techniques
Advertisements

Chapter Outline 6.1 Why Use Net Present Value?
Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules Chapter 5 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Capital Budgeting Processes And Techniques
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Corporate Finance, 7/e © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6-0 CHAPTER 6 Some Alternative Investment Rules.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Capital Budgeting1 Select investments which increase value of firm Maximize wealth of shareholders Important to firm’s long-term success  Substantial.
Why present value leads to better investment decisions than other criteria Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run there’s still time.
Intro to Financial Management Capital Budgeting. Review Homework Cost of bonds –Use net proceeds –Use after-tax cost Cost of common stock –Use net proceeds.
Key Concepts and Skills
Hawawini & VialletChapter 7© 2007 Thomson South-Western Chapter 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE NET PRESENT VALUE RULE.
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Average.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 12 Chapter The Capital Budgeting Decision McGraw-Hill Ryerson©2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited Prepared by P Chua April.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 3e Ross, Thompson, Christensen, Westerfield and Jordan Slides.
CAPITAL BUDGETING TECHNIQUES
Capital Budgeting Net Present Value Rule Payback Period Rule
2-1 Copyright © 2006 McGraw Hill Ryerson Limited prepared by: Sujata Madan McGill University Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Third Canadian Edition.
Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
Thank you Presentation to Cox Business Students FINA 3320: Financial Management Lecture 12: The Basics of Capital Budgeting NPV, IRR, and Other Methods.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Corporate Finance, 7/e © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6-0 CHAPTER 6 Some Alternative Investment Rules.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
0 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Decision Criteria NPV The Payback Rule Accounting Rate of Return IRR Mutually Exclusive Projects The.
Chapter 10 - Capital Budgeting
Chapter 9 INVESTMENT CRITERIA Pr. Zoubida SAMLAL GF 200.
Net Present Value RWJ-Chapter 9.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Nine.
Chapter – 5 & 6: NPV & Other Investment Rules, Cash flows
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter 9.
Capital Budgeting Evaluation Technique Pertemuan 7-10 Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Discounted.
4. Project Investment Decision-Making
NPV and Other Investment Criteria P.V. Viswanath Based partly on slides from Essentials of Corporate Finance Ross, Westerfield and Jordan, 4 th ed.
Capital Budgeting (I): Different Approaches (Ch 9) Net Present Value The Payback Rule The Discounted Payback The Average Accounting Return The Internal.
Capital Budgeting Investment Rules
Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Decision Criteria NPV IRR The Payback Rule EVA Mutually Exclusive Projects The case of multiple IRRs.
Stocks & Stock Market Primary Market - Place where the sale of new stock first occurs. Initial Public Offering (IPO) - First offering of stock to the general.
Capital Budgeting Chapter 9 © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Nine.
Other topics: Adjusted Present Value & Preferred Stock MF 807: Corporate Finance Professor Thomas Chemmanur.
Good Decision Criteria
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Discounted.
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Average.
Steve Paulone Facilitator Sources of capital  Two basic sources – stocks (equity – both common and preferred) and debt (loans or bonds)  Capital buys.
Hawawini & VialletChapter 71 ALTERNATIVES TO THE NPV RULE.
Capital Budgeting Decisions. What is Capital Budgeting? The process of identifying, analyzing, and selecting investment projects whose returns (cash flows)
10-1 The Basics of Capital Budgeting Should we build this plant?
8- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 8 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria.
CORPORATE FINANCE I ESCP-EAP European Executive MBA
Capital Budgeting MF 807 Corporate Finance Professor Thomas Chemmanur.
1 Capital-BudgetingTechniques Chapter 9. 2 Capital Budgeting Concepts  Capital Budgeting involves evaluation of (and decision about) projects. Which.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules. Percent of CFOs who say they use the following rules to evaluate projects 2.
T9.1 Chapter Outline Chapter 9 Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Chapter Organization 9.1Net Present Value 9.2The Payback Rule 9.3The Discounted.
CHAPTER NO. 4 CAPITAL BUDGETING. 2 Capital and Capital Budgeting Capital: is the stock of assets that will generate a flow of income in the future. Capital.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria By : Else Fernanda, SE.Ak., M.Sc. ICFI.
Basics of Capital Budgeting. An Overview of Capital Budgeting.
Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules
0 Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition 6 Chapter Six Some Alternative Investment Rules.
6-0 McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Sixth Edition 6 Chapter Six Some Alternative Investment.
Capital Budgeting Tools and Technique. What is Capital Budgeting In “Capital budgeting” capital relates to the total funds employs in an enterprise as.
Other Criteria for Capital Budgeting Text: Chapter 6.
Key Concepts and Skills
Chapter Outline 6.1 Why Use Net Present Value?
CAPITAL BUDGETING PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES Dr.Rachanaa Datey
Net Present Value and Other Investment Rules
Capital Budgeting Techniques FHU3213
Presentation transcript:

Project Evaluation Criteria MF 807: Corporate Finance Professor Thomas Chemmanur

2 2 Corporate Finance 1. Investment Decision (a) Capital Budgeting (b) Long-term Investment Strategy 2. Financing Decision (a) How Should Investment Be Financed? Internal or External Financing What is the Menu of Securities to Use for External Financing? Stocks, Bonds, Preferred Stock, Convertible Debt (b) Interactions between financing and investment decisions 3. Dividend or Payout Decision

3 3 Corporate Finance (a) Of Total Earnings, How Much (What Fraction) Should Be Paid Out and How Much Retained (Retained Earnings)? (b) Once the Payout Ratio is Decided, What is the Method of Payout? Cash Dividends Stock Repurchases  Open Market Repurchases  Tender Offers Fixed Price Dutch Auction

4 4 Objective of Firm Manager The objective of a firm manager is to maximize shareholder wealth  Equivalent to maximizing total value of the firm’s equity, or its stock price The above can be thought of as a benchmark; there may be in deviations in practice  E.g. agency problems However, if the deviations are too much, the CEO can be fired, by the board. Takeovers and leveraged buyouts can also discipline firm management

5 5 Capital Budgeting Capital Expenditures  Expected to generate cash benefits lasting longer than a year Operating Expenditures  Expected to generate benefits for less than a year Capital expenditures are incurred to obtain capital assets used in the production of goods and services; summarized in capital budget  New machinery, real estate, construction of factories, replace machinery, expand product line

6 6 Capital Budgeting is a Complex Process 1. Searching for new projects 2. Marketing and production analysis – cash flow estimates 3. Preparation of cash budgets 4. Evaluation of project proposals 5. Control and monitoring of past projects

7 7 Steps Involved in Evaluating Project Proposals 1. Estimate the cash flows involved at various points in time.  Include not only the benefits, but the investment required 2. Estimate the riskiness in project cash flows, and thus the appropriate discount rate to use. 3. Select projects, and amounts to be invested in each using appropriate evaluation criteria.  Keep in mind limitations in amount of investment

8 8 Project Evaluation Criteria Project Evaluation Criteria: 1. NPV rule 2. Internal Rate of Return 3. Benefit to Cost Ratio Ad-hoc Project Evaluation Rules 4. Payback Period Rule 5. Discounted Payback Period Rule 6. Average Return on Book Value

9 9 The Net Present Value Rule If we assume a flat term structure: Decision Rule: i.Under No Capital Rationing: accept all projects with a positive net present value ii.Under Capital Rationing: accept that combination of projects that gives the highest net present value

10 Example NPV A+B = NPV A + NPV B Investment Amount (Total) = $10, Optimal Combination  I, III, IV. Why? NPV = $ Combination of I & III  NPV = $ < $ ProjectInvestment Required NPV I$ $ II$ $ III$ $ IV$ $300.00

11 Internal Rate of Return (IRR) It is that rate of return at which this equation holds: I.e. IRR is that discounting rate at which the net present value equals zero Decision Rule: i.Under No Capital Rationing: Accept all projects with an IRR above a certain cut-off of return, which depends on the riskiness of the project ii.Under Capital Rationing: Accept that combination of available projects which satisfies the investment constraint and gives the highest IRR

12 Example I 0 = $10,000; C 1 =$4,000; C 2 = $3000 = C 3 = C 4 = C 5 NPV at r = 12% t = ,

13 Example 14% 15%

14 Example Similarly:  16% = $ > 0  18% = $ > 0  20% = -$ < 0 Thus, IRR = 19% > Cutoff (Say 12%)  IRR  19% Discount Rate % NPV($) Note that, by definition, NPV falls to zero at the IRR discount rate

15 Comparison of NPV and IRR 1. IRR Cannot Distinguish Between Lending and Borrowing In some cases (e.g. when initial cash flows are positive), this may lead to acceptance of negative net present value projects: Example: When we lend, we like a high return. When we borrow, we want to pay a low return. ProjectC0C0 C1C1 A %+364 B %-364

16 Comparison of NPV and IRR 2. Multiple IRRs when there is more than one change in the sign of project cash flows Most projects have only one change in sign  from negative to positive cash flow Some projects may have negative cash flows later  more than one change in sign, generating as many IRRs as there are changes in sign. (“Descartes Rule of Signs”) What is the real IRR then? We have to appeal to NPV then. C0C0 C1C1 C2C ,000-25,00025% & 400% -1934

17 Comparison of NPV and IRR 25% 400% Rate of Return % NPV($) 0 TWO SOLUTIONS TO THIS EQUATION: 25% and 400%

18 Comparison of NPV and IRR 3. Gives wrong rankings for mutually exclusive projects This is the case when the timing of cash flows of the two projects under consideration is dissimilar ProjectC0C0 C1C1 F-10,000+20,000100%+8182 G+20,000+35,00075%+11,818 75% 100% Rate of Return % NPV($) 0  G G  F F Fisher’s intersection

19 Comparison of NPV and IRR If the cost of capital is lower than the discount rate at the Fisher’s intersection, then choosing the project with the highest IRR means choosing the project that contributes the least to the firm’s equity value 4. Difficult to apply IRR when the term structure of interest rates is not flat  unlike NPV, where this can easily be done. Advantages of IRR No need to estimate cost of capital, at least in initial stages. It is a measure of profitability, accounting for the timing of cash flows Of course, we do need a cost of capital estimate to decide on the accept / reject threshold that we compare with the project IRR.

20 Profitability Index or Benefit to Cost Ratio P.I. = Present Value of Benefits from the Project Present Value of Investment in the Project Decision Rule i.Under No Capital Rationing: Accept All Projects with P.I. > 1 ii.Under Capital Rationing: Accept that combination of projects that satisfies the investment constraint and gives the highest P.I. Example:  Consider a project with initial investment of $35,000 and net cash inflows of $9,000 per year for 6 years. The cost of capital is 12%

21 Profitability Index or Benefit to Cost Ratio Solution:  PV of Benefits = 9000 [PVIFA: 12%, 6yrs] = 9000[4.1114] = $37,002.6  P.I. = 37,002 / 35,000 = > 1  ACCEPT  NPV = – 35,000 = > 0  ACCEPT  IRR: That discount rate “r” at which 35,000 = 9000 [PVIFA: r, 6yrs] PVIFA = 35,000 / 9000 = IRR  14% > 12%  ACCEPT

22 The Payback Period Rule 1. Payback Period  Number of periods required for project cash flows to add up to initial investment; i.e. smallest “n” for which: C 1 + C 2 + … + C n > I 0, holds. Decision Rule: Accept projects with pay-back period less than a cut-off value. Problems: (i) No discounting. (ii) Choice of cut-off period is arbitrary  rejects positive NPV projects with cash flows after the cut-off. E.g. with a 2 year cutoff, Project A is accepted & B is rejected! ProjectI0I0 C1C1 C2C2 C3C3 10% A(400) years-29.6 B(400) <3 years

23 Discounted Payback Period Number of periods it takes for the sum of the present values of project cash flows to equal the initial investment. However, the problem of ignoring all cash flows after the cut-off remains.  PV of C 1 = 300(PVIF) = 300/1.1 =  PV of C 2 = 100(PVIF) = 100/1.1 2 =  PV of C 3 = 20(PVIF) = 20/1.1 3 = Note we would correctly reject Project A but we might also reject Project B if the payback period was only 2 years. ProjectI0I0 C1C1 C2C2 C3C3 10% PV of A(400) No Payback-29.6 PV of B(400) <3 years

24 Average Return on Book Value Average return on book value: = average forecasted net income average annual net book value of project investment Example: Initial outlay = 6,000; straight-line depreciation Projected Income Statement: Average annual net income = ( )/3 = 700 Year 1Year 2Year 3 Revenue2,5002,6003,000 Depreciation2, ,000

25 Example: Average Return on Book Value It is assumed that depreciation takes place at the end of the year Average of beginning and ending book values Date 0Date 1Date 2Date 3 Gross book value of investment 6,000 Accumulated Depreciation 02,0004,0006,000 Net book value ,0000 Year 1Year 2Year 3 Ave. Book value5,0003,0001,000

26 Example: Average Return on Book Value Average book value = (6, , , )/4 = 3,000 Average book rate of return = 700/3,000 = 23.33% This project would be undertaken if the target book rate of return was less than 23.33% There are a number of problems with this criterion:  It considers only average return on book investment. No allowance is made for the fact that immediate receipts are more valuable than distant ones.  Average return does not depend on cash flows; it depends on the accounting concepts of net income and net book value. These in turn depend on arbitrary conventions adopted for depreciation and so on by the account.