Melinda Jones Ault University of Kentucky Technology Innovators’ Conference Washington D.C. November 16, 2004 Working with Schools: Innovative Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Advertisements

Purpose of Instruction
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
State Implementation Grants for Improving Services for Children with ASD and other Developmental Disabilities and the State Public Health Coordinating.
Surrogate Parent Training
MARCH 16, 2015 New Early Education Indistar® Indicators.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Recent Findings and Resources for Early Childhood Intervention Programs Deborah.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
Angelor Johnson, Training Coordinator Louisiana PROMISE Parent Information and Resource Centers What is PIRC?
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Margaret E. Bausch National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky TED/TAM Conference San Diego, CA November 10, 2006 AT Training.
Promising Practices in Policy Making Michael Morris Chair, Educational Leadership Team (ELT)
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
1 Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS) Elaine Carlson, Westat 2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference Washington, DC February 8, 2005.
Ted S. Hasselbring Margaret E. Bausch National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky Teacher Education Division Conference Albuquerque,
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
The Virtual Cooperative: Using Technology to Connect Schools to Special Education Resources Susan Fread Albrecht, Ed.D., NCSP Assistant Professor, Department.
Opportunities, Initiatives and Key Resources: Building Intentional Inclusive Opportunities Debbie Cate.
REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.
National MEDICAL HOME Autism Initiative Poster Presentation for DEC Conference 2005 Linda Tuchman Ginsberg, PhD
Special Education NEGOTIATING the ARC: WORKING in COLLABORATION TO EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN Leslie A. Jones September 13, 2007.
Your Elementary School September  Title I is short for the Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Reauthorized.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Developing & Implementing an Intentional Inclusion PreK Program: A Team Approach Office of Early Learning and Exceptional Children Division, NC Department.
20 Ways to…Empower Diverse Learners With Educational Technology and Digital Media By Karla V. Kingsley.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
GWDC Education Policy Workgroup Draft Policy Recommendations Mo Amundson, Chair GWDC Quarterly Meeting May 13, 2010.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems National Meeting on Early Learning Assessment June 2015 Assessing Young Children with Disabilities Kathy.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
M a r g a r e t E. B a u s c h M e l i n d a J o n e s A u l t Minneapolis, MN October 21, 2005 Nationwide Use of Assistive Technology Implementation Plans.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
Expanding Opportunities Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children With Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP/NECTAC National Early Childhood.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Michigan’s Prekindergarten: Michigan School Readiness Program MSRP Lindy Buch, Ph.D., Director Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
ACSS Adapting Curriculum for Student Success. GOALS To improve the quality of higher education for students with disabilities To improve the quality of.
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
TECHNOLOGY MASTER PLAN Our Children, Our Schools, Our Future Technology Master Plan.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
What is Title I? Title I is a federally funded program which allows students, who are experiencing academic difficulty, to receive extra help and individual.
Building Systems of Support in Early Childhood Education 2016 OSEP VIRTUAL LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 2, 2016.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Federal Determination Levels Vanessa Winborne Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education & Family Services.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
ESE Policies and Procedures - Amendments.  To maximize accessibility to the online curriculum, students will access the State standards/Access Points.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
ARC Chairperson Training
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Carmen M. Sánchez February 6, 2018
ARC Chairperson Training
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Access, Equity, and Progress
Presentation transcript:

Melinda Jones Ault University of Kentucky Technology Innovators’ Conference Washington D.C. November 16, 2004 Working with Schools: Innovative Research Options

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W orking with S chools  Special Education Research- 19 years  Federally funded research projects  Public school settings  Areas of study  Instructional strategies and parameters  Software development & field-testing  Developmentally appropriate practice assessment- development & field-testing  Early childhood inclusive settings  Social interactions  Embedded instruction B ackground

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W orking with S chools  National Assistive Technology Research Institute  Funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs  Cooperative Agreement  Funded October 1, 2000  Ending date March 31, 2006 C urrently

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI  To examine factors related to the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of AT services in schools  To disseminate the findings of the research in ways that will assist school personnel to develop or improve AT policies and practices for students with disabilities P roject G oals

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI  10 states  46 school districts  Target of 10 students per district  284 students  State, district, and school AT administrators  254 family interviews  274 teacher interviews Participants

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W orking with S chools  Friends  Vested interest  Roles/Benefits  District incentives  Student benefits  Data collector incentives  Bottom-up/ Top-down approaches  Collaborative efforts  Professional responsibility  Worth of research Recruiting

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W orking with S chools  State, District, School, Family levels  Districts have variety of procedures  Review boards  Application process  Verbal permission  Schools & Families  Informal communication  Use responsive people  Research integrity Obtaining Permission

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Website