Technology Strategic Plan Danielle Brewer. Introduction and Stakeholders  Literacy Design Collaborative  Southern Regional Education Board  2010- Common.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
APS District Technology Plan Team Project July 17, 2012 Jill Roberts, Sam Skeels, Deb Stevenson.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Welcome to the Technology and High School Success Fall 2008 Grant Recipients’ Meeting.
PREVENTION & INTERVENTION PILOT PROGRAM Prevention and Intervention of Child Sex Trafficking.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Applying for a STARTALK Grant: Designing a Winning Proposal November 22, 2009.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Learn How to Complete the ACE & Get a College Credit Too.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Melanie N. Yangrelbug.  Objective Tree  Narrative Summary  Outputs and Activities  6 Months Activities  Indicators  When I go back…
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Technology Leadership
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
Tom Barnes, Technology Coordinator Southwest Plains Regional Service Center
Klein ISD Education Foundation Klein ISD Education Foundation … to generate and distribute resources to the Klein ISD, to enrich, maintain,
Improvement That Talks Back: Design, Monitor and Measure Continuous Improvement Efforts Dr. Stephan Knobloch Director of Research Loudoun County Public.
COMMUNITY Needs Assessment Overview
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Technology Planning. Primary Elements Stakeholders Leadership team Needs assessment Technology components Work plan Budget Policies Evaluation.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
May 13, July 1, plans pulled for review (you will not be able to access the system during this time) 2. July 30, 2010 – plans will be.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
Classroom Technology Plan By Saundra Tyson-Dawson E7801 Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merrwether.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Jackson County Public Schools Technology Plan Kimberly Body and Elizabeth Perin Liberty University Education 639.
District Strategic Technology Committee. Purposes Submit technology bridge plan to MDE by June 30 (original) Evaluate current resources of the district,
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Systems Integration Project (SIP) Southeastern Pennsylvania Chapter November 6, 2002.
George Clooney High School School Administrators: Deide Fischer Rosemary Januszyk Lynn Robinson Susan Wycislo 2006 – 2009 Technology Plan Home of the.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Instructional Technology Survey: Highlands School District Shawn Cressler, Summer 2013.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
Purpose : Discuss the use of HSTW/MMGW Key Practices and their link to High Performance Beliefs and Foundations in creating High Performing Schools and.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
PRESENTATION BY THE GHANA TEAM By Eunice Dapaah Senior Education Specialist World Bank- Ghana Office.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.
Student Achievement Teacher & Leader Effectiveness Overview of Stronge & MyLearningPlan/OASYS Interim Report #1 January 27,
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Altarum Institute integrates independent research and client-centered consulting to deliver comprehensive, systems-based solutions that improve health.
Challenges facing Business & Finance:
Building an effective business case for PPM software
MEGAN HOOPES-MYERS BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY EDTECH
Presentation transcript:

Technology Strategic Plan Danielle Brewer

Introduction and Stakeholders  Literacy Design Collaborative  Southern Regional Education Board  Common Core State Standards  One of the leading training components  28 Full-time Consultants in 32 States  Stakeholders  Carol Ann Duke, Lynda Gillespie, Linda Mabe, George Johnson, Daniel Mollette, Dr. Gene Bottoms, Anna Johnston, Rhenida Rennie, Scott Warren, and Steve Broome  School Partner Sites

Technology Vision  LDC Technology Vision  “Increase prevalence of exemplary teaching practices in LDC classrooms.”

Technology Evaluation  Purpose  Questions to be Asked  Possible Barriers  Data Gathered  Findings

Technology Needs Assessment  Categorization of Needs  Prioritization of Needs  Needs Assessment Conclusion

Questions and Identified Needs

Prioritization of Needs  Requirements  Program must be available mobile and web-based for use during evaluations  Web-based program must be able to compile data for:  Individual teacher  Department  School  Districts  Web-based program must have performance indicator scores based on criteria to highlight:  Teacher Planning and Prep  Student Engagement  Classroom Management  Scores must be quantitative for data compilation and qualitative to give meaning to data collection for each performance indicator.  Ability to upload Assessment data to program  State Assessments  District Assessments  Department Assessments  Additional Demands  Web-based program capability to create graphical representations of data compiled for individual teachers, departments, schools, and districts.  Future Demands  Web-based program allows teachers to upload and share exemplar lessons, best practices, instructional strategies, etc.

Technology Needs Assessment  Categorization of Needs  Prioritization of Needs  Needs Assessment Conclusion

Technology Action Plan  Hardware/Software  Staff Development  Facilities/Maintenance

Action Plan Financial Planning Year 1 Staff iPads and Protection Plan $399 a piece Plan $3000 for protection of all 30 iPads $15,000 MetaMetrics Contract for Software Development$100,000 Staff Travel, Lodging, and Training for 2 day training (based on previous training budgets for this staff in past) Hotel: $15,000 Travel: $50,000 Food: $5,000 Training Materials: $5,000 Miscellaneous: $5,000 $75,000-$80,000 Additional IT position$75,000 Unexpected Expenses$30,000-35,000 Total for 1 st year$300,000

Development of evaluation technologies software Developed, tested, evaluated by April 2014 (MetaMetrics and Key Stakeholders) Hire Additional IT Staff MemberApril 2014 Purchase SREB Staff iPads April 2014 (Purchase Order developed by Dr. Bottoms ordered by IT Department) Evaluation Software and SREB Hardware Compatibility CheckMay 2014 (IT Department) Development of training materials associated with the use of evaluation technologies Developed and reviewed by June 2014 (Carol Ann Duke, Lynda Gillespie, George Johnson, Linda Mabe, and Danielle Brewer) (IT training component will be developed by IT Department) SREB Trainer Training July 2014 (All LDC Trainers must attend. Training given by stakeholders listed in development) Pilot School Implementation Trainings begin August 2014 for the school year (LDC Trainers to assigned schools) Updates to current evaluation technologies based on data collected April 2015 (Key Stakeholders) Development of marketing materials to be distributed to HSTW/MMGW sites Created by May 2015 (include information on new updates) for distribution at National Conference held July 2015 (SREB Public Relations Department) Distribution of marketing materials and accompanied survey to collect interest data July 2015 at National Conference August 2015 Mail Outs (SREB Public Relations Department) Roll-Out of Cohort 2 school partner sites of evaluation technologies and trainings School Year (LDC Trainers to assigned schools)

Technology Evaluation Plan  Evaluation Methods  Instruments  Evaluation Timeline

Instruments: Survey

Did the training provide you with adequate understanding to use the evaluation software? If not, what do you still need training on to use the system effectively? Give a brief overview of the activities you have performed using the new evaluation software. Discuss any problems you have experienced with the software/hardware? Do you have any other issues or concerns you feel need to be addressed? What would you like to see the software provide that it currently doesn’t do? Give a brief description of the benefits you have experienced using this evaluation software. Please provide any additional comments in regards to training, software/hardware, and maintenance.

Instruments: Observation Form

Instruments: Meeting Agenda I.Welcome/Introduction I.Presentation of Survey Data Collected I.Address Successes of Strategic Plan I.Address Current Issues/Concerns of Strategic Plan I.Review Overall Status of Project I.What has been accomplished II.Upcoming tasks III.Assignments II.Closing statements

Evaluation Timeline