Traditional Classroom Alternatives Paula Meyers and Linda Wolf ED 5104 Realities of Education Team Presentation March 16, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Curriculum Anthony Scorsone. Each child's IEP should state that the placement is the least restrictive environment for that particular.
Advertisements

Families InvolvementAction Team FIAT TRAINING March 4, 2010.
Audience: Parents, families, local community members

Collaborating with Families: Partnering for Success
M eeting the Needs of All Students in a Collaborative Model: Co-Teaching The School District of Philadelphia A Collaborative Effort Office of Empowerment.
Co-Teaching Overview Mason City Community School District 2010.
Co-Teaching Preparation:
A Focus on Team Meetings 1. 2 Think about the individual. Remember that each student has individual needs, based upon the impact of his/her disability.
Fall 2002Northeast Regional Education Cooperative A Look at Inclusion and the Least Restrictive Environment Best Practices For Collaboration and Co-Teaching.
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP) Be an advocate Be involved Be knowledgeable.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Creating Responsive Learning Environments Mercer, Ch. 1.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Principles of Effective Collaboration Success Strategies in the Inclusive Classroom Module.
Team Teaching Methods “Teachers learn best from other teachers, in settings where they literally teach each other the art of teaching.” (Little, 1987)
Compass Schools Program Auburn High School School District Profile One High School One Middle School Four Elementary Schools  96% White  1% Hispanic.
Understanding Inclusion Kristin McChesney. Review…  Based on the article, what is the definition – or concept – of inclusion?  The generally accepted.
Inclusion DAN SCANLON JOE ENSMANN Alex-Dunn.jpg.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Inclusion Parent Meeting Welcome!
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” - Henry Ford -
RtI Basics for Secondary School District of Manatee County PS-RtI Team.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching
Assisting Students with Disabilities
L O O P I N G Research Findings Jaworek School Council Looping Study Group 2004.
SCHOOL COUNSELING "Helping children to become all that they are capable of being." Created by Tammy P. Roth, MEd Licensed School Counselor.
Seven steps educators need to take for optimizing learning directed towards gifted and talented students. EDGT 410 Sara Warren
WELCOME!!!. NTO Science / Social Studies Michele Dorsey (ITL, Gen Ed Inclusion)- Longfellow Rebecca Allwang- (Gen Ed Inclusion) Bryant Woods Sonya Robinson.
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
Co-Teaching is defined as two teachers (cooperating teacher and teacher candidate) working together with groups of students - sharing the planning, organization,
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Mentor Teacher Training Austin Peay State University Spring 2013 Semester.
Effective Practices Co-Teaching Presented by: Cynthia Debreaux, Regional Consultant DPI/ECU August 21, 2012 Hertford County Schools 1.
Which Is Best For My Child? Inclusion or Pull Out?
LOOPING *This presentation was used in 2009 to introduce looping to elementary parents.*
Building Inclusive Schools Boston Public Schools Department of Special Education and Student Services.
Gartening Together … With material adapted from: Frameworks for Collaboration. by Faye Brownlie and Randy Cranston Presented at Changing Results for Young.
Molly Fisher Dara Ludens Sharon Packard. How Many Gen. Ed. Teachers feel prepared to work with students of Sp. Needs?  According to a study, “From Ryan.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Your Exceptional Child Kaily Osborne. We will cover… IDEA IEP Inclusion RTI.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
Mentors and beginning teachers teaching together in a collaborative setting AIP & Co-Teaching.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
Danielle DerwichMelissa Scire English Teacher EC Teacher
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
General Education Special Education Inclusion Classroom Self- Contained Classroom Bilingual Education Resource Room Collaborative Teaching Home School.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
 Federally-funded project  Hands-on science classrooms.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education,9th Edition ISBN X © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Planning.
Effectiveness of Co-Teaching Shelby Grubesky Department of Education, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA Co-teaching is defined as the partnering of a.
Early Childhood Feasibility Study Presented by Early Childhood Feasibility Committee Members Eileen F. Swan, parent Amy Lupoli, parent Alisa Ruggiero,
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Department of Specialized Instruction & Student Services Strategic Plan – Initiative 1.
Kim Taylor Denise Arseneau Tammy Gallant
Special Education Tier 4 Levels of Support Inclusive Services Educational Support Services 2015.
Presented by: Jennifer Timpone-Goldstein ED Fall 2008 Collaborative Team Teaching: Does it Effect the Way a Child Learns?
5 th Annual Oklahoma Transition Institute 2010 Creating Transition Elective Courses Susan Teague & Rhonda Heller Owasso Public Schools.
Jefferson County: ESY Information and Procedures
Chapter 5 Learning Disabilities
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
ChApter 2: Program Organization and Management
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Chapter 1 An Inclusive Approach to Early Education
Presentation transcript:

Traditional Classroom Alternatives Paula Meyers and Linda Wolf ED 5104 Realities of Education Team Presentation March 16, 2004

What are some alternatives?  Looping  Team Teaching

Definition of Looping  A multiyear placement for the students and the teacher  Groups of students stay together for two or more years with the same teacher

Also known as…  Continuous learning  Multi-year grouping  Teacher/Student progression  The 20-month classroom  Teacher rotation  Multiyear placement  Continuous progress

History of Looping  Italy Used in preschools 3 years  Germany Typically 4 to 6 years  Waldorf Schools Grades 1 through 8

Becoming more common in…  Other European countries  Japan  Israel  Montessori Schools  United States??

? “Shall teachers in graded city schools be advanced from grade to grade with their pupils through a series of two, three, four, or more years, so that they may come to know the children they teach and be able to build the work of the later years on that of the earlier years…?” In a memo from the U.S. Department of Education in 1913

Research  Not much quantitative research exists on the benefits  Qualitative research supports the process  Qualitative research indicates advantages for both students and teachers

Advantages  Beginning of year less stress and anxiety  Attendance improves  Fewer discipline problems  Provides a “family feeling”  Teacher is a third parent  Development of a sense of community in the classroom  Increased sense of stability and consistency for students  Paired with an effective summer school program, offers benefits similar to year-round school

Benefits for Students  Familiarity with teacher and routines  Increased learning time  Increased time on task  Increased self-confidence  Increased motivation  Increased risk-taking  Better cooperation skills  Long term relationships grow  Social skills improve

Benefits for Teachers  Increased teaching time during second year  Opportunities to better individualize curriculum and instruction  Time saved in skill assessments  Allows for more in-depth knowledge about students and their needs  Long term teacher/student relationships improve job satisfaction

Disadvantages  Student/teacher personality conflicts  Possibility of being “stuck” with a weak teacher  Teachers reluctant to switch grade level and/or content area  Students moving out  New students joining the classroom mid-loop  Too many special needs students in the class  Different teaching and learning styles

Project F.A.S.T.  Families Are Students and Teachers  Implemented in East Cleveland, Ohio  Substantially higher reading and math achievement scores on standardized tests  Increased sense of ownership in student outcomes  Heightened sense of efficacy  Increased decision-making autonomy for students

Project F.A.S.T. Parents -  Feel more respected by teachers  Have more confidence in teachers and administrators  More likely to seek the school‘s assistance  Stronger sense of community between parents, teachers, and students

3 Year Student-Teacher Relationship Teachers –  70% reported more positive approaches to classroom management  92% said they knew more about their students  66% described students as more willing to participate  85% reported students feeling pride in themselves, the group, the school  84% reported more positive relationships with parents  75% experienced increased empathy with collegues

3 Year Student-Teacher Relationship Students –  Reactions were equally favorable  Favorable reactions grow more positive with each successive grade level Parents –  99% requested that their child loop the next year

Team Teaching

Definition of Team Teaching  Two full-time teachers assigned to one classroom of students for one year

Also known as…  Co-teaching  Collaborative Teaching  Paired-teaching  Inclusion Teaching  Cooperative Teaching  Complimentary Teaching

History of Team Teaching  IDEA – Individual Disabilities Education Act of 1997 “Requires that at least one regular education teacher participates in meetings that determine the IEP for each child with a disability” Thomas Hehir, Director of the Office of Special Education Program at the U.S. Department of Education

Becoming more common in… School districts –  Trying to meet needs of more students  IDEA – Individuals with Disabilities Act  Encouraging teachers to work together  Tighter budgets  Trying to access more professional knowledge

Variations of Team Teaching  Two certified regular education teachers with one group of students  Two certified teachers – one regular education teacher and one special education teacher with one group of students

Research  Focus on process rather than achievement  A way to implement inclusion  No evidence that it promotes satisfactory student achievement  Supports individualized student services

Advantages  Instruction for special education students Specific Directed Individualized Intensive Remedial  Mixes special education and regular education students  Substituting  Different teaching styles

Benefits for Students  Receive the ideas and talents of more than one teacher  Are exposed to more learning and teaching styles  Supported by more than one teacher  More individual instruction time  Gain the attention of a second teacher

Benefits for Teachers  Share with other teachers Strengths Skills Experiences  Share responsibilities with other teachers Planning Instructing Drilling Testing Reviewing assignments

Disadvantages  Joint planning time  Substituting  Too many IEP students in the class  Teacher personality conflicts  Different teaching philosophies  Different teaching styles  Different classroom management styles  Size of classroom space

“Collaboration is fast becoming one of the most popular service delivery models.” Peggy T. Reeve and Daniel P. Hallahan, 1994

Discussion  What are the advantages and disadvantages of looping and team teaching?  Do the benefits outweigh the disadvantages?  Do either looping or team teaching fit your teaching style? School environment?  What aspects could you implement in a traditional classroom setting?