SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Empowering the Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Characteristics and Conditions Associated with Exemplary Middle Schools.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
IIT: Supporting Staff and Students at PVMS.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
C Charting our Course Into Learning Through the Arts.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Collaborative Data Teams
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
+ REFLECTIVE COACHING APRIL 29, Goals for Today Check in on where everyone is in our self-guided learning and practice with reflective coaching.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Data Team Training February 4, 7, 10, 2014 Data Team Training February, 2014.
Staff Development and the Change Process
“CANUCK PRIDE”.  Made up of over 20 teachers, parents, students  Establish goals and priorities  Expand teaming protocols & interdisciplinary connections.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: Deborah Swensen Assessment Director Utah State Office of Education Aaron Brough Educational Data Specialist Utah State Office of Education.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Kainoa Hopfe, Teacher, NHIS Marie Pineda, Teacher, NHIS Robyn Faumuina, Teacher, NHIS Bernice Kihara, Retired Literacy Coach Implementing Change through.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 4 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 4.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Who Own’s the Learning? Coaching and Leading the Learner Led Environment Pomaria Primary School 2013 Chic Foote Helix consulting
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Understanding Roles.
Empowering a Learning Community Transforming Our Adult Education World NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Goals: Empower a professional.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Definitions and Dimensions of the Interactive Team.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
School Leadership for Students With Disabilities Project #H325A Course Enhancement Module Anchor Presentation #3.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Director of Mathematics, Coppell ISD Mary Kemper.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
NHN member organizations
Department of Special Education
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Presentation transcript:

SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Empowering the Team

React to these statements “The whole community is brought in to focus on what it needs to do to have positive outcomes for students in its schools” (p.223). “Members of the interactive team are interested in obtaining power, defined as the ability to facilitate change that improves programs for students with special needs” (p.238).

The Process of Change 1.Conflict and resistance 2.Common vision 3.Redefining culture 4.Professional development 5.Changes in personnel 6.Mentoring newcomers 7.Stages of concern 8.Evaluation and celebration

What is needed to change (adapted from McLeskey & Waldron, 2002 on inclusion) Support from top to bottom Schools must be empowered to manage the process All factors must support the change Must be more than an add-on and instead transform the school Student differences should become normal (specific to inclusion) Change has a ripple effect Professional development must be provided as needed Resistance is expected The work must be ongoing without an end date

Professional Development Training experiences that are not directly linked to college credit (Morgan, 2003) A correlation exists between hours achieved and educators ability to carry out assigned roles Why else do we need professional development?

Strategies of Professional Development Sharing knowledge Skill development through coaching and reflection Team development High amounts of interactivity; energize the audience

Buying into the system Believing in not only the content, but the presenter. Earn respect. Sell who you are and why there may be a connection between you and the participants. How could this be done? Be more than a presenter. Establish a need, show how to make change, and follow-up on everyone’s progress. Work with teachers who set their own goals towards improvement.

Who buys in Teacher values and beliefs, as evidenced by their instruction, shows how likely they will engage in your proposed ideas (Sweeney, 2003) Do not try to change values and beliefs as they are highly resistant to change (Tatto, 1999). How do we enact change for these teachers?

Models (Correa et al, 2005) Experimental – engaging teachers in the process to help them discover Collaborative – connecting teachers’ work through discourse and sharing Sustained and intensive – modeling, coaching and problem solving

Approaches Teachers as researchers –Teachers who engage in active research to observe and analyze their own teaching are more likely to make informed changes about what they do in their classrooms. This engagement in the learning process is essential to our validation and turns us into professionals (Fueyo & Koorland, 1995).

Alternative Models of Professional Development Collaborative Apprenticeship using reciprocal interactions (Glazer & Hannafin, 2006) –Four step process (from watching a mentor to incorporating new ideas and mentoring another) Self-reflective writing (Mann, 2005)

Final Questions What would a needs assessment find as important at your site or in your position? How do we “buy” a teacher who is resistant to a necessary change? Examples? What model of professional development would you most likely support?