Traffic Terms and Concepts Whydo we need to concern ourselves with traffic when we design pavements? Why do we need to concern ourselves with traffic when.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
Advertisements

Traffic Data For Pavement 2012 FHWA Highway Information Seminar, Arlington, VA Tianjia Tang, PE, Ph.D. Chief, Travel Monitoring and Surveys Division 421.
Truck Size and Weight For this Power Point go.
Engr. Ejaz Ahmad Khan Deputy Director Pakhtunkhwa Highways Authority
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
By Mr.Surasak Kaewdee Transportation Engineering Dr. Kunnawee Kanitpong (Adviser) Asian Institute of Technology ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC LOADING CHARACTERISTICS.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
Minnesota Department of Transportation House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee February 23, 2015.
Problem 4.1 Applied Loads & Reactions
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
MTO EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Tables 6.02 and 6.03, and “MTO Empirical Design Examples”, all of which.
Introduction to Pavement Design Concepts
P AVEMENT T HICKNESS D ESIGN CTC 440. O BJECTIVES Know how to determine the thickness of flexible/rigid pavements.
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / Asphalt Institute Method
Transportation Engineering II
Vehicle and Traffic Consideration CEE 320 Steve Muench 5/9/ Highways Airports.
PaveDAT Pavement Damage Assessment Tool Roger Mingo, P.E.
INDOT Challenge: How to Maintain Our Highway Infrastructure Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
1 Virtual Weigh Stations Recent State Initiatives Talking Freight Series Webcast Presented By Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. February 10, 2009.
Flexible Pavement Design
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Load Equivalency. Plate theory: solutions limited to a single tire print Prickett & Ray (1951) – provided a graphical extension of Westergaard theory.
Load Characterization. Rigid Pavement Design Course Traffic Load Considerations Load Groups Lane Wander Load Configuration.
Using ESAL method.  Pavement damage depends on weight distribution.  Weight distribution depends on: ◦ Number of axles ◦ Weight on each axle ◦ Spacing.
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
Geometric & Pavement Design Example Problems
MTO TRAFFIC MODEL The following presentation contains references to Figures 6.02 and 6.03, Tables 6.01 and 6.04, all of which are posted under subsection.
M Slavik & J Bosman. 2 Expertise Data Information Knowledge M1 M2 M3.
Monitoring a Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Bridge for Superloads Osman Hag-Elsafi Jonathan Kunin Structures Research Transportation Research and Development.
Equivalent Granular Thickness 6.04 Apply the concept of Equivalent Granular Thickness to convert a layered system of different materials into an equivalent.
MTO OVERLAY DESIGN The following presentation contains references to Figures 6.02 and 6.03, Tables 6.01 and 6.05, “Overlay Design Model” and “Overlay Example.
1 the effect of heavy vehicle composition on design traffic loading calculations (E80s)
Part 2 Processes and approaches associated with the FHWA method 1 1 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data.
1 Part 4 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data Computation. Additional Columns 2  Ucode=if(urban_code=99999, “Rural”, “Urban”)  VMT=(end_point-begin_point)*AADT.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
Issue: Should the federal government increase the maximum weight on single-trailer trucks traveling on interstate highways from 80,000 pounds to 97,000.
RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGESAND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BYTRUCKS RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BY TRUCKS Terry Swygert South.
SESSION 6 Thickness Design
LOADS 1.
Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:. for better or for worse? Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Automotive Technology, Fourth Edition James Halderman BRAKING SYSTEM PRINCIPLES 93.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Choosing the Right Asphalt Mix Clark S. Morrison, PE State Pavement Design Engineer February 23-24, 2015.
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
At Auburn University National Center for Asphalt Technology Accelerated Pavement Testing Facilities “APT”
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
Sand Mining Road and Traffic Impacts
Figure 2-7 (p. 47) A bar graph showing the distribution of personality types in a sample of college students. Because personality type is a discrete variable.
Vehicle Weights.
Fuel cost and road damage: evidence from weigh-in-motion data
Foundations of Physical Science
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
Chapter 5: Pavement Structure and Base
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Introduction to Pavement Materials
Transportation Engineering-II
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Pavement Thickness Design
Flexible Pavement Design (JKR Method)
HVS Testing at ERDC – Last Five Years
Flexible pavement design
Flexible Pavement Design (ARAHAN TEKNIK JALAN 5/85 PINDAAN 2013)
Factors Affecting Pavement Design
BRIDGE LOADING AND RATING
The number in each lane indicates
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Terms and Concepts Whydo we need to concern ourselves with traffic when we design pavements? Why do we need to concern ourselves with traffic when we design pavements?  Traffic is what LOADS the pavement The following presentation contains references to Figure 6.01 and Table 6.01 which are posted under subsection 2.6 of the course notes on the instructor’s website. Viewer discretion is advised as some scenes contain material of a graphic nature.

 Traffic loads are cyclic (repetitious)

 Repeated, cyclic loads on an structure eventually result in structural fatigue

WWWWe see the result of this fatigue as pavement damage or distress

6.01 Explain the concept of load equivalency and define the standard unit load/configuration used in pavement design technology. hheavy vehicles cause damage to pavements tthe heavier the load per axle, the more damage iin order to assess the damage caused by the many different types/configurations of vehicles, one specific load/configuration was adopted as the standard

The standard adopted is the 18,000 lb single axle load, a truck with a single rear axle the rear wheels each transmit 9000 lb loads to the pavement 9000 lb 18,000 lb = 80 kN

aaaa load equivalency factor gives the number of repetitions of the standard load/configuration that would cause an equivalent amount of damage as one pass of the specific vehicle; eeeeg., a load equivalency factor of 2.5 means that… one pass of a specific vehicle causes an equivalent amount of damage as two and a half passes of the standard vehicle =

6.02 Define the following terms: a) ESAL b) ITN c) DTN a) the standard load and axle configuration to which all other load and axle configurations are converted when evaluating traffic loads for pavement structural design ESAL = Equivalent Single Axle Load (= 80 kN) 9000 lb

ITN (Initial Traffic Number)  the average number of ESAL's/day in the first year of a pavement design analysis period DTN (Design Traffic Number) tttthe average number of ESAL's/day over the entire pavement design analysis period TTTThe total ESAL applications over the design analysis period divided by the number of traffic days eeeeg., 6,000,000 ESAL’s over 20 years = 300,000 ESAL’s per year or 1,000 ESAL’s per day for 300 truck days per year (i.e., DTN = 1000)

6.03 Apply the Asphalt Institute’s model to determine ITN. Find Figure 2.01 in the course notes. Example shows: 1.L ocate WT on scale D. 2.L ocate HT on scale C. 3.E xtend line to pivot line, B. 4.L ocate L on scale E. 5.E xtend line from E through B to ITN on scale A.

Nomenclature: WWWWT = Average Gross Vehicle Weight of heavy trucks in kips HHHHT = Average daily number of Heavy Trucks in the design lane LLLL = the legal axle limit in kips IIIITN = the Initial Traffic Number

EXAMPLEA new 4-lane road pavement is to have an AADT of 12,500 vpd with 10% heavy trucks whose average gross vehicle weight is 40,000 lb. If the legal single axle load limit is 20,000 lb, find the ITN. With no indication otherwise, assume two-way traffic operation and a directional split of 50%. Remember, AADT is bidirectional! A x 0.5 = 6250 vpd in one direction B x 0.1 = 625 heavy trucks per day in one direction

Use Table 6.01 from the course notes to find the Lane Distribution Factor, LDF: For 4 lanes, 5000<12500<15000 LDF = 0.80 HT = 625 x 0.80 HT = 500

So, WT = and HT = and HT = then L = and ITN = 40 kips 500 tpd 20 kips 520 ESALs/day Or use the equation:

ESALs/day