Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
Beyond Peak Hour Volume-to-Capacity: Developing Hours of Congestion Mike Mauch DKS Associates.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Integrating Travel Time Reliability, Dynamic Assignments, and a Trip-Based Travel Demand Model TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 11, 2011 Risk Assessment & Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Projections for Toll.
Estimating Risks Associated with Travel Demand Forecasts 14 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 2013 Thomas Adler, RSG Michael Doherty,
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
May 10, 2011 Life-cycle Benefit-Cost Analysis of Alternatives for Accommodating Heavy Truck Traffic in the Las Vegas Roadway Network Dr. Alexander Paz,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Network Benefit Cost Analysis: An Overview of the Application of NET_BC Software for Caltrans District 5’s System Analysis Study TRB Planning Applications.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Feasibility of a Metropolitan Truck-only Toll Lane Network: The Case of Atlanta, Georgia Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
A Simple Framework to Access Potential Impact of Regional Toll System on Environmental Justice Population Chi Ping Lam, Houston-Galveston Area Council.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
1 Fine Tuning Mathematical Models for Toll Applications Dr. A. Mekky, P.Eng., A. Tai, M. Khan Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
A Sketch Planning Assessment of Managed-Lane Options for the I-5 Freeway Corridor Master Plan William R. Loudon, DKS Associates.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Status Report on the Regional Value Pricing Study Ronald F. Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning November 15, 2006 Item 11.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Post Processing Procedures in Travel Demand Modeling
Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Application of a Macro Based Capacity Constraint Assignment Technique
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 2007 A Practical Approach for Post-Processing Managed Lane Facilities

1 ETL Lanes Electronic Toll Lanes Tool for Managing Demand Price to Keep Traffic Moving Guide for HOT Lane Development, FHWA,

2 ETL Projects Maryland State Highway Administration Projects Inter-County Connector (ICC) Capital Beltway (I-495/I-95) I-270 from I-70 to I-370 Western Mobility I-495 to I-270 Role - Developed Travel Demand Forecast

3 ETL Forecast Issues Develop Year 2030 Forecast for the ICC Toll Facility Variable Tolls to Manage Demand Guarantee Traffic Flow Reasonable LOS Threshold LOS “C” to LOS “D” conditions – 1800 pcphpl 6% HV, Rolling Terrain – 1650 vph Open Process for EIS

4 Travel Demand Model MWCOG V2.1C Travel Demand Forecast Model Validated Study Corridor Base year 2000 No-Build Year 2030 Tolls ― Travel Time Penalty Assignment

5 V2.1C Toll Application Improvements Convert Toll Cost to Time Equivalent Trip Distribution 4 Income Groups Work & Non- Work Purposes Mode Choice Average Cost by Purpose Vary Peak & Off- Peak Per Person Cost for HOV Assignment Vehicle Cost Vary Peak & Off-Peak Source: MWCOG V2.1C User’s Guide & Technical Memorandum Oct

6 Time & Cost Equivalents By Income Level & Purpose Source: MWCOG User’s Guide V2.1D #50 Model

7 Time & Cost Equivalents By Vehicle & Time Period Source: MWCOG User’s Guide V2.1D #50 Model

8 Toll Cost & Time Vehicle PeakOff-Peak (minutes) Airport Auto Single Occupant Auto Multi Occupant Auto Truck miles 5.62 miles Income Group PeakOff-Peak Work Non Work Non Work (minutes) inc inc inc inc

9 Travel Demand Forecast Model Assignment Large Geographic Area Coarse Network Macro-level Assignment

10 Refinement of The Travel Demand Model Output Post-Process Applied at the link level Procedures from NCHRP-255 “Link Smoothing” Benefits Raw Assignment Capital Beltway RMSE 14% Link Refinement Capital Beltway RMSE 6% Annual Growth Factor RMSE 25%

11 Link Refinement Part 1 – Model Bias Ratio Adjustment Difference Adjustment Part 2 – Redistribution Count factor Capacity Factor

12 ETL — Managed Facility Redistribution Problem Capacity Based Constraints: → Reflect Managed Nature of Facility → Reflect the Results of Model Run

13 Post-Processing Approaches for ETL Facility Use the Raw Model Output Limit ETL Facility to 1650 vphpl Incorporate ETL Into the Link Refinement Procedure

14 ETL Raw Model Output Approach Represent the Toll Impact on the Demand Issue of Coarse Network – Loading Points Macro ― Level Assignment Algorithm Facility Open to All Traffic ― Over/Under

15 Fixed Volume Flow Approach Limit the Volume 1650 vphpl Redistribute the Surplus or Shortfall to other Parallel Competing Routes Differs from Results of the Travel Demand Model Assignment Not Reflecting the Cost of Toll – Pricing Question

16 Incorporating the ETL into the Link Refinement Approach Redistribute Volumes Over the Cutline Capacity & Count Factors New Facility Impedance – Capacity Adjust Capacity for the ETL Facility Reflect Demand

17 Capacity Adjustment Freeway LOS “E” Capacity (2310 vphpl) Apply Peak to Daily Ratio Factor (8%) ― Daily Capacity Two Model Runs Toll Non-Toll Adjust the ETL Capacity Based on the Ratio of the Raw Assignments for Toll & Non-Toll Apply the Ratio to the LOS “E” Capacity for the ETL Redistribute Volumes over the Cutline Review Results – Adjust Toll Accordingly

18 Overview of Process End No Yes Start Set Toll Cost Export Link Data Assign Links to Cutlines Calculate ETL Lane Capacity Evaluate Toll Demand OK Run TDFM No Toll Run TDFM Toll Vol non-toll Vol toll × Capacity LOS E { Peak Off-Peak NCHRP-255 Procedures

19 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd ICC

20 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd ICC68,986 vpd

21 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd35,927 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd34,803 vpd ICC68,986 vpd

22 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd35,927 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd34,803 vpd ICC68,986 vpd78,546 vpd

23 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd35,927 vpd26,667 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd34,803 vpd42,501 vpd ICC68,986 vpd78,546 vpd

24 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd35,927 vpd26,667 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd34,803 vpd42,501 vpd ICC68,986 vpd78,546 vpd62,958 vpd

25 Results Facility2000 Count Direct Model Output Raw Fixed Capacity Incorporate Part 2 of Link Refinement Procedure MD 2820,000 vpd35,927 vpd26,667 vpd29,391 vpd Randolph Road33,800 vpd34,803 vpd42,501 vpd46,667 vpd ICC68,986 vpd78,546 vpd62,958 vpd ICC Toll Volume: 68,986 vpd ICC No-Toll Volume:127,723 vpd Capacity Reduction Factor: 52%

26 Toll Demand Analysis

27 Summary Developing ETL Forecast Traditional 4-Step Travel Demand Forecast Model Incorporate ETL Characteristics into NCHRP-255 Link Refinement Procedures Redistribute the Link Volumes based on Capacity Calculate the ETL Capacity Based on No-Toll and Toll Model Runs & Adjust ETL Capacity for Redistribution Open Process for EIS Requirements Report Regional Impacts & Measures of Effectiveness