The ccTLD Governance Project ITU ccTLD Workshop March 2003 Professor Michael Geist University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law Technology Counsel, Osler, Hoskin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICANN Report Presented by: Dr Paul Twomey CEO and President LACNIC, Montevideo 31 March 2004.
Advertisements

The ICANN Experiment ARIN-Calgary 3-April-2000 Borrowed from Andrew McLaughlin by Ken Fockler.
CcTLD Management, ICANN, and the Public Interest July 26, 2001.
The ICANN Experiment ISOC-Israel 13-March-2000 Andrew McLaughlin.
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Louis Touton Presentation to the FTAA Joint Public-Private Sector Committee of Experts on the Internet.
Whois Task Force GNSO Public Forum Wellington March 28, 2006.
The ICANN Experiment CainetCainet Andrew McLaughlin.
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
Some Comments on ccTLD Manager Local & Global Responsibilities Frank March Chair,.nz Oversight Committee (NZOC) (also IT & Telecoms Policy Group)
Michael geist canada research chair in internet and e-commerce law university of ottawa, faculty of law July 24, 2004 ccTLDs and national governments.
Kuala Lumpur 24 July 2004 ICANN/ITU workshop Framing ccTLD relations Linking global and national responsibilities.
ICPLICPL. ICPLICPL Internet Governance An Oxymoron? Stuart Lynn Former President, ICANN ICPL Cornell University June 28, 2005 An Oxymoron? Stuart Lynn.
© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Introduction to Registry/Registrar Issues Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations June 23, 2003 Serving.
ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.
Emerging Leadership Vistas and Organizational Design: Public and Private Sector Applications Kalu N. Kalu, Ph. D Associate Professor Auburn University.
Text Competition, Consumer Choice and Trust Metrics IAG-CCT Call 18 June 2014 I. Update on metric evaluation II. Baselines collected to date III. New metrics.
The Cyberlaw Rules: Why The Internet is Transforming Law Carleton University March 2002 Professor Michael Geist University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law Director.
APTLD New Initiative: APTLD Registry Gateway Jian Zhang June 2012 Moscow.
1 Social Enterprise Alliance Member Teleconference.
Glen de Saint Géry ICANN GNSO Secretariat for Theresa Swinehart Counsel for International Legal Affairs Domain Day Milan.
“ICANN and the Global Internet” ICANN Workshop Wednesday, October 9, 2002 Mexico City.
New gTLD Basics. 2  Overview about domain names, gTLD timeline and the New gTLD Program  Why is ICANN doing this; potential impact of this initiative.
Introduction to ICANN’s new gTLD program. A practical example: the Dot Deloitte case. Jan Corstens, Partner, Deloitte WIPO Moscow, 9 Dec 2011.
.lv NIC 20 gadi The Evolution of the DNS – new TLDs Alexander Schubert.
ICANN and the Internet Ecosystem. 2  A network of interactions among organisms, and between organisms and their environment.  The Internet is an ecosystem.
Launching IDN & IDN TLDs: A gTLD Registry Perspective APNIC, Beijing
The Management of Top Level Country Domain Names Derek Browne Information Technology Specialist 6 th CIF October 30, 2008.
Text Competition, Consumer Choice and Trust Metrics IAG-CCT Call 18 April 2014 I. Possible overlapping metrics II. Metrics for discussion.
Internationalized Domain Names: Legal Issues and Potential Abuses Michael YAKUSHEV cctld.ru.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
LAW OF THE INTERNET. The creation of client-server networks developed within a single company, academic institution or public organization can be seen.
ICANN LAC Regional Strategy Final Results URUGUAY February 7-8, 2013.
CcTLD/ICANN Contract for Services (Draft Agreements) A Comparison.
Domain Name Administration – AG/LC Dr. Patrick W. Lay President & CEO.AG Registry
1 Dot KE ccTLD RE-DELEGATION & MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE Workshop on Internet Governance at the national level 19 th July 2005 Michael Katundu, Communications.
In Dec-2010 ICANN Board requested advice from ALAC, GAC, GNSO and ccNSO on definition, measures, and 3- year targets, for competition, consumer trust,
ICANN COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLANNING DISCUSSION Brussels, June
Why ICANN failed Milton Mueller Associate Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies.
1 ICANN update Save Vocea APSTAR retreat, Taipei, TW 24 February 2008.
© 2005, SWITCH ccTLD „.CH“ (Switzerland), part 2 Marcel Schneider Dipl. El. Ing. FH/STV/EUR-ING Manager Special Operations and International Relations.
New gTLD Basics. 2  Overview about domain names, gTLD timeline and the New gTLD Program  Why is ICANN doing this; potential impact of this initiative.
World summit on the information society 1 Internet Governance and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Dr Tim Kelly, Head, Strategy and Policy.
Brights Consulting Inc. 29 September 2015 APRALO-APAC Hub Webinar – New gTLD program Case studies - Examples of how companies/communities are using new.
GNSO Public Forum Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Lisbon, 29 March 2007.
ccTLD IDN Report ccTLD Meeting, Montreol June 24, 2003 Young-Eum
Adrian Kinderis – AusRegistry International Best Practices of a ccTLD Registry BEST PRACTICES OF A ccTLD REGISTRY ADRIAN KINDERIS AUSREGISTRY INTERNATIONAL.
Domain Name Policy in 2001 Boudewijn Nederkoorn Chairman Council of European National TLD Registries.
1 Comments on the interim report of DNSO WG-C (New gTLDs) Toshi TSUBO Hiro HOTTA Tsugizo KUBO Naomasa MARUYAMA Shuichi TASHIRO Feb. 28, 2000 at APTLD Workshop.
Overview of DNS Industry Trends AfTLD 2 nd African ccTLD Event Lesley Cowley Chief Executive 7 th April 2008.
The Impact of Evolving IT Security Concerns On Cornell Information Technology Policy.
Copyright © 2011 Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.1 How ccTLD registries see new gTLDs APTLD Meeting in Busan August 2011 Hiro Hotta this presentation.
Securing Future Growth: Getting Ready for IPv6 NOW! ccTLD Workshop, 8 th April 2011 Noumea, New Caledonia Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC.
ICANN Regional Outreach Meeting, Dubai 1–3 April Toward a Global Internet Paul Twomey President and CEO 1 April 2008 ICANN Regional Meeting 1–3.
Confidential and proprietary US Proposed Whois Legislation Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act (“FOISA”)
The European ccTLD Landscape Peter VAN ROSTE - ICANN Briefing – Brussels - 25 June 2013.
1 Domain Name Marketplace Patrick Jones Registry Liaison Manager 29 March 2007.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
Blended Value Accounting & Social Enterprise Success John Anner, PhD SIERC Annual Conference Auckland, New Zealand 12 February, 2016.
Review of CENTR’s dialogue with the GAC Emily Taylor, Solicitor Company Secretary, Nominet UK.
GNSO IDN work Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council IDN Workshop Marrakech, June 25, 2006.
1 Internationalized Domain Names Paul Twomey 7 April 2008.
Domain Day ICANN and Reform Tuesday, 5 November 2002 Milan, Italy Theresa Swinehart, Counsel for International Legal Affairs, ICANN.
IANA Stewardship Transition & Enhancing ICANN Accountability Panel and Audience discussion | WSIS Forum | 5 May 2016.
1 27Apr08 Some thoughts on Internet Governance and expansion of the Domain Name space Paul Twomey President and CEO 9 August 2008 Panel on Internet Governance.
GAC SESSION 7: PSWG Update. PUBLIC SAFETY WORKING GROUP (PSWG) – UPDATE TO THE GAC Agenda Item 7 | ICANN 56 | 28 June 2016.
Study Goals & Who We Are Study goals:
NCUC Africa Members First Regional Webinar Ines Hfaiedh
.uk Public Policy Partnership
One Size Does Not Fit All
Christopher Wilkinson Head, GAC Secretariat
Presentation transcript:

The ccTLD Governance Project ITU ccTLD Workshop March 2003 Professor Michael Geist University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law Technology Counsel, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Background Not a CIRA project Growing importance of ccTLDs Localization of the Internet Americanization of dot-com (ACPA) Challenge of characterizing ccTLDs Work-in-progress

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Background Phase One - Governmental involvement in ccTLDs Phase Two - Clustering TLDs Implications

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase One - Governments & ccTLDs Review of 50+ ccTLDs Relevance - No single source for information ICANN - ccTLD developments -- one size fits all?; less “self- regulated” than commonly perceived Methodology TLD sites Direct contact with TLD operators

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase One - Governments & ccTLDs Key data point - Government involvement via: Legislation Running the TLD Agency oversight No involvement Other data points - historical development commercial orientation of TLD ICANN relationship

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase One - Governments & ccTLDs ccTLDs grouped into four categories: Government run or agency (11) Private, for-profit (9) (two have formal contractual relationship with government) Non-profit (20) (25% formal relationship with government; 25% no relationship; 50% informal relationship) Academic institutions (5) Government involvement greater than expected Majority have some relationship with government Rarely a pure commercial enterprise

Professor Michael A. Geist

ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs Phase one interesting -- government involvement far heavier than generally perceived Groupings not particularly informative -- illustrate government interest but don’t give a sense of policy, governance issues Add information -- ascertain which domains are “more government/public focused” and which are “commercial”

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs Commercial issues Registry model -- Competitive registrar model/sole commercial provider (2) Single non-profit with functional commercial operation (1) Non-profit/government (0) Local registration restrictions -- None (2) Some local restrictions (1) Restricted to local population (0) Speed of registration Immediate (1) Delay/paperwork or review required (0)

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs Government/Public Interest Issues Government involvement Government agency (3) Government legislation/contract/ultimate authority (2) Informal government involvement (1) No government involvement (0) Public Interest stated goal Yes (2) Efficient functioning of DNS (1) No stated goals (0)

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Phase Two - Clustering TLDs

Professor Michael A. Geist

Commercial Cluster

Professor Michael A. Geist Commercial Cluster Government/ Public Interest Sector

Professor Michael A. Geist Government/ Public Interest Sector Commercial Cluster Hybrid Cluster

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Implications Commercial vs. Government/Public Interest Hybrids are a distinct minority -- most are recent creations and question marks remain Success stories tend to pre-date commercial success of the Internet Close matching of gTLDs and ccTLDs

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Implications Commercial vs. Government/Public Interest - WHY? TLD policy choices often at odds Growth of the registry v. presence requirements Public elections v. fair representation IP interests v. speech and local interests

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Implications National level - how governments treat their ccTLD Clear public interest goals may be mismatched with commercial, market led focus Need for difficult choices Government must be willing to step in to protect public interest

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Implications Global level Governments increasingly engaged in ccTLDs -- more difficult for ICANN agreement? ICANN agreement - one size clearly doesn’t fit all -- is it a model best suited to commercial TLDs?

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Implications Future trends Hybrids likely to experience governance problems ccTLDs push to either end (.la,.co) gTLD developments (ACPA) push toward ccTLD

Professor Michael A. Geist ccTLD Governance Project Future Work Refine and expand matrix Data collection centre for ccTLDs Analysis of current policy choices

The ccTLD Governance Project Professor Michael Geist University of Ottawa Law School Technology Counsel, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP *