Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress on modelling emission scenarios.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

M. Amann, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes. Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, W. Winiwarter The CAFE baseline scenarios: Key findings.

Advertisements

1 Background EEA A European Union institution Established by EU Regulation Staff: about 80 Budget: 22 Meuro Copenhagen EEA home page:

IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.

Air Pollution and Climate

State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,

1 TETRIS Work Package 6 – Quantitative Analysis of International Emissions Trading Christoph Böhringer, Ulf Moslener, and Niels Anger TETRIS Final Conference,

Options for Setting Environmental Interim Targets for Health for CAFE Summary of presentations to the CAFE Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Advice.

Sensitivity analyses for the CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.

The potential for further reductions of PM emissions in Europe M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.

WORLD POPULATION SITUATION

Global Warming & the Kyoto Protocols. The topic of global warming inspires heated debates among world leaders. The topic of global warming inspires heated.

European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.

European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.

Economic Implications of Global Convergence on Emission Intensities Govinda R. Timilsina Senior Economist The World Bank, Washington, DC 32 nd USAEE/IAEE.

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.

EC4MACS European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies GAINS Greenhouse Gas – Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies DG ECFIN.

Comparing mitigation efforts between Annex 1 Parties Initial results (excl. LULUCF) Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

The impacts of the UN/ECE protocols on PM emissions in Europe Preliminary results of a study conducted for the PMEG Meeting, Dessau, March 10, 2006 with.

Progress in the development of national baseline scenarios M. Amann, J. Borken, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute.

M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.

The GAINS model State of play

Baseline projections of European air quality up to 2020 M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, K. Kupiainen, W. Winiwarter,

COP 10, Buenos Aires, 06 December 2004 UNFCCC Mads Bergendorff UIC Environmental Advisor Building on the Railways’ environmental strengths Rail today is.

Mitigating BC Kristin Rypdal and Terje Berntsen Based on paper in prep. by Rypdal, Rive, Berntsen and Klimont All results preliminary.

Cost-effective measures to achieve further improvements of air quality in Europe ( focus on key measures in the EECCA and Balkan countries) Based on presentation.

IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.

Low carbon scenarios for the UK Energy White Paper Peter G Taylor Presented at “Energy, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change scenarios” June.

Baseline developments for NEC Directie revision Projections Expert Panel 25 October 2007 Dublin, Ireland Eduard Dame DG Environment C5, Energy & Environment.

Global Climate Change: What Every Executive Should Know Global Energy Services May 2005.

Current knowledge and possible systematic biases Linkages with greenhouse gas policy Fabian Wagner M. Amann, C. Berglund, J. Cofala, L. Höglund, Z. Klimont,

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.

Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.

Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,

1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,

Sustainable Energy Systems The EU “WETO” World Energy, Technology and climate policy Outlook 2030 Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero European Commission,

Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,

Preparations for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol Report to the WGSR September 2006 Markus Amann et al., EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling.

Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.

The three CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.

Overview of Transboundary Air Management in North America Gothenburg Protocol and Review 20 September 2006 Nav Khera and Kimber Scavo.

Energy Demand Outlook by Mohamed Ariff Based on Data from The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE What is the Cost of Not Having Nuclear Power or Carbon Capture and Storage While Still Stabilizing.

An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.

Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,

Sustainable Development: Cooperation in FEALAC Sustainable Development: Cooperation in FEALAC October ，２００ 7 Economy and Society WG Delegation of Japan.

Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.

The impact of post 2012 climate Policies on European air quality Kristin Rypdal, CICERO.

World Climate: Negotiate a Global Climate Agreement.

Feasible Climate Targets Richard Richels International Energy Workshop June 17, 2009 Venice, Italy.

Clean Air for Europe ROLE OF ENERGY BASELINE IN CAFE 28 February 2002 Matti Vainio DG Environment, Air Quality and Noise Unit.

Progress on modelling emission scenarios

European Commission ECCP II WG 1: ECCP Review

State of play in developing the NEC baseline scenario

Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.

Three policy scenarios for CAFE

M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,

M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z

Emission Projections for 2020

Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.

Energy Efficiency and Renewables role in the future energy needs

CAFE baseline dissemination workshop

The Second European Climate Change Programme Working Group I ECCP review Draft Mandate Stefaan Vergote DG Environment, Climate Change & Energy Unit.

CAFE baseline dissemination workshop

Janusz Cofala and Zbigniew Klimont

Stakeholder consultation meeting on the CAFE baseline scenario Welcome 30 April, 2004 CAFE BASELINE SCENARIO STAKEHOLDER MEETING, 30 April, 2003.

Tentative Ideas for Co-operation

Presentation transcript:

Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress on modelling emission scenarios

I. Emission scenarios for the EEA Kiev 2003 report Objective: Explore ancillary benefits of Kyoto implementation options in Europe

Scenarios for the EEA Kiev report Energy scenarios developed with RIVM/IMAGE/TIMER model, for groups of countries 5 alternative energy scenarios: BL: Baseline: No constraints on GHG emissions UA: Unilateral implementation of Kyoto/Marrakech cuts on GHG, EU bubble TFU: 10% reduction of GHG in Europe, with bubbles TWB: International trading of GHG reductions, banking of 80% of the ‘hot air’ emissions of the Former Soviet Union TWOHA: International trading, no ‘hot air’ allowed

Emission controls assumed Energy and emission statistics for used to calibrate RAINS database Emission controls assumed: Gothenburg Protocol / NEC Directive LCP Directive Fuels Directives Auto-Oil 2

SO 2 emissions 2010

NO x emissions 2010

Preliminary conclusions LCP Directive will over-fulfill NEC Directive for SO 2 No major/significant influence on NO x and VOC More optimistic assumptions about structural changes will lead to lower emissions in accession countries For 2010, differences in air pollution impacts of implementation alternatives of Kyoto Protocol are limited, given the present legislation on air pollution

II. Emission projections for the northern hemisphere up to 2020

Emission legislation (1) Europe: 1999 Gothenburg Protocol of CLTRAP EU legislation: National Emission Ceilings Directive (2000) Former Soviet Union (FSU): Action implied by Gothenburg Protocol for European part of Russia North America (US + Canada): US Clear Skies Initiative Ozone Annex of Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement

Emission legislation (2) China: 10 th Environmental 5-years Plan East Asia (Japan, Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, etc.): Review of national legislations South Asia (India): Essentially uncontrolled Mexico, Middle East, North Africa: Not included in this analysis

SO 2 emissions

NO x emissions

VOC emissions

CO emissions

Conclusions “Classical” anthropogenic air pollutants (NO x, CO, VOC, SO 2 ) unlikely to grow in the northern hemisphere in next 20 years (Controlled) increase in developing countries compensated by controls in industrialized countries But: “Safe” air quality levels will not be achieved In industrialized countries only limited potential for further technical emission controls will remain Developing countries started to control mobile sources; for stationary sources only SO 2 controlled

III. Baseline scenario for UN/ECE and CAFE

Baseline scenario Energy scenario: Commission proposes DG-TREN baseline energy scenario for CAFE National scenarios for UN/ECE? Agricultural scenario: EU: No news beyond 2010 (CAPRI not beyond 2010) Europe-wide trends up to 2020: WATSIM US scenario for accession countries? National scenarios for UN/ECE?