Different symmetry realizations in relativistic coupled Bose systems at finite temperature and densities Collaborators: R.L.S. Farias and R.O. Ramos Rodrigo Vartuli Department of Theoretical Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, UERJ II Latin American Workshop on High Energy Phenomenology 5 th December 2007 São Miguel das Missões, RS, Brazil

Outline Motivation Study of symmetry breaking (SB) and symmetry restoration (SR) In multi-scalar field theories at finite T and are looking for the phenomena * symmetry nonrestoration (SR) * inverse symmetry breaking (ISB) How a nonzero charge affects the phase structure of a multi-scalar field theory? Work in progress and future applications

1- Motivation The larger is the temperature, the larger is the symmetry the smaller is the temperature, the lesser is the symmetry:

Symmetry Breaking/Restoration in O(N) Scalar Models Boundness : +  unbroken -  broken Relativistic case:

The potential V( ) for –m 2, N=1 (Z2) Let´s heat it up!!

Thermal Mass at high-T and N M ² (N=2)

For ALL single field models: Higher order corrections do NOT alter this pattern !!

(1974) O(N)xO(N) Relativistic Models Boundness: λ>0 OR : λ<0!!

Thermal masses to one loop

Critical Temperatures at high-T and N=2 M ² (N=2) Both m² < 0: SR in the ψ sector SNR in the sector Transition patterns

M ² ISB Transition patterns Both m² > 0: sector: unbroken sector : ISB

Temperature effects in multiscalar field models can change the symmetry aspects in unexpected ways: e.g. in the O(N)xO(N) example, it shows the possibilities of phenomena like inverse symmetry breaking (ISB) and symmetry nonrestoration (SNR) and symmetry nonrestoration (SNR) But be careful: Question: Can we trust perturbative methods at high temperatures ? NO ! ( but these phenomena appear too in nonperturbative approaches ) THEY ARE NOT DUE BROKEN OF PERTURBATION THEORY

~ O( T ) ~ O( T.  T/m ) Perturbation theory breaks down for temperatures temperatures l T/m > Requires nonperturbation methods: daisy and superdaisy resum, Cornwall-Jackiw-Tomboulis method, RG,large-N,epsilon-expansion, gap-equations solutions, lattice, etc

Nonperturbative methods are quite discordant about the occurrence or not of ISB/SNR phenomena: NO PLB 151, 260 (1985), PLB 157, 287 (1985), Z. Phys. C48, 505 (1990) Large-N expansion Gaussian eff potential PRD37, 413 (1988), Z. Phys. C43, 581 (1989) Chiral lagrangian method Monte Carlo simulations PRD59, (1999) Bimonte et al NPB515, 345 (1998), PRL81, 750 (1998) PRL81, 750 (1998) Large-N expansion Gap equations solutions PLB366, 248 (1996), PLB388, 776 (1996), NPB476, 255 (1996) Renormalization Group Monte Carlo simulations PRD54, 2944 (1999), PLB367, 119 (1997) PRD54, 2944 (1999), PLB367, 119 (1997) Bimonte et al NPB559, 103 (1999), Jansen and Laine PLB435, 166 (1998) YES PLB403, 309 (1997) Optimized PT (delta-exp) M.B. Pinto and ROR, PRD61, (2000) M.B. Pinto and ROR, PRD61, (2000)

Conclusions for O(N)xO(N) relativistic: ISB/SNR are here to stay!! Applications? Cosmology, eg, Monopoles/Domain Walls

What happens in real condensed matter systems ? ( potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate) Liquid crystals (SmC*)  Reentrant phase 383K < T < 393K Manganites: (Pr,Ca,Sr)MnO,  ferromagnetic reentrant phase above the Curie temperature (colossal magnetoresistence) Inverse melting (~ ISB) liquid  crystal: He3,He4, binary metallic alloys (Ti, Nb, Zr, Ta)  bcc to amorphous at high T Etc, etc, etc …. 3 Review: cond-mat/

Phase structure and the effective potential at fixed charge We start with the grand partition function Where H is the ordinary Hamiltonian and Using the standard manipulations like Legendre transformations … we get

Phase structure and the effective potential at fixed charge Z is evaluated in a systematic way where or where

Phase structure and the effective potential at fixed charge Using imaginary time formalism The renormalized effective potential in the high density and temperatures is given by where Neglecting the zero point contribution similar made in PRD 44, 2480 (1991) or

Phase structure and the effective potential at fixed charge The phase structure depends on the minima of the effective potential We have two minima: for unbroken symmetry for broken symmetry and

Phase structure and the effective potential at fixed charge Minimizing the effective potential with respect to µ In the high density limit µ >> m Now we will show numerical results for broken and unbroken phase of the theory with one complex scalar field Working at high density µ >> m and high temperature T

Numerical Results (broken phase) PRD 44, 2480 (1991) Small charge - Symmetry restored Charge increase - Symmetry never restored (SNR)

Numerical Results (unbroken case) Unbroken case Ordinary η=0 have no Symmetry breaking But at high T and µ Remember that

Numerical Results (unbroken case) PRD 44, 2480 (1991) Broken symmetry at high T (ISB)

In Preparation & For one complex scalar field we show very interesting results like (PRD 44, 2480 (1991)) Symmetry non restoration Inverse symmetry breaking & We are extending these calculations for two complex scalar fields

Future applications * In collaboration with L.A. da Silva R.L.S. Farias and R.O. Ramos Nonequilibrium dynamics of multi-scalar field Theories Markovian and Non-Markovian evolutions for the fields… See poster: Langevin Simulations with Colored Noise and Non-Markovian Dissipation