1 Is sufficient weight given to travel- related CO 2 emission when assessing the environmental performance of offices?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Advertisements

CityCo, Piccadilly Hoteliers Forum
Transport Energy Descent Plan – Steve Melia. This Workshop: 1.Presentation 1: the Problem 2.Questions/Comments 3.Discussion: Forming a T.T. Transport.
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
Presentation to IPH HIA Forum 4 th November 2010.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (TDMI) – GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PRESENT AND FUTURE European Conference on Mobility Management.
CIVITAS Thematic Group Safety & Security Reggio Emilia visit The traffic calming campaign in 47 streets of Vitoria- Gasteiz and the superblock concept.
Kilkenny City and Environs Draft Mobility Management Plan
Carbon Footprint Kerry Sophie. What is a Carbon Footprint ? A carbon footprint is “the total set of greenhouse gas emissions caused directly and indirectly.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
Junction 25 Business Travel Network Launch Event 19 TH November 2009.
Ewan Anderson, Fore Consulting Limited.  Two examples of recent projects:  Harlow Grange, Harrogate (124 dwellings).  Clifton Gate, York (3,400 dwellings).
Greener, cheaper, better Yes we can! Janet Rice Executive Officer, Sustainable Melbourne Alliance for Transport and Urbanism Former Councillor and Mayor,
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
Satawu and transport climate jobs ITF Climate Change workshop Durban 1 st and 2 nd December 2011.
Umeå:s positive experiences with CIVITAS and how we would like to continue the work!
Real Estate & Planning Henley Business School The influence of office location on commuting behaviour Peter Wyatt.
Transport for London Surface Transport Leon Daniels Managing Director 19 th September 2013.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Low carbon transport policies for the UK Phase Two: Policies Keith Buchan, Director, MTRU.
Seminar 23rd November 2001 Other Policies: Demand Management & Highway Investment Professor Marcial Echenique.
Enter Presentation Name Public Works Transportation Division ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Hamilton, Ontario Transit Plenary November, 7, 2012.
Joint Transport Forum I Rapid Transit Line 2 Our Future Transport I West of England Sub Region.
An independent view of the transport issues Malcolm Buchanan Colin Buchanan and Partners.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
TRANSPORT INNOVATION FUND Stephen McFarlane Regional & Local Transport Delivery - DfT.
GeniUS! Challenge #4 - Utilising footfall & transport 15/3/12 Andy D’Agorne.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS Vladimíra Šilhánková Assoc. Prof., Dipl. Ing. arch., Ph.D. Faculty of Administration, University Pardubice Czech Republic.
Transport Accessibility Report for Peel House COLIN BUCHANAN.
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Providing sustainable travel tools for A Guide to the Successful Management and Promotion of FE / HE online TravelBUDi Solutions: a fast moving world.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Go for Green … … encourages outdoor physical activity that protects, enhances, or restores the environment. … works with organizations, businesses, governments.
Transport and Health. Determinants of health Source: Dahlgren and Whitehead.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
Mobility energy use for different residential urban patterns in India Anil Kashyap, Jim Berry, Stanley McGreal, School of the Built Environment.
Monitoring: Continuous Improvements & Achieving Results Scott Copsey Travel Plan Coordinator University of Hertfordshire.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Trafford Park Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 995 – GMATS Trafford Park report Whereas report 995 presents.
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
PARKING STRATEGY POLICY DEVELOPMENT Transportation & Asset Management Environment & Regeneration Scrutiny Committee 28 February 2007.
Parking Policy - Sustainable Development, Vibrant Cities Gerry Murphy 12 September 2013.
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS Key Transport Facts: Trend 1: Growth in passenger transport and freight compared with.
Higher Education Precinct Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1055 – GMATS Higher Education Precinct report.
16 October London Borough of Merton Transport Liaison Robert Pontin.
Scrutiny Presentation Local Transport Plan and Active Travel Strategy 24 th October 2013 Andy Summers and David Burt.
Dr Lee Chapman University of Birmingham Climate Change & Transport Please note that due to copyright restrictions that apply to publishing this presentation.
Evaluating Sustainable Transport Measures in the North Fringe A DfT case study North Bristol SusCom meeting 19 September 2013 Kiron Chatterjee
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
UCCCfS: Climate Change Action Plans Monday 11 th May 2009 Derek Marshall Estate Development Manager - Dundee College.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,
15. Canada’s Booming Urban Centres After World War II, many couples were reunited and decided to start families At the same time, the use of automobiles.
Housing Density & Design Density: A means to the end Accessibility, Population thresholds, Vibrancy Debra Just General Manager City Strategy Adelaide City.
North American Motorcoach Travel: A Green & Safe Alternative 5 th European Bus & Coach Forum International Road Union Kortrijk Xpo, Belgium October 2007.
Conferencing and Remote Working - A Win-Win for Business and Sustainability? Peter James.
Choosing Health in the South East: Road Transport and Health Briony Tatem Senior Public Health Information Analyst.
Transportation.
VRU AGE and Road Safety Suzanne Meade.
A growing bus market Andy Strong Public Transport Manager
E-bikes and the Sharing Economy
Sustainability Inform kids, “More than 600 “new urbanist” communities are planned or in construction across North America.”
Access to food FACT CARDS
Members’ Workshop Wednesday 17th April 2019 Woodhill House Aberdeen
North East Transport Consultative Forum Thursday 30th May Woodhill House Aberdeen
Presentation transcript:

1 Is sufficient weight given to travel- related CO 2 emission when assessing the environmental performance of offices?

2 Aim and objectives Aim: –To determine whether, when assessing the environmental performance of offices, CO 2 emission from commuting and business travel is given sufficient weight Objectives: –Compare CO 2 emissions resulting from commuting/business travel with those from building operation –Investigate weight given to each in BREEAM Offices –Test whether method for assigning credits for travel-related CO 2 emission efficiency is capable of discerning intra-urban differences in location

Source: BRE (2009) Total UK Carbon emissions by activity (end user figures)

4 Transport CO 2 emission Road transport accounts for 93% of transport emissions by source (excluding the UK’s share of international aviation and shipping) 70% commuting trips are by car, accounting for 73% of all commuting miles travelled (DoT, 2006)

5 Source: Transport Statistics GB (2007) Transport CO 2 emission

6 CO 2 emission from commuting and business travel Office activity generates travel as a result of –workers commuting between home and workplace –customers/clients and suppliers visiting the premises The frequency and length of trips and the mode of transport used will depend on: –The requirement for Physical presence of workforce Face-to-face contact with clients –The location of the office in relation to the location of: Workforce Market Complementary business activities –Availability and cost of transport modes

7 CO 2 emission from commuting and business travel Cervero (1988) found that office decentralisation in N. America led to longer journey distances and greater use of private vehicles In Canada the IBI Group (1990) found significant variation in public transport patronage depending on whether the urban form was decentralised, compact or nodal In the Netherlands Konings et al (1996) found that developments in existing city limits attracted a greater proportion of public transport commuting than urban extension or rural developments In the UK Titheridge and Hall (2006) found that the creation of new growth centres in South East England led to increased car use as the centres provide less opportunities for access by rail “The trend towards centralisation of services, distribution and retail provision, often at edge of town developments, …, have all contributed towards increasing demands for transport” (CfIT, 2007)

Office locations in the Bristol Sub-Region Ordnance Survey Gazetteer and location data © Crown Copyright

Proportion of commuters travelling to office destination wards, classified by mode of travel Office location Car driver (inc taxi) Car passen- ger TrainMotor- cycle Walk/ bike Bus Clevedon57%4%1% 15%2% Portishead63%5%0%1%11%1% Ham Green55%4%0%2%18%2% Aztec West76%6%0%1%9%4% Almonds- bury 77%5%0%1%6%4% Parkway66%6%2%1%9%7% Brabazon71%6%1%4%12%4% Bristol Bus P70%6%4%2%10%5% City centre47%6%2% 19%21% Source: 2001 Census: Special Workplace Statistics (Level 2)

Proportion of commuters travelling to specific offices in Bristol (2000/1), classified by mode of travel Office location Car driver (inc taxi) Car passen- ger TrainMotor- cycle Walk/ bike Bus Out-of-town Orange (Aztec West & Almonds- bury) 79%7%-2%6%7% City centre Orange27%4%16%8%22%7% Andersons23%-29%-25%23% Bristol & West 28%8%13%2%15%36% DAS29%21%9%2%14%25% City centre average 27%11%17%4%19%27% Source: various travel surveys

Gross floor-space (m 2 ) of sample Nat. vent. cellular Nat. vent. open-plan Air-con standard Air-con prestige Sub-TotalTotal City Centre: Under 10 years- 1,765 14, , ,454 City Centre: 10+ years 32, , ,336 67, ,700 CITY CENTRE 881,153 Out-of-town: Under 10 years- 43,193 91, ,953 Out-of-town: 10+ years- 100,619 73,659 5, ,131 OUT-OF-TOWN 315,084 TOTAL1,196,238

12 City Centre (overview)

13 North Fringe (Almondsbury and Aztec West Parks)

14 Emersons Green

15 Clevedon

(M&O) 2008 CriterionCredits% % Management Health and Wellbeing Energy Transport Water91166 Materials Waste Land Use & Ecology0010 Pollution TOTAL BREEAM Offices

17 Naturally Ventilated Cellular Naturally Ventilated Open Plan Air-conditioned Standard Air- conditioned Prestige kgCO 2 /m 2 of treated floor area [1] kgCO 2 /occu- pant Proportion of Bristol stock (in terms of gross floor-space) 3%28%48%21% [1] Source: Carbon Trust (2000) Weighted average CO 2 emission per worker per annum for Bristol = 286kg Annual CO 2 emission from office occupancy

18 ModeKm travelled per person per year commuting / on business CO 2 emission (kg/km/ person) CO 2 emission (kg/person) weighted by distance travelled by each mode Walk / Bike51 (1%)00 Car driver2,285 (69%) (single) Car passenger304 (9%) (share)2.37 Motorcycle26 (1%) Other private31 (1%)-- Local bus109 (3%) Rail / underground440 (13%) (train)2.81 Other public90 (3%)-- All modes3,336 (100%)273 Annual CO 2 emission from commuting / business travel Sources: Dept for Transport, National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory

CriterionCredits% % Energy Transport BREEAM Offices Not all of the transport credits relate to location In 2006 it was 12 out of 17 credits but in 2008 it was only four out of the 10 available This means that in 2008 only 3% of total BREEAM credits are available for location-dependent transport features (compared to 15% in 2006) Given the amount of CO 2 emitted as a result of commuting/business travel, this might be regarded as rather low

Access to public transport (up to 2 credits) CO 2 emissions from commuting and business travel (up to 10 credits) Cyclist facilities (up to 3 credits) Carried out a travel survey (1 credit) Implemented a travel plan (1 credit) 2008 Access to the public transport network (up to 3 credits) Access to local amenities (1 credit) Cyclist facilities (up to 2 credits) Site layout that ensures pedestrian and cyclist safety (1 credit) Travel plan (1 credit) Restricted parking (up to 2 credits) BREEAM Transport Credits

21 Access to public transport (2006) Ordnance Survey Gazetteer and location data © Crown Copyright 500m network distances from public transport nodes Peak Service Daytime service City centre office space 100% Out of town office space 11%77%

Commuting and business travel (2006) Office location Proportion using each mode Kg CO 2 per person per year weighted by modeSource Car driver (inc taxi) Car Pass’rTrainMotor-cycle Walk/ bikeBus England69%-8%1%14%7%272 DfT (2008) Transport Statistics GB South-West76%-2%1%15%5%298 Temple Quay27%11%17%4%19%27%114 Travel survey data from Bristol Council and Orange plc City centre47%6%2% 19%21% Census Bristol Out-of-town  Orange 79%7%-2%6%7%311Orange plc  Clevedon 57%4%1% 15%2% Census  Portishead 63%5%0%1%11%1%248  Ham Green 55%4%0%2%18%2%216  Aztec West 76%6%0%1%9%4%299  Almondsbury 77%5%0%1%6%4%303  Parkway 66%6%2%1%9%7%260  Brabazon 71%6%1%4%12%4%280  BBP 70%6%4%2%10%5%276 Dist travelled each year on commuting / business (km) 2, DfT (2008) Transport Statistics GB CO 2 emission (kg/km) National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory Annual CO 2 emission by mode (kg)

23 Commuting and business travel (2006) Kg CO 2 per person per annum

24 Access to public transport (2008)

25 Access to public transport (2008) Ordnance Survey Gazetteer and location data © Crown Copyright

StopServiceDist Walk Time No. ServicesFreqSWT Reliability Factor Total Access Time Equivalent Doorstep Frequency Access IndexTotal Zz X Equivalent Doorstep Frequency = 30 / (walk time + waiting time) Walk time (mins) = Distance (metres) / 80 (metres per minute) Waiting time (mins) = 0.5 * (660 mins / number of services) Additional waiting time is incorporated to reflect service reliability - Buses = 2 mins - Trains = 0.75 mins Range of Index BREEAM Credits >= >= >= 8.003

27 Access to local amenities (2008)

28 Conclusions Weighting Despite CO 2 emission per worker from building operation and travel being comparable, there is a substantial difference in the credit-weighting allocated to each Under the current version of BREEAM for offices, only a maximum of 4% of the available credits can be awarded for ensuring the office location is environmentally sustainable Model sophistication Using the 2006 model parameters the results show that all city centre locations and nearly all out-of-town locations receive maximum BREEAM credits Using the 2008 method there is little to distinguish one city centre location from another and, out of town, only one office location receives any credits It would appear from these results that the 2008 version of the assessment method is not able to discern intra-urban differences in the sustainability of office locations